Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    An Offseason To-Do List for the Minnesota Twins


    Nick Nelson

    The season is officially over, but for the Minnesota Twins front office, their work is just beginning. Here are 6 key priorities for the Twins as they look to build on their success from 2023.

    Image courtesy of Stephen Brashear-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The Twins front office is in a fairly good place heading into the 2023-24 offseason, with a lot of continuity built into their division-winning roster and relatively few blatantly obvious needs. But they do have needs.

    Here at Twins Daily, the baseball season never ends. We'll be firing up end-to-end offseason coverage soon, with planned weekly themes in November plus cool bonus content for TD caretakers. Sign up now to make sure you don't miss out! The following top priorities will guide much of the discussion throughout the coming months

    Here are the boxes the front office must check this winter:

    ☐ Find a front-end starter to replace Sonny Gray.

    The Twins will extend Gray a qualifying offer. Presumably Gray will turn it down. From there, it becomes very difficult to see the two sides coming back together, though it's not impossible. (See: Carl Pavano, 2011.)

    That means the Twins front office is tasked with replacing their 2023 team MVP. Gray is going to leave some big shoes to fill as the co-ace who paired with Pablo López to lead one of the best rotations in franchise history. He ranked third in the majors in ERA, trailing only the two surefire Cy Young winners (Blake Snell and Gerrit Cole). Gray was individually worth more than five wins, according to FanGraphs. He was also the team's best pitcher in 2022.

    It's a big void that will be tough to offset. But the good news is that the front office should have considerable money to spend – their current projected 2024 payroll is at least $30 million lower than this year's – and plenty of intriguing trade chips in their overloaded position-player corps.

    The latter is especially noteworthy, since this regime has shown a clear knack for trading to acquire frontline starters, with a track record that includes Kenta Maeda, López, and of course Gray.

    ☐ Gamble on another high-upside starting pitcher.

    Even if the Twins are able to once again pull off a high-scale move to acquire a high-end starter, they shouldn't stop there. The planned 2023 rotation depth included not just Gray, but also Maeda and Tyler Mahle, who are free agents as well. Joe Ryan, Bailey Ober and Louie Varland are nice to have on hand, but the front office should be targeting high-upside additions to raise the ceiling on this unit.

    The presence of so many proven solid options gives them a stable enough floor to take some risks, which is a fun place to be. The Twins might consider pursuing an opportunistic trade – like, say, for disgruntled Blue Jays starter Alek Manoah – or targeting one of the numerous buy-low candidates in free agency, a group that will include Frankie Montas, Jack Flaherty and James Paxton.

    Pete Maki's pitching program instills confidence that the Twins can mine some gold, and suddenly Minnesota is a rather attractive destination for starters.

    ☐ Make decisions on long-tenured veterans.

    Max Kepler and Jorge Polanco: they've been around longer than almost anyone in the clubhouse, and they are both coming off quality seasons (albeit with some ups and downs). The Twins have team options on both for 2024, and it's all but assured those options be exercised. That doesn't mean they will be back.

    Both Kepler and Polanco could draw significant trade interest for a team that – as we've discussed – needs to backfill some pitching. Meanwhile, the Twins have young talent pushing these longtime mainstays.

    On another front, the Twins must make a decision regarding their other longest-tenured player: Byron Buxton. While trading the hobbled 29-year-old isn't an option, the front office needs to reach a firm stance on what they can expect from Buxton in 2024, and orchestrate their roster-building accordingly. 

    ☐ Figure out the plan at first base.

    Alex Kirilloff is sadly headlong down the same path as Buxton – too frequently injured to be relied upon from a planning standpoint. His upcoming shoulder labrum surgery leaves the future of first base in a state of limbo.

    One plan would be to go out and target a new player who could potentially take over as full-time first baseman if Kirilloff can't go. Another would be to think creatively about internal options. For example, top prospect Brooks Lee looks ready to go and currently has no clear path to the big-league roster, with a crowded infield picture. But if first base is open...

    ☐ Re-evaluate the hitting program.

