Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Shaitan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    2,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Shaitan

  1. Only if they have no faith in Jeffers. And even then I'd make him prove he's healthy and can hit this year. Say what you will about "late bloomers" but they're the perfect deal for a budget conscious team: get his prime years on a rookie contract, them let him walk in his early 30s.
  2. I don't think I'd ever extend a reliever unless their name was Rivera. They're just too volatile and only grow more expensive. If he's willing to take a below market contract based on his recent injuries, I suppose I'd listen.
  3. Countdown until the "too many SS" threads begin...
  4. If he plays well enough, they'll find AB for him. Never just hand a prospect a starting job. Make them work for it.
  5. I don't really think it's worth considering Correa, but I like the storyline if the Twins did have the first 2 picks of that draft on the same time.
  6. Would be fascinating if he'd make the Hall and Mauer didn't. Which I would assume because of a ring and a bigger market. But he won't.
  7. Flame throwers on the waiver wire tend to have no control.
  8. I'd argue that SS, or OF, are their deepest positions in the minors. I'm fine with a short-term solution. And, while unpopular, I'm also fine with Polanco as that short-term solution. I'm more concerned about a Plan B at catcher. Jeffers is young and could go either way. Not sold on Garver's long-term success. And he had a gruesome injury last year (which can't help). There are a million stopgaps at SS. There are only AAAA level stopgaps at C.
  9. I get it. But the truth is that they need both quality and quantity. And $4m for a starting pitcher is basically Jake Cave money. Meaning...he could be gone tomorrow. Is it a glamorous signing? No. Is it a bad signing? Also no.
  10. 14 years? It felt like 5. In his prime he was tops in the league. That's what I care about. HOF is just a marketing tool.
  11. A team with like 50 openings for pitchers signed one for cheap. I don't really see the rub here. You want them to sign 50 Verlanders?
  12. I remember when he was the Twins best reliever. While admittedly at his peak, I guess the pitching last year wasn't so bad...
  13. What does Park/Korea have to do with this post?
  14. I like Berrios a lot. But there aren't 12 pitchers in the last 120 years I'd sign to a 7-year contract.
  15. I'm surprised to see Morrison and Worley are still playing. I know Morrison got some MLB time this past season, but neither struck me as grind-it-out-in-AAA personalities.
  16. Pretty sure Albers will be back. 10 or 15 more times.
  17. You might have talked me out of it, just by saying he's worth less than Nolasco (10 years ago) on the open market.
  18. I think Pineda may resign. I also think counting on his to pitch 160 IP is unrealistic. Maybe 80-120.
  19. Except neither Perkins nor Duffey went to the bullpen in year 2. It took years and riding the AAA shuttle first before they made the move.
  20. Math isn't fun to watch? Shocking!
  21. Has Pineda ever pitched a full season? He's a fine pitcher when healthy, but he's not an arm you can rely on. He's a bonus.
  22. Andrew Albers is still with the Twins based on his first 2 games.
  23. I don't have much faith in him, but the price is right when weighing cost/reward.
×
×
  • Create New...