Attention Mauer Haters!

[PseudoSABR]

The non-snark crowd? Where do they hang out?

Well, my sarcasm has been lost on at least one poster .

[Paul]

Well, my sarcasm has been lost on at least one poster .

I know how you feel

[CDog]

Why does the BA have to come down? If he increases his LD% closer to career norms I think his average can go higher. But there are 2 reasons why he couldn't keep it up- his health and a possible reconfiguration of the roster (ie, trading of Span and/or someone else, Mauer failing to adjust when moved to the 2 hole where he historically hasn't hit as well, Revere falling into a slump like last year, prolonged slumps or injuries by whoever else bats in front of, or behind him in the order). That's the glass half empty perspective anyway.

His LD% has been at (and even just slightly--probably not significantly differently--above) his career level all year (and also his "glory" years). The change has been the increased GB% at the expense of the FB% coming down.

 

As pointed out (sorta), over the last 4 full seasons (this year he has only 3 ABs in the 2-slot) his OPS in the second spot is higher than his overall. Although he only has about a third of a season's worth of work there.

[Riverbrian]

His LD% has been at (and even just slightly--probably not significantly differently--above) his career level all year (and also his "glory" years). The change has been the increased GB% at the expense of the FB% coming down.

 

As pointed out (sorta), over the last 4 full seasons (this year he has only 3 ABs in the 2-slot) his OPS in the second spot is higher than his overall. Although he only has about a third of a season's worth of work there.

Does anyone think that Joe Mauer would change his approach at the plate if slotted #2. It would be crazy if he would cuz his approach while batting in the #3 is about what you look for in a #2.

 

I'm not talking about individual at-bats to different situations. I'm talking overall.

 

Joe in the #2... Just makes sense... Even if the only reason is that he will see 15 more at-bats hitting #2 as compared to #3 and everyone else can move up one spot in the order.

[CDog]

I'm talking about his .363 BA over the past 42 games, it's pretty hard to maintain an average that high for that long of a period, and his BABIP in June and July have been rather high thus far.

How filthy ridiculous is it that he hit that for an entire season!?!

 

Without checking, the thing that strikes me about the last few weeks is that Mauer's gotten back to something I've mentioned elsewhere on this site. What I've always been amazed by and enjoyed watching over the years is that almost every single at-bat results in a ball hit squarely. Outs or hits or fly-balls or grounders or line drives, he would work the pitcher until he scaled one somewhere. That had been much less the case last year when he was clearly not healthy and still not quite like the days up through 2010 at the start of this year. Lately it feels like (yes, I hate that phrase usually, too) he's gotten back closer to that. Work, work, work, work, SMACK the ball somewhere.

[Brock Beauchamp]

How filthy ridiculous is it that he hit that for an entire season!?!

 

Without checking, the thing that strikes me about the last few weeks is that Mauer's gotten back to something I've mentioned elsewhere on this site. What I've always been amazed by and enjoyed watching over the years is that almost every single at-bat results in a ball hit squarely. Outs or hits or fly-balls or grounders or line drives, he would work the pitcher until he scaled one somewhere. That had been much less the case last year when he was clearly not healthy and still not quite like the days up through 2010 at the start of this year. Lately it feels like (yes, I hate that phrase usually, too) he's gotten back closer to that. Work, work, work, work, SMACK the ball somewhere.

It's not a term you'll see me throw around often because of its non-sabrness but Joe has a brilliant "baseball mind" and the skills to back it up. He goes to the plate with a methodical approach and thanks to his ability, can sit there and annoy the pitcher into giving him what he wants. His AB against Chapman in the ninth was a perfect example of that ability.

[Riverbrian]

It's not a term you'll see me throw around often because of its non-sabrness but Joe has a brilliant "baseball mind" and the skills to back it up. He goes to the plate with a methodical approach and thanks to his ability, can sit there and annoy the pitcher into giving him what he wants. His AB against Chapman in the ninth was a perfect example of that ability.

When I think of Joe... I think of the Sweet Swing... Flawless... Best in baseball... Or at least that I've seen.

 

When it comes to Joe and his power. I still believe that's it's possible to see it again. He hit's the ball hard enough. So we are talking about a slight adjustment to the angle of his swing. I don't think it's a leg strength issue.

[SwainZag]

This thread needs more Dan.

Speaking of Dan, he still hates Mauer.

 

Check out the little twitter convo he had with Rhett Bollinger today.

 

https://twitter.com/Coulrophobia7/status/220236611957424128

[Brock Beauchamp]

Speaking of Dan, he still hates Mauer.

 

Check out the little twitter convo he had with Rhett Bollinger today.

 

https://twitter.com/Coulrophobia7/status/220236611957424128

I miss our favorite St Cloud hockey blogger and part-time Winger roadie.

 

Someone should invite him over here.

 

Or not.

