Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Minor League Coverage

    What's Next For Byron Buxton?


    Cody Christie

    Not all prospects pan out. That's just the nature of the game. Baseball can be a cruel and challenging journey but that's why so many people love this sport. The unknown is always around the game. On any given night, a player whose name you've never heard could make history and that history is deep-rooted and transcends generations.

    Byron Buxton was supposed to make his own history. He was a can't miss prospect with the potential to follow in the footsteps of current All-Stars like Mike Trout and Bryce Harper. Things haven't gone exactly to plan for Buxton and the idea starts to trickle in that the Twins might have been a little too aggressive with their budding star.

    Image courtesy of Benny Sieu- USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    Minnesota's top prospect was demoted a little over a week ago. His Triple-A results have mirrored his big league results as he is striking out too often and not getting on base enough. There has been a little bit more power, three extra-base hits and a .608 OPS, but these numbers aren't going to make the Twins come calling in the immediate future.

    Over the last two seasons at the big league level, Buxton has a total of 187 plate appearance and 174 at-bats with 15 extra-base hits. One of the most concerning issues has been his strikeout totals. He has 68 combined strikeouts so he struck out in 36.4% of his plate appearances. Speed is one of his biggest tools but he's only getting on base 23.9% of the time so it's hard to utilize this tool.

    What's Next For Byron Buxton?

    Buxton has plenty to prove in the minors before the Twins are willing to give him another shot at baseball's highest level. Buxton doesn't even have 100 at-bats at the Triple-A level under his belt so there is still things for him to focus on as he prepares for another big league opportunity.

    Strikeouts

    Out of players with a minimum of 40 plate appearances in 2016, Buxton's 49.0 K% is the highest in the big leagues. Since he has been in Rochester, he has improved his K% slightly to 32.4% but it's still much too high. Seeing better pitching on a daily basis has been tough for Buxton. He is going to have to learn how to make the appropriate adjustments. When he was drafted, there were some who questioned the level of competition he was facing in rural Georgia. For now, he needs to do a better job of recognizing pitches and working counts in his favor.

    On-Base Percentage

    Besides strikeouts, one of the biggest areas of concern has been Buxton's inability to get on base at a consistent clip. If he wants to be able to showcase his blazing speed, he needs to find a way to make more consistent contact and get on base. During the 2015 season at Double-A and Triple-A, Buxton hit over .300 and got on base 36.7% of the time. Those numbers would be great but with each movement up the ladder there have been new struggles . He's still almost five years younger than the competition in the International League but it can be frustrating to think that some of the best young players in the game were already finding big league success in their age-22 season.

    Steals

    Buxton stole a remarkable 55 bases in 2013 while being caught 19 times between Low-A and High-A. In his injury plagued 2014 season (31 games), he swiped six bases and was caught twice. Last season, Buxton played over 100 games and was caught stealing only five times but he was also limited to 24 steals. At baseball's highest levels, the pitchers have better pick-off moves and the catchers have stronger arms. Stealing bases is an art form and it could be one of the most valuable pieces of Buxton's game if he can find the right balance on the base paths.

    Is Buxton a bust as a prospect? Only time will tell at this point. There is plenty of baseball left in his career and he will have other opportunities at the MLB level. He will need to make a significant reduction in his strikeout percentage while making more consistent contact and using his speed as a weapon on the bases.

    This might sound like a lot but he's a young man with all the tools in the world. It's his turn to prove to the organization that he can be the player that all of the baseball world claims he should be.


    Interested in learning more about the Minnesota Twins' top prospects? Check out our comprehensive top prospects list that includes up-to-date stats, articles and videos about every prospect, scouting reports, and more!

    View Twins Top Prospects

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I don't know that our 40 man is really that full. For example, given the depth at their positions, Pat Dean and Kennys Vargas have virtually no future with this club, yet still have 40-man roster spots. And with Berrios added, there are no imminent prospect promotions that will require a 40 man spot either (and we may have a player on the 60 day DL by that time too).

    Yeah. Like most things, it should not be the problem that it is.

     

    Very good to hear. If past is prologue, Santana probably has at most another 2-3 weeks of reasonably competent play before we can't run him out there any more.  Maybe Buxton will be ready for his next audition by that time. 

     

    While I agree that Santana will probably hit a wall soon, I'd still leave Buxton in Rochester for longer than 2-3 weeks. 

     

    What I don't understand is how Buxton can be so terrible at the MLB level and just immediately regain his confidence and start hitting at AAA. I realize it's a big jump, but not the .400 OPS jump like it has been for him. Has to just be a nerves/confidence thing, right?

