Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    What Will It Take For Twins To Contend In 2015?


    Nick Nelson
    Image courtesy of Bryce Kluckhohn, USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    In his first full season as manager of the Minnesota Twins, Tom Kelly guided to the team to the first World Series title in franchise history.

    After Kelly retired in 2001, Ron Gardenhire took the helm, and in his first season he led the Twins to the American League Championship Series.

    Your move, Paul Molitor.

    The Twins have been in a losing funk for such a long time that it can be difficult for fans to remember just how quickly fortunes sometimes turn. But it can happen, and it has. The dramatic shifts that have coincided with the last two managerial changes provide evidence enough of that.

    Kelly originally stepped in midway through the 1986 season, with the Twins on their way to 91 losses. At the time, they had not finished above .500 in eight years, but the club experienced a renaissance under Kelly, capturing two championships in his first five seasons.

    After this successful stretch, they fell back into a rut, and by the end of the 90s they were caught in an extended losing spell similar to the one they are presently trying to escape. The Twins lost 90 or more games every year from 1997 through 2000, and while it appeared they were headed for a division title in 2001, they collapsed in the second half and fell short.

    Gardenhire took over the following year, and we all know the rest of that story.

    In light of this history, Molitor shouldn't feel too intimidated as he takes the reigns and seeks to steer the Twins out of the darkness.

    Despite the timing, it likely wasn't the changes in leadership that primarily drove these last two turnarounds, but rather influxes of prospect talent and emergences of young star players, as well as savvy veteran additions.

    The team is in a comparable position now as Molitor embarks on his journey, so it's not hard to draw a parallel and envision a similar outcome. It stands to reason that the new skipper himself -- uninterested in sitting through multiple years of stagnation -- is doing so.

    Will the resurgence be as abrupt as it was in those aforementioned instances? Of course, the answer is 'probably not.' The Twins need to get back to the .500 range before a deep postseason run becomes a consideration. Talk of a worst-to-first swing in the Central is mostly just rosy optimism that always tends to manifest at this time of year.

    Mostly.

    It's hardly unthinkable that the Twins could find themselves in contention for the division late in the season. Obviously they need to stay healthy and get a lot of good individual performances. But, in a broader sense, two things need to happen:

    1) Fast start. The team needs to put itself in a competitive mindset with a surprisingly strong start, and a record at or above .500 heading into July. This would set them up as "buyers" at the deadline, allowing them to upgrade in areas of need midway through the season. It would also make more urgent the calling up of prospects who could make a positive impact (e.g., Byron Buxton and Miguel Sano).

    2) Weak division. This part, unfortunately, isn't really in the Twins' control. During his Q&A at the Winter Meltdown event, team president Dave St. Peter opined that the AL Central might be the strongest division in baseball. Well... that needs to be not the case. Not so much because the Twins need to be able to come out on top -- the addition of an extra wild-card spot somewhat negates that aspect -- but because they need a team or two they can beat up on and pile up wins against.

    In 2010, when the Twins won the division, they went a combined 26-10 against Chicago and Kansas City. In 2009 they went 24-12 against those same two clubs. Between '02 and '03 they won 29 of 38 games against the Tigers.

    With baseball's unbalanced schedule, taking care of business against the division's bottom-feeders is critical to contending for October. For the last few years, the Twins have been that bottom-feeder; they need to swap out of that role.

    It's a little difficult to envision such a scenario this year -- the Royals and Tigers ain't what they used to be, and the White Sox and Indians both look pretty good on paper -- but you never know.

    What do you think? What will it take for the Twins to be competitive in the division and in the American League this year?


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Vargas should not regress much if at all.  His stat lines are below what he did in the minors.  He got off to a fast start which many remember but then tailed off.    I would expect him to have about the same stats lines if he went a whole year batting.

    We were 14-18 against the AL East and 36-40 against the Central so the big demon switched from the right coast to the left coast and we did not beat up on the Central.  Not just the AL West but San Fran and La as well.   California was not kind to us..   .  

    What will it take?  In order of importance:

     

    • Attitude change: play to win every game and hate it when you lose.  Do not hang your arms over the dugout railing in the seventh inning, do not go belly up when you play the AL East.  Believe that your goal to win every single game and do it.  And hate losing.  And if you are in a management position make sure that everyone gets it and gives 100% and if they do not get it, get rid of them.
    • Chemistry.  It is a team.  No teammates thrown under the bus, no players thrown under the bus.  Especially the ones who are rookies and need their confidence build up to perform.  Coaching and throwing someone under the bus are two different things.  Coach, do not blame.   If players (and coaches/managers) do not get this, get rid of them.
    • Take the best 25 up North out of Spring Training and play the best 9 most of the time.

