Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

chpettit19

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,226

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    168

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by chpettit19

  1. chpettit19
    Bummer the Cardinals are going to have to trade him since he's going to be so pissed at them for mismanaging him, too. I mean, unless you think .05 innings per start is a massive jump for him? He averaged 5.75 innings per start for the Twins last year and is just over 5.8 innings for the Cards. It's almost like you're the one making up whatever reason you want. But to each their own.
  2. chpettit19
    @wabene covered the Sonny stuff perfectly. Sonny left because the Twins wouldn't pay him 75 million over 3 years. Francona's pitchers also left for more money. Vogt and the Guardians changed their approach at the plate and it's lead to more power and more runs. That has nothing to do with Francona. They're concentrating on pulling the ball in the air more. Like the Twins. And they're winning more because of it. I'm not a huge Rocco guy. I don't care if he's fired today. But if you're going to put him down at least do some research and make sure you're not mad at him for things you're completely wrong about.
  3. chpettit19
    If 25% of the 20 best players on the planet had "hiccups" I'd say it should be pretty well expected that the average MLB regular has a "hiccup" or 2 along the way.
  4. chpettit19
    1. Rocco hasn't changed his approach to pitching, he has better players. He always let good pitchers stay in. Go look at where Berrios used to finish in innings pitched with Rocco around. 2. Terry Francona absolutely looked at stat sheets and made decisions based off them. Go listen to some interviews with him. There's a bunch out there. Even some nice long ones with him and Joe Maddon talking about the use of analytics. Is Cleveland winning more this year because Francona had no more feel for the game left last year, but first time manager Vogt is just a mad genius?
  5. chpettit19
    Tanner Scott is almost guaranteed to be dealt. What's he going to cost is the question. But he'd be the move the Twins should make if they're "going for it."
  6. chpettit19
    I haven't seen him much in the OF, but if he can be an average defender out there he may be what they hope(d) Martin would/will be.
  7. chpettit19
    I'd argue Keaschall should be an "untouchable" guy every bit as much as those other 3. If he can play OF, which he's doing now, he can save us from future Margot and Garlick situations where we're rostering guys who can only hit lefties and do nothing else on a major league field. Keaschall is less than a year older than Emma and dominating at the same level while looking like he'll get to AAA sooner because of Emma's injury. Which isn't his first. I actually think Keaschall should be ahead of Emma on the Twins prospect list, although, in the same tier. And I'm more of a tier guy. I think those 4 are tier 1, and that'd be your "untouchable" list.
  8. chpettit19
    I don't trust any of their lefties at all so I'd like to see a good lefty arm brought in. Tanner Scott would be the dream, but he's likely going to cost a ton in prospects. The righties are interesting, though. I know everyone was excited about Varland in the pen last year, but it was 12 innings. And there was some hard contact in there. Can Staumont and Stewart stay healthy until and through October? Topa has had 1 good season and is coming back from missing over half the year with injury. I'm sorry, but I'm not counting on him for anything. There is talent, and I don't think they need to go crazy with bringing in a righty, but I'm not as sold as others that they shouldn't at least be kicking the tires and seeing what's out there. I don't think they trust anyone outside of an on fire Lopez to go super deep into a playoff start. I think the pen is going to be leaned on relatively heavily in the post season. And if that's the plan, I'd like to see another more established arm if the cost isn't crazy.
  9. chpettit19
    One of those guys is Luke Keaschall and the other is some fella named Brooks that a few people around here (myself included) are pretty excited about. Hint: The second one is Lee. Keaschall's name is starting to pop up on top 100 lists, and he's certainly getting some love by the Twins faithful, but are we excited enough about him? The praise for Lee had a lot to do with his draft position, but Luke has bested him in wRC+ at every level (Lee skipped A ball) at a younger age. Keaschall looks like he has every opportunity to make it to AAA in his first full season just like Brooks Lee did. He's now playing a lot of CF which opens up more paths to the majors. Luke jumped up to #9 on the most recent Twins Daily prospect ranking, but is that high enough? I'd argue no. I know some people will find this crazy, but I'd actually put Luke ahead of Emma. Brooks is still a prospect, and is showing he can hold his own in the majors to some extent right now so he'd be my #2 with Jenkins still at #1. But I think Luke Keaschall is the #3 prospect in the Twins organization, and am excited to see what he can do in AAA at the end of the year (or maybe sooner?).
  10. chpettit19
