Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Twins Missed a Golden Opportunity with Byron Buxton Roster Move

    Byron Buxton's trip to the injured list created an opportunity for the Twins to make an impactful roster move. Instead, they doubled down on one of the most puzzling decisions of the season.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Byron Buxton's exit from Tuesday night's game against the Kansas City Royals immediately became the biggest storyline surrounding the Twins. After leaving in the fifth inning because of discomfort during his second plate appearance, the club officially placed him on the injured list Wednesday with a hip impingement. That decision wasn't surprising. Buxton has been ailing since before the All-Star break, and he needed an injection Wednesday that would have sidelined him for at least a week, anyway.

    The corresponding roster move, however, was extremely surprising. Rather than using Buxton's absence as an opportunity to add an impact player or someone capable of filling the obvious void in center field, the Twins called up Tristan Gray. It was a move that continued one of the more confusing trends of Minnesota's season.

    Gray simply has not earned another opportunity at the major-league level, but he's getting one, anyway. He owns a .604 OPS this season, and if you remove his hot opening week, that number drops to .580. Defensively, he's struggled at shortstop, posting -4 Outs Above Average according to Baseball Savant. He currently owns both a negative fWAR and negative Win Probability Added. Nothing about Gray's performance this season suggests he deserves another call-up. Yet the Twins continue to show an unusual amount of faith in him.

    Earlier this year, Gray remained on the roster much longer than many expected. While he was with the club, he started far more games at shortstop than his production warranted. Now, with Buxton landing on the injured list, Gray was once again the organization's choice—this time, over some much more compelling alternatives.

    Buxton's injury leaves a massive hole in center field. Luke Keaschall is now the closest thing to an everyday option, but he has played just 11 games at the position and has not exactly looked comfortable there. That inexperience showed up again on Wednesday when he misplayed a carom off the wall, allowing Salvador Perez to take an extra base.

    Beyond Keaschall, the Twins technically have Alan Roden, Ryan Kreidler, and Kody Clemens who can handle center field, but their usage throughout the season suggests the coaching staff does not view any of them as legitimate options. Manager Derek Shelton said after the game Wednesday night that Kreidler could see more time in center, but that Keaschall would keep getting most of the run.

    That's exactly why this felt like the perfect opportunity to promote Walker Jenkins. Jenkins is widely regarded as one of baseball's top prospects and projects to be a cornerstone of the Twins' future. He's capable of playing center field and has looked every bit like himself since returning from injury. Since rejoining Triple-A St. Paul at the end of June, Jenkins has posted an .858 OPS, while continuing to show the all-around offensive skill set that made him one of the game's top prospects.

    There was a natural opening on the roster at a position that matched his defensive ability, for a team desperately looking for an offensive spark heading into one of the biggest stretches of its season. Everything seemed to be lining up for Jenkins.

    Some have pointed to the 40-man roster as the reason Minnesota chose not to make the move, but that explanation doesn't really hold up. The Twins have multiple players occupying 40-man roster spots who are not part of the immediate picture, and someone like Mike Paredes could have been transferred to the 60-day injured list to create space if necessary.

    If the organization truly believes Jenkins needs more development time, that is a separate conversation. But even then, Gray doesn't feel like the best alternative. Matt Wallner has been on a tear with St. Paul, posting a 1.089 OPS since the beginning of June. Gabriel Gonzalez has offensive upside while providing the right-handed hitting the Twins are losing with Buxton's injury. Kyler Fedko may not have impressed during his first taste of the majors, but he offers legitimate center field defense and speed off the bench—two things that became much more valuable the moment Buxton hit the injured list. Each of those players would have addressed a roster need more directly than Gray.

    Instead, the Twins once again chose a player whose overall production has been below replacement level. It's a particularly frustrating decision given where the Twins sit on the calendar. Every game matters as the trade deadline approaches. The front office is focused on buying, but how aggressively they do so could be calibrated by the way they play this week. Calling up Jenkins could have energized the clubhouse, excited a fan base looking for something to rally around, and filled an obvious positional need. Instead, the Twins made one of the least inspiring roster moves they could have made.


