Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,998

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    This has been Pagan for three years. It's time to realize the outcome does reflect the talent. He should not be on this roster. If you look at Bundy's starts, he's had a lot more good than bad starts.
  2. Mike Sixel
    I'm guessing Enlow will be a starter at the beginning of next year.
  3. Mike Sixel
    That's my thought, but then I'd have had guys to from the minors replacing Cave and Beckham awhile ago.... We know they're bad, take a shot.
  4. Mike Sixel
    That's where I am right now. Not 100% sure I'm confident, but that's what I'd do.
  5. Mike Sixel
    So, go into this year without Gray? Yikes. You have to give up talent to get talent. It was a good trade. I guess they could have punted this year, and not made the trade. That would have been safer for their jobs, I'd guess
  6. Mike Sixel
    I doubt he could be worse than Beckham at this point, or Cave. Why not try? Anyway, hope you are well.
  7. Mike Sixel
    And yet, Atlanta is doing it, rather than play obviously bad players. Twice this year.
  8. Mike Sixel
    Larnach scored very well defensively, because he throws very well, and he takes good routes. One system had him among the best OFers at holding runners. Larnach would be a massive improvement over Cave or Beckham.
  9. Mike Sixel
    That's what Atlanta has been doing.....
  10. Mike Sixel
    I wish the Twins were as aggressive as the Atlanta team, and would promote guys that might not be ready, but have futures and elite skills. The won't be "ruined" if the come up too soon and fail, but at least they'd have a chance to be good (Atlanta promoted at least two guys this year that were crushing AA, but hadn't even been there for 100 at bats.....).
  11. Mike Sixel
    Bundy has 6 bad starts where he went less than 5 innings. He has almost twice as many good starts as bad. He has zero good starts where he went less than 5......He has 7 where he went 5.1 or more innings. https://www.fangraphs.com/players/dylan-bundy/12917/game-log?position=P&season=
  12. Mike Sixel
    It won't be JRod.... The catcher from Baltimore will win.
  13. Mike Sixel
    The rookie of the year will be Rutshman. He's a catcher that plays great D and hits Miranda is like fifth on war.... All three are great additions to the twins. Posters here seem to forget Ryan is a rookie.
  14. Mike Sixel
    Which other pitcher was traded that was better, that they could get? Mahle wasn't some cheap, bad, pitcher.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Three good pitchers were traded. Two were possibly hurt, and one was too expensive. Those were the options, whether we like it or not. So, Mahle or ? Whether you wanted more or not isn't relevant to which starter was actually available. So, of the three, did you want one, or not? If so, which one? Castillo would cost Lewis, SWR and two more top five guys.
  16. Mike Sixel
    Only three good pitchers were traded, and two were potentially hurt, and they couldn't match what Seattle did. They tried to win, rather than sit still. I can't believe people wanted them to do nothing?
  17. Mike Sixel
    I count 13 good starts and 7 bad starts for Bundy. While I generally think fWAR makes sense, I think that pitchers are different every five days. Some days are good, some bad. I don't think you can peanut butter their play across the year like you can hitters. If you had been told you'd get 13 good and 7 bad starts from Bundy at the beginning of the year, you'd be thrilled. Very thrilled.
  18. Mike Sixel
    They've both been better than I thought. So, yes.
  19. Mike Sixel
    A lot less off days this year, due to the late start to the year. That said, I doubt he's starting a game in the post season, though if he did, four innings would be great
  20. Mike Sixel
    And Royce Lewis who is also in the top 100.
  21. Mike Sixel
    Because Verlander is a hall of fame pitcher that has shown he can go further into games. Not that it matters, he isn't signing here.
  22. Mike Sixel
    How is Contreras not on this list? I'd be very happy if they signed him, and I'm a Jeffers fan.
  23. Mike Sixel
    David Ortiz would like a word with you about hitting behind the runner.... And, sacrifice bunts are a terrible idea before the 8th inning. Terrible.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Who says it is?
  25. Mike Sixel
    There is no reason he should be on a contender's roster. I've lost faith in the front office over this, frankly.
×
×
  • Create New...