Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Alan Roden Should Report to Fort Myers Next Spring with at Least One Extra Glove

    Alan Roden is off to a rocky start in Minnesota, but he finished 2026 strong. His path to playing time might require picking up another position, though.

    Greggory Masterson
    Image courtesy of Kiyoshi Mio-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Alan Roden has had a Twins career that has been very unfair to Alan Roden, starting the moment many Twins fans learned that he existed. Twins historians may recall the 2025 trade deadline, during which the Twins made nine trades, the last of which sent then-setup man Louis Varland to Toronto. Roden was the second piece of the return for Varland (and Ty France), arriving in Minnesota alongside lefty pitching prospect Kendry Rojas.

    Fans were predisposed to dislike Roden for having the temerity to have been traded for a hometown kid, but he didn’t help himself much on the field. In 12 games, he mustered just a .463 OPS, then he sprained his thumb sliding into the wall chasing a foul ball. He missed the rest of that season.

    And Roden wasn’t in a position to struggle. At the time of his acquisition, he was just one of many left-handed corner outfield options, alongside (but not limited to) Trevor Larnach, Matt Wallner, James Outman, Walker Jenkins, and Emmanuel Rodriguez. He was thrust into a situation where he not only needed to fight for playing time in the present, but also had to fend off higher-profile prospects on his heels.

    After roster decisions and injury delayed Roden’s 2026 MLB season, he struggled out of the gate, with another OPS under .500 through his first eight games. However, even with a demotion and inconsistent playing time, he finished the season strong, slashing .317/.403/.450 and posting more walks than strikeouts over his last 24 games, to end the season with a .769 OPS in 32 games—15-20% better than average. It was fewer than 100 plate appearances, but it offered a glimpse of the player the Twins thought they had acquired from Toronto: a solid defensive corner outfielder with great strike-zone control and a little gap power. It’s not a high ceiling, but it’s easy to see how a player like Roden can be a solid, everyday player who helps teams win games.

    However, everyday play in the outfield probably isn’t feasible in Minnesota next season, even assuming that Larnach has played his last game in a Twins jersey (which, given the club’s history, might be a big assumption). Roden will be jockeying for playing time with fellow lefties Jenkins and Rodriguez, the latter of whom is out of options and will need to be on the big-league roster. Furthermore, Byron Buxton and Luke Keaschall will see a good share of time in the outfield.

    You might even say that the outfield is crowded before considering Roden. But there is some playing time to be spared. Jenkins, Rodriguez, Buxton, and Keaschall all have checkered injury histories, and it’s safe to assume there will be at least a couple of trips to the injured list from that group. Once you factor in rest days and a potentially fluid designated hitter spot, it’s not difficult to see some playing time every week. But at this point, he’s slotted in as the fifth outfielder.

    However, there might be another lane to playing time for Roden. Prior to his surprise selection in the third round of the 2022 draft, Roden was viewed primarily as a first baseman, having logged 39 appearances there as a 22-year-old junior at Creighton, compared to 15 games in the outfield. He also split time between the outfield and first base his draft summer in the Cape Cod League.

    As a pro, Roden has only logged one inning at first base, and he’s listed at 5-foot-11, but he’s got some athleticism, and it’s not hard to imagine him over there after watching France and Kody Clemens (both within an inch of Roden, height-wise) playing first base for the past two seasons.

    Even if Roden’s a bit rusty around the bag, the Twins have been successful in recent years in improving first base defense in players like Clemens and France, the latter of whom won a Gold Glove after years of being regarded as a poor defender. Carlos Santana also won his first Gold Glove at first base as a Twin, and they converted players like Luis Arraez into passable first basemen.

    This isn’t advocating for Roden to be an everyday first baseman or anything. But if the Twins want to get him on the field as much as is reasonably possible as a bench player, this is one way. A couple of outfield starts paired with a game at first base each week allows the Twins to play Roden about 50% of the time. Given Rodriguez’s lack of experience and Buxton’s recovery from offseason hip surgery, the Twins probably need to count on Roden even more at the beginning of the season than almost any other team’s fifth outfielder. And that day-to-day playing time can go up when any of the four guys ahead of him miss time later on.