    I'm surprised to see the "net positive" option getting the most votes. Interesting. I voted 0 wins. I've been on the record here for years that I don't think managers make much of a difference. Most of them are doing things the same way now, and most of those decisions are based heavily on strategies put in place with/by the baseball ops department. Talent wins. I hate the pinch hitting before the 7th, but part of that is because the FO brings in guys for those roles who have no business facing righties later in the game. So is it on Rocco that he does that? For sure. But it's also very clearly part of their overall strategy, and it wouldn't get so many complaints from me if the righty coming in in the 5th had an OPS over .700 against righties instead of .459 (Margot's current number). I dislike the shorter starts from starters, but that's MLB as a whole. It makes sense that guys who aren't very good don't get to see the lineup a third time while your better starters get extra rope. Pitch counts keep getting lower and lower, but the Twins rotation has been unbelievably healthy the last 2 years (I knocked on wood, don't worry) which could be a result of the more limited workloads (I don't know, but it seems like a logical possibility). But, generally speaking, many of the overall complaints about Rocco are just complaints about MLB strategy in this day and age. And I agree with those who say the game is less entertaining with the change in strategies, but I want my favorite team to win so I'd rather them follow the less entertaining strategies that have proven to be the better way to win games despite what "old school" fans on the internet say.
  11. chpettit19
    I think that first sentence is the key to this discussion. Most teams have the prospects tiered. There's some organizing within those tiers, but the first step is to tier guys. If a team at the top of the draft has 4 guys all in the same tier and 1 of them is going to cost 2 mil less than the other 3 choosing that cheaper player to save money is very different than having 4 guys in tier 1 and picking somebody from tier 2 or 3 instead in order to save money. Last year was universally viewed as a draft with 5 elite guys and then a drop off. There were numerous rumors that Crews wanted significantly more than Skenes at pick 1-1. I have no idea if that actually played into the Pirates' decision, and Skenes did sign for 200k more, but it's a pretty logical decision to take Skenes in that situation if Crews was telling them he'd require full slot compared to the 500k less Skenes took. But if the Pirates had drafted Jacob Wilson (went 6th) in order to save money that would be a highly questionable strategy. We tend to get rankings in terms of lists when really they should be tiers. There aren't as hard and fast lines between each guy as people tend to act like there are when it's a listed ranking.
  12. chpettit19
    I agree there's room for Julien on the infield because the Twins rotate guys a ton to start with, and injuries are always going to happen. Lewis shouldn't be a reason to trade anyone. His talent should be, but he's played less than 100 games in what should be his 4th season. But if they could spin Julien into one of the young Marlin arms I'd be into that. They have their own concerns that have lowered their value in the same way Julien has. Julien enough to start a conversation with Miami about Meyer or Luzardo? I think the "there's no room" or "we have a log jam" ideas are crazy. Kyle Farmer is still on this team. There's no such thing as too much talent. But if they could get a Miami arm for a package based around Julien I'd be all for it.
  13. chpettit19
    I think all trades should be based on the chance to improve their odds of postseason success. I think they definitely need a shutdown lefty in the pen as I don't trust anyone currently in the org to be a postseason lefty arm, but do they need a lefty starter? I don't see that as that important. Teams with at least 50 wins right now wRC+ vs Lefties - vs Righties: Philly: 117 - 109 Cleveland: 117 - 104 Baltimore: 123 - 116 Yanks: 103 - 119 Dodgers: 128 - 116 Brewers: 103 - 112 Braves: 111 - 94 Red Sox: 98 - 105 Royals: 97 - 95 Mariners: 94 - 94 Twins: 126 - 111 7 of 11 teams (including the Twins) have better numbers against lefties than righties. 1 is the same. And 3 are better against righties. I don't see the need to get a lefty starter. Get a lefty out of the pen better than Thielbar, Funderburk, and Okert, but if you're bringing in a starter just make sure they're a legit playoff starter.
  14. chpettit19
    If only this situation was predictable...
  15. chpettit19
    It absolutely would help to make a deep playoff run, but, according to Gleeman, the Twins attendance is down about 1200 per game so far this season. I can't imagine the business people were projecting 54000 fewer fans to this point in the season when calculating their budget before the season so they're likely already starting from a hole and probably aren't willing to bet on a deep playoff run when it comes to investing significantly more money into the payroll. But, generally speaking, a deep run would most certainly make it far more palatable to add to the payroll at the deadline.
  16. chpettit19
    Going to start this by saying I'm in no way suggesting we should all believe the recent Vazquez is the "real" Vazquez and what we should expect moving forward, but here's an article from Dan Hayes yesterday about changes to his swing he's made this season. If you don't have a subscription this link isn't very useful for you, sorry. But he has made some changes. Him and Derek Shomon (assistant hitting coach) have been working together and even took a trip to Driveline when the team was in Arizona to get a better idea on tweaks to make.
  17. chpettit19
