Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Minneapolis/St. Paul Was Supposed to be an Expansion Team!


Twins Video

The 1961 American League season was unique because for the first time since the turn of the century the league was not made up of 8 teams. Not only did the Senators move from Washington to Minnesota, but the league added 2 expansion teams, the Los Angeles Angels and the “new” Washington Senators. Originally the expansion teams were supposed to be located in Los Angeles and Minneapolis-St. Paul, but Calvin Griffith, the owner of the Washington Senators, asked for and received approval to move the Senators to Minnesota, giving Washington the expansion team. Even though the Senators had a hard time getting fans to attend, the baseball felt that because of baseball’s anti-trust issues that it was best to have a team in the Nation's capital.

Up until the Senators moved to Minnesota there had only been 5 teams that had pulled up stakes in one city and moved to another. They were: 1) in 1953 when the Boston Braves moved to Milwaukee, 2) in 1954 when the St. Louis Browns moved to Baltimore, 3) in 1955 when the Philadephia Athletics moved to Kansas City, and 4/5) in 1958 when the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants moved to Los Angeles and San Francisco, 

There would be other relocations after the Twins: 1) in 1966 the Milwaukee Braves moved to Atlanta, 2) in 1968 the Kansas City Athletics moved to Oakland, 3) in 1970 the expansion Seattle Pilots moved to Milwaukee, 4) in 1972 the Washington Senators moved to Dallas/Ft. Worth, 5) in 2005 the Montreal Expos moved to Washington, D.C. and 6) in 2024 the Oakland Athletics moved to Las Vegas.

When the Washington Senators relocated to Minnesota in 1961 they brought with them a team that had finished the 1960 season with a 73-81 record, good for 5th place in the 8 team American League. This was their best finish in 6 years -

1946

4th

1947

7th

1948

7th

1949

8th

1950

5th

1951

7th

1952

5th

1953

5th

1954

6th

1955

8th

1956

7th

1957

8th

1958

8th

1959

8th

1960

5th

Not only were they in the 2nd half of the 8 team division in standings, but here are their attendance standings.

1946

5th

1947

7th

1948

6th

1949

7th

1950

6th

1951

6th

1952

6th

1953

6th

1954

7th

1955

8th

1956

8th

1957

8th

1958

8th

1959

8th

1960

8th

Their attendance for the 1960 season at Griffith Stadium was 743,404 (9,655 per game), which was the lowest in the American League. When they moved they brought with them their Owner and General Manager, Clark Griffith, Farm Director – Sherry Robertson and Manager – Cookie Lavagetto. Cookie would only last 59 games into the season when he was fired with a 23-36 record and was replaced by Sam Mele who would be 47-54-1 for the season. Their overall record was 70-90-1 good for 7th place (out of 10 teams). Both the expansion Senators and the Angels would finish behind the Twins in the standings as well as the Kansas City Athletics. The Twins attendance for the season was 1,256,723 (an average of slightly over 15,000 per game (3rd out of 10 teams).

How much better was it to receive a team as a transfer rather than an expansion team?

If we examine the 8 teams that relocated between 1901 and 1968 you will see that many of them had early success that may not have happened if they had received an expansion team.

Here is where those 8 teams finished in the standings in their first five years in a new city.

Team

 

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

1953 Milwaukee Braves

 

2

3

2

2

1

1954 Baltimore Orioles

 

7

7

6

5

6

1955 Kansas City Athletics

 

6

8

7

7

7

1958 Los Angeles Dodgers

 

7

1

4

2

2

1958 San Francisco Giants

 

3

3

5

3

1

1961 Minnesota Twins

 

7

2

3

6

1

1966 Atlanta Braves

 

5

7

5

1

5

1968 Oakland Athletics

 

6

2

2

1

1

It’s really interesting to note that there have been a total of 8 franchise moves listed above and 6 of the teams won a league championship within 5 years of moving.

Here are the first five years of every expansion team.

