Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

2wins87

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by 2wins87

  1. That is basically what I am saying though. The offense was doing fine against Allen just hadn't bunched up their hits. Why play for one run in that situation? And if you really want that one run, why not just go for a safety squeeze in the next AB? I didn't understand it.
  2. It's a small change but the total run expectancy for that situation went down. I have to think that the odds of at least one run went up significantly due to the possibility for a sac fly. That would have to mean that the odds for two or more runs went down by a fairly significant amount. So by the odds they were not going for multiple runs. Jeffers is slow but he also hits the ball in the air quite a bit and has a lot of power. Mostly I don't like giving outs away with the starter getting hit hard and reaching the end of his outing.
  3. I'm generally still in favor of the long leash for starters, and Gray being the staff ace so far with a low pitch count heading into the 7th--pretty much a no brainer. I don't belive for a second that Gray's incredible success the third time through the order coming into today was anything but good luck though. It's a pretty hard and fast rule that every starter gets hit harder each additional time through the order. It happened to Lopez two days ago also. As long as the starters are being efficient and effective, letting them pitch deeper will probably be good for the bullpen and should work out more often than not. There are going to be a few more games like this one though, that's the trade off.
  4. Was really not a fan of that bunt call in the sixth. It's basically a push in terms of run expectancy, from about 1.44 runs expected with runners on 1st and 2nd with no outs to 1.39 runs expected with 1 out and 2nd and 3rd, but that wasn't really my issue. I don't mind a sac bunt from time to time even if the math says it's a slightly negative play, but it depends on the guy bunting and the game situation. I don't know why they're playing for one run there. They only had 2 runs off Allen, but he'd hardly been shutting the offense down. In particular they were taking good at bats the third time through the order and pushing his pitch count up toward his limit. Jeffers laid down a good bunt, but even if he perfectly places it he's not putting pressure on the defense with his foot speed. So it's one pitch and an out for Allen. Farmer as the lead runner also doesn't have speed so it's not even like he can score from third on most ground balls or shallow fly balls. Not to mention the fact that Jeffers has been hot, and while Castro has also been hot, he is still Willi Castro. He hadn't taken good at bats against Allen earlier in the game (popping out on the first pitch and then grounding out on a pitch outside the strike zone with a 2-0 count). I'd rather take a shot with Jeffers, and Castro still likely would have been up in a good RBI situation. Seemed like a momentum killer to me at the time.
  5. I don't know how much of the early season data and scouting is getting incorporated into the reports from fangraphs. It's sort of a preseason list but a couple months late. Some of the writeups clearly reference developments since the start of the year but I don't know how hard they worked on upgrading every individual tool grade, particularly for guys down the list where a lot of the info could still be mostly from last year. They do have him 23rd which is higher than he was on the TD preseason list. If he keeps producing people will take notice and scouts will take note of any swing path changes or other adjustments.
  6. I'm surprised how little criticism there has been of Vazquez since he has been a black hole in the lineup most of the season. We knew he was signed for defense, but it hasn't been fun to watch at the plate. Theres a level of offense where the defense just doesn't make up for it, I think its called Butera-esque. He has had a couple of good games lately, but more importantly Jeffers has been tearing it up in increased usage which has been critical for a couple wins. I've always been a fan of Jeffers and really thought he would be a seemless replacement to Garver with less bat but enough additional defense not to miss it that much. I had to temper my expectations last year that he would be that kind of starting catcher, but I've never totally given up on the dream. I think Jeffers' defense has continued to improve at the MLB level. His biggest issue has been a large platoon split which tends to kill a batting line for a regular RH hitter. He's actually crushed righties this year and I'm hoping it's a sign that he's just breaking out as a hitter.
  7. Mahle was a positive for the brief healthy stint he had. Injuries happen in baseball, especially to pitchers, so I disagree with him being on this list because of it. I'd say Jorge Lopez may be creeping onto the list at #5 for me. He's not too negative on the WPA list right now because he had some early saves, but it's hard to put any trust in him right now. And at what point does it become a fluky good half-season with Baltimore versus a disappointing end to last year and start to this year? I remember a lot of arguments at the time of the trade that we could ignore all of his stats prior to the start of last year, which always seemed absurd to me. Well, the career high K rate disappeared and he's back around his prior norms. Same with the career low HR rate. The only thing making him look good at the beginning of the year was his ridiculously high GB rate, but that's back to just moderately high now. I'm pretty worried about him going forward.
