Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Twins Trade Candidate Breakdown: Chris Paddack


    Nick Nelson

    He's among the players most likely to be shopped around this offseason as the Twins front office seeks to clear payroll. 

    Can they actually move him? Which teams might be interested? What could Minnesota realistically get back? Let's explore these questions.

    Image courtesy of © Matt Krohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    What's Up with Chris Paddack
    He finished the season on the injured list, although it sounds like he was on the verge of being able to return and might have tried to do so in the playoffs if the Twins didn't collapse and miss out. Alas, he didn't appear at all in the second half, finishing with fewer than 90 innings thrown in yet another campaign plagued by arm problems.

    He's entering the final year of a contract extension signed in January of 2023, set to earn $7.5 million at age 29 in 2025. Over the course of three seasons in Minnesota, he has pitched to 4.82 ERA over 116 innings, including 4.99 in 17 starts this year. 

    The Case for Trading Chris Paddack
    It's pretty straightforward and self-explanatory. Coming off a fourth consecutive injury-shortened season, Paddack is a major question mark going forward. His salary stands out as a big sticking point for Twins leadership as they desperately seek to shed payroll in search of flexibility to add, or merely to meet their budgeted number.

    He's a talented pitcher with upside, and we've seen him flash it at times as a Twin. But having Paddack around feels like a luxury, especially with young starters like David Festa and Zebby Matthews already breaking through to the majors. Although $7.5 million isn't some huge sum in the grand scheme, there's little doubt the front office would love to redirect that money toward the bullpen, bench or first base. It's no surprise Paddack was recently listed by MLB Trade Rumors among top 35 trade candidates of the 2024-25 offseason.

    The trickier part of this discussion is building a case to trade for Paddack from another team's perspective. His track record makes it almost impossible to trust his in his health, or really even his performance when available. Then again, it sounds like he was cleared for a relatively normal offseason program, and he is a respected arm talent with a high ceiling when he's right. Paddack is still under 30, and his contract (1 year, $7.5M) could be attractive for an upside-seeking team relative to free agency options.

    Bobby Nightengale Jr. wrote in the Star Tribune last week that "league sources expect some interest in Twins starter Chris Paddack."

    Comparable Trades of the Past
    One of the reasons it's tough to envision Paddack's trade market and theorize a return is that there just aren't many precedents that come to mind. Actually one of the best comps might be ... Chris Paddack, who was acquired by the Twins in 2022 under similar circumstances: His previous season had been cut short by an elbow injury, but Minnesota bet on him rebounding and tapping into that ever-tantalizing upside. 

    In that case, I think it's fair to say his arm health was more openly in doubt. Already the survivor of one Tommy John surgery, he had suffered a UCL sprain in 2021 with the Padres, receiving a stem cell injection after the season in hopes of healing the injury without a second reconstruction. The Twins knew the risk when they signed up, and indeed, Paddack made it through only five starts before needing to go under the knife once again.

    Despite the looming health uncertainty, Paddack did have other more appealing qualities at that time: he was three years younger, with multiple years of inexpensive team control remaining. The trade cost to acquire him is a little hard to directly assess because Paddack was shipped alongside buy-low reliever Emilio Pagan in exchange for Brent Rooker and one year of a legitimately high-caliber bullpen arm in Taylor Rogers

    Another comparable player traded for in recent Twins history, I suppose, is Anthony DeSclafani. Very similar story here: pitcher with some level of proven upside, coming off elbow injury that he attempted to rehab, acquired by the Twins as part of a complicated and creative trade package. The same motivation that compelled them to target DeSclafani in that deal -- adding a veteran starter for the back of the rotation on a cheap-ish one-year deal -- would be the same one stirring interest in Paddack.

    It seems fair to say that if Minnesota can find a way to move Paddack, the deal will take shape in a similar fashion to those examples, with multiple players and maybe even multiple teams involved.

    Potential Trade Partners
    If there's a general sense of confidence in his health, Paddack could draw interest from a wide range of teams, especially in the midst of pervasive reduction in spending across the league (which I expect). For all his risk, the right-hander could be attractive on a one-year commitment compared to the treacherous free agent market. Here are a few team names that stand out in my mind as likely suitors for Paddack. 

