Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Why Another Twins Trade Deadline Selloff Doesn’t Make Sense

    Minnesota could still make a move before the deadline, but the organization's biggest trade chips are long gone after last summer's roster overhaul.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The 2026 MLB trade deadline is shaping up to be another pivotal moment for the Minnesota Twins. Sitting in the thick of the American League Wild Card race at the All-Star break, the front office faces a familiar question: buy, sell, or stand pat After last year's franchise-altering selloff, however, the equation has changed dramatically. The Twins already cashed in many of their most valuable trade assets, replenishing one of baseball's top farm systems in the process. If they decide to sell again, there simply isn't enough remaining on the major-league roster to dramatically reshape the organization. That's not to say Minnesota has nothing to trade. It just means the return is unlikely to mirror the prospect haul the club received a year ago.

    Joe Ryan is the Only Franchise-Altering Trade Chip

    If there is one player capable of bringing back a transformational return, it's Ryan. A front-line starter with another season of club control would be one of the most coveted pitchers available—if, indeed, the Twins made him available. Diamond Centric currently ranks him as the second-most valuable trade candidate, behind Detroit’s Tarik Skubal. Any Ryan trade package would have to include multiple top prospects and/or a controllable big-leaguer.

    The problem isn't finding interested teams. Every contender would line up for Ryan. The issue is whether trading him makes any sense. There have been no indications the Twins are interested in moving their ace, and doing so would effectively wave the white flag on a season that has exceeded expectations. Minnesota has remained in the playoff picture largely because of its clubhouse chemistry, resilient offense, and a belief that it can compete despite last year's roster turnover. Trading Ryan would send the opposite message. Even if the return looked fantastic on paper, it would tell the clubhouse that the organization is already looking toward 2027, instead of trying to capitalize on a legitimate postseason opportunity.

    Ryan Jeffers Could Help a Contender

    Jeffers is another of the more interesting trade candidates on the roster. He recently returned from a broken hamate bone and is scheduled to become a free agent after the season. Catching depth is always at a premium in July, and several contenders could use another bat behind the plate. Diamond Centric currently ranks him as the 29th-best trade candidate. 

    The Twins also learned they could survive without him. Victor Caratini and Alex Jackson handled the workload admirably during Jeffers's absence, giving Minnesota confidence that it has enough depth to finish the season if necessary. However, there's no guarantee that duo can continue to produce at that high of a level. 

    Still, Jeffers isn't likely to command an overwhelming return. A realistic package could include a borderline top-100 prospect, along with a lower-level lottery ticket. That's a respectable return for a pending free agent, but it doesn't dramatically elevate an already improved farm system. Considering Minnesota is unlikely to retain Jeffers this winter, moving him would be understandable from an asset-management perspective. It just wouldn't be the type of deal that changes the organization's long-term outlook.

    Josh Bell's Value Doesn't Match His Production

    Throughout his career, Bell has been one of baseball's familiar deadline rentals. After another slow April, he has quietly turned into one of Minnesota's most productive hitters and played a significant role in the Twins leading the American League in runs scored. His bat certainly has value. The problem is that his defensive limitations negate it. Diamond Centric currently ranks him as the 41st-best trade deadline candidate. 

    Bell is essentially a designated hitter, and contenders rarely pay premium prospect prices for DH-only bats. Even if Minnesota found a willing trade partner, the return would likely consist of lower-tier prospects, rather than impact talent. Bell probably won't be back next season, making him a logical trade candidate on paper. In reality, his value to Minnesota's lineup may outweigh whatever modest return another club is willing to offer.

    Trevor Larnach Has More Value in Minnesota

    Larnach has surfaced in trade rumors before. The Twins have previously explored moving him, but either opposing clubs weren't interested, or Minnesota didn't receive an offer matching its valuation. Diamond Centric has Larnach ranked as the 48th-best trade candidate. 

    Now, Larnach is doing exactly what the Twins hoped he would. Alongside Bell, he has helped anchor one of the American League's best offenses, giving Minnesota another top-of-the-order threat as it chases a playoff berth. Could the Twins revisit trade discussions? Certainly. Would the return justify subtracting an everyday contributor who remains under team control through next season? Probably not.

    Unlike Bell or Jeffers, Larnach still offers value beyond this season. Unless another organization significantly raises its offer compared to previous discussions, there's little incentive for Minnesota to move him. Even in the worst-case scenario where Larnach cools off and the team misses the postseason, they should be able to get at least a fringy prospect for him at the non-tender deadline this November.