     

    And then hope for good years, fast starts, etc.   Unless you build a winning mentality in the organization, you are not going to win.

    Edited by Thrylos

    Vargas should not regress much if at all.  His stat lines are below what he did in the minors.  He got off to a fast start which many remember but then tailed off.    I would expect him to have about the same stats lines if he went a whole year batting.

    How close are you talking?  Within 10 OPS points?  Or are you going by wRC+ or what?

    Jimmers I look at baseball reference and don't see wRC+ stats for minor leaguers..   I  see Vargas 2014 year in the minors was close to his career in the minors in BA and OPS which was .288 and .854.    This is quite a bit better than his year with the Twins which was .274 and .772.    Doesn't seem that far fetched to expect that he can continue to do slightly worse than his minor league numbers in the majors.   The pitching is better but he should be getting better with more at bats as well.     He was lumped with D Santana as guys that are likely to regress but I just don't see it in Vargas.    Santana on the other hand had way better results in the majors than he did in the minors in both BA and OPS.     I hope he can keep it up but tend to believe the minor league numbers more than the major league numbers.   Valencia comes to mind.   Different players but I don't expect those same lines from Santana in 2015.   If he just plays good D and gives us .274 BA and .772 OPS I would be thrilled.

    What will it take?  In order of importance:

     

    • Attitude change: play to win every game and hate it when you lose.  Do not hang your arms over the dugout railing in the seventh inning, do not go belly up when you play the AL East.  Believe that your goal to win every single game and do it.  And hate losing.  And if you are in a management position make sure that everyone gets it and gives 100% and if they do not get it, get rid of them.
    • Chemistry.  It is a team.  No teammates thrown under the bus, no players thrown under the bus.  Especially the ones who are rookies and need their confidence build up to perform.  Coaching and throwing someone under the bus are two different things.  Coach, do not blame.   If players (and coaches/managers) do not get this, get rid of them.
    • Take the best 25 up North out of Spring Training and play the best 9 most of the time.

     

    And then hope for good years, fast starts, etc.   Unless you build a winning mentality in the organization, you are not going to win.

    I like this post. My favorite part is "Take the best 25 north out of spring training and play the best 9 most of the time." Consistency with the starting lineup IMHO is a good thing.

     

    In recent years I could hear circus music playing in my head as the announcers rolled out today's lineup and batting order.

     

    I also do not agree that in the last game of a series the manager is doing a good thing by "emptying the bench" and "getting them all in there" as has been the case under recent management.

     

    I also very much agree with your comments about a winning attitude and chemistry.

    I like this post. My favorite part is "Take the best 25 north out of spring training and play the best 9 most of the time." Consistency with the starting lineup IMHO is a good thing.

     

    In recent years I could hear circus music playing in my head as the announcers rolled out today's lineup and batting order.

     

    I also do not agree that in the last game of a series the manager is doing a good thing by "emptying the bench" and "getting them all in there" as has been the case under recent management.

     

    I also very much agree with your comments about a winning attitude and chemistry.

    I concur with this post with the possible exception of the last part.  IMO, the winning attitude and chemistry, that comes from actually winning.  

    Not just chemistry. Also, a balanced breakfast including juice, toast, milk and delicious Trix cereal!!

     

    Is this the rally bunny from last year? - if so, not sure Trix is the way to go --

     

    http://40.media.tumblr.com/195cb6a86ae114692b61d65263bf10a0/tumblr_n1z29sTcIx1rlb49io1_500.png

     

    and I suspect this one has gone stale by this point:

     

    http://sportzwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Z0021064.jpg

    I give the Twins little or no chance to contend for the division title.  I fully expect them to win half their games, but that ain't going to be enough, sports fans.  I think the biggest problem this team will have in 2015 is, there are too many starting pitchers under contract.  The Twins will have to decide early which pitchers will get Spring training innings.  I think guys like Berrios and Meyer will not be given a chance to break through this "good enough" wall to win spots in the spring.  The Twins can't win the division without 5 quality starters, and they are going to break camp with only 3 (Hughes, Santana, Gibson).

    "I think the biggest problem this team will have in 2015 is, there are too many starting pitchers under contract."  Said no general manager or manager in the history of baseball.

