Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    5 Major Trade Candidates if Twins Decide to Reshuffle Their Core

    While the Twins are still within striking distance of the playoffs, has their bad stretch been bad enough to consider significant changes? Here are some players who could be traded, to truly reshape the current roster.

    Nate Palmer
    Image courtesy of © Katie Stratman-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Major League Baseball (and the Minnesota Twins) are exactly four weeks away from the 2025 trade deadline. At this point, the Twins are within striking distance of a playoff spot. The problem is that when they haven’t been playing well, the performance has been very discouraging, which makes “buying” hard to endorse—and, as we will explore here, makes one wonder if the Twins have a core ready to compete for the playoffs, let alone make a deep run. With that in mind, it may be prudent for the front office to consider tearing down what was expected to be the core of this team and forming a new one for future seasons. 

    Not everything will happen overnight. A core rebuild could happen quickly, as the Twins do have some quality pieces and would need to look to supplement that group better than they have been currently. A core rebuild likely cannot happen in full by the end of the month, but the Twins can get a strong start on the process.  

    The most obvious thing that can happen immediately is a series of marginal moves: trading away players on expiring deals. Willi Castro, Chris Paddack, and Harrison Bader top that list. When we consider establishing a new core, this group and their trade value may not be enough, but the trades could prove valuable as a source of organizational depth that can develop into regulars, future trade targets, and, of course, the chance of a high-performing wild card acquisition. Moving someone like Bader out could also force the team to get a longer look at Austin Martin or DaShawn Keirsey Jr., accelerating the evaluation process (and perhaps, over the next year, accelerating turnover) for those prime-aged players on the fringes of the roster.

    Changing the core, however, would require bigger and riskier moves, too. Here are some moves with larger consequences that the Twins could consider—ones that would shake up the core and help establish a new one.

    Trevor Larnach or Matt Wallner
    As the two lefties came up through the minors, it always seemed it would be a miracle if both were genuinely able to work long-term on the Twins roster together. This deadline may be the perfect time to part with one player to find value in another. With the Twins' organizational depth, no player acquired for one of these two would need to replace them on the roster. 

    For one, Wallner or Larnach would still exist on the roster, and would fill the role of a left-handed corner outfielder. Some well-regarded prospects could fill in at their positions (looking at you, Walker Jenkins and Emmanuel Rodriguez) soon. This move also creates room for the Twins to identify a right-handed bat to insert into the lineup, something that this club desperately needs, and has needed for some time.

    As far as which lefty to send out, that feels like a toss-up. While both are left-handed, Larnach and Wallner bring slightly different skill sets to the table. Wallner appears to have the highest chance of being a game-changing power bat, which may tip the scale for the Twins. Taking the best package available in this scenario is the best way to go. 

    Royce Lewis
    We know this story all too well. Royce Lewis can’t seem to stay healthy in a Twins jersey, or their affiliates' jerseys. Lately, even when healthy, he has struggled to produce. Lewis is just back from his most recent stint on the IL, and if he can regain any offensive form, it could be the prime opportunity for the Twins to part ways with him and reshape part of their core. 

    A change of scenery could jumpstart Lewis's career. Moving him would also give the Twins more freedom to think about the future on the infield. If this sort of move works for Lewis, the Twins front office will undoubtedly hear about it for ages. (Anyone heard about this David Ortiz guy?) At the same time, there are currently plenty of question marks surrounding Lewis, and instead of reacting in fear, the Twins need to decide if they can afford to wait on Lewis and watch him not regain form. 

    Jhoan Duran or Griffin Jax
    A trade of one of these two is the most obvious possibility this month, among the major options. At the same time, it may cut to the heart of fans the most, because these two have been largely blameless during the team's recent spiral. Relief pitchers are the most expendable players on any non-playoff roster, but they're also the easiest players to slot into contending ones.

    Out of these two, I would have to believe the Twins would prefer to part ways with Duran. He would likely fetch the best package, and we must not forget that the decline in the top end of his velocity has been a concern over the past two seasons. Those concerns could be unwarranted, as Duran is putting together an excellent season. 

    While Duran’s strike rate is down, his 1.69 ERA and 12 saves will undoubtedly catch the eye of a contending team looking to add a lockdown closer to the back end of their bullpen. Jax would be easier for many fans to stomach trading away, since he seems to have these blips where he gives up a series of games in a row before becoming a dominant reliever again. 

