Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

umterp23

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    763

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by umterp23

  1. umterp23
    I'm not trying to debate you bight on Sano, was trying to find a similar comparison to Ryan and if Sano is deemed acceptable in a different position. All good on my end and your comments. If Ryan was to improve to say .240 avg, 20+ homers, K% less than 30% would we be happy? I think so. That easily replaces Garver at everyday type of catcher and allows him to move to DH at bats. The player movement on the team gets interesting at that point.
  2. umterp23
    But do you love Sano who is an older version of Jeffers: Avg, 23 out of 24, OBP 23 out of 24, OPS 17 out of 24 and amount of K's dead last. So he basically last in everything if you look at the top 24 guys listed. Sano had just over 200 more at bats than Jeffers. So ouch to both. Jeffers as a catcher vs 1B play is a little more taxing for him than Sano. I like Jeffers a lot and think a full season of MLB play was a sophomore slump so to speak. Sano is just Sano, big hit, bigger whiff type of player
  3. umterp23
    Move Sano along with Larnach in a package deal to get a MLB starter. Someone will bite on Sano hit 30 HR's and striking out 45% of the time. He is what he shows. Larnach might not be an answer in the outfield, if you think he is then Package Sano and Kepler together. This opens the door for Miranda to get his feet wet in the show. Rotate Miranda and Kiriloff at 1B along with Miranda at 3rd. Donaldson can take a day off here and there and you can get Garver some DH at bats to rest his legs behind the dish. Looks good to me on paper, but paper don't win games.
  4. umterp23
    It's a fun paper exercise on values, who is wanted, trade partners, etc. Bottom line as a fan, all the comments are a good gauge on what we would like to see happen. I don't see Garver and Jeffers being moved. Garver has issues with injuries, Jeffers filled in quite nicely, regardless of the .198 avg to date. He is strong behind the dish, has some easy power and is serviceable. Rortvedt is solid behind the dish but I don't see see his bat being better than the other two. I"m not hung up on righty/lefty options to give guys a break. Jeffers hit lefties fairly well this year and Garver can hit both options. If we play the spreadsheet statistical managerial role of Rocco we are in trouble.
  5. umterp23
    to keep Garver healthier, I see his rotation at the DH spot crucial. Now that opens up a can of worms. Let's say Kiriloff and Sano are rotating at 1st base/DH... Garver and Jeffers are rotating at Catcher... I think we have DH covered in that scenario but the spreadsheet loving Rocco could be the issue to the solution. Now if Miranda is the 3b of choice and rotates in with Donaldson because we know his legs will dictate DH time... we have DH issue with getting everyone at bats consistently
  6. umterp23
    At least no one has brought up Lewis yet. I have seen comments in the past that Lewis is heir apparent at SS and it could be next year or after. Not sure that is viable option. Handful of games since 2019 with a knee injury doesn't bode well for a SS position that has to move quickly and plant throw etc. SS needs to be addressed with a long term (meaning not a one year deal) FA acquisition. If Gordon is the better option, then make it so if you don't acquire anyone. You need stability on a diamond with C, SS & CF. We have 2 out of 3, who is SS that solidifies the group. Very easily could have 1 out of 3 if Buxton moves on
  7. umterp23
    Pay him what he wants, how about pay for 36% of what he is worth since he doesn't play more than that in last 4 years. What he wants and what he deserves are millions apart. No faith in the guy who had one out of this world month in his career.
  8. umterp23
    didn't realize that he was also bugs bunny and pitching in the game at same time. Polanco at short doesn't equal 100 losses
  9. umterp23
    older vets are looking for one year pay me deals and not worried about the following years. They will chase the money. Not worried about finding vets to fill spots, the right dollar figure brings them in
  10. umterp23
    Catcher is the least of our concerns. All about pitching depth for this team
  11. umterp23
    Not a bad thing for Larnach hit the reset button. It worked for Jeffers by getting off to terrible start in April and spent a month in St. Paul for May. Since his return, he has moved his stats upward and looks more like he did last year. So for Larnach, use the time down there to take a breath, work on some confidence with positive at bats and get ready for 2022.