Team

 

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

1961 Los Angeles Angels (of 10)

 

8

3

9

5

7

1961 Washington Senators (of 10)

 

9

10

10

9

8

1962 New York Mets (of 10)

 

10

10

10

10

9

1962 Houston Colt .45s (of 10)

 

8

9

9

9

8

1969 Kansas City Royals (of 6)

 

4

4

2

4

2

1969 Seattle Pilots (of 6)

 

6

4

6

4

6

1969 San Diego Padres (of 6)

 

6

6

6

6

6

1969 Montreal Expos (of 6)

 

6

6

6

6

6

1977 Toronto Blue Jays (of 7)

 

7

7

7

7

7

1977 Seattle Mariners (of 7)

 

6

7

6

7

6

1993 Colorado Rockies (of 7) (of 4)

 

6

3

2

3

3

1993 Florida Marlins (of 7) (of 5)

 

6

5

4

3

2

1998 Tampa Bay Devil Rays (of 5)

 

5

5

5

5

5

1998 Arizona Diamondbacks (of 5)

 

5

1

3

1

1

Of the 14 expansion teams listed in the table only the Diamondbacks were able to finish in 1st place in their division (3 times). Only the Diamondbacks, Kansas City Royals and Colorado Rockies experienced moderate success.

1960/61 Expansion Draft to stock Los Angeles Angels and Washington Senators

In the very first expansion draft an existing team had to make available seven players from their active roster as of August 31, 1960 and eight others from their 40 man roster, with a maximum of seven players that could be taken from each existing club.

The Angels took Eli Grba, Jerry Casale, Duke Maas, Tex Clevenger, and Bob Sprout with their 1st five choises, while the Senators took Bobby Shantz, Dave Sisler, Johhny Klipstein, Pete Burnside and Carl Mathias with their choices. The Senators/Twins would lose Tex Clevinger, Hal Woodeshick, Hector Maestri, Rudy Hernandez, Johnny Schaive, Faye Throneberry, Julio Becquer and Joe McClain.  

1997/98 Expansion Draft to stock the Tampa Bay Devil Rays and Arizona Diamondbacks

In the most recent expansion draft each existing team could protect 15 players. All players in an organization were eligible to be drafted except with those with no prior major league experience who had less than 3 years of service. A team could lose no more than 1 player per round, with 28 selections in rounds one and two, and 14 selections in round 3. After the first two rounds a team could add three more players to be protected.

The Devil Rays chose Tony Saunders, Quinton McCracken, Bobby Abreau, Miguel Cairo and Rich Bulter with their 1st five choices. The Diamondbacks chose Brian Anderson, Jeff Suppan, Gabe Alvarez, Jorge Fabergas, and Karim Garcia with their choices. The best player taken in the draft would turn out to be Randy Winn taken from the Marlins by the Devil Rays in the 3rd round. The Twins would lose Brent Brede (1B) and Damian Miller (Catcher).

Conclusion

Clark Griffith did the fans of the Twins a great service by moving his franchise to Minnesota in 1961, rather than giving Minnesota an expansion team.

card-grid.jpg

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

Fat Calvin

Posted

Great write-up!  (But if I were you, I'd drop one "f" in every mention of the "Grifith" name, just as a precaution.  It could offer protection from revisionist censors.)

Karbo

Posted

Wow, this is the 1st time in I don't know how long I've read or heard domething positive about old Calvin!

jjswol

Posted

4 hours ago, Karbo said:

Wow, this is the 1st time in I don't know how long I've read or heard domething positive about old Calvin!

Calvin was called cheap but what most people fail to mention is how generous he was to many players and employees.

strumdatjag

Posted

What metropolitan area is most deserves getting an MLb team, but has never had a major team sport ;basketball, hockey, football and baseball)?

Louisville: It’s home of the iconic baseball bat and has always supported its AAA team well.  However, it’s just a little more than one hundred miles to Cincinnati, so the Reds would try to block Louisville.  
Birmingham - it has the population.    But too close to Atlanta 
Austin - This is the most likely new city to get a team.  It may be far enough from Dallas (about 180 miles) and Houston (160 miles)  to keep The Rangers and Astros from balking.  
 