    Selling Again Would Send the Wrong Message

    The Twins could trade Ryan, Jeffers, Bell, Larnach, or any combination of those players before the deadline. The bigger question is what those moves would accomplish. Outside of Ryan, none of those players are likely to return the type of impact prospect package that materially changes the farm system. Minnesota already completed that work during last year's deadline. What's left are complementary pieces whose value is greater to a club chasing a postseason berth than it is on the trade market.

    More importantly, another selloff would send a clear message to the clubhouse. After fighting their way into contention and entering the All-Star break fueled by confidence and momentum, dealing away productive veterans would suggest the front office no longer believes this team is capable of making a run.

    The Twins may not be aggressive buyers at this year's deadline, but they also don't have much reason to become sellers. The organization's biggest replenishment has already happened. Now, the focus should be on seeing just how far this surprising group can carry itself in October—or even on bolstering the team for that stretch run.


    Does it make sense for the Twins to hold on to all these players? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Kaelen Culpepper

    St. Paul Saints - AAA, SS
    Culpepper was one of four Saints batters with three hits on Tuesday night in the team's 15-5 win over Louisville. He was 3-for-4 with a walk and his second triple.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    42 minutes ago, LyleCole said:

    At the same time,  ownership, management, and the fans should take a look at the long term picture and make the decisions that are best in that view given whatever financial constraints exist.  Given the nature of our ownership (cheap), the best long term moves are to sell everything that isn't locked down and will not be part of that rebuild.   That is Buxton (32 years old), Bell (33), Larnach (29), Jeffers (29), Joe Ryan (30)..   

    Dude, this is at least the third time I've seen you post that the team should trade Buxton. What rock do you live under? He has said many, many times that he doesn't want to be traded and wants to retire a Twin (as recently as at the All-Star HR Derby). You can hate on him and management all you want, but he's not going anywhere. And as long as they are close to at least a WC berth, none of the others are either, the exception being Jeffers, but only if the offer for him is substantial. 

    18 hours ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    You're right, but they did. Bitching about it now ain't going to change that. Hey, we did get some good prospects in return. I have an idea, why don't we trade some of these great prospects we have for good relievers with some controllable years left and reverse what we did last year? A lot people seem to love to hate last year so let's do the opposite this year. There's guys like that out there who are rumored to be available. Let's trade some of our prospects not named Jenkins or Culpepper for guys like Soriano, Detmer, or Sam Bachman of the Angels, Mason Miller, Bradgley Rodriguez, or Jhony Brito of the Padres, Luke Weaver of the Mets,  Daniel Lynch, Lucas Erceg, or Alex Lange of the Royals, Jeff Hoffman of the Blue Jays, Trevor Rogers or Shane Baz of the Orioles, or Hunter Greene or Nick Lodolo of the Reds. I'm sure there are more maybe even better guys that could be had for some of the talent we have in the minors. Let's do it.   

    So, I get your thinking but there probably needs to be a filter on the potential trade candidates from around MLB.

    Mason Miller to the TWINS is not happening w/o the likes of Jenkins. Hunter Greene isn’t going anywhere…….. I live in Cincinnati and Lodollo has a blister issue, on the IL again to try & determine what to do…..he’s “not available”.

    There are some guys it makes sense to pursue in your group! ….. I like innings eating Littell from Washington…… he’s starter/reliever & again, can throw innings.

    This probably deserves to be said.....if the Twins were in the NL they'd be in 8th place in the WC and tied with the Nationals.  The Nationals.  Clear sellers.

    We've got a buffet full of the world's worst foods and we're pretending the lutefisk is tasty because it isn't stinky tofu.  It's still lutefisk.  It's still not good.

    Tom Pohlad is going to "try hard" his way into another dumb decision if he listens to the advice in this post.

    25 minutes ago, JD-TWINS said:

    Mason Miller to the TWINS is not happening w/o the likes of Jenkins.

    Twins have some other prospects in top 100. The Padres may shift their plans by August 2 and so might the Twins. If the Padres are trying to reboot, they may listen to Tait, Rodriguez, Hill, Roden, and PTBNL.

    1 hour ago, JD-TWINS said:

    So, I get your thinking but there probably needs to be a filter on the potential trade candidates from around MLB.

    Mason Miller to the TWINS is not happening w/o the likes of Jenkins. Hunter Greene isn’t going anywhere…….. I live in Cincinnati and Lodollo has a blister issue, on the IL again to try & determine what to do…..he’s “not available”.

