Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Cris E

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    1,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Cris E

  1. Have you seen what the Yankees are planning on running out there next year? JUDGE! and Hicks when he's healthy and Stanton when he's healthy and Bader and some kids. And let's be honest, Judge has some injury history as well, missing 50 games in 2018 and 60 in 2019. Kepler can field all the OF spots, might hit better with next year's rules, isn't expensive, is an adult so he won't be a distraction, and MN Twins fans are the only ones spoiled enough to want to get rid of him. Again, the whole league crashed last year, not just Kepler. He had his worst season, true, but it was a 93 OPS+. Who else did you want? Pollack from CHW had a 91 OPS+, Cleveland's Franmil Reyes was 73, KC's Hunter Dozier had a 90. Heck, Detroit's whole starting lineup only had one person ahead of him, and Kepler would have tied Baez for second at 93. A lot of teams would have been thrilled to be running Max out there.
  2. At this point I could see trading Kepler to NYY for IKF and some young arms.
  3. Move ahead with Vasquez at C, Go get Bassett and then call Correa back and tell him we're serious. I think he wants to see what sort of team he'll be on for a decade before signing. If there's time they can trade for someone to hit from the right side and mess around on calls regarding Kepler and Pagan.
  4. The top couple prospects in the Yankees' system are SS, so while Correa does fit their model for ultra-professional grown-ups (vs petulant disasters like Tatis) I think they have other ways to spend their money right now.
  5. The thing about these ultra-huge contracts is that the number of years is almost irrelevant. 8x$35m=$280m is not a ton different from 10 for $300m if you think about tossing a couple $10m years on the end of such a huge deal and how little $10m might be in 2032. I'd be comfortable telling him the $340m Lindor and Tatis deals are not going to be comps, and letting him go at that point if he presses the point. The Twins' roster is not awash with guys needing to make $15m or more so they can handle a $35m ticket without getting the vapors.
  6. The trick to trading Kepler at a point where his value is low is finding a team who REALLY believes in his chances for a bounce-back next year. Someone who is certain the death of the shift or a new home field will let him blossom, or at least find 2019 again. You're not going to hear teams saying something like that out loud in the papers, but if you talk to enough of them you'll get a couple who direct the conversation around to him to see if they can pick him up cheap. Sorting through those talks to get one GM hooked and eventually willing to pay what you want is the game in a deal for Max. Not sure that it's actually out there, but working your way through the other teams is what it'll take (unless TOR or MIA leap at him in talks for the guys we want to get.)
  7. Two points: PIT has been standing pat on Reynolds with a preposterously high asking price for a long time. It's well-established that they are happy to hang on to him for a while yet. But make a call anyway, throw some names around, listen for something unexpected to be said. They may be completely in love with Arreaez or something. It's not the best run franchise out there, you could get lucky. I wouldn't be averse to sending one of our Totally Awesome Except They're Always Hurt corner guys out for him.
  8. One thing that's changing next year that might work against MN luring FAs is the balanced schedule. Back in the day (ie last year) the competition was harsh on the coasts but CLE/CHW/MIN and CHC/STL/MIL got to beat up on the weak kids in the Centrals to get a ticket to the post-season. In the new world the Padres and Dodgers will be spending less time beating on each other and more time stalking the weak sisters in fly-over country. We'll still get a division spot, but there's little chance of a wild-card anymore. FAs that want a short trip to the post-season will be paying attention.
  9. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/12/twins-rumors-christian-vazquez-offer.html
  10. I think the big game shortstops are in a completely different category than the catcher search. Trading with OAK or TOR or picking up a lesser FA like Vazquez isn't going to change the budget around a $25-35m contract. A larger FA like a Rodon might have to wait until the big stuff is resolved, but a $8-12m catcher is going to fit easily. But regardless of what the Twins want, the people holding the papers on the big prizes (Boras, TOR, OAK) are going to draw things out a bit and let the market develop. As the pressure on team officials to Do Something keeps building in immoderate places like NY and BOS, there will come a point where someone just throws down to take the hand, and that's worth waiting for when you're the seller.
  11. Having a SS solution in place before you go shopping makes your initial bargaining position better (you're not sitting across the table from Boras desperate for a guy) and removes the danger of trying to nail something down in March. It's like eating before you go grocery shopping, just smart and helps avoid dumb purchases. I don't think they trade Gordon until Celestino proves he can actually play CF at the major league level. He showed some knuckleheaded moves on the basepaths, they did figure him out at the plate and he wasn't great about throwing to the right base, so there's substantial work to be done before he deserves a spot as large as Buxton's caddy.
  12. You can't trade, fix or pitch him if you let him walk, so step one was getting a contract on him. Opening day is months away, the 2023 roster is far from set at this point and the Falvine like to make moves. Just relax and let them work. The hubris they were being accused of in this thread is in every front office in the league and makes Pagan valuable. People will come asking for him: he's got a 96mph fastball with life, a 20 save season under his belt, he'll take the ball 60 times a season and he's a good guy in clubhouse and is good with the media. Teams value that.
  13. All the incentives in Maedas's contract are around starting. His contract is 8/$25m so his base salary isn't high but he gets more for starts and innings pitched. Moving to the pen is going to cost him half his paycheck and he will be cranky, as would any of us. Contract Notes: Innings Pitched Bonus $250,000 each for: 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200 Games Started Bonus $1M each for: 15, 20, $1.5M each for 25, 30, 32 Trade Assignment Bonus: $1M Opening Day Roster Bonus: $150,000 Per 2/9/20 trade, Dodgers retain $10M (assumed to be 2020-2022 salary + trade bonus)
  14. Dave Winfield, 15 minute King of the GWRBI. Long Live the King!
  15. Coaching major league players is hard because it takes a high level of achievement and a high level of confidence to reach an MLB roster, and both of those things make it hard to yield control of what works to an outsider to make changes. I have no idea how coaches, especially the younger ones or outsiders, can get through to players who have had success in the past but need to make changes today. Breaking through has to be an exercise in psychology as much as anything.
