Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Why I'm Choosing to Believe in Tom Pohlad This Offseason

    Twins fans have every reason to doubt the Pohlads. But Tom Pohlad has given me enough reason to believe this offseason could be different.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins are heading into an offseason with no shortage of questions, but perhaps none is bigger than the one that has followed this organization for years: How much money will the team spend? That question has become almost impossible to separate from any discussion about the Twins' offseason plans. Fans look at the top of the free-agent class and immediately cross off many names, because they assume the Pohlad family won't pay for them. Every potential trade eventually comes back to salary. Every roster need comes with the question of whether ownership will actually provide the money necessary to address it. That's why Tom Pohlad's comments at Monday's end-of-season press conference were so interesting. He didn't give a specific payroll number, but he was about as direct as a Twins owner has ever been about the organization's willingness to spend.

    "The approach we’re going to take this offseason is strictly about what our strategy is, and I have said over and over that a $100 million payroll or anything close to that is not sufficient to be consistently competitive and in the playoffs, and so we intend to take the offseason and meaningfully invest," Pohlad said. "I know everybody in this room wants me to define what 'meaningfully' is, and I understand that that’s a subjective word. But I am confident that Jeremy Zoll, if he has conviction about a move that’s going to improve this roster and help us accomplish our goals, that this ownership group is prepared to support him with the financial resources he needs."

    The quote has understandably been divisive among Twins fans. Some fans heard an owner finally saying the things they have wanted to hear for years. Others heard another Pohlad making another promise and immediately thought, "I'll believe it when I see it." Honestly, I understand both reactions. If your immediate response to that quote was skepticism, there is plenty of history behind it.

    Tom Pohlad is not the first Pohlad to own the Twins, and that family history is a huge reason why fans have such a difficult time trusting anything the organization says about payroll. Carl Pohlad, Jim Pohlad and Joe Pohlad all had their own versions of the same ownership philosophy, at least in the eyes of many Twins fans. The organization has consistently operated with financial limitations, and fans have repeatedly watched the Twins pass on opportunities to spend at the top of the market. Joe Pohlad's comments following the 2024 season are a perfect example. When asked about payroll in an interview with WCCO, he said, "If we have a winning product, regardless of what our payroll is, I think fans will come out." He also said he wasn't going to get into payroll at that point, while promising the Twins would have a better product the following season. A year earlier, he famously talked about the organization needing to "right-size our business." Those comments fit the perception Twins fans had developed over decades. When a Pohlad talked about payroll, the conversation was either vague or focused on financial restraint.

    That's why I can't blame anyone for looking at Tom Pohlad's comments and refusing to believe them. He has the same last name as the people who came before him, and the Twins have spent years giving fans reasons to be skeptical. There's nothing wrong with wanting to see the money actually spent before deciding that this time is different. Talk is cheap, and the Twins have had plenty of it over the years. But I'm going to do something a little different this offseason. I'm going to believe Tom Pohlad.

    I'm not suddenly a Pohlad apologist. I've been as critical of the ownership group as anyone, and I'm certainly not willing to declare that Tom Pohlad has already proven he is going to run this organization differently. What I'm willing to do is give him a chance to prove that he is different, because there are some legitimate reasons to think this Pohlad might not simply be a carbon copy of the ones who came before him.

    The first reason is the obvious one: Tom Pohlad talks about the Twins very differently than the previous Pohlads did. That doesn't mean words are enough, because they aren't, but the difference is difficult to ignore. Compare Monday's comments to Joe Pohlad's comments following the 2024 season. Joe wouldn't even get into a payroll number. Tom Pohlad volunteered that a $100 million payroll is not enough to consistently compete and make the playoffs. Joe talked about having a better product. Tom talked about "meaningfully invest." Joe talked about the business. Tom talked about giving Zoll the financial resources necessary to make moves he has conviction in.

    We've also heard Tom Pohlad say that he is a "go big or go home" guy. We've heard him say that he would invest in the team at the trade deadline if the Twins were in the playoff mix. We've heard him speak much more confidently about what he believes this organization needs to do to compete. Maybe all of that will ultimately amount to nothing, but it's certainly not the same messaging Twins fans have heard from the Pohlad family for the past several decades. This is a Pohlad talking about spending with a level of confidence and specificity that we haven't heard before.

