Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Santana Signing Signals Shifting Mindset


    Nick Nelson

    His signature pitch may be that nasty slider, but the Minnesota Twins have thrown us a major curveball with the signing of right-hander Ervin Santana to a four-year, $55 million contract.

    Beyond the addition of a quality veteran arm, the move signifies a continuing shift in organizational philosophy and a major shakeup to the long-term look of the rotation. It also may indicate that ownership is taking a more active role in roster construction.

    Image courtesy of Jason Getz, USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Let's get this out of the way: I was wrong on this one. Very, very wrong. Comically wrong. I wrote on Wednesday that "I can't see the Twins making a serious play" for Santana, and a tweeted "it ain't happening." Shows what I know.

    In fairness, this signing doesn't jibe with what Twins officials have been saying or doing over the past several months. The front office has (sometimes not so subtly) hinted that it doesn't really view contention in 2015 as realistic, with the focus more on on bridging the gap and maintaining long-term flexibility. This was backed up by implications from Terry Ryan and Dave St. Peter that payroll would not rise significantly, as well as by Minnesota's previous free agent splash.

    Signing Torii Hunter to a one-year deal was a move that appeared to be aimed more at generating good will and creating a favorable environment for young players, as opposed to actually improving the team.

    Indeed, it was hard to argue with La Velle's recent assessment:

    Next offseason will be the one in which landing a top pitcher (Samardzija and David Price will be free agents) to anchor a revival will be a more palatable move.

    It's a roundabout way of saying my expectations for the [2015] Twins are low, low, low. My expectations for them this week at the winter meetings are low, low, low. And their chances of moving up the charts in the AL Central are low, low, low following Chicago's moves.

    And yet, now Ryan has signed Santana to the largest free agent contract in franchise history -- a four-year deal that adds more reliability to the 2015 rotation, but inhibits the flexibility of that unit going forward while also carrying significant risk.

    Just one year after throwing $50 million in guaranteed money at Ricky Nolasco (with disastrous results in Year One), the Twins have essentially doubled down, once again handing a lucrative four-year contract to past-30 a veteran with a good-not-great track record.

    Nolasco's struggles this past season have no bearing on how this new acquisition will perform, and it seems fair to say that the Ryan and Co. are especially high on Santana since this isn't the first time the general manager has gone outside his comfort zone to pursue him. There were multiple reports that the Twins made a sizable multi-year offer to Santana last year, even after signing both Nolasco and Phil Hughes.

    Santana is now a year older, and he took a small step backward in 2014 compared to 2013, but that didn't stop Ryan from upping his ante and forfeiting a valuable draft pick (something he's never done) to bring him aboard.

    In the big picture, it's hard to view this as a great signing, because the Twins are now heavily invested in Santana into his mid-30s and are also reducing flexibility for young players to take over, both now and down the line.

    They have three veterans locked in for 2016. In 2017, the club is committed to Santana and Nolasco -- who will both be 34 -- for more than $25 million.

    In the scope of the ongoing rebuilding process, that might seem a little odd. There are several vaunted pitching prospects in the pipeline, some of whom are on the verge of arriving.

    But to me, there are two big takeaways from the Santana addition:

    1) The Twins are hedging their bets with prospects. It's easy to say now that a 2016 or 2017 rotation should be filled by Kyle Gibson, Alex Meyer, Trevor May, J.O. Berrios and maybe Kohl Stewart. But we've seen enough prospects derailed by injuries or heightened competition to know that planning around all those guys panning out is overly optimistic. If those pitchers (or others) do in fact all turn into major-leaguer starters, that's a nice problem to have.

    2) Somewhere within the front office, urgency is building. Owner Jim Pohlad has made some public comments this offseason that have been noticeably at odds with Ryan's typically conservative demeanor; undoubtedly bristling at sagging ticket sales, Pohlad has hinted that he's ready to spend and give his product a more immediate jolt. I don't know how much he influenced the GM's pursuit of Santana (and others), but I'd guess it was significant. My sense was always that Ryan would personally prefer to pursue short-term options or make-good contracts (and that was actually my preferred strategy).

    I can't say I love the Santana signing because it's a major commitment to an aging hurler who's never been truly great, but I view it as a solid move. The Twins are building some decent pitching depth and lessening their reliance on prospects, both of which were much needed.

