Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Hawkeye Bean Counter

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Hawkeye Bean Counter

  1. Have you looked at the lineups? In general 7-8 minor leaguers, maybe 1-2 name hitters, the odd game where 4-6 big leaguers. As to the pitchers, primarily bull pen games. Also the pitchers are working on pitches, not what they can do well. I do not know, but I am guessing Topa is working on something, also getting a homerun or two, inflates the states in a SSS. Lets look at the positives: 1. Buxton - Looks healthy looks to be swinging well, and running well. Homers and triples, sign me up. 2. Correa - looks heathy. Buxton and Correa as top 30 players if they stay healthy should really be a big help. 3. Julien - Looks to be replicating last year. 4. Ober - wants to take over the #2 role. His stuff is nasty. 5. Varland - may take over the 5 spot and not give it up. No major injuries. Only real set back is to Disco. We will see if he can give us some innings this year or not and how successful he is. I will be keeping an eye on Kepler and Wallner. However for now, I am very pleased with spring training. This team will be very very good. 93-96 W is my guess.
  2. I am a big Kepler fan, I also think he has figured something out. In 21 at bats so far, and a .693 OPS he is not quite showing it. Granted, he may be trying to work on something. I am beginning to think he may be a player that takes a while to get in a groove and once there does well. How quickly can he get to that point this year. .700 is still better than what he did last spring, but I want him in the .800 to .900 range this year.
  3. Petty was having elbow soreness last year so they took it easy. He has also dialed back on his fastball and now averaging in the 92-94 range. He is still a very good pitcher shown by top 100 status, but the ceiling is coming down a bit. As to the Twins philosophies, I think they like the high upside of high school pitchers generally in the late 1st til about 3rd round - I feel last year was an exaggeration due to how deep the draft was and the fact the Questad was willing to signing for $500k. You add in the fact we had a relatively empty pipeline when they got here it is not surprising they went more to the college pitching route to try and boost the pipeline more quickly with more developed pitchers. Early reports on Soto look good. I am looking forward to game action from him. He is fresh ball of clay with an arm that doesn't have a ton of mileage which is good and has some downside in that we don't know how much of a workload it can handle. With his body type I am not too worried, he appears to be very well put together. The pitching side of the farm is something I am very excited about. I think there are a lot of quality arms at all levels and the cream will start to rise to the top.
  4. The Twins take on pitchers with questionable health, like a Desclafani, because they are getting them either for free, at a major discount. Disco for $4 million even if he blows out his arm will not make or break our season. For $4 million he could be a significant depth piece. I am disappointed, his spring has been slowed down, and he hasn't been able to work on his new pitches as much. This pretty much guarantees that Red Sox will be signing one of the 2 remaining big pitchers remaining and throwing more money at the problem. Damn Giolito went from guaranteed of a top dollar contract, to taking a 2 year prove it deal, to likely looking like a Paddack type pitcher you are hoping can get healthy again.
  5. But we should be worried we don't have a #2 . . . . . . . . This is tongue and cheek. We just need health in our starters and this has the potential to be just as strong or even slightly better than last year.
  6. Do we though? Did Arizona have one? Did Texas have one? And are we sure we already don't have someone that could fill the void? I think I would rather have Paddack than Gray in a 1 and done playoff scenario. He did better in the postseason than Gray albeit in a different role.
  7. Noah Miller has the potential if the bat comes along, to be a key piece in an organization. However we got an outfield and flipped prospects for someone who has a high ceiling as well but a much lower floor, as Miller could be your defensive shortstop/no bat player right now.
  8. The team is B+, A-, Management B to B+, Front Office C- to D, The front office gave the management the freedom to sign Correa last year as a a 1 year higher salary with the realization they wouldn't have any big money for this year. I am ok with that, especially considering next year will be much higher. We have a nicely constructed team, and tons of assets on the farm. Right now, what version of Disco we get will be a big determination on this year. If we get the 2021 or early 2023 version it will be very good and if Paddack performs well be may actually have a better pitching staff than last year. However we got Disco as a throw in because of the elbow, and he was already shut down for 2 days and ramping back up. I feel good he is ramping back up, but I don't have high confidence he can get through the year.