    New York Mets
    They have some holes to fill in the rotation with Sean Manaea and Luis Severino heading into free agency. Head exec David Stearns has been open about the need to add in the rotation. "We have to have multiple starters. We understand that," he told The Record. "We went into last offseason with the same need, and I think we'll be able to do it."

    New York does have a pretty solid starting pitching corps in place, so they could potentially afford to take a gamble on Paddack, hoping to catch lightning in a bottle and bolster their championship hopes. Under owner Steve Cohen, the Mets are in sort of a sweet-spot for this kind of trade because they won't overly scrutinize a salary like Paddack's, but might also be looking to avoid huge financial commitments after leading MLB in payroll this year.

    Texas Rangers
    Like the Mets, Texas is a free-spending team with World Series aspirations. They also seem like a heck of a natural fit for Paddack, a Texas native known for arriving at the ballpark in his cowboy attire. The Rangers have a strong track record of taking fliers on starting pitchers whose stock is down and striking gold; Lance Lynn and Mike Minor are among the examples. They're also the team that signed Tyler Mahle to a two-year contract coming off Tommy John surgery with the Twins, although the returns haven't been so good there up to this point.

    Like the Mets, Texas is facing significant veteran losses in the rotation, with Max Scherzer, Nathan Eovaldi and Andrew Heaney becoming free agents. They could be looking to load up on arms.

    Tampa Bay Rays
    I don't have any specific reasons for including the Rays, other than that they are an unpredictable team with whom the Twins have done business in the past. Unlike the Rangers and Mets, they are far from big spenders, but they could be interested in acquiring a contract like Paddack's if they believe he's healthy and they like his underlying metrics.

    Tampa has a solid stable of young starters, but could be keen to add a veteran with frontline talent on top of it. I also think the Rays (or other teams) could be interested in Paddack as a multi-inning weapon out of the bullpen.

    Baltimore Orioles
    Corbin Burnes has finally reached free agency and is in search of a mega deal. Assuming they don't bring him back, he will leave a massive void in their rotation, and the O's will be on the hunt for quality arms to supplement their overflowing young offense. 

    One name that stands out to me here as a possible return is Ryan O'Hearn, a strong lefty bat and first baseman making an equal $7.5 million in his final year under contract. Formerly a nondescript player for the Royals, O'Hearn blossomed in Baltimore over the past two seasons under now-Twins hitting coach Matt Borschulte, posting a 122 OPS+ in both, but his poor defense keeps his value in check. 

    Conclusions
    When it comes to trading Paddack, there is definitely a will, but is there a way? The plausibility will be dictated by several factors: his arm prognosis, the temperature of the free-agent market, and the spending inclinations of major-league teams. If the Twins are able to move Paddack and his salary, expect the deal to be significantly more complex than a standard one-for-one swap.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    9 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    Hard to get innings out of guys who were just successfully returning from TJ (deGrom and Mahle) and rookies before their call up. Context matters.

    deGrom has averaged 53 innings pitched per season over the last 5 seasons. He pitched 10 innings last year. Do you think he's going to pitch 150 innings in 2025? Less than 1% chance of that happening.

    Tyler Mahle has never been durable - one season above 120 innings over the last 5. He pitched 12-2/3 innings in 2024. He's had multiple shoulder injuries over the past 5 seasons in addition to the torn elbow ligament. He's also very unlikely to give the Rangers 150 innings.

    These guys are a lot like Paddack as far as durability. Would you bet the over on 160 innings combined from deGrom and Mahle? I wouldn't.

    Then there's Jon Gray who was injured several times and ended the season in the IL. Kumar Rocker pitched less than 50 innings. Bradford pitched 82 innings.

    I would estimate the Rangers need to cover an additional 300-400 innings out of their rotation (assuming they don't trade Jon Gray).

    5 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    deGrom has averaged 53 innings pitched per season over the last 5 seasons. He pitched 10 innings last year. Do you think he's going to pitch 150 innings in 2025? Less than 1% chance of that happening.