    Additionally, they're continuing to push back against the "cheap" label, and changing the perception that they simply aren't interested in spending to make the team better in a season where they are unlikely to compete for the playoffs. As a fan who's been frustrated with what I view as a defeatist attitude at times, I appreciate that.

    At the end of the day, a $50 million contract (or even two $50 million contracts in two years) is not that substantial in today's MLB, nor is a team payroll just north of $100 million, which is where the Twins now sit. But this franchise is moving in the right direction, and giving fans some reason to hope that these miserable past four years really are in the rearview mirror.

    Whether TR made that pivot on his own or required a little push from above, it's good to see.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Of the pitchers you listed, Ervin is better than Porcello. Healthier than Kazmir and Latos.  And almost all are going to get more than four years and $55M.  Cueto, Zimmerman, Jeff S, Price, and Greinke could all get in excess of $100M, some approaching $150M. The reality is we weren't signing most of those guys either way.

     

    I wouldn't want Porcello or Fister, would have less interest in Kazmir, but there are look to be a lot of options next year.  There may be bounce back seasons from Buchholz, Estrada and Masterson.  There are just more pitchers. 

     

    Regardless, I was already counting on 2015 to be a development year, meaning I was fine letting the young guys play even if they struggle.  We need to know.  We still might get some answers, but now it's not certain the picture will get any clearer.

    I wouldn't want Porcello or Fister, would have less interest in Kazmir, but there are look to be a lot of options next year.  There may be bounce back seasons from Buchholz, Estrada and Masterson.  There are just more pitchers. 

     

    Regardless, I was already counting on 2015 to be a development year, meaning I was fine letting the young guys play even if they struggle.  We need to know.  We still might get some answers, but now it's not certain the picture will get any clearer.

     

    I think the picture will be clearer. Theoretically, one of the two could get 30 starts.  The other could have 50 bullplen appearances, or 10-20, then move to the rotation and get 15-20 starts.

     

    If that does not happen, it is on the Twins and was likely going to the case whether or not we signed Ervin.

    My take:

     

    1. I'm glad they aren't sitting back and waiting for the farm.

    2. I'm glad they are attempting to add talent to the awful pitching staff.

    3. I'm not in love with the signing, but I do think it helps the team.

    4. I don't think it's the dollars that might hinder the team, it's that they don't really have room for Meyer and May and Berrios now.......and they just traded for Meyer and May (leaving them w/o a CF for 2-3 years now), if those guys still aren't ready to help, that's three years with no payback.

    5. I hope they have the guts to pull the plug on anyone that isn't pitching well, assuming Meyer is ready at that point (or May or Milone). If they just stick with the guys (if they are bad) because they are vets making money, that will be a bummer.

    6. I'll be shocked if both Nolasco and Santana are better than league median this year, hoping to be shocked.

    Pretty much nailed my thoughts on the signing.

    I think the picture will be clearer. Theoretically, one of the two could get 30 starts.  The other could have 50 bullplen appearances, or 10-20, then move to the rotation and get 15-20 starts.

     

    If that does not happen, it is on the Twins and was likely going to the case whether or not we signed Ervin.

    You and I will just have to disagree that a season in the bullpen is an acceptable place for a good starting pitching prospect. Who has passed the age of 25. :)

     

    Trevor May had a couple of compelling outings last fall and I would have liked to see him take some turns in the rotation. I hope Molitor and Allen do not turn him into a pitch to contact bullpen arm. Even Milone might have been given a shot in ST as a possible "different look" kind of guy for the rotation (and only lefty).

    My take:

     

    1. I'm glad they aren't sitting back and waiting for the farm.

    2. I'm glad they are attempting to add talent to the awful pitching staff.

    3. I'm not in love with the signing, but I do think it helps the team.

    4. I don't think it's the dollars that might hinder the team, it's that they don't really have room for Meyer and May and Berrios now.......and they just traded for Meyer and May (leaving them w/o a CF for 2-3 years now), if those guys still aren't ready to help, that's three years with no payback.

    5. I hope they have the guts to pull the plug on anyone that isn't pitching well, assuming Meyer is ready at that point (or May or Milone). If they just stick with the guys (if they are bad) because they are vets making money, that will be a bummer.