[FrodaddyG]

I miss our favorite St Cloud hockey blogger and part-time Winger roadie.

 

Someone should invite him over here.

 

Or not.

I think you mean "NHL '08 Franchise" blogger. I miss him in the same way I miss that pain sensation you get when you floss your teeth until your gums bleed.

[Fire Dan Gladden]

I'm not sure where to put that one but I assume it was directed at me. I know that I'm wrong frequently but like everyone else who is also wrong frequently... I'm not going to recognize when I am. I apologize if I've crossed some line in this discussion by saying that I believe it and part of that reason is based on playing and coaching.

Actually, this quote wasn't aimed at you specifically, rather at everybody who feels they need to qualify their comments with some semblance of name dropping. Because of how this forum works, anybody could drop this type of statement in their comment and nobody would be the wiser. I just don't feel it is an effective route to use to make your argument, rather it can come across as annoying.

 

For the record, I have played multiple sports at high levels (higher than most) competing for championships. I have also been a collegiate coach. I understand the discussion of "clutch". I have "laced em' up" and been in those positions. But I do not agree with much of what is being thrown around in this thread. People are who they are. All things being equal, people tend to perform at the level they are accustomed to. Statistical reports have shown that given enough opportunities, numbers will move to individual averages (up or down). Sure there are people that "want the ball", but that doesn't necessarily make them better at crunch time. I have also seen individuals who perform excellently in high stress situations, but will not publicly announce it (ie demand the ball). That is a personality trait. Just because you are willing to take the risk doesn't mean you should be there.

 

Clutch is a pipe dream. It is a word used to describe somebody who was able to get a positive result more often than not for being in the right place at the right time. Was Scott Brosius clutch? How long did he last? Jack Morris, a decent but not overly exceptional pitcher, has almost parlayed one well pitched World Series game into a nod for the Hall. He wouldn't even be in the discussion if Erickson pitched that game. Let's take it another route. If Jeter was drafted by the Royals, how would he be perceived today? Good, but not godlike. Think Craig Biggio. What if the roles were reversed and Biggio played for the Yankees? Look at the "closer" role. Matt Capps is a league average reliever, who happens to have experience coming in with a 3 run lead in the 9th inning. Last year and this year, the Twins have sent Glen Perkins out in high leverage situation after high leverage situation. He was almost always successful. Who was more clutch? Who gets the accolades and the bigger contract? Truthfully, who would you rather have up in the 9th inning: Craig Counsell or Alex Rodriguez? It's all right place/right time.

 

Another issue that nobody is discussing is political aspect of this. When Kevin Garnett played for the Wolves, he always got the ball at the top of the key for the last shot of a close game. Never mind that it was about the worst offensive move he had in his repertoire. He always missed. The political fallout for not doing this would have been outrageous, even though the team probably would have won more games if they went a different route. The media would destroy the coaching staff. Kobe Bryant is horrible at the end of games, but if he isn't shooting the last shot, heads will roll.

 

Look at the Mauer fallout. The Twins are nursing Mauer along to keep his bat in the lineup. Never mind how spectacular his offensive numbers are. People say he isn't worth the contract because he isn't hitting 50 HRs a year. It's ignorance and stupidity. People are saying that he isn't worth it because he isn't catching every day. You can usually count on one hand the number of catchers that catch more than 125 games in a year. If Mauer ends up with 90-100 games caught this year, people will complain. People aren't talking about how in the years prior to Mauer signing his contract, he was worth about $30 mil per year while getting paid $8-10 mil. Now he makes $23 mil, and is producing what? $10-12 mil? That's strictly numbers. Nobody talks about his impact on television revenue, gate receipts, memorabilia, advertising, being the face of the franchise, etc. (Oh, and we do have a new stadium by the way.) Still don't think he is worth that contract to the state of Minnesota? Ask the Angels about their Pujols contract and his impact on the Latino community out there. If you don't think Mauer is having that type of impact here, you are nuts.

[ofx1]

That's the usual response from someone who didn't.

Have you ever been paid to play baseball? Player of the month trophy from a JuCo doesn't count.

[biggentleben]

When I think of Joe... I think of the Sweet Swing... Flawless... Best in baseball... Or at least that I've seen.

 

When it comes to Joe and his power. I still believe that's it's possible to see it again. He hit's the ball hard enough. So we are talking about a slight adjustment to the angle of his swing. I don't think it's a leg strength issue.

Griffey's swing is perhaps the only one I'd counter with. His or Ted Williams'.

[powrwrap]

Griffey's swing is perhaps the only one I'd counter with. His or Ted Williams'.

http://i45.tinypic.com/10qcjm1.gif

[Riverbrian]

Actually, this quote wasn't aimed at you specifically, rather at everybody who feels they need to qualify their comments with some semblance of name dropping. Because of how this forum works, anybody could drop this type of statement in their comment and nobody would be the wiser. I just don't feel it is an effective route to use to make your argument, rather it can come across as annoying.