    To their credit, David Popkins and the hitters pulled things together in the second half. Buoyed by the immediate success of rookies like Royce Lewis, Edouard Julien and Matt Wallner, Minnesota's offense was among the league's most potent after the break Still, their whiff-heavy profile continued to make them an especially boom-or-bust unit, and ultimately led to their exit from the playoffs. After setting a new MLB strikeout record as an offense, Minnesota struck out 28 times and scored three total runs in Games 3 and 4 against Houston.

    It doesn't sound like the Twins are inclined to fully disassociate from this offensive identity – "I would rather have a guy have a great at-bat, go deep into a count and possibly strikeout, but give us a chance to actually give us a baserunner or actually look for a ball in the middle of the zone and pulverize it," said Derek Falvey – but they need to find some balance.

    Whether that means shaking up the roster a bit, targeting players who specialize in hitting for contact, or making alterations to their training and instruction programs (though it sounds like the main coaches will be back), there are several ways the Twins could approach this.

    ☐ Extend at least one young building block.

    The future is here. This is a great moment to lock down some stability, cost assurance, and long-term control. The three rookies mentioned above are all candidates for extensions that will provide them with financial security and the Twins with a bit of extended control. (I favored trying to opportunistically strike a deal like this with Lewis last spring, but alas, that ship sailed.)

    The Twins could also consider extending one of their younger pitchers, like Ryan, Ober or Jhoan Duran. Another option would be to take the Rays approach and strike a long-term contract with a top prospect who's yet to debut, such as Lee.

    The bottom line is that, with relatively few major outside needs to address this offseason, the Twins can look inward and aim to take care of business that sets up their proven internal core for longevity and success.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    9 hours ago, Jocko87 said:

    But you added the two strikes part. He said nothing remotely close to swing for the fences with two strikes. 

    It would be interesting to dive a little deeper with him on this.  What does he define as a good at bat?  What do you want to see with two strikes specifically?  Until someone gets him on record with specifics like that don't put words in their mouths.  If they have said something like that I'd be happy to adjust but I'd be willing to bet his answers to those questions would be pretty satisfactory to most of us.

    He also didn't say that he's cool with striking out half the time.  My read is that they have correctly assessed that the strikeout is the wrong metric to manage to. 

    How many strikeouts this year did you mutter to yourself "what a horrible at bat!"  For me, a lot.  What matters here is the bad at bat, not the strikeout. 

    He did say he was okay with strikeouts as long as they try to pulverize the ball.  That certainly implies that this approach is acceptable with two strikes.

    After a successful season the Twins should be in a good position for a more lucrative TV deal. I wonder why the Twins don't set up their own network along the lines of the Yankees' YES network.

    My to-do list would focus on finding a way to keep Gray for at least 1 year. Maybe year 1 at $30 million and a player option for year 2 at $20 million. This could be sweetened by some incentive provision if necessary to close the deal.

    20 hours ago, terrydactyls said:

    The quote from Falvey defending the "swing for the fences" mentality disturbs me.  Going deep in the count - good idea.  But with two strikes, looking for a pitch down the middle to "pulverize" is assinine.  The hitter should be protecting the plate and trying to put the ball in play.  This past season, roughly half the Twins' outs were via strikeout.  That needs to be addressed.

    I'm not exactly sure how striking out gives the team a chance. Does Falvey anticipate the catcher dropping the third strike and throwing the ball into right field? The worst team approach ever.

    17 hours ago, JD-TWINS said:

     

    Farmer - Polanco - Castro - Gordon - Julien - Lee………all capable of playing 2B.

    Farmer - Castro - Lee……….all capable of playing SS

    Polanco - Farmer - Castro……….all capable of playing 3B

    There’s a strong possibility that Julien plays every day at 2B v. RH pitching.

    Polanco played 104 games in ‘22 & hit .235 - he played 80 games this year & hit .255. He’s a career .270 hitter. It seems other clubs would have access to the information that shows a distinct decline in output & availability. If I’m a GM & discussing Polanco with the Twins it’s also pretty easy to see the clogged roster spots in the infield…….seems to be a clear bargaining chip.

