Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Need to Trade Joe Ryan at the Deadline

    Joe Ryan has become one of baseball's most valuable pitchers. That could make him the key to the Twins' future, but not in the way you think.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of William Parmeter

    Twins Video

    Joe Ryan has been everything the Minnesota Twins could have hoped for this season. Through his first 70 1/3 innings, the right-hander has posted a 3.20 ERA while striking out 79 hitters and establishing himself as one of the most reliable starters in the American League. He had a minor hiccup against the White Sox Monday night, but still, he's on a run of dominant outings stretching back to the end of April.

    The advanced metrics suggest his success is no fluke, either. Ryan's expected ERA sits below his actual ERA, while his FIP is even lower. The underlying numbers paint the picture of a pitcher who has legitimately taken another step forward in 2026. Put simply, Ryan has pitched like an ace. And that's exactly why the Twins should consider trading him.

    That might sound counterintuitive. But Ryan's combination of performance, affordability, and remaining control is precisely what would make him one of the most coveted players on the trade market. If the Twins decide they aren't positioned to seriously contend in the near future, there may never be a better opportunity to maximize the value of one of their most important assets. One of the biggest reasons why is Ryan's contract situation.

    If he were approaching free agency, the decision would be relatively straightforward. The Twins would either keep him for a playoff push or move him for whatever return they could get before losing him. But that's not the situation here. Ryan isn’t a free agent until after next season, meaning whatever team (hypothetically) acquired him would be getting him beyond this year.

    Acquiring a frontline starter for one postseason run is valuable. Acquiring one for multiple seasons is something entirely different. That's why teams are often willing to pay a premium for pitchers in Ryan's position. They're buying a pitcher who can slot near the top of the rotation immediately. They're buying cost-controlled production, and a player they don't have to compete for on the open market for multiple years. Those players rarely become available. And when they do, bidding wars tend to follow. A recent example (to an extent) is the Garrett Crochet trade.

    When the White Sox moved Crochet to Boston, they landed four prospects in return, including a pair who ranked highly on Top-100 lists. While Ryan wouldn't command quite that level of return, the comparison illustrates the type of value that frontline pitching can generate.

    The Twins could realistically target a package built around a Top-100 prospect and additional high-upside talent. More importantly, they would probably have multiple teams competing to make those offers. The market for starting pitching is almost always aggressive, and there are plenty of contenders who could use help.

    The Braves, Padres, Yankees, Diamondbacks, Cubs and Brewers are all firmly in the postseason hunt that could really use a top-of-the-rotation starter like Ryan. Other clubs (the Cardinals? the A's?) might get involved if they hang around longer than expected and their rebuild seems to be ahead of schedule.

    The point is that the Twins wouldn't be negotiating from a position of weakness. They would be negotiating from a position of strength. If Ryan were made available, Minnesota could afford to be selective. The front office could compare offers, identify the prospects they like the most, and ultimately choose the package that best fits the organization's long-term vision.

    That's a luxury many sellers don't have. Of course, none of this means trading Ryan would be easy. In fact, it would probably be one of the most difficult decisions the front office could make. Ryan is a popular name. He's developed into exactly the type of pitcher every team wants leading its rotation. Trading players like that is never fun.

    But front offices have to separate emotion from evaluation. The question isn't whether Ryan is good; the answer to that is obvious. The question is whether keeping Ryan gives the Twins a better chance to build a championship-caliber roster than trading him for a significant haul of young talent.

    That's where things become more complicated. If the Twins were clearly positioned to compete for a World Series over the next couple years, holding onto Ryan would be an easy decision. You keep great players when you're trying to win championships. But if the organization believes it's still several pieces away, then Ryan becomes something different. He becomes an opportunity to add multiple young players and improve the organization's long-term outlook. An opportunity to accelerate a retooling process without committing to a full rebuild.

    While Ryan is still relatively young, there's also the reality that pitcher value can change quickly. Pitchers get hurt, performance fluctuates, and circumstances change. There's no guarantee Ryan's trade value will ever be higher than it is right now. That's what makes this summer so intriguing. It's what made his elbow scare in May so paralyzing.

    The Twins have one of the most valuable trade assets in baseball: a pitcher performing at an ace level, multiple years of team control remaining, and a market that would almost certainly be filled with interested buyers.

