Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    3 Free-Agent Landmines Twins Need to Avoid This Offseason

    The Twins need to be careful where they spend this offseason. These three players could become expensive mistakes.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Activity in MLB free agency is expected to pick up considerably this week, with a flurry of moves coming before MLB reaches its December 2 lockout deadline. As teams begin addressing their biggest roster needs, the Minnesota Twins will have plenty of decisions to make about which players are worth pursuing and which contracts carry too much risk.

    There are always players who look like attractive additions on the surface but could turn into financial burdens before their contracts are finished. The Twins have experienced this firsthand in recent years, with deals for Carlos Correa, Christian Vázquez, and Victor Caratini—each of which has come with its own set of challenges. While those contracts aren't identical, they serve as reminders of how quickly a free-agent signing can go from an exciting addition to a big mistake.

    With that in mind, let's look at three landmines the Twins should steer clear of this offseason. This isn't a list of unrealistic targets or superstars Minnesota has no chance of signing. Instead, these are players the Twins could realistically pursue, but whose projected contracts carry significant long-term risk. I'm also limiting the list to players expected to receive multi-year deals. A one-year contract might not work out, but a one-year contract is never truly a bad deal. All contract projections discussed are based on predictions from MLB Trade Rumors.

    Brandon Lowe, 2B
    Contract prediction: 3 years, $69 million

    The Twins pursuing a second baseman in free agency wouldn't be a bad idea. One potential roster construction would involve moving on from Royce Lewis, shifting Kody Clemens over to handle first base, and bringing in an established second baseman. There are a few players at the position who would make sense, but Brandon Lowe is one option I would prefer the Twins avoid.

    Lowe has plenty of power in his bat, but there are some concerning underlying numbers that make his projected contract difficult to justify. He strikes out nearly 29% of the time while walking less than 10% of the time. Those numbers create some volatility in his offensive production, particularly as he gets older and loses some of the power that makes him such an intriguing hitter.

    The long-time Rays utility man will turn 33 next season, meaning a three-year contract would keep him under team control past his 35th birthday. An average annual value of $23 million is a significant commitment for a player whose offensive profile already carries some downside. Lowe could certainly provide an exciting middle-of-the-order bat, but the Twins aren't in a position to take that kind of financial risk.

    There's another complication, too. Lowe received a qualifying offer, meaning the Twins would have to surrender draft pick compensation to sign him. Giving up a draft pick while committing $69 million to an aging second baseman with a high strikeout rate isn't the kind of investment Minnesota should be making.

    David Bednar, RP
    Contract prediction: 4 years, $68 million

    The Twins haven't signed a relief pitcher to a multi-year free agent contract in nearly a decade. Given the state of their bullpen heading into 2027, there's a case to be made for changing that approach. However, that doesn't mean Minnesota should throw crazy amounts of money around when pursuing established relievers, especially when the contract could extend well into a pitcher's mid-30s.

    David Bednar is one of the most talented relievers available and would give the Twins a significant upgrade at the back end of their bullpen. He has the stuff and experience to handle high-leverage situations, and adding someone of his caliber would address one of Minnesota's biggest roster weaknesses. The problem is the projected contract. MLB Trade Rumors predicts a four-year deal worth $68 million, which would be a massive commitment for a reliever entering his age-32 season.

    Relief pitchers are notoriously difficult to project from year to year. Even some of the best closers in baseball can experience sudden declines in velocity, command, or effectiveness. Committing four years and $68 million to a reliever is always a gamble, but doing so with a pitcher in his early 30s makes the final years of that deal particularly concerning. The Twins would essentially be betting that Bednar can remain an elite bullpen option well into his mid-30s.

    Like Lowe, Bednar also received a qualifying offer, meaning Minnesota would have to surrender a draft pick to bring him aboard. That's another significant cost attached to an already-risky contract. Bednar would probably make the Twins better in the short term, but the downside of this deal is difficult to ignore. The Twins need bullpen help, but they don't need to create another expensive roster problem in the process.

    Ryan Jeffers, C
    Contract prediction: 4 years, $75 million

    This one might be controversial, because Ryan Jeffers is beloved within Twins Territory. The Twins extended a qualifying offer to their veteran catcher, giving him the opportunity to return on a one-year deal worth $23.15 million. However, there's also the possibility that Jeffers declines the offer and the two sides work toward a longer-term agreement.

