Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Richie the Rally Goat

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    10,588
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Richie the Rally Goat

  1. I agree on the ridiculous nature and the impact on the fans, but my opinion is this is more of an unprepared MLB, than the Twins going back on their word. in reading between the lines, if the MLB did indeed put pressure on the Twins to take a 1 year deal, it’s because they (MLB) weren’t ready to launch their own streaming package, this current outcome was the best of a bad situation for the Twins. who is going to invest in all the capital expense, cameras and computers, hire all the crew, setup all the infrastructure to broadcast a 162 game season for 1 year? Only Bally because they already had the cash spent on the capital and they didn’t have to set it up from scratch. It was already depreciated out. any competitive bid had to be a multi year deal because ESPN or local Tv station would have had to pay off the capital expense, or… “hey we’ll do a 1 year deal, but you have to pay the out year costs”. my opinion was the MLB was the Twins stop-gap as a stand-alone, but because they would be the only team involved, it might have been really low dollars because of the associated costs the mlb would incur.
  2. @John Bonnes great spot on Fox 9. Excellent last point on the payroll!
  3. Also, if you’re in-range 830 WCCO is streaming the game.
  4. That was my assumption too, but usually that’s when I get proven wrong.
  5. Martin and Castro in the OF is interesting
  6. 100% agreed, I thought James was well reasoned, and he fits with the OP, but I disagree with him, on the history and his qualms with WAR. its not a perfect metric, but its good, and more importantly its easy and accessible. baseball has always been a stat heavy sport, from the earliest days. Our stats have become more complex with access to computers, but keeping the box scores in the paper books, scouting reports… it’s all analysis of data with the tools you have.
  7. I would also guess The Celsius, which is right around the corner and equally “sus”
  8. The great Bill James weighs in: https://www.billjamesonline.com/judge_and_altuve/
  9. Also… I like fangraphs, and it’s my go-to, but baseball-reference has a glossary too https://www.baseball-reference.com/about/ https://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained.shtml
  10. 100% agree on context being extremely important. Sample size is key on any metric, and comparing apples to apples. So WAR isn’t helpful at all for current season in April, I bristle seeing it quoted in May, but when you’re coming up on half a season and discussing trade deadline, it can be useful. As others have mentioned, WAR is a cumulative stat, so I usually try to pair it with rate stats, to try to bring context. Hitters: OPS is my go to. Pitchers, I like WHIP. I tend to measure fielding separately, baseball savant outs above average (also a cumulative stat). Is a nice comparison.
  11. https://library.fangraphs.com/misc/war/ “You should always use more than one metric at a time when evaluating players, but WAR is all-inclusive and provides a useful reference point for comparing players.”
  12. Agreed on the Guardians and Rangers. Being in-line with bankruptcy court gave them a significant lever in the tv contract negotiation. Hard to say how many suitors the Twins had, but according to the Athletic article DSP was quoted in, in his usual very vague terms it sounded like The MLB was pressuring the Twins to take a 1 year TV only deal. I would imagine that might significantly limit the negotiation leverage for the Twins.
  13. Forbes isn’t “Fact”. Forbes is a publication that tries to turn wealthy people into celebrities by sharing information those wealthy people want to share. It’s not GAAP audited financial filings for the SEC on publicly traded companies, it’s estimates
  14. Correct, but he’s not a manager. He doesn’t make decisions about how the Twins are run. He’s an instrument just like the players are. Buxton, Correa, Provus, none of them set the budget, or have any insight, they repeat what they are told and share their opinions.
  15. I’m super excited about this team, and I think the complementary bullpen pieces brought in by the FO were good moves to solidify a very good top end of the pitching staff. The Twins may never again field as good of a team as appear poised to field for 2024, and that they didn’t push their chips in to make the two big moves that would transition them from post season contenders to World Series favorites is a horrible shame reminiscent of 2009 and 2010. they hid behind a bs excuse about a TV contract that they knew they were getting something. They didn’t know about Amazon, but they knew they were getting something from the MLB, or some TV contract, and they knew 2025 was going to net them some amount in the MLB grand scheme. im not pissed off about the money, I’m pissed off about the ownership’s plan to be conservative!
  16. Agreed, how I think of it is… If the FO/Ownership had framed it as “we believe the core is in place, and we’re going to supplement it with complementary pieces” it would have been true, given the impression of lower spending, without pegging the payroll to income. Pegging it to income made it a lie when they signed the Tv deal but still didn’t spend it.
  17. Quoted below is DSP from the Athletic, bolding is mine: “That said, it’s not a perfect outcome for anyone. It’s a one-year deal for us. Some of it was in our control, much of it was out of our control. Some of it is a product of the bankruptcy system. And as we think about it from our perspective, it’s a balancing act. You balance economics, distribution and production quality, and local priorities vs. national priorities.” I heard one of the talking heads, maybe Gleeman have a theory about this means the MLB is trying to launch a streaming service with all of the teams that were on Bally for 2025 and the League was pressuring the Twins to accept a 1 year deal without streaming rights. if this is the case, they were likely hamstrung in negotiations
  18. Agreed, no way ERod’s clock starts in 2024 unless they absolutely have to, which means Buxton, Martin, Kiersey, and Prato were all together in a fiery car accident during spring training. Brock Stewart should be the primary setup man for Duran. Why the heck would a top 25 starting pitcher with a 3.5 ERA who threw 144 innings last year get moved to the bullpen for two guys each with a 5 ERA? If Ober isn’t the number 3 starter in the rotation, it’s because he’s the number 2, number 1 due to injury, or he’s on the IL himself.
  19. Agreed! And if Santana actually is a leader in the field/at the plate, something went horribly wrong
  20. Lopez 185 innings 3.5 era 1.15 WHIP Ober 170 innings 3.7 era 1.1 WHIP Ryan 180 innings 3.9 era 1.15 WHIP A very optimistic yet possible outcome, all top 20 pitchers, still the best top 3 rotation in all of baseball
  21. in WHIP and K/BB they’ve shown ability to deliver extremely good results at limiting base runners. Home runs tend to vary widely, but keeping runners off the path is a great recipe for success. im bought-in on top 3. If López, Ryan, and Ober are in the 180ish innings, Paddack can get 100 innings and DeSclafani doesn’t throw 100 innings, I very much believe this rotation is as advertised. Health is key, I think it’s possible
  22. I agree, by rate stats Ober was a top 25ish starting pitcher. He’d have been a front of rotation starter on a bad rotation.
  23. Ugh is the right word! is Paddack or DeSclafani injured/setback? I’d rather have Festa or Raya in the rotation than either of those two, but starting the season with them might be too quick.
×
×
  • Create New...