    6. I'll be shocked if both Nolasco and Santana are better than league median this year, hoping to be shocked.

     

    7.  Now the Twins have a pitcher they can trade down the line to help replenish the farm system when they start drafting in the first round with the 28th pick. This would happen if the younger pitchers show they belong and can adequately replace the pitcher being traded or we have the ammo to trade a prospect to acquire a piece that helps us get to the World Series.

    You and I will just have to disagree that a season in the bullpen is an acceptable place for a good starting pitching prospect. Who has passed the age of 25. :)

     

    Trevor May had a couple of compelling outings last fall and I would have liked to see him take some turns in the rotation. I hope Molitor and Allen do not turn him into a pitch to contact bullpen arm. Even Milone might have been given a shot in ST as a possible "different look" kind of guy for the rotation (and only lefty).

     

    I think we will have to disagree. I have lived through guy after guy being penciled in as a lock in the winter and seen any number of things happen every year.  What we know in December is always completely different from the reality of the following June.  It happens every year.  The blocking argument has never been a problem.  I think many are nervous since Meyer didn’t make it up, but I think it was never in the cards. Nobody thought Pino was a better prospect than Meyer.

     

    Here is a brief history:

     

    In 2010 we had Blackburn, fresh off an extension and a good 2008-2009.  Back to back 200 IP at 4.00.  Young guy, going to take a step forward.  He went out and put up a 5.42 ERA.

     

    In 2011, Duensing was locked in.  He was our best pitcher in 2010. Pavano was always going to be good because he had the one good year. Liriano was back to being Liriano.  Blackburn was a bounce back guy, they made excuse after excuse about his arm and it taking away his best pitch, hitters were sitting on his fastball but he was healthy now.  Duensing put up a 5.23.  Pavano’s ERA jumped to 4.30.  Liriano’s went from 3.62 to 5.09.  Baker and Liriano only pitched 134 IP each. Blackburn had an ERA of 4.49 and only pitched 145 innings.

     

    In 2012, we had hope Liriano was going to bounce back.  You could pencil in Pavano for at least a league average 4.50 type ERA and he is an inning eater.  Duensing was a guy we needed to give a look, bounce back guy.    Well Liriano put up a 5.31 ERA and logged 100 IP.  The new found health did not seem to help Blackburn, he had a 7.39 ERA and logged 98 innings.  Duensing proved to be more 2011 Duensing, 5.12 ERA and only 109 innings.  Pavano, well proved to be not a guy that could log innings OR be productive (6.00 ERA in 63 innings).

     

    In 2013, Scott Diamond was our best pitcher and going to the guy, he was locked in.  Big Pelf was brought in to stabilize the back half of the rotation.   Gibson was going to emerge.  Huge upside potential.   Diamond put up an ERA of 5.43 and only logged 131 Innings.  Gibson struggled as most rookies do, 6.53 ERA in 51 innings.  Pelfrey was awful.  5.19 ERA in 152 IP.

     

    In 2014, Ricky was the a huge get.  We were making excuses for Pelfrey.  1st year back from TJ….then he hit his groove for 6 starts, then he wore down….We could get help from the farm as early as June. Deduno was actually pretty good the year before.  Maybe he was a gem we found. Ricky had an ERA of 5.38 and was shut down, only 159 IP.  We got a whopping 23 innnings of 7.99 ERA out of Pelfrey.  Turns out he isn’t any good.    And Deduno’s ERA jumped to 4.60.

     

    In my humble opinion, having one extra guy that starts April 1st getting quasi starts in a long relief role until he steps into the rotation is a fine strategy.  It could actually be a great way to break a guy like Meyer in.  Not to mention the depth and talent upgrade Ervin provides.

     

    I clearly approve.

    Edited by tobi0040

    Should have done that last year with Meyer......and NONE of the guys you listed (that have come up in the last 4 years) are half the prospects as him, they aren't good comparisons at all (well, maybe Gibson, maybe).

    Eh, Gibson is a pretty terrible comp to Meyer.

     

    Higher floor, lower ceiling. Gibson was a solid prospect; Meyer has the potential to be dominant. Or implode spectacularly.

    I think the picture will be clearer. Theoretically, one of the two could get 30 starts.  The other could have 50 bullplen appearances, or 10-20, then move to the rotation and get 15-20 starts.

    If that does not happen, it is on the Twins and was likely going to the case whether or not we signed Ervin.