    "I think the biggest problem this team will have in 2015 is, there are too many starting pitchers under contract."  Said no general manager or manager in the history of baseball.

    That reminds me of when the team was bragging back in the offseason prior to the 2011 season about having six quality major league starters and only five spots in the rotation and what a good problem that was.  

     

    Oops.

    That reminds me of when the team was bragging back in the offseason prior to the 2011 season about having six quality major league starters and only five spots in the rotation and what a good problem that was.

    Ah yes, those halcyon days of Kevin Slowey pitching out of the bullpen.

     

    That 2011 rotation proved so solid, the only tweak it needed for 2012 was Jason Marquis!

    Ah yes, those halcyon days of Kevin Slowey pitching out of the bullpen.

     

    That 2011 rotation proved so solid, the only tweak it needed for 2012 was Jason Marquis!

    yep, when he lost the spring training rotation competition spot by having the best spring training ERA of the bunch :-)

    Edited by jimmer

    So much depends on which players actually get the most time. Neglecting May/Meyer or Pinto in favor of prolonged attention to so-so veterans like Milone/Pelfrey & Suzuki will lower the potential of the team. And I'm skeptical that the projected OF can catch enough fly balls to enable the pitching staff to reach the ERAs that they deserve. With an average OF defense, I think a .500-ish record would be well within reach. As it is, I think 78 wins is probably the best we can expect.

     

    (Ironically, alternating DL stints from Hunter and Arcia might be a net positive for team's performance.)

    Baseball Prospectus projects them to have the worst record in the league, thanks to the worst pitching in the league.

    http://www.baseballprospectus.com/fantasy/dc/

    This seems a little beyond something Molitor can fix.

    To make the playoffs, several pitchers will have to seriously outperform expectations.

    I don't think it's impossible -- If Hughes stays superb, there are some pitchers on the roster with upside. But it would take a bunch of them making major, major leaps compared to last year.

    Nolasco could do that, if the reason for his bad season was injuries.

    Not sure who else is going to jump much. The only scenario would be Meyer and May suddenly improving a couple levels. But pitchers don't tend to make huge leaps in control all of a sudden. Or master a new pitch all of a sudden.

    But could it happen? Hughes, Nolasco, Santana, Meyer, and May, all below 4.0 ERA? Sure. But it would be a very, very, very pleasant surprise.

    Jimmers I look at baseball reference and don't see wRC+ stats for minor leaguers..   I  see Vargas 2014 year in the minors was close to his career in the minors in BA and OPS which was .288 and .854.    This is quite a bit better than his year with the Twins which was .274 and .772.    Doesn't seem that far fetched to expect that he can continue to do slightly worse than his minor league numbers in the majors.   The pitching is better but he should be getting better with more at bats as well.     He was lumped with D Santana as guys that are likely to regress but I just don't see it in Vargas.    Santana on the other hand had way better results in the majors than he did in the minors in both BA and OPS.     I hope he can keep it up but tend to believe the minor league numbers more than the major league numbers.   Valencia comes to mind.   Different players but I don't expect those same lines from Santana in 2015.   If he just plays good D and gives us .274 BA and .772 OPS I would be thrilled.

    Here's the issue with Vargas... Brock said it the other day.  His plate discipline went away when he came up here last year.  To some extent, that's normal.  It happens to most prospects I'd guess.  Guys like Arcia (who didn't really develop that until AAA) struggle a bit more there and I suspect that's part of the reason why he hasn't quite lived up to the expectations (side note, speaking of breakouts, I think he has a big one this year).  With Vargas, his plate discipline has always existed.  Now that he's used to playing up here, Vargas won't be dealing with the nerves and those types of things.  If he simply returns to his old habits, I don't think he regresses much at all and may come closer to his minor league numbers.  He may have some bumps in the road (that's pretty normal for a young guy), but compared to Santana, I think he's got much better odds succeeding than he does failing.

    Baseball Prospectus projects them to have the worst record in the league, thanks to the worst pitching in the league.

    http://www.baseballprospectus.com/fantasy/dc/

    This seems a little beyond something Molitor can fix.

    To make the playoffs, several pitchers will have to seriously outperform expectations.

    I don't think it's impossible -- If Hughes stays superb, there are some pitchers on the roster with upside. But it would take a bunch of them making major, major leaps compared to last year.

    Nolasco could do that, if the reason for his bad season was injuries.