    Tyler Mahle has never been durable - one season above 120 innings over the last 5. He pitched 12-2/3 innings in 2024. He's had multiple shoulder injuries over the past 5 seasons in addition to the torn elbow ligament. He's also very unlikely to give the Rangers 150 innings.

    These guys are a lot like Paddack as far as durability. Would you bet the over on 160 innings combined from deGrom and Mahle? I wouldn't.

    Then there's Jon Gray who was injured several times and ended the season in the IL. Kumar Rocker pitched less than 50 innings. Bradford pitched 82 innings.

    I would estimate the Rangers need to cover an additional 300-400 innings out of their rotation (assuming they don't trade Jon Gray).

    First off, pitchers are unreliable in general.

    In general, there are about 150 pitchers per year with 70 innings pitched. If we extrapolate that out to pitchers with 300+ innings over the past 4 years, you get 133 (of course some weren't good enough to stick/retired/etc) 
    There are 12 pitchers in all of MLB who've averaged 175 innings over the past 4 years. 1 in 11.
    There are 18 pitchers in all of MLB who've averaged 163 innings over the past 4 years. 1 in 7.
    There are 32 pitchers in all of MLB who've averaged 150 innings over the past 4 years. 1 in 4.

    In 2023, the Twins had the best rotation they've fielded since 2006. The rotation was expected to be Gray, Lopez, Mahle, Maeda, Ryan with first depth as Ober. 5/6 of the Twins top starters were considered injury prone with only Ryan being reliable.

    While Texas is certainly going to be looking for depth, desperate is still not a word I'd use. Their top 5 starters all look solid for performance.

    Given that the club was acting like a mid-market one, the signing of Correa was a HUGE win.  In hind sight, acquiring Paddock made sense given the extreme cost of starting pitching....if you get 10-15 starts for $7 million is cost-effective. 

    Unfortunately, Joe Pohlad decided to "right-size" the payroll before putting the team up for sale.  Now, the FO is stuck trying to adjust on the fly.  So we get Correa trade rumors.  Rather than simply put Paddock in the bullpen (a place that I think he could be very productive and MAYBE stay healthier), they're stuck trying to move him (a move that will likely cost them a prospect in the 20-25 range).

    Thanks Joe.

    5 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    Lets ignore the 6 year veteran's innings. Here are his actual results on the mound in ERA.
    2019 - 3.33 <-- young pitcher with upside! This guy could be great!
    2020 - 4.73 <--- promising young pitcher got hurt, but it happens
    2021 - 5.07 <--- it's just a small sample size!
    2022 - 4.03 <--- okay so there might be a ceiling here.
    2023 - 5.40 <--- huh, I thought he was better than this
    2024 - 4.99 <--- oh, this is who he is.

    Last winter I put this same information out in discussions where people wrote Paddack into the rotation. I suggested that 90 innings would be a possibility and that 120 innings were outside of reality. Paddack may still be a useful arm in the bullpen, an argument I also made last winter. The question is if $7.5 million is too much for a #6-8 guy in the pen. 

    My belief is that Paddack can be traded for a dart (player not on any team's top 40 prospects list). CP can also be included in a trade as well with other players. Falvey has been all in on Chris Paddack since 2019 though.

    An aside ... Is it an unknown (possible) that Levine was responsible for all player decisions and the divorce signifies a change in direction regarding player acquisition? 

    1 hour ago, David Maro said:

    Don't see a offer for him until teams see him pitch in ST. You can't expect a team to take his contract without seeing if he can take a mound and show something. This situation is and has been a problem with Falvey trying to build pitching with tired,weak arm and shoulder pitchers. They saw it with the BP as well,just look at Stewart who couldn't even get out of ST. They need to do better at drafting and develop pitching like Cleveland does.

    Build a rotation? Add 1 guy that is injured each year. 1.  I mean, this is a rotation almost completely built from within, other than Lopez. 

    It's not even close to "build pitching" by acquiring weak armed pitchers. 

    3 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    If they're going to struggle moving Paddack, moving Dobnak as well will be a huge effort. Both have negative value.

    I don’t think that Paddack has negative value at all.  I don’t think it will be hard to trade him at all.  

