Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think Buxton at 7 shows better integrity than the rankers who still have him #1 or #2 out of force of habit. Last year took some luster off IMO, and the ranking should reflect that. #7 still means likely a darn good player.

Posted

KC, Chicago, and Detroit combined to have 8 prospects on the list. Cleveland has impressive depth now, with ten names. The only two prospects in the division getting better than a B+ grade were Buxton (A) and Berrios (A-).  The Twins had five on the list before Detroit posted its first of three. KC had two prospects, both in the lower half of the list. The Sox had three prospects on the list.

Posted

 

I think Buxton at 7 shows better integrity than the rankers who still have him #1 or #2 out of force of habit. Last year took some luster off IMO, and the ranking should reflect that. #7 still means likely a darn good player.

Yeah, Buxton's .305/.367/.500 (.867) stat line in 72 games at AA and AAA sure does take the luster off of him.

Posted

 

Yeah, Buxton's .305/.367/.500 (.867) stat line in 72 games at AA and AAA sure does take the luster off of him.

I think Buxton suffers from two things 1) obviously, his slow start in the majors and 2) prospect fatigue.  I think people are underestimating how good of a year he had last year, especially off of a lost 2014 season.  He's going to be a stud for us and sooner rather than later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...