    Not sure who else is going to jump much. The only scenario would be Meyer and May suddenly improving a couple levels. But pitchers don't tend to make huge leaps in control all of a sudden. Or master a new pitch all of a sudden.

    But could it happen? Hughes, Nolasco, Santana, Meyer, and May, all below 4.0 ERA? Sure. But it would be a very, very, very pleasant surprise.

    I have little doubt that Hughes, Nolasco, Meyer and May are all capable of a below-4.0 ERA.  I just don't think Meyer and May are going to be given the chance to prove it.  Too many starting pitchers under contract already.

    I have little doubt that Hughes, Nolasco, Meyer and May are all capable of a below-4.0 ERA.  I just don't think Meyer and May are going to be given the chance to prove it.  Too many starting pitchers under contract already.

    If ERA was a stat that judged pitcher's ability solely on what they do, that MIGHT be true.  With our defense, there's no way they all have an ERA under 4.00.  One, maybe and he'd have to pitch out of his mind like Hughes did last year.

     

    ''a pitcher with a large ERA-FIP gap probably plays in front of a very good or very bad defense.'

     

    Our TWINS rotation ERA-FIP gap was over a full run, and in the direction you don't want it to go. That's really bad.  The next largest gap going in the direction you don't want it to go was just the slightest hair over half a run. at .51)

     

    As far as why ERA is not the best stat to judge a pitcher, here is a good read:

     

    http://www.fangraphs.com/library/pitching/era/

    Edited by jimmer

    What does it mean to contend?

     

    To me, a team isn't contending if they haven't spent a day in first place (or even in one of the wild card slots) in the previous two weeks

     

    It isn't contending if an occasional win streak puts you a few games a way from the second wild card spot. It is possible to bring yourself into contention by continuing that win streak, but teams have to get there.

     

    Being a competitive is a lower bar. Competitive teams score more runs than they give up.

     

    The Twins have neither contended or been competitive in quite a while. Various objective sources do not project the Twins to contend or be competitive this year either.

    I give the Twins little or no chance to contend for the division title.  I fully expect them to win half their games, but that ain't going to be enough, sports fans.  I think the biggest problem this team will have in 2015 is, there are too many starting pitchers under contract.  The Twins will have to decide early which pitchers will get Spring training innings.  I think guys like Berrios and Meyer will not be given a chance to break through this "good enough" wall to win spots in the spring.  The Twins can't win the division without 5 quality starters, and they are going to break camp with only 3 (Hughes, Santana, Gibson).

     

    That is my fear as well.  I think Ryan is absolutely serious that Pelfrey and Stauffer will get every chance to win that fifth spot along with the rest of the candidates.  In my opinion that's a mistake.  

     

    I get the competition thing but they should have cut their losses with Mike last season.  They also should have shipped out Nolasco last winter as well.  Especially after his tweets last fall about not wanting to be in Minnesota.  Ricky is not happy in Minnesota and you can see it on the mound and in the clubhouse.  I don't believe he was afflicted wit an injury for most of the season last year.  I call BS!    

     

    I would much rather see a starting rotation composed of Hughes Santana and Gibson with the remaining candidates slugging it out for the final two spots (Milone, May and Meyer).  Berrios could also be in the mix by seasons end.    

    What does it mean to contend?

     

    To me, a team isn't contending if they haven't spent a day in first place (or even in one of the wild card slots) in the previous two weeks

     

    It isn't contending if an occasional win streak puts you a few games a way from the second wild card spot. It is possible to bring yourself into contention by continuing that win streak, but teams have to get there.

     

    Being a competitive is a lower bar. Competitive teams score more runs than they give up.

     

    The Twins have neither contended or been competitive in quite a while. Various objective sources do not project the Twins to contend or be competitive this year either.

    No such thing as objective when it comes to baseball.   All have bias.    The 06 Twins didn't contend until the last three days of the season?   Contending does not mean the same as competitive because there are factors that are out of a team's control.    87 team would not have been contending if there was one of the top East teams in the Division.       Competitive to me does not mean coming close and then losing.  It means capable of winning and then either winning or losing.     I am happy to have a competitive team and take my chances on contending.

    First, it's the manager that sets the tone.  Billy Martin was a tough guy.  Tom Kelly was a tough guy.  And both hammered the fundamentals into the players heads.  Ron Gardenhire started out that way, but morphed into a "Players Manager".  As soon as he put the weight back on and grew a beard last season, he should have been fired. 

     

    I see Paul Molitor as an old-school kinda manager.  It all starts there.

    Joe Maddon?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...