    The second reason I'm willing to believe him is that we've already seen Tom Pohlad follow through on one of his promises. Just as the 2026 season began, Pohlad said that if the Twins were in the playoff mix at the time of the trade deadline, he would be aggressive and invest further in the team at that time. When the deadline arrived, the Twins were indeed in the playoff mix, and Pohlad did exactly what he said he would do. The Twins didn't sit on their hands or make a token addition. They were aggressive, adding multiple players and taking on significant money (by Minnesota Twins standards) in the process.

    The A.J. Minter trade was the clearest example of that. The Twins took on Minter's full remaining contract, rather than trying to find a way to make the deal work while minimizing their financial commitment. Considering the uncertainty surrounding the Twins at the deadline, when it wasn't exactly clear whether they should be buying or selling, ownership could have easily used that uncertainty as a reason to stay conservative. Instead, Pohlad followed through on what he said he would do and supported one of the more aggressive trade deadlines we've seen from the Twins, both in terms of the players they acquired and the money they were willing to take on. It doesn't prove that everything Pohlad has said will come true, but it does give us one pretty important example of him saying he would invest when the opportunity presented itself, and then actually doing it.

    That doesn't erase decades of skepticism toward the Pohlad family, and it shouldn't. But it does give us at least one example of Tom Pohlad saying he would do something and then actually doing it. Up to this point, he really hasn't given Twins fans much evidence that he can't be trusted when he says he is willing to invest. Now he has a full offseason to show whether that continues.

    That's why I'm choosing optimism this time around. I'm tired of approaching every Twins offseason by looking at the biggest names in free agency and immediately convincing myself that the Twins won't sign them. I'm tired of looking at a big contract and immediately calculating why ownership won't approve it. I'm tired of telling myself not to get excited about certain players because the Pohlad family will never spend that much anyway. Maybe that pessimism will prove to be correct again, but I'm not going to start the offseason there this time.

    Maybe I'll be wrong. Maybe "meaningfully invest" will end up meaning something much smaller than Twins fans hope. Maybe the Twins will make a handful of modest moves and call it an investment. Maybe they'll pursue some of the biggest names in free agency and lose out to teams willing to spend more. If that happens, I'll be right there with everyone else asking why the words didn't match the actions.

    But I don't think Tom Pohlad should be judged entirely on what Carl, Jim or Joe Pohlad did. At some point, you have to allow the new guy to show you who he is. Tom Pohlad has talked differently. He has shown some willingness to back up those words. Now he has a full offseason and an opportunity to make his biggest statement yet.

    So I'm going to take him at his word. I'm going to believe that "meaningfully invest" actually means meaningful investment. I'm going to believe that a $100 million payroll really isn't enough. I'm going to believe that when Zoll has conviction about a move, ownership will back him up. Maybe I'll regret it, but for once I'm going to enjoy a Twins offseason believing that something bigger might actually be coming.


    What do you think? Are you willing to believe Tom Pohlad, or do you need to see the Twins actually spend before you'll buy what he's selling? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Walker Jenkins

    Minnesota Twins - MLB, OF
    The outfielder was named to the International League Postseason All Star team. He hit .308/.407/.532 (.939) with 17 doubles, three triples and 12 homers.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, The Great Hambino said:

    Here's one question I have that I haven't been able to clarify:

    When Joe was handed the team, he didn't really have control.  Jim was the one who still represented the franchise on ownership committees, and it was Jim, not Joe, that facilitated the Correa trade.  As it turned out, Joe was merely the public face of what was actually a family decision-making operation - and when push came to shove, a Jim-decision-making operation.

    The question I have is this: do these sort of limitations also apply to Tom?  Is he the representative on league committees, or is he simply a new face on the same decision-making body?  Jim and his brothers are still on the board, and the board is still majority-Pohlad-controlled even with the limited partners in the fold.