    I’m taking the less cost player with best defense as my utility guy in the infield - guy v. LH pitching at 2B. Farmer.

    Castro is going to be on the roster and available at all 3 spots as well.

    We can sign & trade Polanco, as I stated, with the probable caveat that another player will need to be included to get reasonable return.

    We could also not take any financial risk and do him a favor and let him be a FA.

    Lots of moving pieces in the infield, and don't forget "old man" Correa at shortstop. My biggest concern, looking ahead, maybe not to start 2024, but certainly within a year or so, is where are you going to play Brooks Lee? With Correa at shortstop and presumably Lewis at third base, where does Lee play, especially if you also have guys like Julien and Kiriloff (if healthy) playing, not to mention Polanco if he stays. And then there are the backups who can start like Farmer, and Castro, and even Solano, all of whom were productive this past year. Just too many bodies, so someone (or multiple players) will have to be sent elsewhere. Honestly, it's a logjam, but I don't have any great suggestion. What we do with a top prospect like Brooks Lee? As others have suggested, it would be beneficial to his development if he knows where he is going to be playing this coming year. 

    1 hour ago, Doctor Wu said:

    Lots of moving pieces in the infield, and don't forget "old man" Correa at shortstop. My biggest concern, looking ahead, maybe not to start 2024, but certainly within a year or so, is where are you going to play Brooks Lee? With Correa at shortstop and presumably Lewis at third base, where does Lee play, especially if you also have guys like Julien and Kiriloff (if healthy) playing, not to mention Polanco if he stays. And then there are the backups who can start like Farmer, and Castro, and even Solano, all of whom were productive this past year. Just too many bodies, so someone (or multiple players) will have to be sent elsewhere. Honestly, it's a logjam, but I don't have any great suggestion. What we do with a top prospect like Brooks Lee? As others have suggested, it would be beneficial to his development if he knows where he is going to be playing this coming year. 

    We have already seen a blueprint with Arraez.  The team felt they had options to replace Arraez and they traded him.  If Lee proves to be capable, they will make a trade or move someone to the OF.  With the DH as well as playing match-ups, they can also rotate a day off in the filed between the IFers and of course there are always injuries.  We might see Lee and Lewis play multiple IF positions in the future.

    15 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    no idea why you'd want Wallner to change anything, unless you want him worth 5 fWAR somehow......a SO is better than a weak grounder with men on base and less than two outs....by far.

    For 140 years players tried to hit a ball to the right side on the ground to advance a runner from 2B to 3B with less than two outs. With a guy on first (particularly with new rules) starting a runner with no outs and trying to advance a guy into scoring position with a ground ball is an aggressive play to try & get runs.

    No matter how much I like or you like Wallner, rationalizing strikeouts doesn’t make sense to me.

    I know CC hit into an infinite number of double plays in ‘23 but he also lead the team in RBI - runners don’t score or move on a K.

    If Wallner hit 6 less homers over a season and cut his K rate by 6-8% my assumption is that’s a good thing.

    2 hours ago, Doctor Wu said:

    Lots of moving pieces in the infield, and don't forget "old man" Correa at shortstop. My biggest concern, looking ahead, maybe not to start 2024, but certainly within a year or so, is where are you going to play Brooks Lee? With Correa at shortstop and presumably Lewis at third base, where does Lee play, especially if you also have guys like Julien and Kiriloff (if healthy) playing, not to mention Polanco if he stays. And then there are the backups who can start like Farmer, and Castro, and even Solano, all of whom were productive this past year. Just too many bodies, so someone (or multiple players) will have to be sent elsewhere. Honestly, it's a logjam, but I don't have any great suggestion. What we do with a top prospect like Brooks Lee? As others have suggested, it would be beneficial to his development if he knows where he is going to be playing this coming year. 

    Didn’t forget CC - my comments were about guys in the “logjam” of an infield that could be traded or not started. He’s a fixture and there’s no reason for conjecture at SS, other than depth.

    Brooks Lee is going to start at 2B at some point.