  12. umterp23
    I like the Gordon move to AAA to get the reps most likely at SS/2B and not so much in the OF. Let him play the rest of August and then in September bring him back to see how he plays those positions. Simmons can be moved to bench player and farewell pack on the back tour for rest of the season.
  13. umterp23
    Twins should capitalize on overpay scenarios, especially from Padres and/or Blue Jays. What price will be enough for Twins to make the move? Fly on the wall in the trade bunker office for the Twins would be a fun day. I think you get something less impressive for Pineda, Robles and Duffy would be arms for the future but don't think it will be anything that knocks our socks off. Buxton move would be interesting, don't see them parting ways with him at this time. I'd like for Berrios to go NL vs AL
  14. umterp23
    Jeffers as with any player will benefit from playing daily. I have been a big fan of day on, day off catcher rotation Rocco incorporates. The benefit for Jeffers that last few days has been the playing time. He has played 6 of the last 7 days hitting .285 during that stretch. So is he that kind of bat from an avg perspective? Could be as I like his approach, patient, sees pitches and has some pop. K rate is higher than anyone would like, some of that I think is he misses the one pitch he is looking for, fouling it off and then battles with 2 strikes. Got off to a horrible start in April but has battled back from that to move the needle in the right direction. I'm still on board with his trajectory of being a very serviceable catcher at the bigs level.
  15. umterp23
    the most valuable trade asset would be if another team views him as such and he can be a solution. Yankees who need OF help come to mind. So yes for them and let's see if there is anything we value for in return from the Yanks
  16. umterp23
    For Berrios does it come down to one simple question... Are you in or are you out? Simple in words but not so simple to execute. If the Twins believe they are in to compete for division next year and he is the cornerstone, can't call him an Ace because I don't think he is one. Then Twins have to make him an offer that would be in the $20MM - $25MM a year. If he is considered at age 27 the start to his prime years, then let's do a 3 year deal for $75 with option for year 4. That gets him to his age 30-31 year and let's see how we can close out the remainder of his career in Twins uniform at that time. If he balks at such a deal, then move him. Free agency is a tricky one where a player has to bet and bank on himself and for himself. Twins on the other hand have to show Berrios that they are in for the next year by not blowing up the team if they want him to stay. That could mean get the Buxton deal done now to show Berrios we are moving forward and not blowing it all up. If Berrios truly believes he is the Ace, the Man on the Hill then stroke his ego and name him the #1 for next year if he has signed a deal. Give him strong incentives to boost his pay annually and his year 4 salary would be based on his base plus escalators. For example: Cy Young, Playoff MVP, WS etc. He gets for example $1MM for MVP, $3MM for Cy Young and $5MM for WS title during those 3 years, then his year 4 kicker would be $25MM + the award money becomes his base salary. Pipe dream sure, but nice to wish for nice things
  17. umterp23
    If Berrios was to go to Yankees, only way I would do it would be to get 3 players in return at a minimum. Give me any 2 of the 4 pitchers that they have on their 40 Man - Abreu, Garcia, Gil and Gomez. The 3rd player would be 40 Man player in minor league SS - Peraza. That has to be the starting point for me. Don't want a guy with arm issues so obviously you have to be a little gun shy on that front in any trade. Berrios on Yankees wouldn't be their ace of the staff so the haul in return might not be worth it.
  18. umterp23
    Buxton isn't worth the move at the moment, but I don't mind moving him in the off season. Career .247 hitter and lucky/unlucky injury upon injury doesn't give me the warm and fuzzy he can last 100 games per year. I can't justify $20MM a year for 60% game action. Rogers would be interesting move to bring something in return that is close to be ready, what that would be, not my job. Could you get a SS on the rise, SP or RP to make us for a 2 for 1 deal? Maybe. Berrios is the prize but is he a true ace on a staff? This year yes on Twins, but other contenders he would most likely be a solid #2 or #3 rotation guy, maybe #4 depending on the staff. So his haul in return fluctuates on perception and trade partner. Here I would demand back in return 4 for 1 deal: SS, SP, SP & RP. 3 out of the 4 top 100 prospects from said team we partner with and 2 have to be in top 20 in their system.