    Last season, Tanner Scott was part of a package that netted the Marlins a top-50 prospect, along with three other Padres prospects. Lucas Erceg also found his way onto the Royals at the deadline in exchange for three prospects, including MLB.com’s number four-ranked prospect in the Royals system. Relievers can still fetch good packages at the trade deadline. Contenders want to be able to lock down games with as much certainty as possible. Duran has proved he can do it.


    Where are you at? Is it time to rebuild part of this core, or do you still have confidence in it? What moves would you make? Make it heard below! 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I'm really sorry, but for once I just don't have the time or mental strength to sit down and read everything presented here. Very unlike me, but it is what it is.

    The Twins are in a weird place where we can debate a future owner, vs how much longer the Pohlads are in charge. Do the new owners, assuming new ownership in the next 6 months, recognize some really good things the current FO has done over the years and want to assist them more? Do they mostly sit pat and see what the FO does for 2026 and then make a decision? Or do they come in with sweeping changes?

    Personally, I believe a new ownership should stick with what's in place and evaluate what's on hand. IMO, history has shown that's the smart way to take over any business. For instance, I think the Johnson lead scouting and draft department is really good. Falvey has implemented a lot of good changes throughout the MILB system. What might the current FO do with a little more $ flexibility initially.

    Falvey has always looked to the present, as well as the future. He's NEVER done a Dombroski move of trading away a ton of prospects for a short term gain. Of course, he's also never had a huge wallet to add a lot in FA the way Dombroski had had either.

    I don't oppose making moves. Maybe the Twins can trade and still add. But honestly, what does moving Bader, Paddack, and France really bring back prospect wise? Nothing more than a couple A level players.

    You really want to trade away Duran, Jax, whoever? You want a complete rebuild? How has that worked in the past? How has that worked for the Orioles, the most recent team I can think of. It took YEARS to be viable again. But not every prospect has turned out, and they have no pitching. Their complete teardown hasn't really provided the results they wanted. And I'm even going to bring up the A's as any sort of example.

    I trust the character of Falvey in regard to the long term outlook of the Twins. That's ALWAYS been his approach. And I have no doubt IF he made a grade or two, it would be in the best future of the Twins. But he also knows his butt is on the line, and he's not going to do something stupid for the Twins, or his own reputation. 

    Current ownership is NOT going to add payroll, barring a huge surprise. And Falvey is just not going to tear things down. It's just not his nature.

    Much like 2023, this team, despite being constructed weirdly, has a chance to rebound. If Matthews comes back decently, if SWR KEEPS looking solid, if Festa can find the consistency he showed in 2024, the rotation isn't sunk until Lopez returns. 

    If Royce and Wallner and Correa suddenly remember who they are, things change offensively.

    A lot of IF'S to be certain. But the Twins were hovering about .500 in 2023. Then they went on a run. Similar to 2023, this current team had a bad beginning, then a hot streak, and then finished poorly.

    I am ABSOLUTELY against any kind up blowup and rebuild. Even my reluctant love for the Vikings being cursed has shown my recently that smart decisions can make a rebuild on the fly makes sense. The problem with the Twins is WHO IN THE HELL IS GOING TO OWN THEM IN 6 MONTHS.

    And that's a difference in the trade deadlines. Falvey won't sacrifice a team he might be in charge of a year from now. And with a whole half season to play yet, how could you dismiss Festa and SWR improving and Matthews back and Lopez back in August? How about Lewis, and Waller and Correa getting their crap together? Keaschall back maybe making a difference? 

    There's still a chance this team actually realizes their potential. But if they don't, and just cave over the next few weeks, I don't think this team is devoid of talent. But I'd rather follow the Brewers attitude and just let the kids play. Let Ohl and Adams have their shot. Go ahead and let Rodriguez get a shot of he's healthy. Maybe promote Kline from AA. 

    If it's not working, change what you're doing.

    I'm not saying the 2025 Twins are awful and destined for failure. There's a legitimate chance this team rebounds with the talent on hand. But I can also see a 2026 team that might need 2025 to get ready.

    23 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    The two players who have value from the article are Duran and Jax.

    Yep, that's really about all of value we have to offer, at least without foolishly trading away a Ryan, Lopez, or Buxton. I imagine that at least one of those bullpen guys WILL be traded before the end of the month. 