    Nonetheless, it's difficult to see Roden carving out a consistent three-game-per-week role without a little time on the dirt, and he has real experience playing first base. If his true talent level is close to what he showed in 32 games this season, he’s a player that the Twins should want in the lineup—and he’d be a luxury to have on the bench. Of course, that’s assuming his true talent level is close to what we saw late this season.

    Roden as the backup first baseman (in addition to his work in the corners) makes sense with the roster as currently constructed, given that Royce Lewis is penciled into that spot and hits right-handed. Roden, a lefty, giving him a day off against righties would help Lewis’s numbers. But it remains to be seen if Lewis is indeed in that role next season. His production since the summer of 2024 certainly hasn’t earned it. If the everyday first baseman is instead Kody Clemens, a fellow lefty, it doesn’t make as much sense, unless the Twins play Clemens at second base on days Roden starts against a righty.

    Similarly, many of the potential bats that the Twins could add in free agency to replace Lewis in some form (such as Jake Bauers, Brandon Lowe, Nathaniel Lowe, Jazz Chisholm Jr., Jeff McNeil, or even Arraez) are left-handed. Adding a lefty infielder probably precludes Roden from any time on the dirt. But if they were to instead acquire a righty like Rhys Hoskins, Alec Bohm, or Gleyber Torres, Roden playing some first base could be valuable.

    Even without a little work at first base, Roden seems to be a valuable role player on next year’s team who could be thrust into more action at any time. But being able to add a bit of time at first base would immensely benefit his career and the Twins’ roster flexibility.


    Only read this if you won’t take it more than 10% seriously:
    Alan Roden was a high school catcher. The Twins have a very murky catching picture next season. Of course, they shouldn’t have him also come to camp with a catcher’s mitt.

    But maybe.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Walker Jenkins

    Minnesota Twins - MLB, OF
    The outfielder was named to the International League Postseason All Star team. He hit .308/.407/.532 (.939) with 17 doubles, three triples and 12 homers.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    41 minutes ago, MMBoys93 said:

    55th percentile xSLG, 60th percentile hard hit, .488 SLG in minors this year. Martin career high is 7 HRs at any minor league level. Not a good comp 

    It's a good comp for overall production/profile.

    MiLB, especially this year's International League, is not the same as MLB. 80%+ of players you're comparing Roden to in the minors are not good enough to stick on an MLB roster. So yeah, Roden's "hard hit" could be slightly better than the average player who isn't good enough to play in MLB.

    You seem to be confused about SLG = Power. It's not. ISO is extra base production. SLG is batting average + extra bases. Roden has a high batting average. He has a very low ISO at the level where it counts (MLB).

    Roden has a career ISO of .102 at the MLB level. Martin has a career ISO of .090. Might as well be identical twins as far as I'm concerned.

    Roden hit 1 HR in 94 PA this year, which would be 6 HRs in 600 PA. Martin hit 3 HR in 358 PA or 5 HRs in 600 PA. Again, twins where it actually matters (MLB).

    Rodens bat speed is 69.7 mph. Martins is 69.1 mph. Power comes from bat speed. They're both far below average. The biggest difference between them is Roden tries to hit the ball hard 2x as often as Martin. 

    48 minutes ago, IndianaTwin said:

    Yeah, but if he splits time between 1B and the OF, people will complain about the Twins not putting a guy at a position and letting him stay there. 

    That's sarcasm -- I'm a big fan of positional flexibility. Put me in the camp of those intrigued enough by his past to explore the options. And he's still got an option left, according to Fangraphs. 

    Like I always say: the best benches have a guy who can only play second base

    28 minutes ago, S Bart said:

    Maybe come to spring training with a little less weight also. 🤔 it would improve his performance.

    They said that every year with Sano. And when he would finally shed the weight off, he still performed just as horribly. So losing the weight doesn't really mean anything. Could losing the weight help stave off some exhaustion and potential injuries down the line? Absolutely. But there isn't as much correlation that as people like to think.