    I'm not sure that would be a good outcome for Minnesota. Jeffers has established himself as one of the best offensive catchers in the American League, and his bat is certainly valuable at a position where good offense is difficult to find. However, there are reasons why the Twins' contracts with Vázquez and Caratini became problematic. Catchers are particularly difficult to project.

    Jeffers will turn 30 next season, and a four-year contract would keep him in Minnesota as Father Time sinks his claws into him. The physical demands of catching take a toll, and there is no guarantee Jeffers will be able to handle that workload throughout the life of the contract—especially since he's never withstood a full-time backstop's workload, to date. If he eventually has to move to first base or become a designated hitter, his offensive production would need to stay extremely strong to justify the investment.

    At a projected $18.75 million annually, that's a difficult proposition. Jeffers is a good offensive catcher, but paying nearly $19 million per season for a player who might eventually need to move away from the position doesn't make much sense for a team with Minnesota's financial limitations. The one-year qualifying offer is a different conversation, but committing four years and $75 million would be a risk I would rather the Twins avoid.

    The Twins have plenty of work to do this offseason, and there are legitimate opportunities to improve the roster through free agency. Lowe, Bednar, and Jeffers are all talented players who could help the Twins in the short term. That doesn't mean their projected contracts are worthwhile investments. The Twins have already seen how quickly deals for players like Vázquez and Caratini can become difficult to move on from. Avoiding the next version of those contracts should be just as important as finding the next impact addition.


    Are there other free agent landmines the Twins should avoid this offseason? Would you be comfortable with any of these projected contracts? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    8 minutes ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    Agree on Lackey.  He gets a cup of coffee next year, begins to develop as a pro in 2028 sharing duties with Jeffers (and being tutored by Jeffers) as C2 for a good part of the year, 

    Tutored how, teach him how go from 24.5 caught stealing in 2023 to 10.6 caught stealing in 2026?

    As a catcher , Jeffers is a gaping hole in the defense.  Caratini's 16.2 is not great but still better than Jeffers.

    29 minutes ago, RpR said:

    Tutored how, teach him how go from 24.5 caught stealing in 2023 to 10.6 caught stealing in 2026?

    As a catcher , Jeffers is a gaping hole in the defense.  Caratini's 16.2 is not great but still better than Jeffers.

    Yeah, that’s all Jeffers could teach - how to have a better arm.  Nothing else. Catching in the majors is only about throwing out runners and everything else either isn’t important or something young players just pick up on their own.

    What a ridiculous comment.  

    2 hours ago, mickster said:

    sign Bednar and sign Jeffers.   Love the comp pick and its still a win.

    If we were to sign Jeffers to an extension - I would sign Bednar immediately.  Giving up a 3rd round pick and locking up a good catcher and elite reliever for 3-4 years seems to be an extremely smart deal to make for the Twins.  

    Free Agency is a necessary evil if you look at it that way or a necessary way to improve on the short term. Signing of young players to long term deals can lock down stars to be but that is still free agency risky. Yes we signed Buxton to favorable friendly deal, but his injuries year over year hasn’t been good business. Ask thenO’s if they truly love the long term lockdown signing of Bassalo at catcher. I’m from Maryland and family and friends bitch all the time that signing was very premature.
     

    Signing any free agent comes with all kinds of risk vs rewards. The Jeffers risk is age to a degree, has always been in a role share tandem. Mentor a Lackey, or any up and comer, is a good thing. The hope that Lackey is ready in ‘28 to take over isn’t a guaranteed, he would have to jump through 3 levels to get there, just don’t see it. JPitch calling, ABS do’s and don’ts, clubhouse teammate, etc. plus any performance by Jeffers would be a good thing. Throwing out base runners is always the catchers fault when not successful. Hell, not many catchers are good at it. Would I sign Jeffers long term, yes but that ship has most likely sailed as the Twins aren’t a competitive team. Jeffers will want to be on a competitive teams that is playoff capable every year of his remaining playing time. Simple outlook is Twins aren’t that.
     