    3 hours ago, Doctor Wu said:

    Yep, that's really about all of value we have to offer, at least without foolishly trading away a Ryan, Lopez, or Buxton. I imagine that at least one of those bullpen guys WILL be traded before the end of the month. 

    Castro absolutely has value... you will be pleasantly surprised by the return!

    Unless you believe in miracles, "within striking distance of a playoff spot" shouldn't be a factor in whether the Twins should be sellers. I don't know anyone who believes this Twins team could go all the way, so all a playoff slot would do is put a little extra money in everyone's pocket before the inevitable disappointment.

    At this point, it makes more sense to do a strategic trade or two that might actually strengthen the team next year. I usually bitterly oppose trading pitching, but Duran? Sure. Maybe he even gets to pitch for a team that goes all the way.

    On the other hand, better to keep Willi Castro as the one jack-of-all-trades teams need these days. But the rest?

    Any deal that could be made to get a reliable, bona fide, every-day starter at pretty much any position in the infield except short would be a big step in the right direction. No more guys journeymen who are adequate at a handful of positions but not good enough to be a regular at any of them. We've see how that works out.

    On 7/3/2025 at 7:11 AM, BrokenCompass said:

    You have to look at this from the buyer's perspective. If you're a 1st or 2nd place team, are you desperate for a Matt Wallner or a Trevor Larnach to bat in the heart of your order right now? Probably not. They'd likely be platoon players or pinch hitters. Twins won't see much return for that. 

    I don't think anyone's buying Royce Lewis, nor should the Twins sell when he's at rock bottom in his career. 

    The Twins are really going to get a haul for Buxton or Joe Ryan, and maybe something for Duran. If you want a true rebuild, those are the guys are going to help with the foundation. The rest of the team is just window dressing. 

    1st or 2nd place teams generally aren't looking for bats for the heart of their order right now.   They are in 1st or 2nd place because they already have those bats.  They are looking for depth and role players and situational hitting of some sort or a guy who can get hot for them at just the right time.  The right team with the right need might well give something useful.  Not gonna get a Juan Soto type return but should get something.  Need to make sure we're not making trades just to make trades though.

     

    I'm pretty sure the thought of leaving has occurred to Correa already. He has a big check coming no matter where he goes, I'm sure he realizes the career hi-lites he's missing by staying in Minnesota. I wouldn't doubt he's been expected to get traded to a contender since he signed the contract. He wanted the guaranteed money first.

    Probably Buxton has had similar thoughts, maybe not as long. He's knew he needed to be able to stay healthy first. You don't see him trying to plow into fences as much as he used too. Big plus, is as opposed to Correa, is that Buxton only gets paid amounts equal to a very mediocre starting outfielder unless he has a tremendous season.

    22 hours ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

    All of this discussion regarding a rebuild is nonsense unless the team is sold first.  I have a strong feeling that nothing of significance happens at the trade deadline this year because the owners will not want to do anything that could diminish the sale price.

    Nothing done with the roster is going to have any effect on the sales price. 

    Unless they take on Xander Boegarts contract I guess. That is a healthy additional debt. 

    On 7/3/2025 at 5:22 AM, tony&rodney said:

    In November of 2023 a trade of Royce Lewis to Seattle may have returned Bryan Woo. Would a trade now net Harry Ford? 

    In a similar vein would Pittsburgh have listened to an offer of Wallner, Jeffers, and Julien for Chandler last November? What is Wallner's market today?

    The two players who have value from the article are Duran and Jax. The Dodgers have so many pitchers. Could they be enticed to give up Dalton Rushing and a couple of oft-injured pitchers (River Ryan and Emmet Sheehan) for Griffin Jax, Christian Vazquez, and Emmanuel Rodriguez?

    I have no idea what value the Twins place on players, much less how other teams view the Twins organization. I believe the Twins will stand pat, but I don't know if the last year has had any effect on the plan. Maybe it has but maybe it makes no difference.

    Podcaster Jim Riley has proposed a trade of Royce Lewis to Seattle for catcher Harry Ford:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8k19YrZ2JA

    ... at 15:55.

    Currently holding the final AL Wild Card slot, would Seattle consider Royce Lewis an upgrade over rookie Ben Williamson, a glove-first third baseman (with an RBI double in Saturday's 1-0 win)?

