Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

arby58

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by arby58

  1. First, the Mets didn't 'save' any money by not signing Correa, because they replaced him with Francisco Lindor, who is on a 10-year, $341 million contract(!). He makes $34.1 million this year, while Correa makes $33.3 million. Lindor is having a decent year, with a 2.1 WAR in 70 games. However, Correa has posted a 2.5 WAR in just 54 games, 5th best among all MLB shortstops - and the 4 above him have all played at least 70 games. Sure, the Giants 'saved a lot of money' but the shortstops they have are barely better than replacement players. My guess is they wish they had signed Correa.
  2. The Twins are 5th in the AL in runs scored. They are 11th in ERA. I'm not buying that hitting is the glaring area of weakness.
  3. I saw him in Des Moines when he was down last when he went on a tear. We were in an outfield box in a game where he went 3-5 with two home runs and a ringing double to the centerfield fence. One of the home runs hit above us on the facing to the upper stands in left field - so hard that it damaged the facing. We then got to watch workers above us repairing it. If he's healthy and right, he has serious skills. Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be able to maintain that.
  4. The issue isn't his 'improving average' it is that he brings little else offensively. He's still below .600 OPS, which is really bad, and has a negative WAR. I like veterans, but there is little that is dynamic about his bat - suspect they will want more later in the season.
  5. I'm a big fan of veterans, but I would not be surprised if Farmer gets DFA'd at some point in the next month or so and Wallner gets promoted. Or Julien. Or Lee. Whenever one comes up, Farmer going down is the only logical move.
  6. Yeah, but if nobody is buying now, it doesn't really matter. My guess is nobody will buy now - why would they?
  7. I suspect for the Twins it is Correa - and maybe Santana. From what I've observed, teams that are going well always have 'chemistry' and when they're not going well, not so much. The Twins have been really up and down this year, but I suspect it would be better 'chemistry' if Lewis had been playing every day and Julien and Wallner had been performing like the second half of last year.
  8. Hitting coaches - can anybody credibly name more than a few at the MLB level? Blaming them or thinking a new one is going to immediately change things - I doubt it. It seems to work better for pitching.
  9. Buy low sell high - Kirilloff is in the ‘buy low’ phase at the moment.
  10. Quite an over-statement. He had 25 at bats this year before being sent to AAA. Last year, in 213 at bats he had 14 HR, 41 RBI, and an .877 OPS. He's hitting again at AAA - I don't understand the 'can't hit anything' opinion.
  11. This isn't just an issue for the Twins - young players often take time to figure things out. The most hyped rookie in all of MLB this year was Jackson Holiday - can't miss, number 1 prospect. Started the year with the Orioles and put up a -0.5 WAR and was sent to AAA. I think we as Twins fans sometimes get tunnel vision related to the team. Meanwhile, we often complain about veterans with slow starts - did it last year with Kepler, this year with Santana - yet they figured it out and both are solid contributors. They're veterans.
  12. I've been a pretty constant believer in Santana this year. In his last 10 games, he is 12 for 35 with 11 RBI. He's second on the team in HRs, RBIs and total bases and is solid defensively.
  13. Last year they had three rookies play major roles and a couple others were supporting cast. This year SWR is having a big impact, and Martin has had some moments. My guess is Lee and Festa will play a role in the second half. That doesn’t sound too bad in terms of MLB readiness.
  14. Given that Santana is second on the team in HRs, RBIs, Total Bases, and Walks (and plays better defense at 1B than anybody else on the roster) that isn't happening. Yes, I know he also has the second most at bats and his OPS is still below .700, but he is not a DFA option. Agree with others that Julien needs to add some two-strikes hitting ability and the current depth provided by Margot and Farmer means they stick around a little longer. IF Lee gets healthy and/or Julien performs and Wallner gets it back together, both Margot and Farmer might not see the second half of the season, at least not from Target Field.
