Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Otaknam

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Otaknam

  1. Hopefully Emmanuel Rodriquez, by all reports an elite defender, is ready to take over CF, allowing Buxton to move to right. But Buxton’s injuries aren’t always from playing defense. He gets injured swinging a bat, or running the bases, or sliding. The fact is he is injury prone and brittle, something all parties have to accept. I doubt moving him to right makes much of a difference injury wise.
  2. If Jax wants a chance to start give him a shot. Unlike others opinions posted here, the Twins’ starting staff isn’t proven and deep, aside from Lopez, Ober, and Ryan. While they have a number of minor leaguers looking for a chance, and Festa and Matthews, none of these guys are can’t miss prospects. Varland has been unsuccessful as a starter, but has shown he could potentially fill Jax’s role in the bullpen. If Jax struggles after a half dozen starts, move him back to the bullpen.
  3. I think Castro will be traded as a salary dump, with salary dumping the Twins go to move in 2025. Saves them $6 million. But I think the return would at best be a decent AA prospect with an upside, maybe a pitcher they take a flyer on.
  4. I doubt the Twins will trade Duran this offseason. But some of these trade projections make no sense. Why would the team have to include more than Duran, one of the top closers, to acquire minor leaguers Teel or Painter? Of course the Twins are enamored with pitchers who have been injured, like Mahle and Paddock. Sarcastically, that would put a trade for Painter in play. Also, why does the writer consider the Rangers as in competitive mode, but not the Twins? The Twins had a better record on 2024 and still have some solid young players.
  5. My first reaction was “No way”! But, as the writer points out, any signing would come from the international bonus pool, making every team a potential player. We can dream the penurious Twins could actually make a move for this guy, right ?
  6. No one on this roster should be untouchable. No trade clauses can always be waived for the right price or situation. But trading Jax would weaken the bullpen. A better option is to try him as a starter, where there are a couple of question marks. His 70+ innings in 2024 are almost half of what many starters throw because of the latest philosophy of limiting how many times a starters faces a lineup. And Jax has nasty stuff. Good starters are harder to find than good bullpen arms.
  7. Moving Lewis to first base, as one posting suggested, would be foolish. Lewis is very athletic and can be an everyday third baseman. Putting him at first, the easiest infield position, would waste his athletic talent. I hope they don’t trade Keaschall, who looks like an excellent everyday player for second base, making Julien a candidate for trade. Miranda still has value, as we saw during his record setting hit streak. DH and periodically playing third and first seems like the solution.
  8. I love Eeles putting himself on the prospect list. If he establishes himself as a big leaguer, that would be a great story that even the East and west coast focused media could not ignore. It seems like Kiersey should be higher on this list, given his offensive production, speed, and defensive skills. I look for him to make the 26 man roster in 2026. His only negative is his age and that he hits left handed, and the team has plenty of lefty hitting outfielders.
  9. I’m not sure why a team would trade for the oft injured Paddock with a $7.5 million contract, unless the Twins picked up half the salary. For that price they might just as well keep him. Trading for injured pitchers is the Twins way.
  10. “They could spin either Joe Ryan or Bailey Ober to Milwaukee for Perkins and a prospect”. Ridiculous comment! The Twins have three solid starters in Ober, Ryan and Lopez. After them everyone is unproven. And you want to trade a starting pitcher for a backup outfielder who is all defense no hit? Pitching and defense is the name of the game. Keep the proven pitching and find a backup outfielder. DaShawn Keirsey comes to mind, by all accounts an excellent defensive outfielder with great speed and good offensive numbers in the minors.
  11. The Twins are in salary dump mode AGAIN. So I think they would trade Correa if they find a the right deal that would bring 2-3 good prospects, maybe even a top prospect. The NY teams can absorb the impact of Correa’s salary vs. the potential for lingering injury. It would also signal the Twins are in rebuilding mode because their best players, Correa, Buxton, and Lewis are injury prone and cannot be counted on.
  12. Not sure why he went to the AFL, given his stat line and age. But best of luck to him as he chases his dream.
  13. Vasquez is untradeable, given that ridiculous $10 million contract. He seems to be solid defensively, but has no offensive upside to justify any team paying that contract. Camargo is the only minor league option and would be suitable if either Jeffers or Vasquez gets moved. That probably will be Jeffers to save his arbitration salary, more evidence that the team is on a downward spiral because of self imposed budget constraints.
  14. We are back to the salary dump Twins of 20 years ago. Vasquez should be the first to go, except for his ludicrous $10 million dollar contract. So unless the team picks up a significant portion of his contract, Vasquez will still be here. A Jeffers trade could happen as a salary dump, but Vasquez isn’t an everyday player. So trading Jeffers would leave a huge offensive hole. If they sign a free agent for first I think it will be Santana, because he wouldn’t cost that much, and cost will drive every decision going forward with this now penurious team. He also improves the defense. They might consider lost cost free agent first basemen on a downward career trend to save money, which would fan the already high flames of indifference for Twins fans.
