Did the Twins Play Meaningful Games in September?

The messaging was consistent from the beginning. The Twins wanted to play meaningful games in September. That phrase became one of the defining pieces of the organization's message entering the 2026 season. It started in January when Tom Pohlad became the new face of Twins ownership after the organization moved on from longtime president of baseball operations Derek Falvey.

Pohlad was asked about how the organization would measure the success of the upcoming season. His answer was straightforward.

"Let's get halfway through the year, to the end of the year, and let's judge the success of this year on wins and losses and whether we're playing meaningful baseball in September."

General manager Jeremy Zoll echoed that message throughout the season. In July, he pointed back to spring training and said the goal had been "to play meaningful games in September."

Now, September has come and gone. And it is fair to ask whether the Twins actually accomplished that goal.

Technically, There Was a Chance

There was a period when the Twins could legitimately point toward September and say they were still in the postseason race. Minnesota's playoff odds climbed to nearly 40% after the Twins swept the Atlanta Braves from August 17-19. The club was hovering around the American League Wild Card picture, and the schedule still provided an opportunity to make a late push.

Then things unraveled. The Twins lost seven of eight games near the end of August, dramatically changing the picture. When September began, FanGraphs gave Minnesota a 9.8% chance of reaching the postseason. That isn't zero. But it also isn't what most people envision when an organization talks about playing meaningful games in September.

The Twins were five games under .500 on September 1. They weren't chasing a division title. They weren't sitting comfortably in a Wild Card position. They needed a substantial turnaround while also relying on other teams to stumble.

Minnesota then went 2-4 over the next week, dropping its postseason odds to 3.1%. At that point, the situation became more reminiscent of Dumb and Dumber. "So you're saying there's a chance." Technically, yes. Realistically, the margin for error had become microscopic. By September 15, the Twins' playoff odds were down to 0.1%. They were officially eliminated on September 20.

So, were those meaningful games? That depends on how the phrase is defined.

Meaningful Baseball or Meaningful Mathematics?

Every September game has consequences. Players are competing for jobs. Prospects are trying to establish themselves. Veterans are auditioning for future contracts. Front-office executives are gathering information that can influence the next season. Those things matter.

But that isn't necessarily what Pohlad and Zoll were talking about. The original promise was made in the context of wins and losses. The stated goal was to have a team playing meaningful baseball in September. That implies a competitive postseason race. The Twins did not have that for most of September. They had an outside chance.

There is an important distinction. A team sitting five games below .500 on September 1 can technically remain alive because of an expanded playoff field and a crowded American League. But being mathematically alive is different from controlling your own destiny or being a legitimate postseason contender.

The Twins' path required a lot to go right. And much of that opportunity existed because the American League was unusually open. That doesn't mean the Twins weren't responsible for their own position. Their record put them in that situation. Instead of entering September with a realistic cushion, they were already chasing.

The Braves series temporarily changed the equation. The losses that followed changed it back. By the middle of September, the question wasn't whether the Twins could make a postseason run. It was how long the mathematical possibility would remain. That's a very different definition of meaningful baseball.

September Games Still Matter... for 2027

That doesn't mean the final games of 2026 are meaningless. Far from it. The Twins now have to use September to answer questions about their next roster.

Young players such as Luke Keaschall, Connor Preilipp, Emmanuel Rodriguez, Walker Jenkins, Brooks Lee and other emerging pieces are getting opportunities to show where they fit. Pitchers are auditioning for rotation and bullpen roles. Veterans are making their own cases for 2027.

Those evaluations matter because the Twins have significant work ahead of them this offseason. The organization has already moved away from the previous baseball operations structure. Zoll is now responsible for shaping the next version of the roster, and the club has to determine which pieces from the 2026 team should be part of that future.

That makes September valuable. It just isn't the same kind of meaningful that was promised in January. There is a difference between meaningful games because a postseason berth is on the line and meaningful games because a young player might earn a starting job next season.

If meaningful baseball means games with something at stake for individual players, then yes, the Twins have played meaningful games this month. September has provided plenty of opportunities for the Twins to evaluate their roster and their future. If meaningful baseball means being genuinely involved in the postseason race, then they last played it in late August.

The Twins began September five games under .500 with a 9.8% playoff chance. Within two weeks, that number had fallen to 0.1%. The team was eliminated on September 20. There was a chance, but it was an extremely small one.

Pohlad made wins and losses part of his measurement for the season. Zoll repeatedly referenced the goal of reaching September with meaningful games. The Twins reached September. They just didn't reach it in the position they wanted. Now, the organization has an offseason to make sure the same conversation doesn't happen again in 2027. Because "we technically had a chance" is not the standard the Twins themselves established.

Do you approve of Twins ownership?

Do you approve of Twins ownership?

• Do you approve of Twins ownership? Required
  

  
• Save

See All Twins Polls >