  9. Brecht lines up with what they like, elite slider excellent fastball.
  10. He has a high ceiling but he is right around where we would take him and there would be a ton of variability. If teams see him as a reliever (a 2 pitch pitcher), Joyce was selected in the third round. It all comes down to his stats his year. He is closer to a 3 ERA he will get drafted top 10. His ERA is in the 4's he is likely a 20 to 30 pick. Its no different than last year Dollander dropping from consensus #1 pick to #9. I don't follow the draft early that much but he is definitely a player I am keeping tabs on. The draft
  11. It doesn't have to make it better than last year (even though it could) it just has to make it better than it currently is. He is an option that has the ability to not only to hold up if called upon, but possibly excel. I love Miller more than most think he was turning it around, however we got a prospect that is currently at a similar level rank wise as Miller with a much higher offensive ceiling. It a real question who is the better prospect. This trade is going to be determined by luck and whether either one is able to get to the big leagues.
  12. He's not lost his stuff just isn't quite good enough or deceptive enough to be a strikeout machine. He becomes a much more effective pitcher if he can limit the amount of balls put in play and remove some variability of babip. He is a solid #3 or #4 pitcher if healthy with potential of #2 type results. For $4 million its worth the risk.
  13. He is an effective Major leaguer if his velocity on the fastball is between 93 and 94.5. I do question if he loses much deceptiveness with the different arm slot or not. I don't think it will. I think the increased velocity, with his pitch mix will pay dividends.
  14. Desclafani has some things to work on but he knows it. Im hoping one of the pitches click. I think you have a 4 ERA player with out a swing and miss pitch. I think you have a #2 pitcher if he can find that strike out pitch. “I’m trying to dial in a swing-and-miss pitch,” DeSclafani said. “I think that’s something I’m in desperate need of.” In that regard, he’s toying with two new offerings that he has workshopped this offseason: a new sweeper that won’t replace his cutter but aim to act as more of a swing-and-miss pitch, and a split changeup with more depth to replace his traditional changeup, which got a paltry 15% whiff rate last season. It’s been a mixed bag so far, with the quality of those pitches worse in camp than they had been during his offseason development, DeSclafani said.
  15. I am saying something fundamentally changed with Miller last full. No different than I think something fundamentally changed with Kepler last fall as well. The difference with Miller was his zone discipline improved immensely. He began walking much more, improving batting average, and beginning to get a tad more power. His OBP in July through August were .321, .354, .365. That is a player that is showing improvement. Now it is A+ ball. Understood. He is also 21, no offense I don't care what he did as an 18 an 19 year old. I care what he is going to do. He had a .648 OPS last year. His first 3 months he had an OPS of .550. His last 3, had an OPS of .750, and if you looked at just his last 2 months he had an OPS of .790. In the majors really only needs to be a low .700 number or high .600. However, yes I do see where he could be an .800 guy.
  16. I don't agree with that take. He had .823 OPS in August of last year and effectively helped lead the team to the championship last year. The question is can he continue to improve is plate discipline as he did last year. An .800 OPS player with his defense is a very valuable piece.
  17. This trade bites us if Miller becomes a competent bat. I personally think he does. However if you were going to trade him, this is the year after the fall he had. It appears you picked up a similar prospect so effectively Margot as a throw in for a year. So it comes down to who is the better prospect - Miller or Doncon. Doncon is younger, but likely a better bat, but Miller can be your no bat defensive utility player now. He has the chance of developing to be slightly below average bat with elite defense. From what it appears Dodgers were instigating this trade to open a spot for Kike. So ultimately I think the Twins got the better end of this trade. Will have to wait and see.
  18. Damn, that sucks. Said it many times I really liked Noah Miller. Margot is a decent backup outfielder. Hopefully Doncon shows something. I don't know much about him other than he is 20 years old. Curious where he would rank in our prospect rankings.
  19. At the same token what did he say??? Nothing about a specific person, he said we are not in the market for 30 million/year players. We are looking at less expensive options. In a nutshell that is what was stated. They have no case since he did not call out a specific player. At best a minor fine. They will just say, don't do that again, I was on the right track on saying we will look at any opportunity and then just blurted out No LOL.
  20. Im wondering if this is a AAA signing.
  21. Ive been following mariners podcast since the trade. They have stated effectively, nothing was off the table, but they did not want to trade their starting 5. They have loved their offseason with constraints that were very similar to the Twins.
  22. Brody Brecht, Hawkeye, currently a top 15-25 prospect is a player I am going to be watching that could be someone the Twins target. Fastball gets up to 102, very very good slider and then questionable control. He went 6 innings yesterday against auburn 2 runs, 11 SO. 60 strikes in 100 pitches. Better than his slightly better than 50% strike rate in his first outing. He is one that could climb into the top 10, but I think 20-30 range is where he ends up.
  23. Everything I read was they had no intention of trading either unless a severe overpay and they could use it to help this years team. Their strength is SP, they wanted to keep that up, and fill in their lineup through other maneuvers.
×
×
  • Create New...