    There are some guys it makes sense to pursue in your group! ….. I like innings eating Littell from Washington…… he’s starter/reliever & again, can throw innings.

    The guys I really like are the Angels pitchers Soriano, Detmers, Bachman, and even Yates, Luke Weaver of the Mets, or either Gausman of Toronto or Robbie Ray of the Giants if we want a rental for a lesser prospect. I think we should get who we can on a trade that makes sense, starter or reliever.  if we want to add a starter we can then improve the bullpen by moving Prielipp and Paredes from the rotation to the bullpen. Obviously nothing prevents us from doing both. I also like the idea of picking up Littell.

    I have read that Hunter Greene may be available, particularly with the Reds making a strong financial commitment to Chase Burns. You never know about these things though.  "National insiders" tell you lots of  guys are available that the teams have no intention of trading and then later stated they were traded because they couldn't even get a strong enough offer. I think they just have to get some headlines and some eyeballs on the articles. If Greene was available, however, I would certainly consider trading any prospect other than Jenkins for him and would consider trading two or three prospects, including one in the top 10 or even top five, and one in the 10 – 20 range. I know there's injury risk but He's worth it.  

    1 hour ago, tony&rodney said:

    Twins have some other prospects in top 100. The Padres may shift their plans by August 2 and so might the Twins. If the Padres are trying to reboot, they may listen to Tait, Rodriguez, Hill, Roden, and PTBNL.

    Also, the Padres gave up Leo De Vries or Miller, plus some pitching prospects. I wonder if they would have any interest in trading Miller to the Twins for Culpeper and thus get something close to the young shortstop they traded away back in the organization. Before I get a bunch of snarky replies, Mason Miller is in his first year of arbitration and has a $4 million salary. He has three more arbitration years left and isn't a free agent until 2030. That's 3.5 years of one of best closers in the game at an affordable price. Seems like that's worth Culpeper plus, especially since we have Marek Houston coming up behind him. Maybe we do some kind of package deal where they get needed immediate hitting help like Larnach plus Culpeper and maybe a AA guy, and we get Miller plus a lower level yet intriguing prospect. Just something to think about . . .

    9 hours ago, RpR said:

    "Care not for the morrow, for the morrow shall care for itself: this day hath enough with his own grief."

    “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

    IMHO another sell-off does make sense—and always did—but especially now with the offense starting to bottom out. I guess we’ll start by ripping the bandaid off:

    Ryan — will presumably return something better than Duran (and had better be much better than berrios). Roster spot to Klein ROS (paredes/klein work spot in rotation)

    ober — won’t be a great return but hopefully something better than the paddack deal. Roster spot to prielipp

    rogers — bag of balls is fine. Roster spot to acton

    nance — be nice to at least get back what we gave up but won’t hold my breath. Roster spot to sands

    bell — a guy can dream of another Cruz/ryan trade… move bux to dh (roster spot to wallner—see below)

    kreidler — a return of something akin to the Castro trade?! Call up Culpepper to get ready for ‘27

    Larnach — I personally would like to keep him but understand the logjam in OF and that our “prospects” in the OF likely won’t give us the type of return we need to make a run (assuming Jenkins is untouchable). Crossing fingers for a solid return. Call wallner back up and give him the rest of the season to make or break

    Emmanuel Rodriguez + a couple top 30-ish pitchers (Barr and Olivares?) for one of the higher end controllable relievers. We’ll need them next year anyway and this helps clear out some of the OF mess

    finally, I really hate to say it but Jeffers :( as we are unlikely to extend him and there already seems to be the makings of a bidding war. Replace with Gonzalez or Mendez 

    rest of ‘26 looks like:

    SP - taj, zebby, Rojas, paredes/klein, prielipp

    RP - [acquired reliever], Gomez, morris, funderburk, sands, acton, Adams, raya

    DH - bux

    1B - lewis

    2B - clemens

    SS - culpepper

    3B - lee

    C - caratini/jackson

    RF - wallner

    CF - keaschall/martin

    LF - roden/gonzalez (or Mendez)

    looking ahead to ‘27, it could maybe look like:

    SP - Pablo, taj, Abel, festa, rojas

    RP - [acquired reliever], Gomez, morris, prielipp, sands, zebby, Adams, raya

    DH - Clemens 

    1B - lewis

    2B - keaschall

    SS - culpepper/houston(?)

    3B - lee

    C - caratini/jackson

    RF - Jenkins 

    CF - bux/martin

    LF - roden/gonzalez (or Mendez)

    of course, a lot could happen between now and then but a fun exercise for me anyway! :)

     

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...