    Just now, MackMan said:

    They said that every year with Sano. And when he would finally shed the weight off, he still performed just as horribly. So losing the weight doesn't really mean anything. Could losing the weight help stave off some exhaustion and potential injuries down the line? Absolutely. But there isn't as much correlation that as people like to think.

    It means you can start running quicker and longer.

    Just now, RpR said:

    It means you can start running quicker and longer.

    Maybe. Now I'm not saying that he's currently Matthew LeCroy where he needs an oxygen mask rounding 1st base, but it isn't the biggest thing he needs to work on. Could he get down to 200 or maybe even 190? Probably and it would definitely help his overall health. But I would rather see him hitting the weight room harder than trying to lose weight. 

    3 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    Nah, we have the first baseman of the future already on the roster. Aaron Sabato put up top 5%, top 10%, top 20% a really high OPS in the minors this year and his xwOBA of .308 suggests he deserved to be top 5%, top 10%... better than average, not the absolute worst hitter in the International league so he's guaranteed for the future!

    Why the need to drag Sabato through the mud? Was he mentioned in the article? Is he related to the article? You just wanted to read numbers on Sabato? You don't like like Sabato? And yes I know the answer to my question already. Now can we get back to Rosen as the topic?

    50 minutes ago, MackMan said:

    They said that every year with Sano. And when he would finally shed the weight off, he still performed just as horribly. So losing the weight doesn't really mean anything. Could losing the weight help stave off some exhaustion and potential injuries down the line? Absolutely. But there isn't as much correlation that as people like to think.

    Tom Hanks Running GIF well...there is speed..less weight..

    Sano never shed weight to a playable level.

    I think he debuted in 2015 at about 260, and he was decent defensively at 3B. As I recall, he was like 235lbs in 2014 and that was a big jump from like 220lbs in 2013. He kept packing on the fat until he was over 3 bills and never got down to a reasonable playing weight for the rest of his career. 

    It was speculated that Sano hit 335lbs at one point before joining the Angels.

    First of all, the Twins need to build a 13 man roster where EVERYONE can actually bring something to the team. All 13 spots are valuable. Secondly, they need to actually USE all 13 players in a constructive way conducive to the building of that roster.

    Currently we have no real clue who is going to play 1B. Hopefully it's an upgrade via trade since FA looks questionable at this point. But if we look at the roster as it stands now, we have a LH catcher (FWIW), 2 LH INF, 2 LH OF, plus 2 RH OF, 1 RH INF, and a probable backup RH bat at C and SU. So there's still room to add a 1B and 2nd utility player who could be RH, but that's TBD.

    All of that to say I don't think the 5th OF necessarily has to be RH or LH. They just need to be a decent ballplayer who  can help the ballclub. I just don't see enough value in Martin. IDK if Gonzalez or Mendez are ready, and they need to play daily. So unless they add someone else, I think Roden is the best fit. And I'm also a believer in bench players having  versatility to increase their value to the team. So absolutely he should be working out at 1B. I was pushing for that last offseason to increase his flexibility. 

    Someone needs to be able to play 1B on a backup basis. And if you aren't a primary starter, you need as many ways as possible to help the team. Roden finishing the season strong hopefully means he's ready to stick at the ML level.  Being able to play some 1B increases his value. The obvious answer to the OP is YES he should.

    I like Roden as a 4th-6th outfielder. We all know there will be injuries to the top 3 outfielder's.  Not sure about the 1B idea. He hasn't shown the type of power you'd like to see for a 1st baseman. AB's wise it may be a bit early to make any real judgements, but age wise it's getting a little late to expect much more than what he has now.

    Square peg for round hole...

    In order to improve the Twins really need a 3+ WAR 1st basemen. I don't think Roden is that guy. A 1-2 WAR bench player? I'd buy that.

    I actually like this idea. I think his underlying numbers looked good on savant, and I'd be willing to give it a shot.

    @Greggory Masterson Curious, if you have Roden at 1B (with probably a right handed platoon at points, and maybe that's Royce or someone else?) along with Clemens probably at 2b, Culpepper at SS, Lee at 3b, and then DH and OF so far taken up with Keaschall, Buxton, Jenkins and Rodriguez, my question for you outside of catcher is, what would you do to upgrade the lineup? Where would you want to spend money in free agency or adding via trade to upgrade the roster?

