Do the Twins Have a Pitching Development Problem?

[Cody Christie]

The Minnesota Twins have one of baseball’s highest-ranked farm systems. The organization has produced homegrown position players who have become important parts of its major-league roster, and its farm system continues to feature several intriguing young hitters. However, the pitching side of the equation looks considerably less encouraging.

Minnesota has some interesting arms working their way through the minor leagues, but it lacks the same collection of high-end pitching prospects. With several established starters approaching free agency, the organization needs to determine whether its current approach to developing pitchers is producing enough quality talent. The problem might not be an immediate crisis, but it deserves attention.

The Prospect Pipeline Leans Toward Hitters

Minnesota's farm system has plenty of position-player talent. Walker Jenkins, Vahn Lackey, Kaelen Culpepper, Emmanuel Rodriguez, and Marek Houston headline a group that gives the organization reasons to feel optimistic about its offensive future.

The pitching side doesn't feature the same depth of nationally recognized talent. None of Minnesota's leading pitching prospects has established the same top-tier prospect profile as the organization's best young hitters.

Riley Quick ranks as Twins Daily's No. 5 prospect, followed by Charlee Soto at No. 10 and Ethan Wachsmann at No. 14. Each offers something worth developing, but all three are at different stages of the process.

Quick has advanced to Double-A and remains an intriguing arm with significant potential. Soto has reached High-A, while Wachsmann is still working through the early stages of his professional development. Their paths toward the majors will require patience, continued development, and plenty of things to go right.

There is nothing inherently wrong with having pitching prospects who need time. Young arms are difficult to project, and injuries can derail even the most promising careers. However, the Twins need more than a handful of intriguing possibilities. They need multiple pitchers to emerge as legitimate candidates for the front of a major league rotation.

A strong farm system can survive losing individual prospects to injuries, trades, or disappointing performances. The concern arises when an organization lacks enough high-end alternatives to absorb those setbacks.

The 2026 Numbers Raise Questions

Prospect rankings provide one way to evaluate a farm system, but performance data can offer a different perspective on how an organization develops talent.

Baseball America's 2026 farm system Statcast rankings examined organizational performance using Stuff+ and other underlying metrics. Its pitching analysis considered factors such as velocity, movement, extension, and release characteristics to evaluate the quality of pitches thrown throughout the minor leagues.

Minnesota finished below average in organization-wide Stuff+, with only eight organizations ranking behind the Twins. That's a troubling result for a team that needs to develop more impact arms internally.

There was a more encouraging finding. Minnesota ranked among the top 10 organizations in the minors in strike percentage. That contrast is worth examining. The Twins' minor league pitchers showed an ability to throw strikes, but their overall pitch characteristics did not measure up particularly well against those of other organizations.

Throwing strikes matters. Pitchers who consistently fall behind in counts put themselves at a disadvantage, create unnecessary walks, and force themselves to work harder to finish at-bats. However, throwing strikes alone does not guarantee success. Pitchers also need offerings that generate swings and misses, weak contact, and opportunities to get hitters out without relying on balls finding gloves.

Stuff+ is not a complete evaluation of pitching development, and one season of organizational data cannot establish that a development system is broken. Still, the difference between Minnesota's strike-throwing performance and its overall stuff suggests an area worth investigating.

Can the Twins do a better job helping pitchers improve their velocity, movement, pitch shapes, and secondary offerings? Are they identifying the right arms in the draft? Are their development methods helping pitchers turn raw tools into effective major league pitches? Those questions deserve serious consideration.

The 2028 Rotation Is Already a Concern

The major league rotation adds urgency to the conversation. Pablo López, Joe Ryan, Bailey Ober, and Dean Kremer are all eligible to become free agents after the 2027 season. As previously noted, that puts Minnesota in a position where it could face substantial turnover in its starting rotation after next season.

The Twins do not necessarily need to lose all four pitchers. Contract extensions, trades, and other roster decisions could change the picture. Nevertheless, the possibility of losing multiple established starters creates a significant challenge.

Minnesota has several internal candidates who could help fill those future openings. Taj Bradley, Connor Prielipp, Zebby Matthews, and Mick Abel represent different options for the organization to evaluate. Other young pitchers could also emerge during the 2027 season. The key is getting some of those arms to take meaningful steps forward.