    What scares me the most every offseason with twins is the leadership team. Evaluating talent for FA’s, trade targets, and money spent on dumpster diving to solving roster gaps, is the risk each year. Our reward, overpriced Correa deal, trade deadline explosion but not a full explosion to say rebuilding was the goal, bottom barrel acquisitions and the extremely poor use of roster construction (Jackson, Gray, for examples). 
     

     

    I couldn't disagree more. We should absolutely sign Jeffers and Bednar. The best available Catcher and one of the best Closers in the game will require an investment. If you want the best, you have to pay for it. 

    5 hours ago, Whammy said:

    Brandon Lowe's K% and BB% in 2026 were basically at his career averages. As was his OPS+.

    His K% ticked up a little from 2025, but his BB% ticked up more. What I see is a dude who has had remarkable year-over-year consistency. Someone who has been strongly above-average basically every year of his career.

    I don't see anything in his numbers that suggests there's any more risk with him that any other 32 year old. 

    Every other MI has the equal ability to stat to decline at 32. Lowe had a 5 war season, otherwise he was in the mid 2 WAR range. 3/49 is even a risky contract 

    2 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    Outgoing is more like the 80th pick

    I'm pretty sure it would be our 3rd highest pick (not counting a potential Compensatory pick for Jeffers). We have a competitive balance "A" pick coming our way, so our 2nd round pick would be our third highest pick.

    10 minutes ago, Whammy said:

    I'm pretty it would be our 3rd highest pick (not counting a potential Compensatory pick for Jeffers). We have a competitive balance "A" pick coming our way, so our 2nd round pick would be our third highest pick.

    They can trade the competitive balance pick, which would make them lose the 3rd round pick.

    1 hour ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    If we were to sign Jeffers to an extension - I would sign Bednar immediately.  Giving up a 3rd round pick and locking up a good catcher and elite reliever for 3-4 years seems to be an extremely smart deal to make for the Twins.  

    THIS.  As long as Jeffers contract doesn't rise too far above 75 million, I'd do 4 years, but that's it.  Bednar is a no brainer decision.  They also need a 1st baseman desperately.  If Lewis starts the season as the starting 1st baseman the Twins might as well waive the white flag.  

    2 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    They can trade the competitive balance pick, which would make them lose the 3rd round pick.

    I already tried to pull those shenanigans. I've been told this is not the case.

    For purposes of what pick we might be losing, our Competitive balance pick counts, whether we own it or not.

    4 hours ago, Cris E said:

    Every team has to bring in talent from outside the organization to augment what the draft and develop source does not provide, so you must use free agency.   

    How many productive free agents did Milwaukee sign in winning the WS?

    😂

    4 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    Yeah, that’s all Jeffers could teach - how to have a better arm.  Nothing else. Catching in the majors is only about throwing out runners and everything else either isn’t important or something young players just pick up on their own.

    What a ridiculous comment.  

    LOL, 🤣It is about being good enough to influence the opposing runners not to run, and teaching rookies how to do it.   But if run-at-will , is OK with you, to each his own.😎

    8 hours ago, Historyking88 said:

    Bednar is one of the best closers in baseball. He instantly transforms your bullpen to at least good. And who cares about the comp pick when you will get a comp pick for Jeffers signing elsewhere which effectively negates that entire argument. Bednar also has several good prime years left and has been healthy for the majority of his career. So again tell me why they shouldn’t sign him? 

    This bullpen is more than one reliever away from “good” but if the pen were already good, he could make it great.

    2 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    How many productive free agents did Milwaukee sign in winning the WS?

    Bauers. Did you know the previous 1B in MIL, Rhys Hoskins, was also a free agent?  That was fun.  Now lets try the Rays:  Nick Martinez, Steven Matz, Cedric Mullins, Jorge Mateo, and minor league free agent Cam Booser.

    Here's what you should take from this: Not that free agency is bad, but that there are better ways to go when acquiring players. You should avail yourself of the most efficient way possible to fill your roster spots, so if you can't draft and develop then trade, and if you can't trade you should buy on the open market. You can try to go with youth growing into the job, but if that doesn't happen do not go without, find a real player.  That's the lesson.  The Twins are very passive in acquiring talent, valuing their own guys too highly and dreaming of possible improvements rather than their likeliness.  That's what TP and Zell need to take to heart.