     

    Theoretically they could get 30 starts. Theoretically they could get stuck in Rochester all season too.

     

    Sticking the youngstes in the rotation at the onset regardless of other options would have been the best  way to ensure we get a clear idea of what they will give us in the furture.  It could have shown that they won't cut it, but I don't care, we need to find out sometime, now is better than next year assuming being competitive is more of a future goal than a present goal.

     

    It is on the Twins to make room for prospects, but I don't trust them to put development ahead of country club ideals.  This is the club that put Kris Johnson, Logan Darnell and Johan Pino at the head of the line because they were more veteran and had put more time in.  It let Ricky Nolasco put up a historically terrible season for an entire year and re-signed Mike Pelfrey to a two year deal because they liked him in the clubhouse.

    Edited by nicksaviking

    Should have done that last year with Meyer......and NONE of the guys you listed (that have come up in the last 4 years) are half the prospects as him, they aren't good comparisons at all (well, maybe Gibson, maybe).

     

    But the blocking argument applies to May as well.  Not just Meyer.  But the moral of the story is things change.  Here is a brief list of assumptions we are making regarding the blocking argument:

     

    -2014 Hughes is the guy moving forward.  He has battled health issues in the past.  We are assuming he is healthy again.

     

    -Gibson is a major league pitcher.  He ended the year with a decent ERA of 4.43, especially given it being his first full year  up.    I think he is going to need to k more than 5.4 people per 9. 

     

    -May is the good May from 2014, not the bad May.  The guy has struggled a ton with control the last few years.  If that pops as an issue again he will be in AAA real quick.

     

    -Ricky Nolasco is the pre-2014 guy.  The numbers are not indicitive of a larger health issue.

     

    -Meyer is healthy and the Twins want him up here on April 1.  He gets his BB's under control.

     

    -Nobody will need TJ, have a bum shoulder, etc. including Ervin Santana.

     

    I am not predicting any of things.  But one of them or some other unforseen thing will happen.  We will need a 6th starter and odds are before June 1.

    Sticking the youngstes in the rotation at the onset regardless of other options would have been the best  way to ensure we get a clear idea of what they will give us in the furture.  It could have shown that they won't cut it, but I don't care, we need to find out sometime, now is better than next year assuming being competitive is more of a future goal than a present goal.

     

     

    Three years from now, I think Meyer and May will either be in baseball or they won't. They will either be really good or they won't.  And I don't think whether they get starts on April 1 or make 5, 10, or 20 appearances out of the pen first will matter at all.

     

    The issue and bigger risk I have with the let the young guys play from day one is depth.  Nothing I have seen from Mike Pelfrey makes me ever want to see him start a game for the Twins again.  Same with the AAAA filler guys we have or will pick up between now and February.  The reason you sign Ervin Santana is so that never happens (in addition to making your staff much better).  Ultimately, We will likely have 30-40 starts next year made by guys that are not Meyer, May, Nolasco, Hughes, and Gibson.  I would rather see them to go Ervin than the alternative.

    Here is my issue....I think Meyer and maybe May are BETTER than Nolasco and Gibson.....and they probably won't pitch unless something REALLY bad happens (not if Nolasco and Gibson are ok, but not bad).

     

    Lots of people worry about depth, I worry about the MLB team having the best player on it, not keeping guys in AAA so in case things go REALLY bad, they come up. I want them up when they are the better option (even if the existing option is acceptable). 

     

    that is the delta in our position, I think.

    Here is my issue....I think Meyer and maybe May are BETTER than Nolasco and Gibson.....and they probably won't pitch unless something REALLY bad happens (not if Nolasco and Gibson are ok, but not bad).

     

    Lots of people worry about depth, I worry about the MLB team having the best player on it, not keeping guys in AAA so in case things go REALLY bad, they come up. I want them up when they are the better option (even if the existing option is acceptable). 

     

    that is the delta in our position, I think.

     

    I just think it is an irrational worry that five guys are going to not need to be replaced, sent down, and stay healthy.   Honest question.  When has that ever happened?

    As I said.....it is about Meyer being better NOW, and not wanting to watch a worse pitcher at all. And, that this should have been done 2 years ago, when they had no real prospects......

     

    I expect them to need 7 pitchers, but I'd prefer the better pitchers be here, and not in AAA, I think I've said that several times now.

