Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    What Minnesota Twins' Lackluster Attendance Means, Short- and Long-Term


    Cody Christie

    Minnesota’s poor play in their first home series was front and center, but fans might not have noticed another problem just off the field: The Twins are struggling to sell tickets, which might impact the team’s potential sale.

    Image courtesy of © Matt Blewett-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Ideally, the opening series against the Astros should have been a breath of fresh air for Minnesota Twins fans eager to see their team back in action at Target Field. Instead, even accounting for the cold of early April, attendance was anemic. Despite the series falling on a weekend against a marquee opponent, the series failed to produce a sell-out. At both Saturday and Sunday's games, the stadium was well below 50% of its capacity. It’s a stark reminder of the downward spiral in fan morale since the euphoria surrounding the team during their 2023 postseason.

    Even though the team heavily discounted tickets to lure even the most casual fans, game attendance numbers told a grim story. Game 1 attracted 36,873 fans, which looks high, but teams should sell out their opener, and the Twins fell short. However, the optimism dissipated rapidly after that initial game. Game 2’s crowd fell precipitously to just 16,082, and by Game 3, only 14,638 fans were present for what was branded as Kids Opening Day. In total, the Twins managed to sell just 67,503 tickets over the three-game series. It’s a total that raises uncomfortable questions about the state of the franchise’s fan base and overall market appeal.

    These figures are even more troubling when compared to previous seasons. Last year, the Twins sold 61,401 tickets for the first two games against the Cleveland Guardians, even though the third game was washed out by rain. Two years ago, in a similarly structured three-game series against Houston, the Twins sold a robust 79,111 tickets. The current numbers are not only a regression from that more optimistic period, but an alarming sign that something deeper is at play.

    What’s driving this decline? The answer lies in a perfect storm of factors, starting with a pervasive sense of disillusionment among the fan base. After the 2023 season, fan morale was high, but then ownership cut the payroll heading into the 2024 season. Besides the payroll limitations, the team’s television situation was a nightmare last year. Then the team went from a near-playoff lock to collapsing and missing the postseason. Minnesota’s fan optimism is near an all-time low, even with the team projected to be in contention for the AL Central title. 

    Yet, the issues extend beyond the ballpark. Off the field, the looming uncertainty surrounding the Twins' future only adds to the overall sense of unease. Recent reports have thrown a harsh spotlight on the state of the franchise’s ownership. USA Today’s Bobby Nightengale noted, “The Minnesota Twins, who were asking interested parties to submit their bids by April 1, now are telling prospective owners they have another 45 days as they continue to seek $1.7 billion.” 

    La Velle E. Neal painted a similar picture recently in the Star Tribune. He emphasized that the Pohlads' offers are below their expectations. Neal even predicted that a sale might only materialize in August or September, a timeline that hardly offers any reassurance to a fan base already bracing for further instability.

    The implications of these ownership issues cannot be overstated. Not getting fans to the games can make it challenging for the Pohlads to demand $1.7 billion, when they have reported offers for $1.5 billion. Recently, I laid out the three possible outcomes of a Twins sale, and two of the three possible scenarios are likely to leave fans feeling bewildered. The prospect of the Pohlads sticking around (even in a diminished capacity) would spell disaster, not just for ticket sales, but for the overall identity of the Twins. 

    It’s a classic case of short-term fixes failing to mask deeper systemic issues. Even with strategic price cuts and marquee opponents on the team’s early schedule, the team is finding it increasingly difficult to fill the seats. The disheartening trend of plummeting attendance is symptomatic of a franchise at a crossroads. Fans want more than just a good deal or an interesting opponent. They want to believe in the future of their team. When the excitement fizzles out before the first pitch is even thrown, it speaks volumes about the state of the organization.