     

    Start with Mike Schmidt.

    Mike Schmidt started out with a low average and lots of strikeouts, true, but even as a rookie he was providing tons of walks and power, making him almost a league-average hitter overall (95 wRC+ as a rookie) despite a low .249 BABIP (his career BABIP would be .280).  That's not a comparable career start to Buxton (48 wRC+ and trending down).

     

    Besides, a hitter with the profile of Buxton, starting his career with the average and K's of rookie Mike Schmidt, but without the walks, power, or "bad luck" suggested by a low BABIP, is not something from which to draw encouragement.

     

    What I don't understand is how Buxton can be so terrible at the MLB level and just immediately regain his confidence and start hitting at AAA. I realize it's a big jump, but not the .400 OPS jump like it has been for him. Has to just be a nerves/confidence thing, right?

    Hopefully, but yeah, the disparity seems pretty extreme.  Although his hitting success wasn't quite so immediate at AAA this year -- as noted, through 7 games at AAA, he had a .608 OPS and a 32% K rate down there.  Good to see him have a few solid games in a row now.

     

    But the disparity does sort of complicate his re-promotion schedule.  Not quite as simple as posting a good stat line down there for X amount of time...

    1) It Was NEVER right not even in any way shape or form to Compare Buxton to Bryce Harper or Mike Trout or even to say he'll "follow in their footsteps"

     

    What the bleep is that bullsh1t  who-EVER came up with such a ludicrous statement

    I've been saying for 2 1/2 years Buxton is NOT Trout nor Harper not close.

     

    2.) The Twins flat out rushed him at nearly every level.  Which i've also been saying for 2+ years.

     

    3.) Buxton gets hurt a lot in the Minors.

      WHICH is OBVIOUSLY MORE REASON to SLOW THINGS f'ing DOWN with him NOT Speed them up as the Twins chose to do.

    Which makes no F'ing sense what so ever.

     

    4. )  I was dead on right with Aaron Hicks and his Question of MLB readiness 2 and 3 years ago.  NOT NICK NELSON who declared him all but our next torii hunter!

     

    5.) The Twins will regret rushing all of :  Eddie Rosario, Byron Buxton, and possibly Brian Dozier and Max Kepler   .....  Dozier is feeling the affects ( BA ave down)

     

    You would of thought they would of learned their lesson With Aaron Hicks 

     

    1) It Was NEVER right not even in any way shape or form to Compare Buxton to Bryce Harper or Mike Trout or even to say he'll "follow in their footsteps"

     

    What the bleep is that bullsh1t who-EVER came up with such a ludicrous statement

    I've been saying for 2 1/2 years Buxton is NOT Trout nor Harper not close.

     

    2.) The Twins flat out rushed him at nearly every level. Which i've also been saying for 2+ years.

     

    3.) Buxton gets hurt a lot in the Minors.

    WHICH is OBVIOUSLY MORE REASON to SLOW THINGS f'ing DOWN with him NOT Speed them up as the Twins chose to do.

    Which makes no F'ing sense what so ever.

     

    4. ) I was dead on right with Aaron Hicks and his Question of MLB readiness 2 and 3 years ago. NOT NICK NELSON who declared him all but our next torii hunter!

     

    5.) The Twins will regret rushing all of : Eddie Rosario, Byron Buxton, and possibly Brian Dozier and Max Kepler ..... Dozier is feeling the affects ( BA ave down)

     

    You would of thought they would of learned their lesson With Aaron Hicks

    I agree with some of that, but in what way was Dozier rushed?

    He was 25 years old and had more than 1600 milb plate appearances as a 4 year college guy.

     

    I agree with some of that, but in what way was Dozier rushed?
    He was 25 years old and had more than 1600 milb plate appearances as a 4 year college guy.

    Yes, you are right on with saying that.

     

    But I believe Dozier has about a total of 45- 50 games in AAA..... with a cumulative total of 225 AB's

     

    I remember Twins called him up out of desperation of another miserable season to Spark plug the offense So IT IS PLENTY defensible in this situation.

     

    But i was planning/ hoping Brian would of seen another 200+ AAA AB's... 

    Edited by shs_59

    Yes, you are right on with saying that.

     

    But I believe Dozier has about a total of 45- 50 games in AAA..... with a cumulative total of 225 AB's

     

    I remember Twins called him up out of desperation of another miserable season to Spark plug the offense So IT IS PLENTY defensible in this situation.

     

    But i was planning/ hoping Brian would of seen another 200+ AAA AB's...

    Personally, I don't separate AAA from AA much. I dont think it's really a jump. AAA is watered down with a bunch of AAAA talent, and minor league lifers with no shot, like Toby Gardenhire.