    What do you think? Should the Twins have promoted Walker Jenkins, or was Tristan Gray the right choice? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Carson Tinney

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, C
    On Tuesday, Tinney went 2-for-5 with two home runs for Fort Myers. He hit a 2-run homer in the 3rd inning, and then he hit a 2-run walkoff homer in the bottom of the ninth!

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    7 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    Or maybe it starts the learning curve and it helps him be successful and even more so in 2027.  Other teams do this, the Tigers just called up Max Clark.  We have a need for a center fielder and Jenkins by most reports is close to being ready.  If you want 100% certainty than wait until he is 27.

    I'm heartened by the Max Clark call up. Max is in the exact same boat as Walker and Kaelen. December 2027 guys. 

    It shows a willingness for teams to make those type of contract purchases in the face of the CBA. 

     

    1 minute ago, Riverbrian said:

    I'm heartened by the Max Clark call up. Max is in the exact same boat as Walker and Kaelen. December 2027 guys. 

    It shows a willingness for teams to make those type of contract purchases in the face of the CBA. 

     

    But they didn't wait until December 2027, they called up Clark now.  We should be doing the same.

    2 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    I'm heartened by the Max Clark call up. Max is in the exact same boat as Walker and Kaelen. December 2027 guys. 

    It shows a willingness for teams to make those type of contract purchases in the face of the CBA. 

     

    Other teams. 

    Just now, Riverbrian said:

    I missed that.

    So with the Gray call up. We are down to? Ross? Morrissette? 

    Keaschall back to the infield? 

    Acquiring an infielder at the deadline? 

    Culpepper should be the next one up.  If he needs more time after being on the IL, I would give Ross a shot.  It would at least improve our athleticism.

    7 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    So if you think it likely he struggle his first year, and you want to be competitive next year..... You call him up this year.

    I don't think anything likely? He could destroy the baseball, completely fail or somewhere in between. 

    My concern is the future cost?  

    Unless someone can tell me how his 40 and 26 man spot works with the new CBA. Explains to me how there is no danger of spending a year of service time golfing in 2027 and no danger of lowering the service time required before free agency. I'm not going to be totally comfortable.  

    3 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    I don't think anything likely? He could destroy the baseball, completely fail or somewhere in between. 

    My concern is the future cost?  

    Unless someone can tell me how his 40 and 26 man spot works with the new CBA. Explains to me how there is no danger of spending a year of service time golfing in 2027 and no danger of lowering the service time required before free agency. I'm not going to be totally comfortable.  

    I refuse to make decisions based on a possible lockout. Is every other team wrong for bringing up rookies? Do we think the twins are smarter than all of them? I don't. 

    Granted Gray is an uninspiring choice. And I'm not a fan of it. But was there a good choice? Really?

    Rodriguez is the obvious #1 choice. But he's only been off the IL for a couple days now, and is rehabbing.

    K-Pepper is obvious choice #2, but he's only been active for a couple of games and needs time to get in to a groove.

    Where do Gonzalez or Mendez play with Bell at DH and Larnach in LF? Neither can play CF and both are still working on their defense. I suppose you could sit Roden and play one of them in RF instead, but is that their best use for now?

    I can't wait for Jenkins. And I can see merit to giving him a shot. He's doing nothing wrong at St Paul. And he could even play CF. But his .800+ OPS in the International League doesn't scream "difference maker ready to roll". He's a real talent with a good future in front of him. And if the Twins wanted to give him a shot right now to get his feet wet, I wouldn't be upset or disappointed. But in theory, this is for 10 days. So I'm just not that worked up about it 

    I think an INF makes sense, and I wish they had someone better than Gray to call up, but they don't. 

    34 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    I'm all for younger players getting callups and opportunity when called up but it's also dangerous to make the assumption that he will immediately perform in the next couple months or it could be as little as the length of time that Byron spends on the DL. 

    I figure every call-up is a gamble, but they keep calling up the same guys and getting the same results. Culpepper and/or Jenkins at least would be something they haven’t tried. And who knows, maybe the vote of confidence is just the catalyst those guys need. Heck, even if they turn out to be streaky and have confidence issues like Royce Lewis, at least that’s an interesting team on the field.