    Three years from now, I think Meyer and May will either be in baseball or they won't. They will either be really good or they won't.  And I don't think whether they get starts on April 1 or make 5, 10, or 20 appearances out of the pen first will matter at all.

     

     

    I guess that I think in three years they'll either be very good starters or in the back of the bullpen.  But I don't want to think, I want to know.  We shouldn't be unsure of what they can do this time next year.  We MIGHT get to see enough of them this year, but now that is not certain.

     

    This can't turn into a Chris Parmelee situation where he got five odd games here and 7 odd games there and we try to make a judgment based on piecemeal information. We shouldn't evaluate these guys based on a scattershot of data from spot starts and periodic bullpen appearances.

    I just think it is an irrational worry that five guys are going to not need to be replaced, sent down, and stay healthy.   Honest question.  When has that ever happened?

     

    Last year the injured starters were continally replaced by AAAA pitchers because their seniority "earned" them the promotion.  And Nolasco was never demoted despite a full season of making the fans turn off the TV.

     

    Besides, I don't want Meyer, May, Berrios or any other true prospect to make spot starts, what good does that do?  If they are going to start for the Twins, they should have a permanent position in the rotation until they prove unable to cut it.

    Edited by nicksaviking

    I don't understand the Pelfrey dislike, and suggest that Meyer, May etc will have to beat him out in spring training.  Seems Pelfrey had one bad inning a lot last season.  I look for him to be in the mix for the rotation and won't be surprised if he makes it. 

    7.  Now the Twins have a pitcher they can trade down the line to help replenish the farm system when they start drafting in the first round with the 28th pick. This would happen if the younger pitchers show they belong and can adequately replace the pitcher being traded or we have the ammo to trade a prospect to acquire a piece that helps us get to the World Series.

    Let's hope it's the 30th pick. :)

    Last year the injured starters were continally replaced by AAAA pitchers because their seniority "earned" them the promotion. 

     

    I don't neccesarily agree with that.  It is clear to me with hindsight that Meyer was not coming up unless he lit the world on fire and we had to bring him up.  He did that for 3-4 starts...but never did really did it.

     

    I think the Twins either wanted to suppress his service time or they wanted to give him a full year and manage pitch counts, and didn't think doing so at the big league level made sense for his development.  I lean towards suppress service time. They didn't want to waste a year of control on 80 pitch count starts.  Now we have a talented Boras client from 25-31 under full control.  We know he is never giving us a discount and he will be a free agent at 31. 

    Edited by tobi0040

    I like the signing as it adds a proven and durable arm that will be 20 percent of our SP corps. If Hughes repeats or comes close to his performance last year, Gibson continued to improve, May settles in, we have one spot for Rickey, Meyer or someone else that emerges, like Berrios.

     

    I see now the wisdom of being careful with Meyer. Made no sense to call him up last year. It would have been like betting on an inside straight in a non contending year.

     

    And I have had to get used to the naysayers on here. No matter what the Twins do there will be criitics. I see this as trying to help the team by bringing in a durable veteran arm in a position of need. Puts less pressure on the kids. 

    I'm sorry, I don't know how anyone could call the signing of Santana a "shifting mindset."

     

    This is the exact same move that the Twins management has been passing off for years now. The Twins need a top of the rotation arm, but they don't even consider that. Instead, they again go for the bargain bin, grabbing up yet another #3 arm, and expect the fans to celebrate that they've opened up the wallet because they've spent a whopping $55 Million bucks. 

     

    BTW, While this will be the newest "biggest FA deal in Twins history," does anyone have any list of what each team's biggest FA deal is, because I've got to think that's still at or near the very bottom of all of MLB. 

     

    It is important for the Twins to start spending money to get some talent back on the roster, but this is another move that seems much less about winning, than another smokescreen for a team that is struggling to keep fan interest and seems to have lost all interest in, or maybe just doesn't have the ability to, putting a winning team on the field.

     

    BTW, While this will be the newest "biggest FA deal in Twins history," does anyone have any list of what each team's biggest FA deal is, because I've got to think that's still at or near the very bottom of all of MLB. 

     

     

    I remember researching that two years ago when Willingham was the Twins largest free agent signing and it was the lowest largest free agent signing for any team. (There has to be a better way to phrase that!)

