Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Provisional Member
Posted

Melotakis makes so little sense, he seems to have some value. He seems like a legit fit for this bullpen right now.

 

Any chance the Twins have a trade in place but needed to make the move now to get guys called up?

The answer to your question is no.

 

If Melotakis was a fit, they would have likely called him up over 2 guys not on the 40.

 

It will remain to be seen if the front office can evaluate pitching, but we do tend to overrate marginal relievers in the minors, though perhaps fairly considering the current state of the major league pen.

Posted

 

I'll hold off on too much judgement for the time being.   FO was right about Park at the end of Spring despite catching grief  

But there, they kept Park, and got the benefit of stashing him in AAA and keeping an additional 40-man spot open; here, they'll likely lose Melotakis, and the only immediate benefit is rostering Gee (who could have taken Breslow's spot instead).

Provisional Member
Posted

But there, they kept Park, and got the benefit of stashing him in AAA and keeping an additional 40-man spot open; here, they'll likely lose Melotakis, and the only immediate benefit is rostering Gee (who could have taken Breslow's spot instead).

They were likely disappointed no one took Park and his salary off their hands.

Posted
But there, they kept Park, and got the benefit of stashing him in AAA and keeping an additional 40-man spot open; here, they'll likely lose Melotakis, and the only immediate benefit is rostering Gee (who could have taken Breslow's spot instead).

 

 

Yeah I would remove Breslow too but maybe Melo just isn't responding

Posted

 

But there, they kept Park, and got the benefit of stashing him in AAA and keeping an additional 40-man spot open; here, they'll likely lose Melotakis, and the only immediate benefit is rostering Gee (who could have taken Breslow's spot instead).

I'm referring to them not adding him back to the 40 & 25-man rosters for opening day as many folks were clamoring for.   AAA performance has justified the move (or non-move for that matter).

Posted

 

I'm referring to them not adding him back to the 40 & 25-man rosters for opening day as many folks were clamoring for.   AAA performance has justified the move (or non-move for that matter).

Yes, I understood that.  But when the front office decided not to add Park back to the roster, they still kept him and kept a 40-man spot free for other use.  There was no risk of losing any players there -- actually adding Park back to the roster would have risked losing someone else. Their choice was actually the risk-averse option.

 

That's not the case here -- Melotakis is at risk of being lost.  Might ultimately be a fine decision, but it's not really comparable to keeping Park off the roster.

Posted

 

Yes, I understood that.  But when the front office decided not to add Park back to the roster, they still kept him and kept a 40-man spot free for other use.  There was no risk of losing any players there -- actually adding Park back to the roster would have risked losing someone else. Their choice was actually the risk-averse option.

 

That's not the case here -- Melotakis is at risk of being lost.  Might ultimately be a fine decision, but it's not really comparable to keeping Park off the roster.

I hear you.

I don't even really see this as Gee/Hildenberger vs. Melotakis decision.   I see it more as a Turley vs. Melotakis decision.   Even after those three big league starts the FO is keeping Turley and DFA'ing Melotakis.   Interesting.

Posted

I hear you.

I don't even really see this as Gee/Hildenberger vs. Melotakis decision. I see it more as a Turley vs. Melotakis decision. Even after those three big league starts the FO is keeping Turley and DFA'ing Melotakis. Interesting.

Turley hits 95 as a starter. Melotakis 91 as a reliever. Pretty simple math, actually.

Posted

In hindsight, maybe the fact Rosario got that call-up a while back and Melo didn't should have been a harbinger.  The writing was being written on the wall.

 

Speaking of that word, maybe that can be Hildenberger's nickname, instead of Trevor Hindenberger.  The Trevor (The Harbinger of Doom) Hildenberger.

Posted

Trevor (The Harbinger of Doom) Hildenberger.

Catchy, but my money is on "Hildy" being what sticks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...