    At this juncture, Twins officials would be well-advised to take a long, hard look at the broader picture. The immediate drop in attendance post-Opening Day should serve as a wake-up call. The ownership situation, fan morale, and overall strategic direction of the franchise are all interwoven, and a failure to address these challenges head-on may have long-lasting repercussions on the Twins’ ability to compete both on and off the field.

    The lackluster attendance in the season's early going is more than a numbers game. It’s a mirror, reflecting the discontent of a fan base that feels let down by both the team’s on-field performance and off-field management. For the Twins, the road ahead will require more than temporary measures. It will require a concerted effort to rebuild trust, reenergize fans, and secure a future that is as bright as the April sun that once shone over a nearly empty Target Field.


    Will attendance improve at Target Field this year? Does lackluster attendance impact the team’s potential sale? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    Definitely cheaper to get Twins TV and watch the games than try to attend them from AZ.


    You can bring bottled water and food into the game. $0. But, lets plan this out for your family of 5 and compare it to the movies, shall we?

    Movies: We'll say you and the fam go to the new Snow White show at AMC in Coon Rapids. Tickets = $80. Food 3 large popcorns and 6 drinks. Whatever. I'll estimate. $79. Service fees and taxes $14. Total = $179 for a family of 5 to go to the movies.

    Twins: Seatgeek for Sunday (family day). Tickets, left field bleachers section 128, row 11 (lower level) where kids can run down to the first row and get balls tossed to them by the players every half inning. The seats give a good view of the game, are covered from potential rain or sun and have monitors above them. $125. 2 beers, 3 fountain drinks, 5 hot dogs, 2 popcorns, 1 bag peanuts = $42. Street parking on 4th. $9. = $176.

    The Twins are cheaper than the movies, even if you're not trying to save money. There are certainly less expensive options for the Twins for a family of 5 as well like bringing in food or choosing less expensive seats (as low as $15/ea with fees). Choose a Wednesday evening game to get $1 hot dogs and save another $15. Cut back on the food a little. Whatever. Attending a Twins game with a family of 5 with some food/drink/parking/seats can be done fairly easily at $100.

    you are absolutely correct


    Tickets alone, Twins tomorrow night full retail in section 301 19.75 per with fees, 98.75 total

    Alamo draft house in Woodbury to see Minecraft tomorrow night is 94.95 for 5 tix

    IMG_2921.png.76b8e2b190edf7a10ebb29668d8ed2a0.pngIMG_2920.jpeg.487acc207963a371b58a4ef966863d0d.jpeg

    1 hour ago, Richie the Rally Goat said:

    you are absolutely correct


    Tickets alone, Twins tomorrow night full retail in section 301 19.75 per with fees, 98.75 total

    Alamo draft house in Woodbury to see Minecraft tomorrow night is 94.95 for 5 tix

    I was trying to give as many benefits of the doubt and advantages to the movies as I could by choosing Coon Rapids as the movie theater. I think you can skip the fees just by purchasing tickets at the box office. 

    Don't forget section 324 (family section). For $18.75 with fees, all seats also include a free hot dog and soft drink. It's like, come on. 5 minutes of searching and you're in.

    Students can sign up for $5 ballpark entrance (SRO) tickets and just sit in Truly on Deck even with club level seats.

    9 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    It's a claim made almost universally by people that haven't actually set foot in the downtown area in over five years.

    I go to a dozen or so games a year.  Sometimes with small children.  Unless you count the one time there was an old lady smoking a cigarette on the Green Line, never once has there been anything close to anything resembling a safety issue

    100% this.  The people who claim this never came anyway.  This explains exactly zero of the decline.

    7 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    The Twins are cheaper than the movies, even if you're not trying to save money.

    Q: What does going to a Twins game and watching a movie for the second time have in common?

     

    A: You know how it ends even before it begins. 

    17 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    I think it's a massive overreaction and the Twin Cities are as safe as St Cloud. I will agree that there are people who say things like that. However, it doesn't explain why the Vikings, Wild and Wolves are still able to draw fans while the Twins are struggling.