     

    4/55 has moved them up though.  They are definately ahead of the Padres, who I believe gave Carlos Quinten their largest contract and the Pirates who set their record this year with Liriano.  This is equal in dollars but fewer years than the Royals gave Gil Meche.  I think Cleveland's 4/56 deal for Swisher is their largest, so that's only a million buck more.

     

    They're low on the list, but who did you want?  I woud never give a 6-7 year deal for a starting pitcher.  The free agent class this year is awful.

    So anything short of spending 150 million is disrespecting the fans?  Exactly one team has spent that kind of money this offseason; a lot of unhappy baseball fans out there.

     

    And 55 million dollar smoke screen? They already had ten-million dollar smoke screen in Hunter...

    I think we will have to disagree. I have lived through guy after guy being penciled in as a lock in the winter and seen any number of things happen every year.  What we know in December is always completely different from the reality of the following June.  It happens every year.  The blocking argument has never been a problem.  I think many are nervous since Meyer didn’t make it up, but I think it was never in the cards. Nobody thought Pino was a better prospect than Meyer.

     

     

    Sure, but last year Pelfrey made it through spring and five starts into the regular season, despite just about everybody on TD pretty clearly believing from the day he was signed that he didn't have the stuff to pitch in a big league rotation. So maybe Pelfrey wasn't blocking Meyer last year, but it turns out he was blocking someone, Kris Johnson even. Blocking happens. I'm not sure Santana will be $15 million better than May or Meyer, so I was ambivalent. Especially if you consider that May and Meyer seem to have a great relationship, and now they are forced to compete against one another for the final spot.. Hunger Games anyone? The Santana signing is maybe not that big a deal to make in the big scheme but fun to argue.

    I like the Pirates' left handed Liriano (3 years/39 mil and a dominator when coaches let him pitch) and the Cubs' Hamels (2 years /20 mil) signings way better than this signing. I don't care about the money. Pohlads can spend whenever they want to (they just haven't wanted to according to past actions). I like the years way better. Time will tell. Maybe, unlike what most armchair managers spout, Santana will get better or remain the same as he starts next year at 32 years of age, instead of get worse fast.  

    I like the Pirates' left handed Liriano (3 years/39 mil and a dominator when coaches let him pitch) and the Cubs' Hamels (2 years /20 mil) signings way better than this signing. I don't care about the money. Pohlads can spend whenever they want to (they just haven't wanted to according to past actions). I like the years way better. Time will tell. Maybe, unlike what most armchair managers spout, Santana will get better or remain the same as he starts next year at 32 years of age, instead of get worse fast.  

     

    Liriano was not coming back here. I don't think either side had genuine interest. Ervin is better than Hammel, almost a half run better career ERA.  Hammel's career WHIP is 1.39.  He hasn't been nearly as durable either. 

     

    Granted two years versus four...

    If we come to 2017 with Meyer, May, Berrios, Stewart for starters either in the rotation or having paid their major league dues, it means we traded off Gibson at some point before he became arbitration expensive, allowed Phil Hughes to walk and got a draft pick because the Twins offered but he didn't take the additional year, and Nolasco is ripe for trade and Santana is being considered for an option year. Not to mention any surprises that would pop up. 

     

    And the Twins would still have a minimal payroll. Would Hicks still be around (Kepler and Walker and Burto in the outfield). Would Dozier have been traded and replaced by Michael or anyone else. Is Gordon on the team by now.

     

    Yes, for the sake of spending money, the team didn't kill themselves with this contract, or even the one-year for Torii, which is worth its weight in fan goodwill...watch and judge.

     

    What makes all of this work is what the Twins can flip certain bullpeners for (Fein, Duensing for example). What they do with Plouffe, Escobar, Dozier. Can Hicks gain marketability. Is Arcia longterm or once he shows shines of shine (shades of David Ortiz) you just move him.

     

    The Twins are fortunate that they have a number of players not only major league bound but also 40-man roster bound who want to play major league ball and know they have a chance to showcase with the Twins, and the Twins just have to know when to pull the plug and (shades of Billy Beane) make trades happen.

     

    Will be an interesting next five years before the team totally settles and have to deal with longterm contracts for Berrios, Meyer, May, Sano, Buxton and the ilk...possible $100 million in those names alone!




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...