  15. That is demonstrably false - look no further than the total payroll for each MLB team. Since the 2000 season, the Twins have had the lowest payroll twice (2000 and 2001). They have typically (but not always) been in the lower half, but they are not even close to the 'most budget conscious' owners in the league. For the record, from 2024 back to 2000, their opening day payroll ranking has been 18 in 2024, then 17, 20, 16, 20, 18, 18, 22, 18, 18, 24, 22, 13, 10, 11, 24, 25, 18, 19, 20, 19, 18, 27, 30, 30. So who has had the lowest payroll the most in those 25 years? The Rays (5), the Marlins (4), the Astro (3), and the A's (3). Along with the Twins, the Orioles, Pirates, and Brewers have 2, and the Padres and Royals 1. Honestly, can't we have reasonable discussions without this sort of hyuperbole?
  16. Vazquez, for all his offensive inability at the moment, is still a very good defensive catcher. The Twins are currently 5th of 15 AL teams in runs scored, so it's not as if they can't afford to value defense at one of the key defensive positions. The Twins are 8-2 in their last 10 games, and even Margot has had some key hits. Last year at this time, people were complaining similarly about Max Kepler. Sometimes you have to trust the judgement of those who see the players in the majors and the minors every day.
  17. Soto sure - and Judge being back is equally important. They both have a WAR of 3.1 at this point in the season.
  18. You're working yourself into a lather with wildly inconsistent claims. Royce Lewis wasn't 'held back' from playing for the Twins as a teenager because of 'the Twins way' - he was 'held back' by tearing his ACL TWICE. He was on the injured list again for a substantial portion of last year and now since the first game of this season. Yet you claim he's basically indestructible. What color is the sky in your world?
  19. This is all cherry picking - Acuna, Rodriguez, Witt are among the best players in the game. I'm surprised you didn't add teenagers Trout and Harper to the list. For what it's worth, Byron Buxton debuted with the Twins at 21 - so did SWR, for that matter.
  20. Are you an MD? How do you know 'he's 100% healthy and ready to contribute?' The worst thing that could happen for the Twins would be to bring him back too quickly, have him aggravate the injury, and be done for a couple more months. Honestly, why do people believe they know better than the professional trainers, doctors, etc. that are employed by the Twins and have skin in the game? It's not as if they gain anything from keeping him in the minors at this point in his career. The Twins are fighting to make the play-offs - they will bring him up when they believe the rewards outweigh the risks.
  21. Now you have 'missed the point.' The request was 'ask them directly' which you didn't do. Of course they aren't going to be stirred up about a trade from years ago unless given the opportunity to comment on it
  22. You should take this rap to a Rays discussion board and ask their fans if they think it was 'no big deal' that they basically gave away what is now a starting pitcher with an ERA under 3. Just as the first thing you learn in investing is that past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, I'm not buying into the first half/second half theory to explain Ryan this year. As he admitted, he was injured last year and tried to play through it - that was dumb, but it helps to explain his performance. Second, he IS throwing harder this year on his fast ball, and he is actually throwing it less often - which was probably part of the 'catch up' in previous years. This idea that it takes the league time to catch up doesn't make a lot of sense - they have tape of every game he pitches, they shouldn't need volumes of his work to 'catch up' if that is what they are able to do. Mowing down the hot-hitting Royals yesterday was impressive - I get the impression you didn't actually watch the game.
  23. "The point"" is here and now. Here and now the Rays would benefit from having Ryan, and suggesting it's ok because they MIGHT churn out another talented pitcher is just a rationalization of a bad trade for them. Did you watch yesterday's game? I did - Ryan overpowered a line-up that is second in the AL (and fourth in all of MLB) in runs scored. He threw harder than ever, and he was efficient as well - 9 Ks no walks. Rationalize that away.
  24. Statistically speaking, it is not overrated - hard hit balls will, more often than not, result in positive results for the hitter. That's not 100 percent, but it is the case more often than not. Morneau (who knows something about hitting) made a comment yesterday about the confounding nature of baseball and the ninth inning was an example. That inning had little to do with the pitchers, it was just one of those weird innings.
  25. Given the Rays are currently 23rd in MLB in ERA (and have a losing record), my guess is their fans would be ecstatic to have Ryan in their rotation.
×
×
  • Create New...