    He as kinda forced into the centerfield environs last season (who else was there). 

     

    He does have blazing speed and Carew and Molly and others have been working with him. But that doesn't work if he doesn't get on base. Bunting is a skill and you have to have a certain comfort level. As well as slapping the ball. Buxton seems to want to work on just his natural hitting more so than develop things that may keep him from adding to his own personal strengths. That's a tough call with players these days (see the Twins and Carlos Gomez, for example, where they tried to work on his speed rather than jsut hitting skills).

     

    Buxton IS also young. He has had the big league experience. He has to learn that there is no necessary showboating, just getting the job done. And it is a team sport.

     

    I think he will be more than fine. He has to be as good as Span, better than Revere (whom everyone seems to hate, but the guy gets on base and steals them...what more can you ask there).

     

    Now let's talk Kepler, also in a similar overmatched boat and coming up on being out-of-options sooner rather than later and needing a place in the outfield.

     

    'I think he will be more than fine. He has to be as good as Span, better than Revere (whom everyone seems to hate, but the guy gets on base and steals them...what more can you ask there)'

     

    Span is very under-rated.  He was as a Twin by both the fan base and the media. He still is in a lot of ways.

     

    Revere has only recently started getting on base at a decent clip.  His career OBP is still under .330 and 24 points below Span's career OBP.  And even if one really cared about SBs, he's also only eclipsed 30 SBs once.

     

    And Span was always the better CF (even before taking into account Revere's noodle arm).  Span just isn't flashy and doesn't have a big smile.

     

    I'm not sure there's any way to say that, as an overall player, Buxton HAS to be as good as Span.  I'd be happy with that and not sure he'll ever get there.

    Edited by jimmer

    Yes, Span is a quiet guy.

    And a prototypical leadoff hitter and solid defensive center fielder.

     

    We've traded Gomez, Span, Revere and Hicks for:

    1 year of JJ Hardy, a few terrifying innings of Jim Hoey, 7 bad innings from Alex Meyer, some hilarious excuses from Vanimal, a good but miscast Trevor May, and a catcher who can't catch, or hit.

    It really is amazing.

     

    Mike Schmidt started out with a low average and lots of strikeouts, true, but even as a rookie he was providing tons of walks and power, making him almost a league-average hitter overall (95 wRC+ as a rookie) despite a low .249 BABIP (his career BABIP would be .280).  That's not a comparable career start to Buxton (48 wRC+ and trending down).

     

    Besides, a hitter with the profile of Buxton, starting his career with the average and K's of rookie Mike Schmidt, but without the walks, power, or "bad luck" suggested by a low BABIP, is not something from which to draw encouragement.

    Buxton is also younger today than Schmidt was when he debuted and to this point has 300 fewer career plate appearances than Schmidt did by the end of his rookie year so I'm thinking there may still be some time and hope for the lad.  I'm less concerned about Schmidt's Babip than I am encouraged by the fact that Buxton is hovering near the league average in that overhyped area.

     

    I'm less concerned about Schmidt's Babip than I am encouraged by the fact that Buxton is hovering near the league average in that overhyped area.

    I think you and I have had this discussion before. Being league average in BABIP is actually a negative indicator if your overall production is poor.  It means you are getting "normal" results on-contact -- you just aren't making much contact, which for MLB hitters is generally a harder problem to reverse than making outs in the field.

     

    And again, BABIP is not really a metric or anything to be "hyped" it is just a shortcut for gauging the relationship between batting average and strikeouts, something that looking at average or strikeouts alone won't necessarily tell you.

     

    1) It Was NEVER right not even in any way shape or form to Compare Buxton to Bryce Harper or Mike Trout or even to say he'll "follow in their footsteps"

     

    What the bleep is that bullsh1t  who-EVER came up with such a ludicrous statement

    I've been saying for 2 1/2 years Buxton is NOT Trout nor Harper not close.

     

    2.) The Twins flat out rushed him at nearly every level.  Which i've also been saying for 2+ years.

     

    3.) Buxton gets hurt a lot in the Minors.

      WHICH is OBVIOUSLY MORE REASON to SLOW THINGS f'ing DOWN with him NOT Speed them up as the Twins chose to do.

    Which makes no F'ing sense what so ever.

     

    4. )  I was dead on right with Aaron Hicks and his Question of MLB readiness 2 and 3 years ago.  NOT NICK NELSON who declared him all but our next torii hunter!

