Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Most pitchers aren't as good against the great teams..... This idea somehow Ryan isn't good baffles me.
  2. They have an entire year of data they didn't have. They have other players. I agree on pagan. Three years of outcomes should be plenty of data.
  3. How many times does he have to act badly without remorse for it to matter to you?
  4. No one is extending pitchers with five years of control left.
  5. Who would you extend? To be clear, you don't think this team is very good, but they should extend people?
  6. I really don't understand your argument.....they shouldn't sign an elite player because everyone else was hurt last year and they didn't win? Like, then, don't sign any FA? What is your argument? How else would you like them so spend the money this year, given NO ONE is left in FA? What are you arguing?
  7. If I'm a terrible team, I 100% take a chance on Enlow on the 40 man. Why not?
  8. Enlow likely gone. I'm baffled. They have others that have almost no upside on the f forty man. Also, imo, this shows they think they can win this year and makes me believe even more they aren't trading Kepler unless blown away.
  9. Those players are pretty rare and expensive. Free agency is a lot about paying guys past their prime due to the rules of the league.
  10. Would you deal Miranda or Lee in a big trade? They seem redundant.
  11. I don't think FO played themselves. In the history of the franchise, all the FOs combined have signed one big time deal, and he was traded after two years. This is on ownership, not the FO.
  12. the lack of patience with inexperienced players on this board is astounding to me. Or not, that's how people are I guess.
  13. Ya, your list is better. Varland, SWR, Wallner and Martin. Where is Lewis in this list? Unless he's hurt again, he'll be up.
  14. They have so few picks, they have to go D. 31st in points allowed.....
  15. Vazquez is signed for three years, not one. And, it's possible they thought they'd sign more guys when they signed him, and didn't succeed.
  16. You don't trust the new guys to start because they don't start so you sign a starter. You never trust these guys to start, then? If they trade a pitcher for a short term SS, that would be awful.
  17. It's a useless study with less data points than home runs Nick Gordon hit last year. The bye week data is much more useful
  18. Backing you up .... Teams have an overall losing record the last three years after their bye. That's an actual number of data points with statistical meaning. The SI study is garbage.
  19. That data is useless. So few data points and we don't know if those teams were favored or not
  20. One week off would make professionals rusty?
  21. Interesting. Did the study look at how they did compared to how they were expected to do, or just look at the outcome?
  22. It boggles the mind you don't think a week off would help their bodies. Not to mention the injury risk . .... Which you are ignoring.
  23. I'm advocating for them to rest their best players for the playoffs. They might win, they might lose. But they'll be healthy and rested.
  24. Meaningless if you lose game 1. To each their own. I want no more injuries, that's way more important than a hypothetical HMA in round 2. They are just as capable at home as on the road, imo.
×
×
  • Create New...