  15. Rocco depends too much on analytics, especially with starters. No manager intuition required, just see what the computer algorithm says. A starter cruises through six innings, 80 pitches, 1 run, four hits, one walk…….take him out because the computer told him to. There are other befuddling examples. Analytics has its place, but a manager needs to believe in his players too. A good example is when he removed Ryan after two innings in the 2023 playoff game against Houston that they lost 3-2. Two innings, one run, then bullpen game that did pitch well. But Rocco showed he had no confidence in Ryan, instead deferring to analytics. Result was a 3-2 loss. Why would any starter want to pitch for Baldelli if Rocco doesn’t trust them? Sonny Gray is a good example.
  16. Turnbull makes sense because, cynically, the FO is enamored with pitchers with an injury history, hoping to get them on the cheap. Mahle, Paddock, Topa, DeSclifani, etc.
  17. If Donovan hit right handed this might make sense. They don’t end another left handed hitter, even if his defense is an upgrade over Larnach and Wallner. And I wouldn’t trade a good infield prospect like the right handed hitting Keaschall for a utility player. Also, I wouldn’t trade starter prospects either for a utility player. Keeping Castro at a slightly higher price and keeping your prospect makes more sense. But who know what ownership will dictate this offseason.
  18. Baldelli is Earl Weaver reincarnated. Even when the offense is going bad, which it did for the first three weeks of the season and for the last few weeks, Rocco didn’t have enough imagination to try a hit and run or steal a base and put some pressure on the defense. So bunting is not in his playbook either. The team definitely needs more speed, especially on defense, but I’m not sure where you find it if Larnach and Wallner are corner outfielders. Lewis is fast, but given his injury issues you don’t want him with a hamstring injury trying to steal a base.
  19. If Miranda at first is their plan for 2025, then my conclusion is ownership is unwilling to improve the team. Miranda was a non factor in the second half of the season, and his defense is below average at best. The other issue is whether they just depend on young starters like Festa, Mathews, and minor league starters to fill out the rotation, which is the likely scenario. If that’s the direction, they might as well try to find a trade partner for Correa and admit they are in rebuilding mode.
  20. Despite his defensive limitations, Jeffers isn’t the problem. The ludicrous $10 million per year three year contract for a part time Vasquez is the problem. Jeffers still has an offensive upside that Vasquez doesn’t have. But they are stuck with Vasquez because of the contract, unless they can find a trade partner and pay a large portion of the contract. Imagine not tendering Jeffers and having Vasquez as your every day catcher!
  21. If $1.5 million for an effective reliever with a 98 mph fastball is a deal breaker for the penurious Twins, the franchise is in a lot more trouble than we know.
  22. This doesn’t make any sense: “the Twins might want to trade (Lewis) from their core to alter the team’s future”, which “could be a necessity to keep the team’s winning window open as long as possible.” How does trading from the core alter the team’s future in a positive way? And how does trading a young core player like Lewis keep a winning window open? They wouldn’t trade young core players for unproven minor leaguers, and they wouldn’t trade them for veterans because of the cost. If the team is in a minor rebuilt, not a total tear down and starting over, wouldn’t you want to keep the young, less expensive core together? A Correa trade makes sense because they want to cut salary, though I don’t think that will happen. Brooks Lee could play SS, though he is a downgrade from Correa. Lewis stays at third, Julien, or better yet, Keaschall at second. Miranda becomes a floater, playing first or third occasionally, and DH. But the Twins can’t trade their young, inexpensive core. That’s what they build around.
  23. An Ober trade would be indefensible. Number 1-3 starters are the most difficult players to find and develop. Ober was their most effective starter and one of three mid rotation starters remaining, along with Ryan and Lopez. Festa, Matthews, and even SWR still have a lot to prove. And the minor league depth for starters is unproven. Nyet to an Ober trade!
  24. Vasquez’ ludicrous contract is an anchor to any trades, unless the Twins pick up part of the contract. So I think they are stuck with him for another season. A more likely scenario is they trade Jeffers for value to save money. I do like the idea of upgrading catcher and don’t know much about either Dodger prospect. But the FO has mixed success on trades, especially for starters.
  25. The only names I recognize on this list are Rosario and De Andrade. I thought the AFL was for players almost major league ready, and just gave them a chance to fine tune some aspect of their game. But I don’t recognize any of the pitchers, and I pay pretty close attention to the Twins’ minors league system.
×
×
  • Create New...