Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

arby58

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by arby58

  1. There are so many variables to weigh in coming up with an asset ranking like this - length of time to the majors versus there and years of team control, position of need, injury history, ceiing and floor, etc. It's a pretty subjective process. It's been interesting to compare these rankings to those from the Baseball Trade Simulator, which engages in a similar exercise for each MLB team's assets. They're higher than these rankings on both Tait and Zebby, about the same for Wallner and Lewis, and lower for Festa.
  2. Give him a break for last year, with a hip injury. Besides, he's never thrown that hard but had good results. Lots of pitchers (see Joe Ryan for the Twins, Greg Maddox and Mark Buerhle elsewhere) do well without throwing more than 95 mph on average.
  3. I do think that Ober gets undervalued, so I agree with Steamer. Interestingly, so does the Baseball Trade Value Simulator. It gives Ober a positive trade value of 21.0 - which is 9th highest among Twins assets. He's had some nice years, and last year was an injury-plagued year.
  4. Nicely researched (or recalled). I'd forgotten about Herbie (and I'm old enough to remember his rookie year). He had an excellent 1982 for the Twins after being in A ball in 1981 - 591 PAs, 82 runs, 23 HRs, 92 RBI and an .848 OPS. The Twins would gladly take that from any of their up-and-coming rookies.
  5. Assuming Kaelen Culpepper is with the Twins in 2026 (since he's not on this list), it seems highly unlikely/implausible that Houston debuts with the Twins in September 2026. When was the last time a Twins minor leaguer made the jump from high A one year to the majors the next? About the only one I can think of is Zebby Matthews, but the Twins starting pitching was decimated when that happened in late 2024.
  6. It's hard for a pitcher to change mechanics in the middle of a season - particularly when you're also dealing with a nagging hip issue. My guess/hope is Ober/Twins staff are aware of this and will fiddle with things in the offseason or spring training.
  7. He did - and the slugging percentage was similar from A+ to AA to AAA. Pretty impressive for 5'11" and 165 pounds.
  8. A similar 'top 10' of Twins trades would be interesting. The Tovar trade was a good one, as was, obviously, the Cruz for Ryan trade. I'd still put the Pierzynski for Nathan, Liriano, and Bonser as number one. The Shannon Stewart trade was also excellent.
  9. From the comments so far, a lot of wannabe commedians who definitely should not quit their day jobs.
  10. Hope or hype or something in between? I'm not sold yet on Hill - far too many walks, and the step up to A+ wasn't pretty. A good year in 2026 at Cedar Rapids could change that, and he'll just turn 20 on Christmas day. Emma is an enigma wrapped in a riddle. Can he ever stay healthy? Quite frankly, at this point, I'm more pumped by Gonzalez - IF he can repeat last year's performance, he should be at Target field later in 2026. Finally, there is Walker Jenkins. Agree he looks the part of a bona fide big league star, but the lack of HR power in the minors is something of a concern. At 6'3" 210 I would have expected more than 10 HRs last year (or 6 the year before). Still a lot of questions to be answered.
  11. There was a similar column at the start of last season extolling the team's starting pitching depth and suggesting using that in a trade for a position player(s). Then Lopez and Ober went down, and then Festa went down . . . so much for starting pitching depth. Ober is coming off a poor year, his velocity is down, and he's 30 - he's not bringing anything back of note. Better for the Twins to work to bring him back to past form. I still don't understand the general disdain for SWR. Other than Ryan, he was their best starting pitcher last year - 22 starts, 4.04 ERA, 7-4 record, about a K per inning, and he's only 25 years old, inexpensive, and controllable. I don't care if he's out of options, I'm putting him in the starting rotation at the start of the year and keeping him there. As for the rest, they will necessarily need depth, and none of the others has stood out enough to get much in return anyway.
  12. Steve Adams at Baseball Trade Rumors isn't high on Vientos. In a question in his mailbag from a Mets fan and 'trade, start, bench' for three players he responded: "I don't think any of the ...three (Vientos, Maurico, Acuna) are all that likely to be big league regulars, but I prefer Vientos' bat to the other two." Sort of damning with faint praise, as he finished with "Also doubt any of Vientos, Maurico or Acuna is more than a complementary part of trade package at this juncture. No one is giving up much to acquire them."
  13. McCarty wasn't a kid in his first job - he was 23 years old his rookie year with the Twins. It's not like Kelly didn't give him a chance - he had 371 plate appearances his first year and produced a .542 OPS and 46 OPS+ for a -2.7 WAR. McCarty bounced around a lot - also played for the Giants, Mariners, Royals, Rays, A's, and Red Sox, and he missed two entire seasons. His first six MLB seasons, he never had an OPS+ higher than 79 - as a first baseman. As his manager, I wouldn't have liked him much either.