    7 hours ago, Jeff K said:

    I was with you until you mentioned Dobnak!  

    He's 7th on the list. Still probably better than some of the veteran retreads that we and others have tried before like Shoemaker. I'm hardly counting on him, but he has been successful before in MLB.

    It's a timing question really.  Innings must be ate, as well.

    Doubt they can get a decent value for him in this offseason so off we go to the deadline.  A healthy Paddack at the deadline has real value and he would have ate many innings on the way.

    If the worst case is that he lives the second half in the pen, it's not the worst outcome except kinda expensive.  Other than more IL time that is.

    I might look to trade in season but earlier than the deadline.  

    The value of pitching year to year just seems to accelerate.  Each year, pitchers in various tiers are projected to make "X" on the free agent market and they almost always exceed the projection.  MLB radio this morning was speculating if the Mariners would trade Luis Castillo to the Orioles for young talent to open up a bigger pot of gold to offer Juan Soto.  Teams don't generally trade away solid SP's like Luis Castillo.

    Because of the need for pitching for every team in MLB, Paddack probably has a little more value than we think.  Not a LOT more, but a bit.  For the Twins, under the "right size my budget" Pohlad regime there is no way the Twins can pay $7.5 million to a bullpen arm who is NOT the closer.  Heck, if the Twins had to pay $7.5 million to Duran or Jax they would probably get traded.

    But there are teams who could look at Paddack as a worthy $7.5 million back of the rotation SP, long reliever or a swing pitcher of sorts.  The primary objective in trading Paddack is not necessarily to bring back a good prospect, it's to dump his salary, freeing up $7.5 million that could be better used somewhere else.  

    But the time to trade Paddack is NOW, not at the deadline, hoping he somehow increases his value.  The Twins need that salary relief NOW.  Not in July or August.  Take what you can get for him and off load the $7.5 million.  There are bigger spending teams that won't look at that as an astronomical salary.

     

    3 hours ago, TopGunn#22 said:

    The value of pitching year to year just seems to accelerate.  Each year, pitchers in various tiers are projected to make "X" on the free agent market and they almost always exceed the projection.  MLB radio this morning was speculating if the Mariners would trade Luis Castillo to the Orioles for young talent to open up a bigger pot of gold to offer Juan Soto.  Teams don't generally trade away solid SP's like Luis Castillo.

    Because of the need for pitching for every team in MLB, Paddack probably has a little more value than we think.  Not a LOT more, but a bit.  For the Twins, under the "right size my budget" Pohlad regime there is no way the Twins can pay $7.5 million to a bullpen arm who is NOT the closer.  Heck, if the Twins had to pay $7.5 million to Duran or Jax they would probably get traded.

    But there are teams who could look at Paddack as a worthy $7.5 million back of the rotation SP, long reliever or a swing pitcher of sorts.  The primary objective in trading Paddack is not necessarily to bring back a good prospect, it's to dump his salary, freeing up $7.5 million that could be better used somewhere else.  

    But the time to trade Paddack is NOW, not at the deadline, hoping he somehow increases his value.  The Twins need that salary relief NOW.  Not in July or August.  Take what you can get for him and off load the $7.5 million.  There are bigger spending teams that won't look at that as an astronomical salary.

     

    I wholeheartedly agree with you. The concern for me is not any return at all - I would trade CP for a PTBNL. Looking at this from the perspective of another team, however, why trade for an oft injured player who is likely to peter out at 75 innings of 4.80 ERA at a best case scenario. On the other hand, some team is likely to believe that $7.5M may be a worthwhile gamble considering their needs. The Twins need to act fast.

    For those who say the rotation is built thru the draft is out of touch. The only SP in the rotation coming out of the draft is Ober.

    Lopez for Arraez 

    Ryan for Cruz

    SWR for Berrios 

    Paddack for Rogers 

    And bringing Varland up in this conversation,how can anyone think he can ever figure out how to go beyond 3 innings. Festa is the only pitcher that is maybe ready for #5. Zebby needs to be in St.Paul to start the season. If I'm missing someone then why didn't they come up ahead of SWR or Festa and or Zebby.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...