  19. umterp23
    top 20 prospect list really is 13 guys since we have 7 in the injured category. I know you need a list but kind of worrisome that almost half aren't playing for injury reasons. Ouch
  20. umterp23
    Hah is correct, point to you sir. I would imagine we will see Rooker after the trade deadline I would think. Brining Cave back to bigs, is very questionable move. Play Gordon in CF to spell Kepler and you have Rooker, Larnach and Kiriloff on rotation in the corner spots. Cave has to be odd man out
  21. umterp23
    living in western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs), Fedko was a small school high school player (meaning it was a Single A Private Catholich High School) so the quality of competition was quite limited at the level. Never thought he was something more than that but he did have a solid career at UCONN. UCONN not really a baseball powerhouse in the Big East but was D1 Baseball. His father was a local news TV sports personality who rubbed many a people the wrong way. He somehow became the Athletic Director for Vincentian Academy where his son played baseball on the promise to raise funds for all sports and raise the level of competitive athletics for the school. Never happened and he got the boot. Just food for thought, doesn't mean the kid is bad egg though
  22. umterp23
    Rooker is your righty at bat for the outfield and you send Celestino back down to AAA for at bats. Cave doesn't need to be called back up, doesn't bring anything better to the outfield mix that is already there. Garver catching for a few innings is nice to see, how does his body recover from playing a full game at catcher will be interesting to see. This opening line makes me laugh... With Jake Cave, Mitch Garver, Brent Rooker, and Willians Astudillo in the lineup for the Saints on Tuesday, this one played out just like you might expect when putting a lineup of major leaguers out against one of minor leaguers... Let's see, Cave 1 for 2, Garver 0 for 3, Rooker who has been with AAA for almost the whole year was the stud and Astudilo 0 for 4. 2 guys did all the damage.
  23. umterp23
    AK and TL are doing what I thought they would. Have some very good at bats, results some good and then some at bats that they look overwhelmed. Welcome to the Show and they are holding their own. They are both a solution for the long term vs Cave who shouldn't be. Not worried that they could be sent down, but weirder things have happened. If they were to be sent down, it would have to be due to not getting consistent at bats, but they are doing that here, so can't use that as the reasoning. Gordon and Celestino being sent down, you can use that reason as they aren't playing that much. Still think Garver being active, he will get more playing time at DH than catcher for health concerns to close out the year. I don't think he starts every other day unless there really is no concern for health being behind the plate. Rort needs to get at bats at AAA and play everyday like they did with Jeffers in May at AAA.
  24. umterp23
    didn't have to worry about Donaldson legs since he struck out couple times in his O for 3 night. Nice to see Jeffers get out of the mini-rut he had been in for the last week or so. Sano with a bomb, feast or fathom and he at least gave us one reason to like him last night. Creeps back over Mendoza line, see how the weekend plays out for him. Only 14 games under .500. Yeah us
  25. umterp23
    Win or Loss depends on how we view the trade(s). If we trade a guy we don't believe we can sign long term, pending FA and get some value back in bodies, it's a win in my view. Get something hell or high water and not put a hope on an agent who is chirping in players ear for more money. That's why agents are there. Now let's say we trade Cruz at the deadline with the thought is we can't sign him next year based on NL installing DH and he has many suitors. his value is $12MM for this example. We get 3 MiLB guys to take his place and one of them hits the bigs next year. His value is major league minimum and we save $$'s to use somewhere else (pitching and more pitching). That's a win-win. If Cruz doesn't like his FA options and twins somehow convince him to come back on team friendly deal, that would be win-win-win. My point really is pending FA gets traded, you get new bodies and then let's see what FA gets in a new deal and produces vs what we spend on new free'd up money.
×
×
  • Create New...