If Bradley establishes himself as a dependable rotation piece, Prielipp builds on his major league opportunities, and Matthews or Abel takes another developmental step, the Twins could enter 2028 with a stronger foundation. But those outcomes cannot simply be assumed.

The organization needs to see progress. It also needs more prospects pushing from the lower levels of the minors, creating competition and giving the front office additional options when injuries or free agency affect the major league roster.

Without that pipeline, the Twins could be forced to search externally for multiple rotation pieces at the same time. That is an expensive proposition, particularly for a franchise that does not consistently operate with the payroll flexibility of baseball's biggest spenders.

Something Has to Change

The Twins do not necessarily need to abandon their current approach to pitching development, but they should be willing to examine it closely.

Perhaps the answer starts with the draft. Minnesota could place a greater emphasis on selecting pitchers with the physical tools and underlying metrics that project to produce major league success. That does not mean reaching for a pitcher simply because the organization needs more arms. It means finding the right balance between immediate value and the long-term need to develop quality starters.

The organization could also examine its minor league development practices. If Minnesota's pitchers are consistently throwing strikes but not producing above-average stuff, the coaching staff should investigate how to help those players get more out of their raw abilities. Pitch design, velocity development, secondary offerings, and individualized development plans all deserve attention.

There is no single solution to producing major league pitching. Injuries and the inherent volatility of young arms will always complicate the process. Even the best development systems experience failures.

However, the Twins cannot afford to have too many failures in this area. Organizations with substantial payrolls can sometimes compensate for weak internal pitching development by signing established starters. Minnesota has fewer opportunities to take that route without sacrificing resources elsewhere on the roster. That makes homegrown pitching especially important.

The Twins have reason to feel optimistic about their young position players, but the organization needs its pitching pipeline to catch up. The next season will provide opportunities for several internal candidates to establish themselves, while the next wave of prospects continues working through the minors. If those pitchers progress, Minnesota could enter 2028 with a more manageable rotation outlook. If they do not, the front office will face an increasingly difficult task.

The Twins do not need every pitching prospect to become a star. They need to develop enough dependable starters to keep the major league rotation competitive without constantly shopping for expensive replacements.

That is the challenge facing Minnesota. The organization has found ways to develop hitters. Now it needs to prove it can do the same with pitchers.

---

What changes can the Twins make to help their pitching pipeline? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

Image courtesy of William Parmeter

View full article

[MackMan]

I think this was by design due to Falvey-Levine. They got used to being able to take a late draft pick and magically develop them into a mid-front end starter for a small club, trade that player off when their value was highest and reload the rotation off that player. Sadly, that never came to fruition because they didn't account for the pood pitching development that came in the Twins Minor leagues. Yes, we have Zebby, Ryan, Festa, and Ober to account for in our rotation but that isn't saying a whole lot seeing as they're back end (outside of Ryan) starters on a small club. 

They only way it made sense to keep Ryan going into 2026 or after the 2025 trade deadline was if you were to go all in on the season and chase that trophy. They didn't pull the trigger for all in and became a mediocre team who played a few hot weeks then came back down to Earth. We are going to have to trade some young, potential future star in order to reload our pitching stock. Honestly, we might have to trade more than that just to make it happen because the 26-27 Offseason doesn't have a lot of names for pitching available unless TP is willing to endorse some big checks. 

[rdehring]

When you look at who the hitters are, it becomes clear why the pitching side isn't as strong as the hitters.  All those hitters were taken in the first round with several amongst the top handful of picks.  It seems logical that pitchers selected later in the draft wouldn't have the same level of hype, wouldn't it?

[4twinsJA]

How about the former Twins that went on to other teams to develop into good pitchers- Megill, Headrick, and Hoffman. Why weren't Twins able to develop them when they were Twins?

[MackMan]

1 minute ago, rdehring said:

When you look at who the hitters are, it becomes clear why the pitching side isn't as strong as the hitters.  All those hitters were taken in the first round with several amongst the top handful of picks.  It seems logical that pitchers selected later in the draft wouldn't have the same level of hype, wouldn't it?