    I'd like to know these answers before I throw my belief behind Tom, even if he is honestly stating his true intentions.  What good is an aggressive mindset if the uncles can still overrule it whenever they feel like it?  If he truly is being given the autonomy to run the team as he sees fit, then I'd feel better - not good, but better - about buying what he's selling 

    It is largely for this reason that they won't get my trust anytime soon.  Everything still feels like it has one intent and one intent only: how do the Pohlads get the price they want to sell the team.  I don't buy anything about long-term competitiveness because I don't believe them that they have any intent to be here in the long-term.

    So it's hard to take all this corporate-babble seriously in light of that.

    1 hour ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I'm an a optimist by nature. I'd like to believe in Tom. But. like many here, I need to see action to believe that he will spend the money necessary to be competitive. 

    The real problem here is spend it on who? The best available FAs are all over 30 except for Arraez. Our need are 2B, 1B, C, 1 SP, and bullpen help. Overpay or not, there is little chance Skubal would choose Minnesota over staying with the Dodgers, same for King and Morejon staying with the Padres or another West Coast team. I don't want Jazz Chisholm (and why would he leave the Yankees) and we got OFs so why spend big on Arozarena or Suzuki. Brandon Lowe is 32 but would be a good get for 2B (move Clemens to 1B) as would our old friend Arraez who's 29, but then there's no room at the Inn for Houston for at least 2 years. If you look at the available FAs, there really isn't a lot to like other than Morejon or Helsley for the BP or maybe one of the 2B. 

    What would show me a lot would be for the Twins to re-sign some core guys that are or are soon to be FAs. The key guys are Jeffers, Lopez, Minter, and Ryan. Jeffers is the priority. He's the best FA C out there and can probably be had for less than $20m a year for 4 years. Lopez seems like he wants to stay - take a risk and give him 3 -4 years at $25M a year. Try to re-sign Ryan for 4-5 years at $30m a year and if you can't, trade him and don't be afraid to take on a big contract. Give Minter 2 years, $20-25M total if that's what it takes although he may be a little cheaper. Go to FA and sign Helsley or Morejon, or even David Bednar or Gregory Soto, and give them a 2 or 3 year deal. Don't worry so much about a guy like Houston who is still in AA - go out and sign Arraez or Lowe and give them at least 2 or 3 year deals. If Houston is the real deal sooner than 2029 you can make a later trade or be creative with the roster and move the older player to 1B.  I know some of you will say "those deals are overpaying at the end of the deal". You're probably right but that's the price of signing people. If you aren't willing to risk significantly overpaying someone at the end of a long term contract you cannot sign anybody any good. Period. 

    I want to believe. Re-signing players who can be the core guys to build around, especially Jeffers, Lopez, Minter, and Ryan, would go a long way. 

     

    What you are advocating is pretty much the same team (Ryan / Lopez / Jeffers / Minter) for $50M additional per year plus what whatever we would spend on 2B and a SP.   That would be close to an additional $100M/year if the SP is a front of the rotation starter and anything less would be pointless given the current depth.   I don't see that happening unless the CBA changes dramatically and the implementation is immediate.  It's not how successful teams have been built.  

    They will wait for Houston to take over SS and move Culpepper to 2B.  They also are not going to give Jeffers a 4-year contract when they have Lackey / Tinney and Diaw on the horizon.  If they extend anyone the priority should be players like Jenkins and Culpepper.  That's a far more sustainable model with greater upside.

    8 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    What you are advocating is pretty much the same team (Ryan / Lopez / Jeffers / Minter) for $50M additional per year plus what whatever we would spend on 2B and a SP.   That would be close to an additional $100M/year if the SP is a front of the rotation starter and anything less would be pointless given the current depth.   I don't see that happening unless the CBA changes dramatically and the implementation is immediate.  It's not how successful teams have been built.  

    They will wait for Houston to take over SS and move Culpepper to 2B.  They also are not going to give Jeffers a 4-year contract when they have Lackey / Tinney and Diaw on the horizon.  If they extend anyone the priority should be players like Jenkins and Culpepper.  That's a far more sustainable model with greater upside.

    Jeffers is my first baseman after 27.....