    1 hour ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    Compared to what Tristan Gray is doing Jenkins is Babe Ruth.  

    We've seen Gray.  He's a net negative performer both offensively and defensively.  Adding him makes the team incrementally worse.  

    "Jenkins hasn't been exceptional so it's better to call up a player who has been significantly worse" doesn't make a lot of sense to me.  

    We don't know what Jenkins will do.  I'm fairly confident it will be better that what we know Gray will do.  

    Gray is going to get a handful of at-bats until Buxton returns. He will mostly sit on the bench.

    3 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I refuse to make decisions based on a possible lockout. Is every other team wrong for bringing up rookies? Do we think the twins are smarter than all of them? I don't. 

    Rookies will always have to be called up. Are they on the 40 man or not when they are called up?

    I'd have to research it. I don't know the answer at this moment but the question is. How many players have had their contract purchased this season? 

    And I'll apply a filter to that. Of those that were. How many were top 100 prospects? The Fedko type players  don't matter because they won't be long term considerations. 

    Clark and Snelling of the top of my head. Pratt with Milwaukee would have been another but they signed him to an 8 year deal. 

    I'd be happy if the Twins want to sign Jenkins and Culpepper to 8 year deals for 50 to 60 million to buy out a couple of extra deals. That changes this discussion.   

    1 minute ago, Riverbrian said:

    Rookies will always have to be called up. Are they on the 40 man or not when they are called up?

    I'd have to research it. I don't know the answer at this moment but the question is. How many players have had their contract purchased this season? 

    And I'll apply a filter to that. Of those that were. How many were top 100 prospects? The Fedko type players  don't matter because they won't be long term considerations. 

    Clark and Snelling of the top of my head. Pratt with Milwaukee would have been another but they signed him to an 8 year deal. 

    I'd be happy if the Twins want to sign Jenkins and Culpepper to 8 year deals for 50 to 60 million to buy out a couple of extra deals. That changes this discussion.   

    I mean, that's two right there. 

    Look, if they are trying to win, service time be damned. But they have three catchers and Gray on this roster. They clearly aren't close to going for it. Just sell, of that's the case and be honest with themselves. 

    32 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    I'm heartened by the Max Clark call up. Max is in the exact same boat as Walker and Kaelen. December 2027 guys. 

    It shows a willingness for teams to make those type of contract purchases in the face of the CBA. 

     

    I really doubt that GMs are keeping players in the minor leagues because the CBA might change. 

    On 7/30/2026 at 11:28 AM, mluebker said:

    I figure every call-up is a gamble, but they keep calling up the same guys and getting the same results. Culpepper and/or Jenkins at least would be something they haven’t tried. And who knows, maybe the vote of confidence is just the catalyst those guys need. Heck, even if they turn out to be streaky and have confidence issues like Royce Lewis, at least that’s an interesting team on the field.

    I'm not afraid of youth. 

    I watched Julien and Wallner nearly carry the team in 2024. Only to flame out later. I'll take an Evan Carter type boost to the 2026 if it happens and 2027 we will deal with later if they flame out. 

    I'm all about exposure to MLB pitching and putting it in the bank. 

    My concern is strictly... if it costs us two years of service time to make the move now... is it worth it? IF options are reduced? Is it still worth it? 

    Some have no problem with that or don't think it would happen. I'd like someone to explain to me how I have nothing to worry about in that regard. 

    And I swear to all that's holy. If they call up Jenkins to face right handers only Or Culpepper to face left handers only. Then I am absolutely against it... regardless if there is no potential service time adjustments made in the next CBA.  

     

    4 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

    I really doubt that GMs are keeping players in the minor leagues because the CBA might change. 

    Maybe... I can't argue your point because I have no way of knowing.

    However,  there seems to be quite a longer list of big prospect contract purchases in 2025 compared to 2026. Roman Anthony and Meyer,  Nick Kurtz, Misiorowski, Caglione and Jensen, Baldwin, Shaw, Basallo, Teel, Burns and Stewart, Dollander, Cam Smith.