     

    2 hours ago, Cris E said:

    Bauers. Did you know the previous 1B in MIL, Rhys Hoskins, was also a free agent?  That was fun.  Now lets try the Rays:  Nick Martinez, Steven Matz, Cedric Mullins, Jorge Mateo, and minor league free agent Cam Booser.

    Here's what you should take from this: Not that free agency is bad, but that there are better ways to go when acquiring players. You should avail yourself of the most efficient way possible to fill your roster spots, so if you can't draft and develop then trade, and if you can't trade you should buy on the open market. You can try to go with youth growing into the job, but if that doesn't happen do not go without, find a real player.  That's the lesson.  The Twins are very passive in acquiring talent, valuing their own guys too highly and dreaming of possible improvements rather than their likeliness.  That's what TP and Zell need to take to heart.

     

    I agree but let's not use Bauers without context.  he did nothing before this year and if the Twins signed a similar type of player this year it would absolutely smacked down here.  

    Hoskins is an example of failure not success. He produced a grand total of 1.1 WAR in 2 seasons.

    The Rays have done a great job of getting a lot out of modest priced free agents.  Nick Martinez signed for $9M which is not much for a SP.  He is not the type of signing posters here are looking for the Twins to sign.

    The point was definitely not that the twins should not sign free agents.  I responded to the statement "Every team has to bring in talent from outside the organization to augment what the draft and develop source does not provide, so you must use free agency."    I think it's more accurate to say that free agency is a much less effective way to try to put together a roster when you fail to draft and/or trade for prospects.

    Bednar was shaky with the Yankees at times last year. Hard pass.

    I'm probably in the minority but I'd like to see Jeffers back on a multi-year deal. He'll get four on the open market and I don't think the Twins will be willing to do that.

    @Major League Ready No sir. You asked a very simple, context-free question that had a very obvious answer.  The answer is, when you don't have a 1B you have to go sign one. And hey, it worked.  

    Free agency is more than seven year $200m contracts. In fact it's usually not a large deal.  A couple years for a reliever, your bridge SS, a back-end starter, that's how you build a roster. Look at the Rays list again. 

    It sounds like I'm splitting hairs, but in fact once the top 8-10 guys are gone (and I would like to get one of them) all the rest are the short time, middle dollar types that every team picks through and adds from every year.

    13 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    Can someone start a petition to end all articles involving any discussion of Ryan Jeffers? This topic has been beat to death. 

    Hard to avoid in any serious discussion about free agency, considering the Twins have a hole for 2027 at catcher and Jeffers is easily the best FA available.

    52 minutes ago, jmlease1 said:

    Hard to avoid in any serious discussion about free agency, considering the Twins have a hole for 2027 at catcher and Jeffers is easily the best FA available.

    There have been a dozen articles that include Jeffers. Jeffers is not close to the best free agent available. He is the best slugging catcher available. As has been discussed, Jeffers catches 80 games and maybe that could be pushed to 90 or even 100. There are a pile of glove catchers available. The key remains .... the budget. A $170M number has room for Jeffers. The TD number of $130M makes that real iffy. In any event, we should be able to agree that people have their thoughts and those positions have been made hundreds of time since the season ended. 

    7 hours ago, Cris E said:

    @Major League Ready No sir. You asked a very simple, context-free question that had a very obvious answer.  The answer is, when you don't have a 1B you have to go sign one. And hey, it worked.  

    Free agency is more than seven year $200m contracts. In fact it's usually not a large deal.  A couple years for a reliever, your bridge SS, a back-end starter, that's how you build a roster. Look at the Rays list again. 

    It sounds like I'm splitting hairs, but in fact once the top 8-10 guys are gone (and I would like to get one of them) all the rest are the short time, middle dollar types that every team picks through and adds from every year.

    Yes, I asked a simple question.  Let's not ignore context or nuance if it has value.  There is very little appetite here (rightfully so) to try and solve our problems with guys that have never performed because the Brewers happened to fill a hole very cheaply with a guy that was never very good and then performed way beyond expectations. 

    It's also makes no sense to say the Brewers were built in any meaningful way with free agents.  They had one free agent that performed and it was a guy that if the Twins signed a guy with the same profile right now we would call it dumpster diving.  What the Brewers have proved is success for small market teams means as little dependence on free agents as possible.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...