 

For the record, I have played multiple sports at high levels (higher than most) competing for championships. I have also been a collegiate coach. I understand the discussion of "clutch". I have "laced em' up" and been in those positions. But I do not agree with much of what is being thrown around in this thread. People are who they are. All things being equal, people tend to perform at the level they are accustomed to. Statistical reports have shown that given enough opportunities, numbers will move to individual averages (up or down). Sure there are people that "want the ball", but that doesn't necessarily make them better at crunch time. I have also seen individuals who perform excellently in high stress situations, but will not publicly announce it (ie demand the ball). That is a personality trait. Just because you are willing to take the risk doesn't mean you should be there.

 

Clutch is a pipe dream. It is a word used to describe somebody who was able to get a positive result more often than not for being in the right place at the right time. Was Scott Brosius clutch? How long did he last? Jack Morris, a decent but not overly exceptional pitcher, has almost parlayed one well pitched World Series game into a nod for the Hall. He wouldn't even be in the discussion if Erickson pitched that game. Let's take it another route. If Jeter was drafted by the Royals, how would he be perceived today? Good, but not godlike. Think Craig Biggio. What if the roles were reversed and Biggio played for the Yankees? Look at the "closer" role. Matt Capps is a league average reliever, who happens to have experience coming in with a 3 run lead in the 9th inning. Last year and this year, the Twins have sent Glen Perkins out in high leverage situation after high leverage situation. He was almost always successful. Who was more clutch? Who gets the accolades and the bigger contract? Truthfully, who would you rather have up in the 9th inning: Craig Counsell or Alex Rodriguez? It's all right place/right time.

 

Another issue that nobody is discussing is political aspect of this. When Kevin Garnett played for the Wolves, he always got the ball at the top of the key for the last shot of a close game. Never mind that it was about the worst offensive move he had in his repertoire. He always missed. The political fallout for not doing this would have been outrageous, even though the team probably would have won more games if they went a different route. The media would destroy the coaching staff. Kobe Bryant is horrible at the end of games, but if he isn't shooting the last shot, heads will roll.

 

Look at the Mauer fallout. The Twins are nursing Mauer along to keep his bat in the lineup. Never mind how spectacular his offensive numbers are. People say he isn't worth the contract because he isn't hitting 50 HRs a year. It's ignorance and stupidity. People are saying that he isn't worth it because he isn't catching every day. You can usually count on one hand the number of catchers that catch more than 125 games in a year. If Mauer ends up with 90-100 games caught this year, people will complain. People aren't talking about how in the years prior to Mauer signing his contract, he was worth about $30 mil per year while getting paid $8-10 mil. Now he makes $23 mil, and is producing what? $10-12 mil? That's strictly numbers. Nobody talks about his impact on television revenue, gate receipts, memorabilia, advertising, being the face of the franchise, etc. (Oh, and we do have a new stadium by the way.) Still don't think he is worth that contract to the state of Minnesota? Ask the Angels about their Pujols contract and his impact on the Latino community out there. If you don't think Mauer is having that type of impact here, you are nuts.

No Biggie.

 

This whole side discussion in my mind is a thin branch for anyone to climb on. Myself included! However, it's an interesting thin branch to be on in my opinion.

 

I don't think Clutch is the right word that I'm searching for. The Problem is that I'm still searching for that concise description of what I consider to be an extremely complicated thing.

 

My thing I guess can be stripped down to "odds of success increase with good swings and good swings can be mental in nature."

[Riverbrian]

http://i45.tinypic.com/10qcjm1.gif

Where's Mauer in this? Can't you make a third one? lol

[Kobs]

Think of the Movie Swordfish... Take the scene where the computer hacker meets the Travolta character for the first time.

 

Now Remove the Gun and the Girl but Leave the Pressure. OK... Leave the girl if it makes you feel good.

 

I know it's the movies but that's an example of someone elevating his game.

 

Also consider that the same computer hacker could be hitting some golf balls off his roof and decide to go back in his trailer and make a routine hack job for small stakes and screw it up because it was just another routine day.

That Rocky sure was clutch too!

[Riverbrian]

That Rocky sure was clutch too!

He sure was. But no Halle Barry.

[CDog]

To bring this back closer to the original topic (but more closely the one that got the tangent going)...The claim is made that you could even tell in the moment how Kirby was raising his game and putting the team on his back and doing all that tough guy stuff that he did in '91. There's also a story I've heard many times that before he went up to the plate in what became probably the most iconic plate appearance in Twins history, that he told Chili Davis he was going to go up and bunt to get aboard for the Chili Dog to drive him in and win Game 6. Davis basically told him not to. Regardless if the story is true or not, what if that story had been told about Joe Mauer? Try to be honest when you think about your reactions...