    Kirilloff doesn’t enter the conversation since he’s left handed and not going to play anywhere but 1B in infield.

    The Lee v. Julien issue is the elephant in the room. To get down to that, Polanco needs to be out of the picture, IMO. Therefore, moving Jorge from the picture via FA or extend & trade is what I see as our path forward.

    1 hour ago, JD-TWINS said:

    For 140 years players tried to hit a ball to the right side on the ground to advance a runner from 2B to 3B with less than two outs. With a guy on first (particularly with new rules) starting a runner with no outs and trying to advance a guy into scoring position with a ground ball is an aggressive play to try & get runs.

    No matter how much I like or you like Wallner, rationalizing strikeouts doesn’t make sense to me.

    The rationalizing strikeouts thing is so odd, and it's done in bad faith.  The poster was saying a K is better than grounding into a double play, but obviously players don't choose to hit into a double play when they swing the bat.  Putting the ball in play will result in getting on base 30% of the time.  If we care about analytics and numbers and data there is no rationalizing for favoring strikeouts to putting the ball in play.  The Twins had 10x the outs by strikeout as by double play.   

    If we're doing the silly bad faith rationalizing I'll say that hitting a HR is always beneficial to a K....by far.  Can't hit an HR if you strikeout!  

    8 minutes ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    The rationalizing strikeouts thing is so odd, and it's done in bad faith.  The poster was saying a K is better than grounding into a double play, but obviously players don't choose to hit into a double play when they swing the bat.  Putting the ball in play will result in getting on base 30% of the time.  If we care about analytics and numbers and data there is no rationalizing for favoring strikeouts to putting the ball in play.  The Twins had 10x the outs by strikeout as by double play.   

    If we're doing the silly bad faith rationalizing I'll say that hitting a HR is always beneficial to a K....by far.  Can't hit an HR if you strikeout!  

    Players don't try to strike out either. I was merely giving an example that strikeouts are not always the worst outcome, nothing more or less. But assuming others are acting in bad faith is cool too.

    On 10/17/2023 at 9:16 PM, tony&rodney said:

    Really. I mean I like all of those players but if the team can be improved a trade can happen with some of those guys (Lee, Julien, or Wallner). I'm not expecting one of these players to be traded but it would not be a surprise.

    I would be shocked if a young core player or top prospect is traded. An aging player or say Larnach type or any given prospect out if the too 15. 

    9 hours ago, Fatbat said:

    I would be shocked if a young core player or top prospect is traded. An aging player or say Larnach type or any given prospect out if the too 15. 

    Is it fair to say that many were shocked and a few quite angry when the Twins traded Luis Arraez? 

    The overriding question is how do the Twins improve their team. Trades have been a preferred path compared to the free agent market.

    31 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

    Is it fair to say that many were shocked and a few quite angry when the Twins traded Luis Arraez? 

    The overriding question is how do the Twins improve their team. Trades have been a preferred path compared to the free agent market.

    1. No failed trades like Mahle’s.  
    2. Be patient with young talent. 
    3. Don’t sign or trade for guys in the downslope of their career. 

    On 10/17/2023 at 1:27 PM, JD-TWINS said:

     

    Farmer - Polanco - Castro - Gordon - Julien - Lee………all capable of playing 2B.

    Farmer - Castro - Lee……….all capable of playing SS

    Polanco - Farmer - Castro……….all capable of playing 3B

    There’s a strong possibility that Julien plays every day at 2B v. RH pitching.

    Polanco played 104 games in ‘22 & hit .235 - he played 80 games this year & hit .255. He’s a career .270 hitter. It seems other clubs would have access to the information that shows a distinct decline in output & availability. If I’m a GM & discussing Polanco with the Twins it’s also pretty easy to see the clogged roster spots in the infield…….seems to be a clear bargaining chip.

    I’m taking the less cost player with best defense as my utility guy in the infield - guy v. LH pitching at 2B. Farmer.

    Castro is going to be on the roster and available at all 3 spots as well.

    We can sign & trade Polanco, as I stated, with the probable caveat that another player will need to be included to get reasonable return.