    Whether the front office ultimately agrees is another question entirely. They may view Ryan as a foundational piece worth building around, and that's a reasonable position to take. But at the very least, the Twins should strongly consider the possibility. Because as difficult as it would be to trade a pitcher as good as Joe Ryan, the return might ultimately do more for the future of the franchise than keeping him ever could.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Eduardo Tait

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, C
    On Thursday, the 19-year-old went 2-for-4 with two home runs and three RBI in Cedar Rapids. That gives him nine homers this season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    15 hours ago, weitz41 said:

    Honestly, this forgone conclusion that the Twins should trade Joe is kind of silly. The AL is SO bad this year that 5 games under .500 and your still in it for a wild card. Now throw in the central being even worse than expected. At this point of the season with WHAT 50% of the BP waiver wire pick-ups and 3 of tonight's starting 9 from the same place. Just ride it out. A little buy and a little sell. Fill in with AAA guys and ride it out.

    Save that big trade for the winter meetings.

    There aren't even going to be winter meetings this season due to the lockout.  I'm not yet convinced there will be missed games next season, but there 100% will be a lockout that halts all offseason business.  Because of this, I don't think we see very much trade activity leading up to the official lockout date given all the uncertainty there will be at that time.

    But this year's postseason isn't uncertain.  And the idea that being sorta within shouting distance of the last wild card is not real contention.  Were the Reds contenders last year?  To me, they were not even though they happened to fill the playoff bracket.  And if teams in this position do think of themselves as contenders, then that means the pool of buyers (demand) will be big and the pool of sellers (supply) will be low.  That is a very good environment in which to be a seller.

    It will suck, but Ryan will and should be traded at the deadline.

    Not only do you need to trade Ryan, you need to do it asap.  Injury risk is high, and if you can get a good package now, it's time.  I'm not sure what people wanting to hold onto Ryan expect will happen with him, but the answer is that he'll be playing with some other team two years from now no matter what.

    2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    As it turns out, Joe Ryan has a say in whether or not the Twins extend him. And if you listened to his public comments after the trade deadline, you may not be inclined to believe he'd sign an extension here. They could overpay him to get him to sign, but that would then have the opposite effect on his trade value.

    And I'd say they can get pretty much the same now as the could've last year. We're not talking an extra top 100 prospect or anything. It'd be a slight improvement on the 3rd or 4th prospect in the deal. There isn't some massive swing in value going from 2.5 to 1.5 in controlled years.

    I think you underestimate the impact of that additional year of team control and Joe being a year older. The impact is at the top of the deal, not the bottom. Last year potential deals revolved around a minimum of two top 100 prospects with one being elite or even a good young major leaguer. Now they are talking about a deal built around a single top 100.

    12 minutes ago, TJSweens said:

    I think you underestimate the impact of that additional year of team control and Joe being a year older. The impact is at the top of the deal, not the bottom. Last year potential deals revolved around a minimum of two top 100 prospects with one being elite or even a good young major leaguer. Now they are talking about a deal built around a single top 100.

    I'm happy to be proven wrong if you can show me some examples of significantly larger returns for guys traded with 2.5 years of control compared to similar guys traded with 1.5 years of control.

    Who's "they?" I'm certainly not talking about it being built around a single top 100 prospect. The value should absolutely still be 2 big time prospects.

    39 minutes ago, TJSweens said:

    I think you underestimate the impact of that additional year of team control and Joe being a year older. The impact is at the top of the deal, not the bottom. Last year potential deals revolved around a minimum of two top 100 prospects with one being elite or even a good young major leaguer. Now they are talking about a deal built around a single top 100.

    No way it's only one top 100 guy unless that guy is in the top ten or so. No way. They aren't getting less than a top thirty guy and two more guys, or two guys in the fifty to seventy range. 

    21 hours ago, karcherd said:

    Why do we need more prospects, we either don't develop or play the ones we have now.  So let's just load up on some more to sit behind the AAAA types and aging vets.

    I don't want Zoll anywhere near making this type of decision for this organization.  We need someone leading baseball operations who knows what they are doing.

    in a word YES

    24 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Man, looking at the prospect lists, I'm not in love with several lists from contenders. Hopefully they find a great package...

    Caminiti and Hartman from Atlanta is my #1 hope right now.

    One, it’s too late to extend him. He’s going to test the market. And even a hard cap (as unlikely as that is) wouldn’t suppress the top end of the market. This is proven in Football, and something he and his agent are betting on.

    Two, the Twins won’t outbid everyone when he hits the market.

    Yes, you have to trade him.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...