    I'm not overly impressed with Roden's tools--doesn't have plus power or plus speed and this year the Twins only used him in the outfield corners, with a negative defensive rating. As a hitter, he may be able to be a high-contact, high OBP type, but I thought the same for Austin Martin.

    There's probably a spot open in the infield and if Roden can handle first base and hit closer to an .800 OPS than .700, yeah give him the first baseman's mitt. 

    6 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    Instead of trying to convert excess outfielders to first base, would it make more sense to simply trade one for an actual first baseman?

    Which one? If they're trading Jenkins, Keaschall, or Emma, they better get it right. If they're trading Roden or Martin, they likely aren't getting a 1B back that's very useful.

    12 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    Which one? If they're trading Jenkins, Keaschall, or Emma, they better get it right. If they're trading Roden or Martin, they likely aren't getting a 1B back that's very useful.

    I don't think there are any rules stating it must be a 1:1 trade.  And MLB GM is not my full time job (I already have a full time job I'm shirking to hang out with you knuckleheads, I don't need another), so I don't know the exact combination it would take. 

    St Louis sure looks like they could use some improvements in the outfield.  I'd start sniffing around what they'd want in a package for Alec Burleson.  Or maybe you can package an OFer with a young starter (or Joe Ryan just to see if they're paying attention) to start a conversation with the Athletics about Nick Kurtz, who has already apparently turned down an extension offer from them.  Those are just two ideas off the top of my head.

    And yeah, of course they better get it right.  But unless you're cool with the status quo of winning 75 games every year, you're going to have to take some risks and be willing to give something to get something.  This is a go big or go home organization, after all

    45 minutes ago, The Great Hambino said:

    I don't think there are any rules stating it must be a 1:1 trade.  And MLB GM is not my full time job (I already have a full time job I'm shirking to hang out with you knuckleheads, I don't need another), so I don't know the exact combination it would take. 

    St Louis sure looks like they could use some improvements in the outfield.  I'd start sniffing around what they'd want in a package for Alec Burleson.  Or maybe you can package an OFer with a young starter (or Joe Ryan just to see if they're paying attention) to start a conversation with the Athletics about Nick Kurtz, who has already apparently turned down an extension offer from them.  Those are just two ideas off the top of my head.

    And yeah, of course they better get it right.  But unless you're cool with the status quo of winning 75 games every year, you're going to have to take some risks and be willing to give something to get something.  This is a go big or go home organization, after all

    It certainly doesn't have to be a 1:1 trade, my point is the same I make every time somebody talks about "excess." There's no such thing. Your suggestion was trading "excess outfielders for a 1B." Just curious what you thought that looked like. Because they don't have "excess" GOOD outfielders. They have an aging Buxton, a mostly established Keaschall, and 2 top 50 prospects. There's no other OFer to trade that brings back anything useful.

    I'm totally on board with the idea of trading for a 1B in general. I just don't see a path where you bring in a meaningful upgrade at 1B by trading any "excess outfielder" not named Keaschall, Rodriguez, or Jenkins. And that's a bold move to make, even for such a go big or go home org. Throwing Roden or Martin in as a sweetener is not the same thing, in my book. Because the real piece in that trade would be a non-outfielder. So, was just curious what you thought trading OF for 1B looked like.

    35 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    It certainly doesn't have to be a 1:1 trade, my point is the same I make every time somebody talks about "excess." There's no such thing. Your suggestion was trading "excess outfielders for a 1B." Just curious what you thought that looked like. Because they don't have "excess" GOOD outfielders. They have an aging Buxton, a mostly established Keaschall, and 2 top 50 prospects. There's no other OFer to trade that brings back anything useful.

    I'm totally on board with the idea of trading for a 1B in general. I just don't see a path where you bring in a meaningful upgrade at 1B by trading any "excess outfielder" not named Keaschall, Rodriguez, or Jenkins. And that's a bold move to make, even for such a go big or go home org. Throwing Roden or Martin in as a sweetener is not the same thing, in my book. Because the real piece in that trade would be a non-outfielder. So, was just curious what you thought trading OF for 1B looked like.