     

    5.) The Twins will regret rushing all of :  Eddie Rosario, Byron Buxton, and possibly Brian Dozier and Max Kepler   .....  Dozier is feeling the affects ( BA ave down)

     

    You would of thought they would of learned their lesson With Aaron Hicks 

     

    Lighten up Francis. 

     

    I think you and I have had this discussion before. Being league average in BABIP is actually a negative indicator if your overall production is poor.  It means you are getting "normal" results on-contact -- you just aren't making much contact, which for MLB hitters is generally a harder problem to reverse than making outs in the field.

     

    And again, BABIP is not really a metric or anything to be "hyped" it is just a shortcut for gauging the relationship between batting average and strikeouts, something that looking at average or strikeouts alone won't necessarily tell you.

    And yet when Danny Santana's was well above the league average in 2014 it was heralded as a bad thing.

    Bottom line is it's way to early  to sell Buxton short.

    And yet when Danny Santana's was well above the league average in 2014 it was heralded as a bad thing.

    .

    This isn't that difficult. Danny Santana's good batting line was due in large part to great luck (as evidenced in part by an extremely high BABIP). Byron Buxton's poor line has little to do with bad luck (he has a normal BABIP, bad luck would generally be considered a low BABIP). Sorry if that doesn't fit your "water good, fire bad" view of statistics.

     

    Both could still be good MLB hitters, but it will take some work to cut their K rates to get there. Neither can count much on better luck on balls in play to make up that ground.

     

    This isn't that difficult. Danny Santana's good batting line was due in large part to great luck (as evidenced in part by an extremely high BABIP). Byron Buxton's poor line has little to do with bad luck (he has a normal BABIP, bad luck would generally be considered a low BABIP). Sorry if that doesn't fit your "water gooBd, fire bad" view of statistics.

    Both could still be good MLB hitters, but it will take some work to cut their K rates to get there. Neither can count much on better luck on balls in play to make up that ground.

    Yes, the Santana was mostly luck was shouted out by many in here during that season and after...and we were right. Then, this past year many of shouted the same thing about Rosario, and many homers got mad at that...but again, we were right. You can't succeed by swinging at everything! The only guys that can have much value doing that have to have 65-80 grade power, which Santana, Rosario, nor Buxton have. You need to be able to make contact and take some walks. All 3 of Buxton, Rosario, and Santana are guys that CAN have stretches of awesome results through bad process, but overtime...bad process is going to lead to bad results more often than not. 

     

    Santana getting hot, but not taking any walks will ultimately lead to the lucky landings stop and back to low avg/obp, just like before and Rosario now. I am very disappointed in the Twins overall ability to develop better plate discipline with their prospects. I get that some guys are just going to be free swingers no matter what, but some guys with discipline are also doing that all on their own and without being coached it as well. Seems like almost ALL of our "TOOLSY" prospects have terrible plate discipline, as if they are simply allowing them to succeed off of their athleticism in the minors, but that doesn't work in the MLB and then its too engrained in them. I have actually heard that said about the Twins and Buxton last year at either Baseball Prospectus or Fangraphs and it echoed my opinion.

    Buck had another good game yesterday (2-5, walk, leadoff homer and no Ks). I think he leads Rochester in BA and OPS, although he only has about 50 PAs. A month at AAA would be good for him. Buxton's development is crucial to the Twins in so many ways. If staying in AAA is the way for him to be as good as almost everyone has predicted, so be it.

    The biggest mistake is going to prove to be their handling of Miguel Sano.  He had 20 games of good production last year and a 5 game good streak this year.  Other than that he has absolutely stunk as a hitter.  He strikes out and he does not hit with runners in scoring position.  Then they compounded the screw up by putting him in a position he cannot play.  A position no-one his size has ever played in the majors.  When he gets hurt, and it could happen, what will Ryan and Molly say then?  He should be in AAA with Buxton, Rosario and Kepler and each brought up when they have proven success at AAA.

     

     

    The biggest mistake is going to prove to be their handling of Miguel Sano. He had 20 games of good production last year and a 5 game good streak this year. Other than that he has absolutely stunk as a hitter. He strikes out and he does not hit with runners in scoring position. Then they compounded the screw up by putting him in a position he cannot play. A position no-one his size has ever played in the majors. When he gets hurt, and it could happen, what will Ryan and Molly say then? He should be in AAA with Buxton, Rosario and Kepler and each brought up when they have proven success at AAA.

    Sano has an OPS of 1.021 in his career with RISP.

    On what planet is that not good???

     

    He has a career OPS+ of 137.

     

    He started the season slow, sure, but he's been fine since, and is one of the best young hitters in all of baseball.

     

    Sano more than belongs in mlb, not AAA.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...