Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think I'd rank them this way by attractiveness to top candidates:

Braves - Orioles - Rangers - Giants - Nationals - Twins - Angels - Rockies

Posted
9 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

I think I'd rank them this way by attractiveness to top candidates:

Braves - Orioles - Rangers - Giants - Nationals - Twins - Angels - Rockies

That's a pretty solid ranking.  I see them in tiers like this:

Braves

Orioles/Rangers/Giants

Nationals/Twins/Angels

And then there's the Rockies: the abysmal organization that really has no business being that abysmal.  They get much better attendance than they have any right to get, and ownership, for all its faults, is at least willing to spend.  Their run of ineptitude was recently laid out in The Athletic: entirely insular, loyalty trumping talent, a strange aversion to trades, nearly a decade of drafting in the top 10 without anything to show for it, an analytics infrastructure about 20 years behind the times (for all you anti-analytics folks, this should be your favorite team).  But it also was filled with quotes and comments from rival executives about the untapped potential of the market as well as the possible ways the unique environment of Coors Field could be leveraged to establish "the greatest home-field advantage in professional sports," according to one exec.

This whole article sprung from their GM stepping down and the owner's son/executive VP (sound familiar?) stating that they're opening the search outside of the organization for "fresh ideas."  Depending on who ends up in that seat, this job could rocket up the rankings in terms of attractiveness.  Or it could be more of the status quo and remain in a tier of its own miles below the Nationals/Twins/Angels.  It could be pretty interesting to see how this all plays out.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
58 minutes ago, Danchat said:

Is he related to Drew Butera?

Google AI says yes, but if that was true, I think I would have found some confirmation of it somewhere (or I would have at least heard of the guy before today.)  My guess is the AI is about as accurate with this as it is with NFHS baseball rules.   (It's useless.)

image.png.b4b927ae11bdec8a3caeadf06c0c24ff.png

Posted
3 hours ago, gil4 said:

Google AI says yes, but if that was true, I think I would have found some confirmation of it somewhere (or I would have at least heard of the guy before today.)  My guess is the AI is about as accurate with this as it is with NFHS baseball rules.   (It's useless.)

image.png.b4b927ae11bdec8a3caeadf06c0c24ff.png

Sal was born in NY, Drew was born in Indiana when Sal was playing in the minors there, Blake was born in Louisiana 9 years after Drew.  I couldn't find any online witnesses to Sal's whereabouts in 1992 so it's faintly possible, but Sal's Wikipedia page makes reference to only one offspring, Drew.

Looks like another AI Hallucination.

Posted
4 hours ago, ashbury said:

Sal was born in NY, Drew was born in Indiana when Sal was playing in the minors there, Blake was born in Louisiana 9 years after Drew.  I couldn't find any online witnesses to Sal's whereabouts in 1992 so it's faintly possible, but Sal's Wikipedia page makes reference to only one offspring, Drew.

Looks like another AI Hallucination.

AI is really good at making things up

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...