Albuquerque and Honolulu be the final towns to consider.  
Honolulu would fit, if mlb wanted to expand into Japan and Korea (with three Tokyo Teams, Osaka, Nagoya, Hiroshima, Seoul …)   That would be a bad idea, in my opinion.    Let the Nippon Baseball League thrive - a game there is more fun than an MLB game anyways 

 

Doctor Wu

Posted

Great article. Seeing the photos of those old baseball cards brings back some great memories of those days gone by, when opening up packs of cards and wondering which players would pop out, and listening to ball games on AM radio, because there was no other choice expect for the Saturday game of the week. 

mikelink45

Posted

You missed what was key for me and a disappointment "Weiner writes that on January 25, 1954, Horace Stoneman of the Giants was in Minneapolis, and spilled his plans to move the Giants to Minneapolis, “probably to the new stadium that would somehow be built on his land on Highway 12.  The Giants’ relocation would be part of a move to send the Cincinnati Reds to New York in exchange for the Giants move to the Twin Cities.  Cincinnati was then the smallest market in the big leagues.” 

I was a Braves fan and really wanted the NL to be here.  Of course I went on to be an usher in the Twins first year so everything turned out well.

IndianaTwin

Posted

On 12/24/2023 at 7:12 PM, strumdatjag said:

What metropolitan area is most deserves getting an MLb team, but has never had a major team sport ;basketball, hockey, football and baseball)?

Louisville: It’s home of the iconic baseball bat and has always supported its AAA team well.  However, it’s just a little more than one hundred miles to Cincinnati, so the Reds would try to block Louisville.  
Birmingham - it has the population.    But too close to Atlanta 
Austin - This is the most likely new city to get a team.  It may be far enough from Dallas (about 180 miles) and Houston (160 miles)  to keep The Rangers and Astros from balking.  
 

Albuquerque and Honolulu be the final towns to consider.  
Honolulu would fit, if mlb wanted to expand into Japan and Korea (with three Tokyo Teams, Osaka, Nagoya, Hiroshima, Seoul …)   That would be a bad idea, in my opinion.    Let the Nippon Baseball League thrive - a game there is more fun than an MLB game anyways 

 

Actually, Louisville was a charter member of the National League, though the Grays only lasted two years, 1876 and 1877.

Then the Louisville Colonels were part of the NL from 1892-99. Honus Wagner spent his first three seasons with the Colonels in 1897-99. The Colonels were one of four teams contracted from the league in 1990. Their owner gained controlling interest of the Pirates and took 14 players with him, including Wagner, Fred Clarke and Rube Waddell.  

Oh, and the Kentucky Colonels of the American Basketball Association were based in Louisville. With Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel, they were the winningest team in the ABA over its nine-year history, but didn't get picked up by the NBA in the merger. 

strumdatjag

Posted

On 12/27/2023 at 6:48 PM, IndianaTwin said:

Actually, Louisville was a charter member of the National League, though the Grays only lasted two years, 1876 and 1877.

Then the Louisville Colonels were part of the NL from 1892-99. Honus Wagner spent his first three seasons with the Colonels in 1897-99. The Colonels were one of four teams contracted from the league in 1990. Their owner gained controlling interest of the Pirates and took 14 players with him, including Wagner, Fred Clarke and Rube Waddell.  

Oh, and the Kentucky Colonels of the American Basketball Association were based in Louisville. With Artis Gilmore and Dan Issel, they were the winningest team in the ABA over its nine-year history, but didn't get picked up by the NBA in the merger. 

I apologize.  I was indeed a Muskies and Pipers fan in my youth.  I should have remembered the ABA Kentucky Colonels.   I should have clarified cities that have not had a big league team (Basketball, Hockey, Baseball, Football)  post-1950.  Thanks for the correction. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...