Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TheLeviathan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,288
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    48

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TheLeviathan

  1. The team definitely needs to invest in another high leverage bullpen arm. Maybe two. But for context.....the team is well within the norm for blowing saves/leads in late situations. I mean....poor Rays fans.
  2. I certainly am not defending the Bremergasms about Urshela. It's just number likes that which solidify my skepticism on these metrics. I haven't been won over by them in any kind of sample smaller than a full season.
  3. Clearly Rocco cost us this game. He sucks. Now 12 of you can save your posts and go be miserable elsewhere.
  4. They all seem to say he's below average. That doesn't pass the smell test for me. Ditto Correa.
  5. This thread is a monument to the fact that complaints about endless, baseless bitching about Rocco isn't "fabricated". Ir's a disease this forum is rampantly infected with.
  6. I know the eye test isn't terribly reliable, but neither are defensive metrics. There is a lot in that I just don't think is terribly helpful for analysis. This team seems to me to be mostly an average to above defense. Though it has trended the wrong way the last month or so.
  7. That almost.....looks....like......sanity. Confusing. Are you sure you belong here?
  8. Well, some often maligned pitchers had a really good night overall. Offense just couldn't make good contact. Jeffers was the only guy who showed up tonight in the lineup.
  9. This isn't even remotely the profile of a "number three starter". And by your own definition he would make 4 out of every 5 starts a quality start. Examining a player to arbitrarily rank him should demand you do more to look at his performance in context.
  10. Agreed. Add to it that teams whine about the unwritten rules when it happens and I'm ready to call for MLB to officially make forfeiting allowed.
  11. Interestingly, only 4 of his 14 starts have been against the ALE. He's been lit up in 5 of his 14 starts as well. His Barrell% and HardHit% are through the roof this year. People seem to be seeing him really well for some reason this year.
  12. This team is too slow to run. Though I'm consistently confused on why Buxton isn't running at all. Early in the season the team was running dudes like Sano and now nobody tries.
  13. With the way we know middle infielders age....I'd be really wary of a deal in the 7-10 year range. But I doubt any team locks in him in with less term than that. I'd happily pay him 3 years and 45M per, but I don't think he goes for that either. Which leads me to believe an extension just isn't in the cards. Baseball can't get a salary cap soon enough.
  14. Twins have the 3rd most wins in the AL, 4th best win %. Sometimes you just have a crummy game of ABs.
  15. The same poster said this. So your "trust" mileage ought to be very minimal.
  16. This. The Twins got a few bad breaks, couldn't get a big two out hit, or didn't execute with the bases loaded. Just one of those games when things didn't bounce their way. (And then a bunch of fielding blunders)
  17. The Braves hoarded mediocre outfielders, not relievers. I agree adding to the bullpen should be a priority but some of our narratives don't match the facts.
  18. How many TD accounts do Fred and Terry have combined? Right now 85% of posts are being made by them....
  19. Man, the ball just explodes off this guy's bat. He's got this compact, vicious swing. I'm trying to figure out who he reminds me off.....almost feels like a less roided-Bagwell.
  20. First, I wasn't speaking to you in the first place and you interjected yourself so I responded. If you didn't want to start a conversation, you didn't need to interject in the first place. Second, my response was completely respectful. Fallacious is not an insult, it is an adjective to describe reasoning that is out of whack. A billion people can think Baldelli is bad at his job and it adds no actual weight to criticisms if they can't stand on their own. I suggested an alternative for people who have a problem with Baldelli. Coming into every post-game thread for generic Baldelli ripping is old. Specific criticisms of in-game actions? Sure, makes total sense. The poster I quoted had no detailed or meaningful criticism to offer. So I took issue with "Baldelli sucks!" as a constant minefield in every thread. It's borderline trolling and I merely pointed that out to another poster who you rushed to defend.
  21. The team is 30-21 with a 5 game lead while their best player has been in a month long tailspin, their second best player has been in and out of the lineup due to injury and now covid, their third best player is in the midst of a rough stretch, the pitching staff has been decimated by injury, and Covid has added a nice touch just to keep things interesting. I'm personally of the belief that managers are largely irrelevant, but people need to take a breath and perhaps contemplate the full array of facts. I mean, you're trying so god damn hard to have your belief that you're literally cherry picking out Garlick to make points. Maybe, if you have to try that hard to make a point, there's something wrong with your point.
  22. Then have a Baldelli gripe thread. This is a single game article where people discuss the goings-on of one game. Turning every one of these into a (often) baseless Baldelli whine-fest is obnoxious and unnecessary. Also, the idea that "lots of people think it!" is justification for it being valid is fallacious reasoning.
×
×
  • Create New...