    I still got more research to do. But... I'll complete it eventually.  

     

    15 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    Gray is going to get a handful of at-bats until Buxton returns. He will mostly sit on the bench.

    Right and if the Twins are seriously going to make a playoff push, how does that help this team?

    All the conversation is around the trade market.  There's another way the Twins can improve their team and it won't cost them a thing!  Try out some young guys.  This is an old, bad lineup.  The risk that playing some guys who may not bet 100% polished and ready is going to tank an otherwise successful season is so, so low... No guarantee about anything, it could flame out and they miss the playoffs.  Oh well, if the season ended today they'd miss the playoffs too. 

    I'm getting more and more "half measure" vibes around the deadline...the Twins are going to nibble at a couple relievers, hold on to their assets, and that's it.  The absolute worst thing they could do in my opinion.  

    Commit to SOMETHING.  Make a decision, and do everything to follow through on it.  Either really, seriously push for the playoffs and worry about the future when it comes, or commit to completing the rebuild, punt on an unknown 2027, and say we're winning the dang AL in 2028.  

    Calling up Gray is such a passive move.  If the Twins truly feel like he's the best they can do then just give up on the season and sell.

    5 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    Maybe... I can't argue your point because I have no way of knowing.

    However,  there seems to be quite a longer list of big prospect contract purchases in 2025 compared to 2026. Roman Anthony and Meyer,  Nick Kurtz, Misiorowski, Caglione and Jensen, Baldwin, Shaw, Basallo, Teel, Burns and Stewart, Dollander, Cam Smith.

    I still got more research to do. But... I'll complete it eventually.  

     

    Don't we want the Twins to be in that boat? I don't think they've done pre-arb extensions with ANYONE since Kepler and Polanco, let alone 1st year contract extensions.

    2 hours ago, HarmonK03 said:

    Based on that then Roden should be sent down.  He can't hit .200 in almost 200 plate appearances.  Per this comment he has had his chance as well.

    Come on guys, this isn't AYSO soccer where every player has to be treated the same and we all get participation medals. The organization sees Roden and Fedko entirely differently as players. They see Roden as a potential MLB regular so he is getting a long look. His Statcast page suggests that there may be something there. That look may be close to the end and will certainly be over by the end of the season. The organization sees Fedko as organizational filler, a guy with an undistinguished track record who blossomed into a good but not elite AAA player at age 25 or 26 for about season's worth of games, but not as a guy likely to develop into an MLB caliber player. He got a brief shot to see how he looked in case they were wrong. He looked awful even when he was playing more regularly, often simply overpowered by MLB pitching. His shot confirmed their initial evaluation so he got sent back. Hopefully they will trade him to another organization so he can get another chance, or he will become a minor-league FA and move to another organization and get another shot. This this isn't because of anything the manager did or didn't do. He got a shorter leash on his opportunity because he has less of a track record and the organization evaluated him less favorably.

    Guys, let's remember that the job of an MLB manager is to win games. He shouldn't be asked to give ABs to a guy who is regularly getting overpowered by MLB pitching in the hope that he will develop in the future unless the organization instructs him that that's his role because the team is in full on rebuild. We aren't. Fedko got his shot, was found wanting, and is now in AAA hoping he gets a second shot or a trade so he can get a shot on another team. That's the way baseball works in a competent organization, and that's the way it should work.

    I would have called up G. Gonzales. He's already been here once, plays the OF, and is already on the 40 man.  Jenkins would have to be added.

    Another idea- Lets make a call on catcher.  Are we trading Jeffers - then lets do it.  Might open another spot depending on who we get in return- no need for a 3rd catcher.

    I think you're going to make a call on a Catcher this week. There's a very interesting article on this site by Greg Masterson about group interview he was involved in with Derek Falvey talking about how the trade deadline works. It helps me understand why most of the deals don't go down until Sunday even though I think or thought that it made more sense to do things sooner.