    I'd also expect the pen to be the place they're most looking at upgrading. And likely a lefty arm. My point was simply that the other poster suggesting their real payroll number is 150 was ignoring what the top 3 people in the organization said all offseason. If 150 was the real number they definitely should not have saved 20 mil for the deadline. I wouldn't be surprised to see them add a little salary, but the other poster's suggestion that there's no reason to believe they wouldn't add another 13 mil seems to be ignoring what the organization spent all offseason telling us. I don't see the Twins trading a top 100 guy this deadline. I think the payroll decrease is a more permanent thing (not that they won't add at all, but they won't be jumping back to 150 next year) and they are going to need their young guys to take a lot of spots now as Pablo gets more expensive and arb salaries start kicking in. I'd absolutely love to see the Pohlads sign off on a really aggressive move to try to make a big time run at things this year, but I don't think they ran the world's worst PR campaign all winter only to make a big splash at the deadline.
  18. chpettit19
    I always like to just point to the Rockies as proof that the guys running teams aren't automatically right. I'd bet money that a group of TD members could run a team every bit as well as they do out in Colorado. But, to be fair, that's likely mostly an ownership problem so I shouldn't be too harsh on the FO folk.
  19. chpettit19
    I think this is the more likely route they go with, if they make any significant trades. I'd bet they don't do anything of significance, but I'd bet the pen, especially a lefty, is probably their focus. The challenge is that relievers still cost a lot in prospects, and that's why I wouldn't expect them to go too big there. The Lopez trade from a couple years ago is probably still in the back of their mind, too.
  20. chpettit19
    And then I added even more context from the literal owner of the team. But you go ahead and keep believing they're going to add 10% to their payroll at the deadline after the owner of the team and the president of the team and the president of baseball operations all told their fans they're cutting payroll. I'm sure they were just lying to us all and 150 was really the number they were willing to go to. Falvey in November openly stated they were cutting payroll. Dave St Peter in February openly states they aren't adding to payroll. About a week later Joe Pohlad openly states they aren't adding to payroll. But you think they'll add 10% to it without thinking twice. Bold prediction.
  21. chpettit19
    The tangible reason is he's left handed. The Twins openly talk about this. It's not Wallner specific, it's all lefties. There were multiple interviews early in the year with Rocco talking about how Julien kept begging to hit against lefties and Rocco kept saying it just isn't what the Twins do, but he'll get some chances here and there. The Twins had their reasons not to let him, but he had a better OPS against lefties than righties in his time in the majors this year. The Twins aren't shy about this. They believe in platooning all lefties if they can. It's their base strategy. Some of us disagree with that. It's not Wallner specific why he doesn't hit against lefties. It's a core strategy of the FO and Rocco.
  22. chpettit19
    "But I can’t point to a specific change in strategy. I think it’s more likely than not that the reality is that any impact from our TV deal, relative to our short-term player investments, is going to probably be limited. But that’ll ultimately be up to the market, and up to opportunities that Derek feels are good for the Twins." -Dave St Peter I'd say that's at least a little bit of a reason not to believe that ownership will be willing to open their pockets. Adding another 10% to the payroll by taking on another 13 million sounds like a very unlikely thing to happen. Same with 10 mil. Maybe they do 3-5 million? When the owner says they're "right-sizing" their business it's probably safe to bet that they aren't hitting the same numbers they had in the previous seasons. 150 million wasn't the "right size" for their payroll so expecting them to go back to that number would be believing that Joe Pohlad was lying and pissing off his fan base for no reason. I think the safer bet is that they don't have a lot of wiggle room to add significant costs in the next 3 weeks.
  23. chpettit19
    Steele is a fascinating option. He's under control for 3 more years, but is in arbitration and will get relatively expensive pretty quick if he keeps performing. Was a Super 2 so has 4 years of arbitration and signed for 4 mil this year in year 1. Depending on what their projections for his arb salaries is, he'd be a really nice pickup at the deadline. I doubt the Cubs are looking to move him, though. I think they're trying to win in the next 3 years and trading him would hurt those chances.
  24. chpettit19
    A week or 2 is of no use when you need the starter in 5 days. Sure, Festa could make the start, but beyond that it gets ugly quick. And I'd argue Varland and Festa is already ugly. It wouldn't be crazy to put him in the pen now, but there's also a logical reason not to. I'd expect Festa is their #6 next year with Varland in the pen and Zebby or one of the other AA arms currently being the Festa next year. I don't think Varland in the pen now vs September makes much of a difference.
  25. chpettit19
    I think Varland gets moved to the pen in September. I think that makes sense. Despite him not being someone I want starting games, they need to keep him stretched out in case of injury. It's been truly amazing the health they've had in their rotation the last 2 years. But I think they leave Varland in the AAA rotation until September and then his career as a starter is probably over and he'll be a fulltime pen guy moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...