  16. I was kind of hoping he'd get it at first base, like the gold glove nomination. Those 8 hr would have looked sweeeet up there next to all those stats from previous winners.
  17. If he was staying in a similar role you can say all that crap, but he left pro ball to join an industry on a completely different seasonal schedule. He had been a college guy before, he tried the pros, and then he returned to his roots where he'd had success and was making a boxcar load of cash. I don't think he owes you anything, and I don't think anybody else is holding him to your noble standards, and by all accounts that includes the pitchers he'd been working with. They all said the supportive and encouraging things, and there was no hint of anonymous sources bitching about it when he left.
  18. Even if Colome and Pagan had been effective and stayed in the Closer With A Captiol C role in 2022 it was the smart play because Duran was the better pitcher and was moved around to the hot spots rather than relegated to the ninth.
  19. This is great work, and not just because I agree with your underlying premise. If I'm Falvine I spent all my time since last spring digging into injury risk factors and trying to figure out how to keep the guys I have on the field and how to identify the individuals or types of players that are likely to have trouble. This was ridiculous, but it'll happen again if we have the same guys do the same things. For every freak HBP injury there were a bunch of recurring things that felt kind of avoidable: hamstrings, core, weak shoulders, etc. It's not related to us either, as many teams lost a lot of time to injury this year. NYY were a hot mess for a bunch of the summer, to name just one. Some of this might have just been poor prep due to the lockout, but that's not what you hang your hat on after a year like 2022. And in a way you can tell they were thinking this way since they did fire and hire the trainer about as quickly as possible once the year ended. It'll be interesting to see what they do for new acquisitions. Correa has a history of injury and Bogaerts has been a rock, for example. (And they both have Boras as rep so it'll be easy to work with both of them. Ha!)
  20. I have been pretty easy on the front office regarding 2022 because of the preposterous number of injuries. Most of their plans were shredded early and the year devolved into patching and promoting pretty quickly. BUT they did plan a rotation around Bundy and Archer and at least one youngster (Grey, Ryan, Archer, Bundy, kids) and that was always going to put a load on the pen. Even in a world where Archer and Bundy slowly grow strong and healthy there should have been a lot more structure around the swing role for the first half of the season. Those guys never improved, just kept slinging 4+ innings of decent starts, but the pen never changed to cover that many innings. The Falvine can wear that part of the outcomes as a direct result of not designing innings 4-6..
  21. People don't get pressed into starting without being stretched out first. Otherwise you just get a bullpen game and they don't need to go to the minors to find that. Winder has always been a starter, and a good one, but he's had some injury problems recently. I think they should let him start until he proves he can't before making him into a reliver. It's harder to find good starters than relievers and he's been on a great path so far, so let him grow.
  22. + The Twins were not doing what the others were doing regardless of what they had planned. The Twins had 14 different people start games, including seven who made between 1 and 5 starts. Many of them were not MLB-quality guys, either callow youth or waiver wire refugees, who were covering for an injury hole. Even their good starters all hit the DL at one or more points and needed to work themselves back to full strength. The plans were in tatters by April 1.
  23. Hedges hits like me, and I bat sixth on our softball team. He cannot be an option. Find someone who can pretty much play both ways but don't insist on outstanding in either. Jeffers is OK doing what he does well and we need someone who can cover for what he doesn't do well. That means find someone who can hit RH pitching and control the running game a little. These people exist: Murphy, Jansen, Vasquez to name a few. Just go get one, and don't dilly dally or they'll all be gone.
  24. https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/2022-starter-pitching.shtml The MLB-wide IP/GS was 5.2 innings. The Astros led everyone at 5.9 and the Twins were below average at 4.7, but not as far below as some seem to imply. That half inning below average is two outs, so not a ton different from the rest of baseball. What was really different was that we had our 12th and 22nd and 33rd best pitchers out there more than just about every other team and anyone's 30th pitcher is almost always going to be terrible or unprepared. There were plenty of arms in the plans for 2022 that were largely missing: Maeda, Alcala, Stashak, and big acquisitions Mahle and Paddack only made a hand full of starts. They have the bones of a good bullpen: Duran, Lopez, Thielbar, Jax and Moran are good pitchers. Pick through some of the kids, only use Pagan before the seventh and maybe re-sign Fulmer and you could be a swingman or two away from adequacy without changing too much. Mostly things hinge on being able to limit your staff to the top 15-20 guys in the org rather than finding 38 arms to run out there.
  25. Sano is a DH and pinch hit candidate, not a full player anymore. If he can get his bat back and stay healthy he may get to put on the big glove again, but I'm not holding my breath. If he doesn't have a huge spring training he should expect to spend some time at AAA before he gets a chance at wearing a varsity uniform for anyone any time soon. Pagan sounds smart, is upfront and honest when interviewed, has had success in the past and still throw mid-90s, He will get more chances. I'm with @weitz41 and would sign him to a sixth inning contract and let him try to work his way into later inning roles. He was over-exposed last year but is still better than a lot of those nameless itinerants that appeared in 2022. (ChiChi who?) My question is about Maeda. He was sent away from the Dodgers because he wanted to start and they thought he wasn't healthy enough to handle to the load. We got him and let him start, and everyone was right because he was very good and promptly broke down hard. His contract is still based around a lot of starting incentives so he's going to hate moving to the pen, but I think he'll be more effective and more likely to finish the season if he stays in the 7th-8th inning role.
×
×
  • Create New...