    Part of it also depends on what you're able to get elsewhere.  For instance, say they get a high quality 2B (much better FA class than 1B this year) and part of the plan is to have Clemens be the regular at 1B.  Keep in mind that the premise of the OP is moving Roden to 1B.  So in this scenario, he's your 1B depth. 

    So if the plan is to have your top utility option to be locked at 1B because your depth is weak, why not rebalance that depth by acquiring a (preferably RH) 1B of similar (or slightly better if you wanna throw in some lotto ticket minor leaguers) quality to Roden.  And while you don't have an excess of good outfielders (though you could develop one if things break right for the young guys), you do have an excess of part-time/platoon/Quad-A corner outfielders that need to be kept on the 40 man. 

    Now you can free Clemens up to be more of a utility man, where I believe he provides the team the most value, and the the part-time/depth 1B is of higher quality.   There are ways to improve the totality of the lineup beyond bringing in a premium 1B, and improving your depth there can be part of that equation

    9 hours ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    I think it we have seen older/young guys do well at the end of the year, and shouldn't bank on them repeating it. (not that it can't be done)

    He ended the season (August and September) 15/40 with 7 walks and only 5 K's (excellent). Against playoff teams (ATL, SD, MIL) 3/12 no walks and 3 k's and 1 Double. 

    If you add July against playoff teams he was 8/33, 1 Double, 10 walks, 7 K's. 

    IMO he is depth for injury and nothing more, because he seems over matched by major league pitching. But yes he should be bringing a first base glove to spring training, in reality the Twins should be handing them out like candy in spring training. 

    Overmatched? He hit .291 with a .376 OBP.

    I was impressed with his approach, although you never know with young players, it was an eye opening debut and made me wonder what if.....they had kept Roden instead of Outman, which I thought and think they should have done.

    Hitting .291 has definitely raised my perceived ceiling with Roden. But then my favorite baseball player of all time is Rod Carew - I love high batting averages while recognizing a team needs 2 or 3 power sources, I'd rather have Lyman Bostock's, Luis Arraez’s, Luke Keaschall's and Rod Carew’s in 6 of the slots if I had my druthers. I saw in 1977 what that can mean!

    52 minutes ago, Greglw3 said:

    Overmatched? He hit .291 with a .376 OBP.

    I was impressed with his approach, although you never know with young players, it was an eye opening debut and made me wonder what if.....they had kept Roden instead of Outman, which I thought and think they should have done.

    Hitting .291 has definitely raised my perceived ceiling with Roden. But then my favorite baseball player of all time is Rod Carew - I love high batting averages while recognizing a team needs 2 or 3 power sources, I'd rather have Lyman Bostock's, Luis Arraez’s, Luke Keaschall's and Rod Carew’s in 6 of the slots if I had my druthers. I saw in 1977 what that can mean!

    Well now - I would prefer a line-up like 1962 & 1963 a lot of triples and home runs. 😁

    5 hours ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    @Greggory Masterson Curious, if you have Roden at 1B (with probably a right handed platoon at points, and maybe that's Royce or someone else?) along with Clemens probably at 2b, Culpepper at SS, Lee at 3b, and then DH and OF so far taken up with Keaschall, Buxton, Jenkins and Rodriguez, my question for you outside of catcher is, what would you do to upgrade the lineup? Where would you want to spend money in free agency or adding via trade to upgrade the roster?

    Don't get me wrong; this isn't proposing that Roden be the primary first baseman--I'm just interested in him playing there once a week, a few times a month.

    My belief is that they should acquire another infielder, probably a 1B/2B with Clemens playing the other. If he's a righty, it's easy to find Roden a handful of starts there. If he's a lefty, it's harder to get Roden playing time there between Clemens and [New Guy]'s starts. And if that's the case, so be it. I'd care more about truly upgrading in the infield than finding Roden games in the infield.