  14. Actually, Duran was good right out of the gate. His first season was 2.0 WAR, 1.86 ERA, 0.975 WHIP, and 89 Ks in just under 67 innings. Nearly as good the next year as well. I'd take those stats for any first year relief pitcher every time. Jax' first year as a relief pitcher was also pretty good. He had a 1.0 WAR, 3.36 ERA, 1.051 WHIP, and 78 Ks in just over 72 innings.
  15. Duran, Jax, and Varland are just the latest in a long line of Twins relief pitchers that were converted starting pitchers. Some of their stellar predecessors were Eddie Guardado, Rick Aguillera, Glen Perkins, Latroy Hawkins, and Joe Nathan. About the only decent 'relief pitcher only' pitchers they've developed in recent years were Ryan Pressly and Taylor Rodgers. They've got plenty of promising arms in the minors. My bet is on at least two of Raya, Festa, and Prielipp playing important roles in the bullpen.
  16. This is a somewhat different debt story from what I have seen elsewhere, which is that the debt was largely from non-baseball real estate losses (albeit tied to COVID). As a finance professional, this seems more plausible - if the $300-$500 million debt is accurate, it would be hard to rack that up because of 'continuing to pay players and staff' during COVID. Yes, the lost TV revenue was an issue, but they also reduced payroll in the aftermath. I'm still betting a lot of the debt is non-baseball-related businesses.
  17. That's simply not true - review the game logs. He played in 37 games. Game 2, 2/4; Game 6, 1/4; Game 10, 1/3; Game 11, 2/3; Game 12, 1/1; Game 15, 1/3; Game 16, 1/3; Game 17, 1/4; Game 18, 1/4; Game 23, 2/3; Game 25, 2/3; Game 26, 2/3; Game 27, 2/3; Game 30 1/4; Game 32, 1/4; Game 34, 2/3. Yes, he had a nice stretch games 23-27, but he also had a nice stretch games 10-15 and ok Games 30-34. He did finish the year on an 0 for 10 stretch, but what player hasn't?
  18. Arraez had a .292 batting average last year, and a .327 OBP. OBP 'overcomplicates' things? That's nonsense logic - getting on base is a key part of scoring runs. Bell had a .237 batting average and a .325 OBP. In essence, they were on base about the same percentage of the time. Are you seriously suggesting that Arraez was as valuable offensively when 77% of his hits were singles, and only 4% were HRS, compared to Bell's 64% singles and 20% HRs? Math is beautiful too, and baseball has lots of math imbedded in it.
  19. I don't understand why people aren't giving Jackson credit for a pretty good 2025. The Twins don't need to 'fix' him, they just need him to continue to perform at his 2025 level.
  20. Career, yes, but not last year. Granted, it was only 100 plate appearances, but Jackson had an OPS+ of 111, an OPS of .763. He also had 5 HRs and scored 17 runs - that's pretty efficient production. Vasquez, in contrast, had an OPS+ of 52, OPS of .545. He also had more than double the plate appearances (214) yet scored fewer runs (14) and hit fewer HRs (3). Last year, really no comparison.
  21. I don't 'get' all the complaining about advanced analytics - you look under the hood at what are acknowledged as the great players, and their underlying analytics are similarly great. What about Arraez' performance stands out to you? The .292 BA last year? It only translated into 66 runs scored - that's about as many as Trevor Larnach last year, and Larnach had far fewer plate appearances.
  22. Why? Arraez' OPS+ last year was 99, Bell's was 110. Arraez' 'advantage' is a higher batting average that supposedly translates into OBP - except last year it wasn't. Arraez was .327, and Bell was .325. Arraez doesn't run well, so all those singles take a lot of additional effort to translate into runs. Arraez last year had 675 plate appearances and scored 66 runs - a run per 10.2 platea appearances. Bell had 533 and scored 54 - a run for every 9.9 plate appearances. OK, so maybe all those hits drive in runs? Bell actually had 2 RBIs more than Arraez in far fewer plate apperances. Then there is the difference in HRs - Bell had 22 versus Arraez' 8 in far less plate appearances. I 'get' that people like to watch him battle against pitchers, but the one thing he should do is score runs - and he doesn't really do all that well in that category.
  23. I guess I'm missing your point. You have both Keaschall and Lee starting for the Twins, and Wallner most certainly is next year as well. So 3 out of 4? Seems pretty good odds. If you were expecting them all to be superstars, then your world is different than mine.
  24. He was the Twins minor league player of the year - and the OP is talking about trading into the same posiiton AND giving up our best starting pitcher to do it. If I'm doing that, I want it to a position where we don't have an heir apparent, and that is 1B or Catcher.
  25. If Culpepper is expected to be ready in late 2026 or 2027, what is the point of trading Ryan for a 'near ready middle infielder? I'm not even sure a very good/major league ready middle infielder would be my target IF the Twins were to trade Ryan (and recent events suggest they are not). I'd be looking for a young 1B 'thumper' or catcher.
×
×
  • Create New...