    What Tom needs to do is somehow get people in place that can fully develop players.  I've said it a million times...the biggest issue is not how much money the Pohlads will or won't spend.  It helps to be able to go get a guy to fill a spot or two.  The biggest issue for this team is their inability to develop players....way too many players reach the majors and fail.  Player development is why the Brewers and Rays had the best records in the NL and AL.  It's why Cleveland continues to win the Central seemingly every dang year.  It's how a team like the Twins become a consistent winner.

    People can believe whatever they want. I could care less. But what proved to me that Tom is a Pohlad is the deadline deal for Hoffman with the Jays. The Twins had the Jays pay 3.75 mil of salary. We all know that when significant cash is included in a deal the prospect anty goes up. This is the way of the Pohlads. When I stop seeing this way of doing business then I can evaluate if anything has changed. 

    26 minutes ago, HerbieFan said:

    What Tom needs to do is somehow get people in place that can fully develop players.  I've said it a million times...the biggest issue is not how much money the Pohlads will or won't spend.  It helps to be able to go get a guy to fill a spot or two.  The biggest issue for this team is their inability to develop players....way too many players reach the majors and fail.  Player development is why the Brewers and Rays had the best records in the NL and AL.  It's why Cleveland continues to win the Central seemingly every dang year.  It's how a team like the Twins become a consistent winner.

    It looks better in the last few years..... Lee, Jenkins, Culpeper, Matthews, preilip, Morris. Then you have Houston and Lackey, maybe ERod. Those are just the drafts, and doesn't include anyone they traded for. 

    @Dave Lemke explain your rationale for disagreeing with me. I've noticed you seem to follow me around the forums and "dislike" or "disagree" with every single post I make because you have nothing better to do?

    I find it to be strange to put a faith into a person you don't know and have little visibility into historical conduct.

    I also think Tom Pohlad's results have been pretty mixed. It's hard to argue the Twins were competitive as promised or that the team had a reasonable path to being competitive from the opening of the season.

    I think the ownership's relatively minor bump in payroll at the trade deadline was also modest and reflected a middle ground approach to being competitive. Not truly going for it (upgrading any bats or a playoff caliber rotation arm which were both sorely needed to be competitive in the playoffs), but not standing pat by bringing in obvious bullpen upgrades.

    "if he has conviction about a move that’s going to improve this roster and help us accomplish our goals, that this ownership group is prepared to support him with the financial resources he needs."

    Jeremy Zoll should have conviction that Tarik Skubal, Seiya Suzuki, and Luis Arraez can "help (them) accomplish (their) goals." He should also have conviction that at least Bo Bichette could help accomplish some goals if he (very unlikely) opts out. Should also have conviction that Ryan Jeffers coming back on a short-term deal could help. And at least 3 of the best relievers on the market.

    Those are some pretty easy convictions to have and stories to sell to ownership about helping accomplish their goals. Should I assume the Twins are about to drop $100 million in free agency for 2027? I'm going to go ahead and guess "no." 

    I'm very squarely in the "believe it when I see it" camp when it comes to Pohlad talk of investment. Which I'm sure surprises nobody here. If I were a betting man, I'd bet the Twins "were in on" a lot of guys this offseason and very few of them were willing to take the Pohlad "financial resources."

    44 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    @Dave Lemke explain your rationale for disagreeing with me. I've noticed you seem to follow me around the forums and "dislike" or "disagree" with every single post I make because you have nothing better to do?

    I find it to be strange to put a faith into a person you don't know and have little visibility into historical conduct.

    I also think Tom Pohlad's results have been pretty mixed. It's hard to argue the Twins were competitive as promised or that the team had a reasonable path to being competitive from the opening of the season.

    I think the ownership's relatively minor bump in payroll at the trade deadline was also modest and reflected a middle ground approach to being competitive. Not truly going for it (upgrading any bats or a playoff caliber rotation arm which were both sorely needed to be competitive in the playoffs), but not standing pat by bringing in obvious bullpen upgrades.