I mean just looking thru the Falvey-Levin draft era, they only took 2 pitchers in the first round (Chase Petty and Charlee Soto) one of which was traded shortly thereafter and the other is still working his way thru the minor leagues. Otherwise it was all hitters that also didn't pan out

[terrydactyls]

One reason why the "pipeline" is barren is the inane belief of the front office that the 2026 team was a playoff quality team.  If they had actively sought trade partners to move Ryan, Jeffers, Larnach, Bell, etc., there might have been a couple of AA or AAA pitchers worth considering as potential keys to the 2027/2028 roster.

[LastOnePicked]

1 hour ago, MackMan said:

They didn't pull the trigger for all in and became a mediocre team who played a few hot weeks then came back down to Earth. We are going to have to trade some young, potential future star in order to reload our pitching stock.

This is the core of their problem going forward. Jenkins, Rodriguez, Culpepper, Houston and Lackey might be good big-leaguers, but it won't mean anything if they constantly have to dig out of 3-run deficits by the 5th inning.

Trades for elite pitching talent on the cusp don't come cheap. You can try to get a few cast-offs like Bradley and Abel, but they're usually made available for good reason - their health or control are massive question marks. The Twins can get better a drafting arms, but even if they do, they won't see the benefits until this new OF/IF core are hitting free agency.

If the Twins don't go all-in and win in 2027. I think this team is going to be stuck in limbo well into the 2030s.

[MackMan]

2 minutes ago, LastOnePicked said:

This is the core of their problem going forward. Jenkins, Rodriguez, Culpepper, Houston and Lackey might be good big-leaguers, but it won't mean anything if they constantly have to dig out of 3-run deficits by the 5th inning.

Trades for elite pitching talent on the cusp don't come cheap. You can try to get a few cast-offs like Bradley and Abel, but they're usually made available for good reason - their health or control are massive question marks. The Twins can get better a drafting arms, but even if they do, they won't see the benefits until this new OF/IF core are hitting free agency.

If the Twins don't go all-in and win in 2027. I think this team is going to be stuck in limbo well into the 2030s.

I wouldn't necessarily say the need to go all in for 2027, I would make a 1-3 year process. One of the biggest hampering right now is Buxton. As great as a player as he is, he costing the team $15million/year for a 80-120 games and now is going to start hitting his decline defensively and speed wise. Heck, maybe declining offensively due to all the hip and knee surgeries he's had. The Twins need to have a long sit down with him and give him the expectations moving forward that he is going to become our everyday RF and Jenkins is taking over CF. The wall in RF is going to help him save his knees in the fact that it will be less running and diving. 

From there, we transition Emma to LF and Keaschall to split with him or REALLY work with Keaschall on his defense so he can find a spot on this team outside of DH. 

A lot of things need to happen in the near future for the Twins to stay Relevant in an AL Central that is starting to have the younger guys taking over (Cleveland, ChiSox, Royals, Detroit) all are getting to their higher end prospects or have young stars starting to blossom on both sides (pitching and hitting). 

[LastOnePicked]

13 minutes ago, MackMan said:

I would make a 1-3 year process.

The future is hard to see, but 2028 will likely leave this team with Bradley, Abel and Prielipp. I can't imagine who they can or would trade to get a legitimate rotation arm. It's going to be question marks and castoffs after Bradley.

Buxton isn't going to last - if they can get 50-80 good games out of him this year, that's a good outcome. Beyond that, folks better hope the new core can really hit. I mean, like really, really hit.

So I'm not sure what happens, especially in terms of pitching, after Year 1. They put all of their eggs in this year's basket. They need to treat it as such, because there's clearly no plan B.

[DataNerd]

I don't have serious concerns about that.  Right now we are having problems from the 23 pitching draft being an absolute stinker and trading away Hill from the 24 draft, but the 22 draft was really good (Prielipp, Morris, Matthews and we only signed 8 pitchers) and the 25 draft looks good currently.

We don't have a ton of SP under contract for 28, but we also have a ton of money freeing up that year (Lopez, Hoffman, Caratini are $32M, Ryan/Kremer/Ober currently estimated for a combined $26M, and looking I'm guessing around $5-10M will be spent on arb increases on guys we keep).  The SP problem isn't as large when $48M is coming off the books to address it.

[tony&rodney]

Eventually the Twins will need to dip into the pool of free agent pitchers to bolster their starting staff. Obviously the bullpen needs help for next year. The alternative is to acquire pitching via trades and push them forward. 

It is probably fair to say that all teams are searching for more pitchers. Development is an ongoing process.