    I think they'll make a move Sunday regarding the catching but I less and less think it will involve trading Ryan Jeffers. I think they may keep him and either trade Caratini or try to slip Alex Jackson through waivers. I think they are considering just keeping all three by putting Jeffers behind the plate 60% of the time and at DH 20% of the time to get his bat in the lineup, playing Caratini at C 30% of the time and first base 30% of the time, with Alex Jackson paying maybe twice a week, once behind the plate and once at 1B. I think they're finding that arrangement just doesn't work when you have a full-time DH like Josh Bell but he's hard to trade because he doesn't have much value and because what you trade him, you just lost one of your middle of the order bats and you don't have a replacement. Lisa and I try to think it through, all the roads pint to either trading Caratini or trying to sneak Jackson to AAA somehow.

    35 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    Come on guys, this isn't AYSO soccer where every player has to be treated the same and we all get participation medals. The organization sees Roden and Fedko entirely differently as players. They see Roden as a potential MLB regular so he is getting a long look. His Statcast page suggests that there may be something there. That look may be close to the end and will certainly be over by the end of the season. The organization sees Fedko as organizational filler, a guy with an undistinguished track record who blossomed into a good but not elite AAA player at age 25 or 26 for about season's worth of games, but not as a guy likely to develop into an MLB caliber player. He got a brief shot to see how he looked in case they were wrong. He looked awful even when he was playing more regularly, often simply overpowered by MLB pitching. His shot confirmed their initial evaluation so he got sent back. Hopefully they will trade him to another organization so he can get another chance, or he will become a minor-league FA and move to another organization and get another shot. This this isn't because of anything the manager did or didn't do. He got a shorter leash on his opportunity because he has less of a track record and the organization evaluated him less favorably.

    Guys, let's remember that the job of an MLB manager is to win games. He shouldn't be asked to give ABs to a guy who is regularly getting overpowered by MLB pitching in the hope that he will develop in the future unless the organization instructs him that that's his role because the team is in full on rebuild. We aren't. Fedko got his shot, was found wanting, and is now in AAA hoping he gets a second shot or a trade so he can get a shot on another team. That's the way baseball works in a competent organization, and that's the way it should work.

    Well Fedko didn't really get a shot, so I disagree there, what he would do with it, who knows.  I don't really care about the Statcast page because Roden hasn't shown anything yet in 3 different stints in the major leagues.  

    Yet this organization keeps giving Gray a shot who they have nothing invested in vs. someone that they have brought up through their organization and have an investment.  Even giving Kriedler a shot when he was hitting .133 before the season started.  And don't forget this is the organization that thought Outman was a major league player so I may question their evaluation qualities a little bit.

    30 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I think you're going to make a call on a Catcher this week. There's a very interesting article on this site by Greg Masterson about group interview he was involved in with Derek Falvey talking about how the trade deadline works. It helps me understand why most of the deals don't go down until Sunday even though I think or thought that it made more sense to do things sooner.

    I think they'll make a move Sunday regarding the catching but I less and less think it will involve trading Ryan Jeffers. I think they may keep him and either trade Caratini or try to slip Alex Jackson through waivers. I think they are considering just keeping all three by putting Jeffers behind the plate 60% of the time and at DH 20% of the time to get his bat in the lineup, playing Caratini at C 30% of the time and first base 30% of the time, with Alex Jackson paying maybe twice a week, once behind the plate and once at 1B. I think they're finding that arrangement just doesn't work when you have a full-time DH like Josh Bell but he's hard to trade because he doesn't have much value and because what you trade him, you just lost one of your middle of the order bats and you don't have a replacement. Lisa and I try to think it through, all the roads pint to either trading Caratini or trying to sneak Jackson to AAA somehow.

    They can't carry three catchers after the weekend if they don't make a trade.  Why are you forcing Caratini's bat into the lineup.  We have a first baseman, let him play there and see if you have solved the position for a few years.

    We have to stop trying to fit in below average players into the lineup and get a regular lineup and play them.  Having guys like Clemens or Kreidler moving around should be it, but we are putting sub optimal lineups because we are trying to force players into the lineup.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...