    But even then, it would help Roden's flexibility and could come in handy if there were an infield injury.

    35 minutes ago, Greggory Masterson said:

    Don't get me wrong; this isn't proposing that Roden be the primary first baseman--I'm just interested in him playing there once a week, a few times a month.

    My belief is that they should acquire another infielder, probably a 1B/2B with Clemens playing the other. If he's a righty, it's easy to find Roden a handful of starts there. If he's a lefty, it's harder to get Roden playing time there between Clemens and [New Guy]'s starts. And if that's the case, so be it. I'd care more about truly upgrading in the infield than finding Roden games in the infield.

    But even then, it would help Roden's flexibility and could come in handy if there were an infield injury.

    Agreed on this. Thanks!

    8 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

    Quick reminder that the Toronto Blue Jays have 4 more seasons of control for Louie Varland. 

    Im Fine GIF by MOODMAN

    Yep.  There was just no need to make that move.  However, I believe Falvey thought he could rebuild much more quickly than a normal rebuild.  When I looked at what he was doing, I thought he could put an entertaining young team on the field for 26 and 27 and be back in contention in 2028.  If Rojas is a legit #2, it's a good trade.  If he is a back of the BP arm and Roden is an average OFer, it's still a decent trade.  In that context, he was making the kind of move that gives a chance at contention that some of us want to see.

    The vision is not hard to see now.  Had they traded Ryan for Tolle and another good piece, perhaps even Arais and they had traded Jeffers for Eyanson, they could be in great shape by 2028 and well beyond.  The rotation would be Tolle / Bradley / Rojas / Prielipp  and Matthews or Eyanson.  That would look pretty good with Quick / Ellwanger / Soto  / Wachsman and Bohorquez as the next wave.  Plus, Hill had they not decided they were a contender. 

    Point being, I didn't like the Varland trade but the direction they were headed gave them a chance to build a contender.  That's a lot more appealing to me than operating on the delusion this team was a contender in 2026.  They still have a lot of young talent but they certainly have not maximized their opportunity like Milwaukee or Cleveland would have.

    14 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    Part of it also depends on what you're able to get elsewhere.  For instance, say they get a high quality 2B (much better FA class than 1B this year) and part of the plan is to have Clemens be the regular at 1B.  Keep in mind that the premise of the OP is moving Roden to 1B.  So in this scenario, he's your 1B depth. 

    So if the plan is to have your top utility option to be locked at 1B because your depth is weak, why not rebalance that depth by acquiring a (preferably RH) 1B of similar (or slightly better if you wanna throw in some lotto ticket minor leaguers) quality to Roden.  And while you don't have an excess of good outfielders (though you could develop one if things break right for the young guys), you do have an excess of part-time/platoon/Quad-A corner outfielders that need to be kept on the 40 man. 

    Now you can free Clemens up to be more of a utility man, where I believe he provides the team the most value, and the the part-time/depth 1B is of higher quality.   There are ways to improve the totality of the lineup beyond bringing in a premium 1B, and improving your depth there can be part of that equation

    Isn't Royce Lewis a RH 1B of similar quality to Roden? Roden played 1B in college. It's not like he's Larnach or Wallner that people wanted to move there who'd never played.

    I fully agree that Clemens is best served as a utility man. They do have an excess of random OF pieces, also agree on that. My disagreement is that there's any use in bringing in a Roden level 1B. Or a "slightly better" 1B. No matter what batter box they stand in. They have an excess of part-time/platoon/Quad-A 1B, too. Sabato, Roden, Lewis, Caratini, Clemens, even Mendez and Gonzalez have played some there. I don't see the point in swapping Roden for Roden with a different name that plays only 1B. 

    I'd much rather they upgrade 2B with Arraez, and 1B with Keaschall because they put Arozarena or Suzuki in the outfield. I don't expect that to happen, but I'm far less concerned with their ability to trade a Quad-A OF who can play 1B for a Quad-A 1B. I'm more concerned with removing Quad-A players from the 40-man and replacing them with real MLB players. Lots of ways to do that. But trading a Quad-A 40-man guy isn't likely to be a key way to do it.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...