    These are waters I rarely wade into, but I see elements of truth in each of these posts.  Those who live west of the river and are familiar with the areas feel more comfortable there and downplay the reservations of the folks who are not comfortable there.  Having lived east of the river my whole life I can say without hesitation that east of the river folks do, fairly or not, have a perception of areas of Mpls that are not good.  And I agree that it is entirely about perception and what we have heard, but it may very well play a factor in attendance.  

    As for the other teams, the Wild play in a very busy part of St. Paul, not Mpls, the Wolves play in an area of Mpls that even I am familiar with as well as a lot of others, and the Vikings play mostly Sunday day games.  The Twins play most evening games that last until well after dark in a part of town that does not seem as well traveled later in the night, and everyone scatters in different directions, making some feel less than safe.  

    Again, just perceptions, but perception can become reality when people believe it.  But, as always, I can be educated.  🙂

    2 hours ago, Mark G said:

    As for the other teams, the Wild play in a very busy part of St. Paul, not Mpls, the Wolves play in an area of Mpls that even I am familiar with as well as a lot of others, and the Vikings play mostly Sunday day games.  The Twins play most evening games that last until well after dark in a part of town that does not seem as well traveled later in the night, and everyone scatters in different directions, making some feel less than safe.  

    Again, just perceptions, but perception can become reality when people believe it.  But, as always, I can be educated.  🙂

    The Wolves play in EXACTLY the same part of town as the Twins. You can see Target Center from home plate at Target Field. The Wolves play in the winter when it's ALWAYS dark out. If people think Minneapolis is safe for a Wolves game but not safe for a Twins game, well, then they're just a little dumb.

    39 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    The Wolves play in EXACTLY the same part of town as the Twins. You can see Target Center from home plate at Target Field. The Wolves play in the winter when it's ALWAYS dark out. If people think Minneapolis is safe for a Wolves game but not safe for a Twins game, well, then they're just a little dumb.

    not disagreeing with you, and haven't been to many Wolves games, but it does feel like you never really have to go outside if you are parking in the ramps.

    With the Twins there are the ramps in right field, but other than, it does feel like parking is further or waiting for the train.

    To be honest, I think people say they don't feel safe because it safe way to say I don't want be in MPLS without explaining the real reason (probably political) they don't want to be there, because what kind of jerk tries to make somebody feel bad for saying they don't feel safe?

    47 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    The Wolves play in EXACTLY the same part of town as the Twins. You can see Target Center from home plate at Target Field. The Wolves play in the winter when it's ALWAYS dark out. If people think Minneapolis is safe for a Wolves game but not safe for a Twins game, well, then they're just a little dumb.

    Call it perception, then, because I have been to both venues more than enough times to feel one way or the other.  I and the original poster also addressed the other two teams.  Maybe I am dumb, but if I am, there are a crap ton of dumb people on the east side of the river.  😉

    If the Twins want to fix their attendance problem, they’ll have to do more than just offer discount nights—they’ll need to rebuild trust and energy around the team. And with the club being up for sale, that uncertainty could be making fans even more hesitant to reinvest emotionally or financially.

    Can we all chip in to cover the 0.2 million Pohlad wants? Or can we convince him to go ahead and sell the team for the 1.5 mil? Winning games (and warmer weather and/or the Yankees) will put more fans in the stands. But maybe the fans are also concerned that new owners might try to move the team (to Nashville?). I think the Twins will do ok as far as attendance. I'm more concerned about their continued lack of offense, injuries to players like Lopez and Lewis and the possibility that maybe they just aren't as good as we think they are. But it's still very early and I remain optimistic.