    We could also not take any financial risk and do him a favor and let him be a FA.

    I'd strongly advise against looking at it from a starter/utility guy standpoint because that will lead you to the lesser player every time. And it should be obvious to all of us that injuries are going to occur. 

    This team is going to have depth in 2024 with or without Polanco or Farmer. With the depth box checked... you can't improve the team with more depth... the team needs to move to the next phase which is choosing the better players... not what you have termed utility players.  

    I don't want to come across as negative toward Farmer because he doesn't deserve that but between Polanco and Farmer... Polanco is the better player. No matter if you see a decline in Polanco... it's really hard to argue that Farmer is the better player. 115 OPS+ for Polanco last year compared to 97 OPS+. 111 OPS+ Career compared to 88 OPS+ career for Farmer. Polanco is 29 compared to Farmer at age 33. 

    Granted Polanco will cost 10.5 and Farmer is estimated at 6.2. Polanco is 4.3 more but from a value standpoint 6.2 is a lot money for what you term as utility. 

    Now if you want to trade Polanco to acquire even better talent like you suggest... OK. That's a reasonable game plan for roster building.

    If we are concerned about who will play SS in the case Correa needs some time off... I can see some logic in that.

    However... simply choosing Farmer over Polanco for utility purposes is a huge mistake in my opinion. If given the choice between two players at this stage... you always choose the better player. Polanco is the better player. 

    Whoever is rostered... they will play and they will play a lot. If they don't... they are not needed.    

    The depth box is checked. This year should be about adding higher level talent. 

    @Riverbrian if next year we had Castro as a 4th outfielder(super utility) and Polanco and Farmer as the backup infielders, we would have a very strong roster.  Assuming AK comes back healthy and raking in June, we also have adequate 1st base platoon coverage.  If Lee wins a job in training camp, we will be absolutely stacked with young talent!

    23 hours ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    The rationalizing strikeouts thing is so odd, and it's done in bad faith.  The poster was saying a K is better than grounding into a double play, but obviously players don't choose to hit into a double play when they swing the bat.  Putting the ball in play will result in getting on base 30% of the time.  If we care about analytics and numbers and data there is no rationalizing for favoring strikeouts to putting the ball in play.  The Twins had 10x the outs by strikeout as by double play.   

    If we're doing the silly bad faith rationalizing I'll say that hitting a HR is always beneficial to a K....by far.  Can't hit an HR if you strikeout!  

    Whether or not you agree with what the poster is saying regarding the value of a strikeout, I think you're missing the reasoning for the strikeouts. It's not because the Twins are swinging and missing a ton, it's because they AREN'T swinging and there is a distinction. Julien and Wallner both see over 4 pitches per plate appearance, which is a lot. The goal isn't to get a good read on the pitcher so much as it is to make the pitcher throw more pitches and get him out of the game.

    So the strikeout itself doesn't have value, but the method does. I don't feel it provides enough value currently, but if they keep the method while either reducing the current players' strikeouts, or find players who can do so, then there is a lot of value in having a lineup that makes the opposing pitchers work more inefficiently than the other teams do.

    3 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    Whether or not you agree with what the poster is saying regarding the value of a strikeout, I think you're missing the reasoning for the strikeouts. It's not because the Twins are swinging and missing a ton, it's because they AREN'T swinging and there is a distinction. Julien and Wallner both see over 4 pitches per plate appearance, which is a lot. The goal isn't to get a good read on the pitcher so much as it is to make the pitcher throw more pitches and get him out of the game.

    So the strikeout itself doesn't have value, but the method does. I don't feel it provides enough value currently, but if they keep the method while either reducing the current players' strikeouts, or find players who can do so, then there is a lot of value in having a lineup that makes the opposing pitchers work more inefficiently than the other teams do.

    Good points.  Definitely a distinction.  Working the count, drawing walks, etc is different than just swinging as hard as humanly possible and hoping you somehow "pulverize" an 0-2 pitch.   If you listen to Falvey though he's clearly in the 2nd camp, which doesn't give me any optimism that things will improve.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...