    This year Lewis has posted 0.1 fWAR and a 74 wRC+ in 35 games while Williamson has posted 0.5 fWAR and a 79 wRC+ in 66 games. FanGraphs projects Lewis with 1.1 WAR and a 108 wRC+ in 55 remaining games while projecting Williamson with 0.5 WAR and an 85 wRC+ in 41 games.

    https://www.fangraphs.com/players/royce-lewis/20437/stats?position=3B

    https://www.fangraphs.com/players/benjamin-williamson/33197/stats?position=3B

    Baseball Trade Values assigns Lewis a surplus value of $15.5 million and Ford a surplus value of $19.4 million.

    Could the Mariners find a better return for Ford?

     

    16 minutes ago, harmony55 said:

    Podcaster Jim Riley has proposed a trade of Royce Lewis to Seattle for catcher Harry Ford:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8k19YrZ2JA

    ... at 15:55.

    Currently holding the final AL Wild Card slot, would Seattle consider Royce Lewis an upgrade over rookie Ben Williamson, a glove-first third baseman (with an RBI double in Saturday's 1-0 win)?

    This year Lewis has posted 0.1 fWAR and a 74 wRC+ in 35 games while Williamson has posted 0.5 fWAR and a 79 wRC+ in 66 games. FanGraphs projects Lewis with 1.1 WAR and a 108 wRC+ in 55 remaining games while projecting Williamson with 0.5 WAR and an 85 wRC+ in 41 games.

    https://www.fangraphs.com/players/royce-lewis/20437/stats?position=3B

    https://www.fangraphs.com/players/benjamin-williamson/33197/stats?position=3B

    Baseball Trade Values assigns Lewis a surplus value of $15.5 million and Ford a surplus value of $19.4 million.

    Could the Mariners find a better return for Ford?

     

    Interesting. While I often watch a fair amount of minor league baseball in addition to the Twins, reality intervenes in the form of time and other responsibilities (which are less than ever in old age). Thus I don't pay any attention to BTV or bloggers, not that I have anything against such a practice. I prefer watching the players than clips, commentaries, and statistics, although one cannot help but be aware of various stats. My comment on the shifting values was more directed at how any team makes decisions about improving their ball team. I was a proponent of trading both Julien and Lewis at the close of the 2023 season only because I felt the Twins needed to upgrade their team and these two guys had sky high values relative to what I perceived as their future worth. I thought the same about Matt Wallner in November of 2024, but these crazy guesses were not popular and there is never any guarantee about returns. It's all wild speculation.

    2026 is the last year with this affordable core of Ryan-Ober-Duran-Jax-Jeffers, so it makes sense to try to contend again with offensive upgrades around the edges and a prospect or two mixed in. It also seems to be the Twins way to trade them at next year's deadline, before their arb numbers get too high, and hope for the best return-wise.

    2025 is a year to try new things. Trade Paddack, let Jax try the rotation for a couple months. Bring up offensive prospects for the stretch run. 

    Lewis has two options, he should be in AAA just like everyone else if he's not producing, but there's no reason to trade him. Keashall, E-Rod, Martin, and others could all produce a higher OPS and comparable defense right now. 

    I like the ideas of trading Larnach and Bader, and extending Willi Castro. Trade Castro only if he brings back something good (like a Joe Ryan type of deal). 

    Castro, Coloumbe, maybe Paddack or Topa could bring back someone with a big league shot. 

    If anyone is David Ortiz on this version of the Twins, it's Matt Wallner. Plus he's a local. 

     

     

    On 7/4/2025 at 12:05 PM, dxpavelka said:

    1st or 2nd place teams generally aren't looking for bats for the heart of their order right now.   They are in 1st or 2nd place because they already have those bats.  They are looking for depth and role players and situational hitting of some sort or a guy who can get hot for them at just the right time.  The right team with the right need might well give something useful.  Not gonna get a Juan Soto type return but should get something.  Need to make sure we're not making trades just to make trades though.

     

    What are they going to give up for a pinch hitter? Just a couple single-A lottery tickets, just farm fodder. 

    You want pieces that will be useful in the future, you gotta give up someone good. 

    35 minutes ago, BrokenCompass said:

    What are they going to give up for a pinch hitter? Just a couple single-A lottery tickets, just farm fodder. 

    You want pieces that will be useful in the future, you gotta give up someone good. 

    You give up someone good you LOSE someone good.  You create new holes.  Far more often than not the team trading away the best player in the deal loses the trade.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...