    I don't follow you around. I don't watch whose posts I disagree with or agree with for that matter. If I have disagreed eith severaal of ypur posts it means we differ in our ideas about the Twins. I disagree with some, agree with some and some I've done both depending on topic. Most likely to disagree with posts that use hindsight on any moves and transactions that don't work. I happen to think when you have a shot at playoffs, that Twins had at trade deadline, you don't give up on the players and tell them you don't have faith in them. You can disagree with my take same as I can disagree with yours. 

    I'm not ready to completely buy in on payroll going up all that much. There's a lot that needs to be sorted out before even thinking about free agents.

    1st the team needs to scatter, around the league, some of the 26 corner outfielders on the roster.

    Then trade for a 1st baseman that will start most of the games. (Burleson?)

    Now figure out what you're going to do about starting pitchers in 2028.

    Is Jackson and Caratini really your catchers for 2027?

    Now...Thow in a lock out...

    Lock out ends and you have about 2 weeks to "spend"...I'm in the wait and see about that.

    3 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    Here's one question I have that I haven't been able to clarify:

    When Joe was handed the team, he didn't really have control.  Jim was the one who still represented the franchise on ownership committees, and it was Jim, not Joe, that facilitated the Correa trade.  As it turned out, Joe was merely the public face of what was actually a family decision-making operation - and when push came to shove, a Jim-decision-making operation.

    The question I have is this: do these sort of limitations also apply to Tom?  Is he the representative on league committees, or is he simply a new face on the same decision-making body?  Jim and his brothers are still on the board, and the board is still majority-Pohlad-controlled even with the limited partners in the fold.

    I'd like to know these answers before I throw my belief behind Tom, even if he is honestly stating his true intentions.  What good is an aggressive mindset if the uncles can still overrule it whenever they feel like it?  If he truly is being given the autonomy to run the team as he sees fit, then I'd feel better - not good, but better - about buying what he's selling 

    mlb.com says the Chairman and Control Owner of the Minnesota Twins is Jim Pohlad.

    Other Board members are Bill Pohlad, Bob Pohlad, and Dave St. Peter. None of the new limited partners are listed.

    Tom Pohlad is listed on a lower line as Chairman & CEO.

    Another title for this article could be "I'm Charlie Brown. Here's why this time I believe Lucy."

    15 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    "if he has conviction about a move that’s going to improve this roster and help us accomplish our goals, that this ownership group is prepared to support him with the financial resources he needs."

    Jeremy Zoll should have conviction that Tarik Skubal, Seiya Suzuki, and Luis Arraez can "help (them) accomplish (their) goals." He should also have conviction that at least Bo Bichette could help accomplish some goals if he (very unlikely) opts out. Should also have conviction that Ryan Jeffers coming back on a short-term deal could help. And at least 3 of the best relievers on the market.

    Those are some pretty easy convictions to have and stories to sell to ownership about helping accomplish their goals. Should I assume the Twins are about to drop $100 million in free agency for 2027? I'm going to go ahead and guess "no." 

    I'm very squarely in the "believe it when I see it" camp when it comes to Pohlad talk of investment. Which I'm sure surprises nobody here. If I were a betting man, I'd bet the Twins "were in on" a lot of guys this offseason and very few of them were willing to take the Pohlad "financial resources."

    I remember when Terry Ryan used to say the spending - or non-spending - decisions were his, that he believed the owners would support him when he made a case for additional spending. 

    The back-and-forth by ownership over the last few years could negatively affect how free agents view the Twins.

    First they sign Donaldson with hoopla about a new day for Twins competition, then they complain about him and give him a railroad ticket out of town.

    Then they sign Correa with hoopla about a new day for Twins to be a destination for top free agents, then fail to fill in the rest of the team the way they implied when they signed him, then they persuade him to leave by telling him they are going to go in a different direction (cost-saving) than what they told him when they signed him. 

    No free agent is going to be persuaded by any talk of a new day in Twinsland, because they know that whatever the Twins say today could change by the middle of next year. 

    The real problem is even if there is a lot of intent for ownership to step up their spending, they have put the team into a situation where in the coming offseason they simply will not have enough options to get to even average spending in major league baseball.