    15 hours ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    It hasn't been called the warehouse district in maybe 20 years?  And nobody anywhere has ever called it the "downtown warehouse district."  Again, thanks for telling us you've never been to Minneapolis.  

    https://www.mlb.com/twins/ballpark/transportation

    You and I have never met.  But if we did, I'd produce my ticket stub from the first series against the RedSox in 2010.  You're right to the extent I still avoid Minneapolis.  Long ago to make ends meet, I waited and tended bar at Neumann's in N. St. Paul....  Be sure to bring your ID when you come. 

    17 hours ago, Craig Arko said:

    Perhaps after the lockout in 2027 contraction will be an option, probably for several teams.

    Bingo.  New money won't pay up for this franchise.  They might take a discount at some point to wait out the lease and move.  But clearly the end is on the horizon for this franchise.  The team and the city no longer like each other.

    18 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    The Twins are cheaper than the movies, even if you're not trying to save money. There are certainly less expensive options for the Twins for a family of 5 as well like bringing in food or choosing less expensive seats (as low as $15/ea with fees). Choose a Wednesday evening game to get $1 hot dogs and save another $15. Cut back on the food a little. Whatever. Attending a Twins game with a family of 5 with some food/drink/parking/seats can be done fairly easily at $100.

    I'm an old man. When I go to a Twins game these days it is either people wanting to go with me because they know I have been an insane fan since 1961 or I go alone. The games with other people are free. When I go myself I buy a standing room only ticket. I don't usually drink or eat anything. When I go to the movie i buy a ticket, Dots, popcorn, and coke. So Twins games cost me less than the movies. Oh, parking. I almost always find somewhere free but have paid $10-12 to park. Safety? I feel as safe walking around the North Loop as i do walking around Lake Harriet or walking around St. Cloud or Rochester. Des Moines, Iowa is scarier to me than Minneapolis. I live in the sticks where I might see my neighbors once a week. Safety is pretty much an internal thought. Warehouse district? I remember when I delivered steel trusses to the galvanizer shop in the 1970s. Target Field isn't surrounded by warehouses or I am totally oblivious, which is possible. 

    The Twins compete for entertainment dollars. Weather, an exciting team, and creative marketing will bring in crowds. My youngest son and many of his friends go to a number of games every year with friends. They have a good time. My son played high school baseball but has never listened to a game on the radio or watched a game on TV that I have seen or heard. If you asked him who Gasper was, he wouldn't know. Marketing, good weather, and an exciting team will bring in the fans.

    1 hour ago, Minderbinder said:

    https://www.mlb.com/twins/ballpark/transportation

    You and I have never met.  But if we did, I'd produce my ticket stub from the first series against the RedSox in 2010.  You're right to the extent I still avoid Minneapolis.  Long ago to make ends meet, I waited and tended bar at Neumann's in N. St. Paul....  Be sure to bring your ID when you come. 

    Well if AI slop says it's true it must be lol!  I don't think mlb.com has ever been to Minneapolis either.

    Finally, you admit you haven't been to Minneapolis for 15 years.  It's bizarre that you keep commenting on the current state of affairs in a place you avoid, but hey, you do you.  Enjoy the outrage!

    On 4/11/2025 at 8:54 AM, Woof Bronzer said:

    Well if AI slop says it's true it must be lol!  I don't think mlb.com has ever been to Minneapolis either.

    Finally, you admit you haven't been to Minneapolis for 15 years.  It's bizarre that you keep commenting on the current state of affairs in a place you avoid, but hey, you do you.  Enjoy the outrage!

    You know better.  You asserted only those in-the-know referred to the warehouse district when the league refers to the warehouse district.  C'mon.

    And no, I admitted no such thing.  I attend games at TF regularly, most recent being last July, but I don't arrive early and I leave promptly.  I freely admit to avoiding downtown Minneapolis.  It's become a dump.

    I avoid spending any of my money in Minneapolis or Hennepin county if I at all can. I personally will make an exception for Twins games. I don’t think I’m that unique in either regard.

    That doesn’t explain the Twins declining attendance, though (beyond marginally)…it goes way beyond that.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...