Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,302

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    337

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    The more I think about it.... They likely tried to do this trade last year, or similar, but Rogers got hurt. There was no way they were signing him if he was good this year, they just don't sign pitchers to expensive deals here. They dealt a very good RP with one year of control, and a corner bat that was stretched to play in the field. They got a former top prospect, who is only months older than Winder and others....and a flyer (imo) RP in return. They (I think) get a PTBNL also? Paddack is the number 4 starter on this roster (who might be the second best pitcher, or might fall off), with Archer / Bundy / Ober / Winder piggy backing, I'd guess. It is possible that Winder goes down, and Ober or / Bundy is viewed as a regular starter, but that's not what I'd do.
  2. Mike Sixel
    Rodgers. Rodgers. Rodgers. That's it. That's the whole post.
  3. Mike Sixel
  4. Mike Sixel
    BTW, Paddack is like 6 months older than Winder.....I hope we can stop talking about taking innings away from young players at the expense of old players....
  5. Mike Sixel
    There must be a heck of a PTBNL coming back? Otherwise, this seems odd to me.
  6. Mike Sixel
    That's what I'd do, so it probably won't happen....
  7. Mike Sixel
    I'll be shocked if he's on the roster that long.
  8. Mike Sixel
    To be clear, I don't LOVE the RPs.....I just think people's minds are clouded by the first two months.....
  9. Mike Sixel
    After July 4: 3rd in win probability added 14 in strikeouts 10th in strikeout percentages 13th in win loss record 7th in saves
  10. Mike Sixel
    After they got rid of their awful closer? I didn't watch enough other teams to say if they were about median or not......but I'm guessing everyone's brain is thinking about the whole year, not after they got rid of the man who they should not have signed. Much like Happ and Shoemaker leaving making the team better.... This team was around .500 after the disastrous start to the year, and people are really struggling to remember that given how badly the year went overall.
  11. Mike Sixel
    By several of the systems that use data, which I know you don't care about....and, as I've pointed out, they were top 10 after July 4 of last year. Did Rogers pitch in August or September?
  12. Mike Sixel
    They were projected as a top 10 bullpen going into the year.....that's thin?
  13. Mike Sixel
    If the Twins get a number 3 pitcher for 1 year of Rogers, that's a HUGE win for the Twins. Also, an ERA in the 3s is more like a number 2 these days.
  14. Mike Sixel
    By Bundy or Archer, you mean Bundy (actually, now? now I'd piggyback the two of them)
  15. Mike Sixel
    Also, the Twins were a top 10 bullpen after July 4 last year.....and have added a couple young, likely good, players to it.....
  16. Mike Sixel
    I'm not sure how I feel about the deal.... The Twins were not going to sign Rogers at the end of the year, most likely. Not unless he took a massive discount (why would he?). I never liked the Rooker draft, and don't think he can play D (I'd be ok with him at DH on a team that didn't have Sano). So, 1 year of Rogers and a guy that might or might not be a good hitter who can't play D (imo) given up. Paddack is intriguing. He had issues last year with his fastball. If those get fixed, and the other pitches stay the same, things will be very good with him. He's not some old reclamation project, as some here think. He's as young (give or take a year) as some of the Twins' prospects....I don't know boo about the RP, other than what I've read in the thread. The posts here blaming Rocco, or saying the FO doesn't have a plan.....I think you are wrong. They just have a different plan than you, or than you thought.....Also, when an opportunity arises, and you like it, you take it. That's much better than having some strict plan. I think I'm ok with this trade. Not a huge fan, not a hater. I don't think this team is a WS team with or without Rogers, so losing 1 year of a him probably is worth the gamble on Paddack.
  17. Mike Sixel
    Based on what? I think the pen is better than people think...
  18. Mike Sixel
    Agreed.
  19. Mike Sixel
    I think that's not enough for the twins....
  20. Mike Sixel
    I can promise I put effort into things not on a sport's message board....
  21. Mike Sixel
    Who says no? Rogers, Larnach, Sanchez San Diego catcher (any of their top three), Paddock, Hosmer, minor league player in the top ten...
  22. Mike Sixel
    Agreed. Gore hasn't thrown a strike in two years, apparently....
  23. Mike Sixel
    Did it actually matter? Really?
  24. Mike Sixel
    I doubt Rodgers is in the deal... But remember, the twins were a top ten bullpen in the second half last year.... Try to erase the early months from your minds...
  25. Mike Sixel
    Berrios was pretty good here, as was Pineda....
×
×
  • Create New...