    And,  I think that the team really missed their opportunity to sell high on veteran players like Buxton, Ryan, Jeffers, and even Larnach.  The trade values of Buxton and Ryan have taken major steps backwards, and Jeffers as a free agent can only generate a comp pick, about half of his value if traded at the deadline.

    Lets say the Twins ownership wants to incrementally spend $40 million, plus $20 million to retain Ryan Jeffers.  How do they even do it in ways that will improve the team?   The Twins will have a hard sell convincing players who have other options to come here and the biggest factor is they have nickled and dimed their way to be the bottom feeder of the league.

    1 hour ago, HerbieFan said:

    What Tom needs to do is somehow get people in place that can fully develop players.  I've said it a million times...the biggest issue is not how much money the Pohlads will or won't spend.  It helps to be able to go get a guy to fill a spot or two.  The biggest issue for this team is their inability to develop players....way too many players reach the majors and fail.  Player development is why the Brewers and Rays had the best records in the NL and AL.  It's why Cleveland continues to win the Central seemingly every dang year.  It's how a team like the Twins become a consistent winner.

    It's also how the Dodgers succeed and why the Mets don't. Development is the #1 driver of every successful team. The extra money to spend is the difference between being able to fill holes externally with a premium player or a mediocre one, and being able to retain your developed players or having to rely on the next developed player with little safety net.

    The Dodgers have been spending for a while. They've only been successful since they went and got the best FO exec in the sport who turned them into a development machine. Development is the key to everything.

    14 minutes ago, MeleMouth said:

    I remember when Terry Ryan used to say the spending - or non-spending - decisions were his, that he believed the owners would support him when he made a case for additional spending. 

    It's been the same line for decades. Falvey said the same thing for the vast majority of his tenure. Until the last couple years when it switched to "I have no idea what my budget is because ownership hasn't told me."

    21 minutes ago, Dave Lemke said:

    I don't follow you around. I don't watch whose posts I disagree with or agree with for that matter. If I have disagreed eith severaal of ypur posts it means we differ in our ideas about the Twins. I disagree with some, agree with some and some I've done both depending on topic. Most likely to disagree with posts that use hindsight on any moves and transactions that don't work. I happen to think when you have a shot at playoffs, that Twins had at trade deadline, you don't give up on the players and tell them you don't have faith in them. You can disagree with my take same as I can disagree with yours. 

    I think part of the problem is that we have a lot of that but the disagreements aren't yielding good conversations.  The truth is....it doesn't require hindsight to see some transaction being bad moves.  Yes, sometimes we do have to wait and see and we're all proven right or wrong at various times.  But to be blunt: many of the people you are tagging "disagree" on are not relying on hindsight and are merely reinforcing what they've been right about all along.

    Personally, I'd rather someone disagree with me with a reply in such a way that contributes to the conversation rather than hit the thumbs down.  So much of that is petty behavior.  Though I appreciate you sharing these thoughts, it helps to know you have real reasoning behind that and aren't just doing it in a mean-spirited way.

    So, in the spirit of my post - Where do you stand on what Tom said?

    Development is easy when you hardly ever (Skubal the exception) have to trade any of your talent to get GREAT players on your roster.  You have an open checkbook, the ridiculous sweetheart deal shielding significant portions of your revenue due to an owner divorce resolved 15 years ago, and now have the fantastic loophole of deferred comp to exploit.

    Oh, and you have a great team in a great market with a great climate.

    How on earth could that franchise succeed?

    14 minutes ago, SteveLV said:

    Development is easy when you hardly ever (Skubal the exception) have to trade any of your talent to get GREAT players on your roster.  You have an open checkbook, the ridiculous sweetheart deal shielding significant portions of your revenue due to an owner divorce resolved 15 years ago, and now have the fantastic loophole of deferred comp to exploit.

    Oh, and you have a great team in a great market with a great climate.

    How on earth could that franchise succeed?

    Good, humorous points, but 14 of the players on the Dodgers' 40-man came by trade, including Betts, Glasnow, and two relievers, besides Skubal.

    FWIW, Brewers have 22, Rays have 24, Guardians have 12, and Twins have 16.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...