  8. Buxton still leads the hitters in win probability added. I'm not saying that's predictive of what's going to happen going forward in clutch spots, but he's found a way to help the team above and beyond his overall stat-line. He's also been a plus on the base paths. He'll surely have another hot streak soon enough. It's disappointing that there's been so little time where everything has lined up with the health but he's hardly been a disappointing player to me. I do think that it's probably beyond just keeping him healthy and that he must still be dealing with inflammation or something in the knee on a semi-regular basis, so it's discouraging that he might not get to the point health-wise where he's even a half-time CF for the regular season. I do think he will at least get out there some in August or September.
  9. Matthews got the first promotion and he'd be my pick too at this point based off statcast and stat-line data. His FB is generally in the mid 90s averaging over 93 mph and he's topped out at 96.3. Seems like he can spin a good breaking ball too though he probably needs to refine into one or two consistent shapes. His changeup didn't get a ton of whiffs in low A so he probably still needs to work on it and that probably adds to to his reliever risk somewhat. His control seems to already be really good though which helps to put him over the top. He had a miniscule 3.3% walk rate against low A hitters while striking out over 35%. Lewis is right behind him for me. The fastball only averages around 90.5 mph and has topped out at 93, but it has been pretty effective so I think it may have some good secondary characteristics. The knuckleball has unsurprisingly baffled low-A hitters getting whiffs on over half of the swings. But his slider has also been really effective so he's really got a full repertoire to go with the knuckle ball and it makes me interested to see how his stuff plays as he moves up. Culpepper is definitely intriguing beyond the stat line as well. He's the hardest thrower of the bunch averaging around 94 mph and having topped out at 97.5 in game. I don't know what he was throwing pre-draft, but based on where he was drafted I'm guessing he added a bunch of that velocity in the Twins' off-season camp. He probably has the most refinement still needed on his pitches and command, but he has the profile of that late round pick from a smaller baseball program that they develop into something solid.
  10. Wow, what a night in Lansing for the Kernels hitters! I think they had a couple full weeks earlier in the season where they didn't even score close to 24 runs. It seems the 8 runs in the 9th were off of a position player, so take those stats with a grain of salt but still a great night for many guys. Watching Tanner Schobel earlier this year he looked like a guy who could punch above his weight though the stat line didn't really show it at the time. He's been coming on lately though. 7 game hit streak in which he is 14 for 33 and now HR in back to back games. I also commented a few weeks ago that Rosario seemed like a guy that could be a minor tweak away from a breakout and it seems like it may have happened. 5 HR in the last 2 and 1/2 weeks and the plate discipline numbers continue to trend in the right direction.
  11. Even with his typical 95 wRC+ Kepler is easily a starting caliber player putting up at least 2 WAR each of the last 6 full seasons thanks to his defense. Not sure where the fit is but yes another team would have no second thoughts about picking up the contract, which is why he would be traded rather than dropped. I don't think the FO is as ready to move on as most fans, but when they are I don't think they are wrong that he has some sort of trade value. The trade value is probably not as high as they believe it should be but it's still there.
  12. Oh that already happened btw. 1.245 OPS in March/April, .616 OPS in May.
  13. For a healthy Polanco it's a no brainer. If he's stays relatively healthy and productive the rest of the season they could still easily pick up the option and flip him for something of value if they decide to go a different direction at 2B. He has another similar option for 2025 so it's still essentially two years of team control at a reasonable price. For the time being Polanco is still the better option on both sides of the ball though. Probably the hardest decision is if he's only mostly healthy and that limits his productivity, which is certainly a possibility the way the last few years have gone for him. I don't see Julien getting a whole lot better on defense that quickly, so if he is the starting 2B next year they will probably need a high defensive floor platoon partner for him, and maybe they already have it with Willi Castro fitting that role and playing better defense than he ever has prior to this year. It's hard to see Julien as a building block 2B long term though. He'll probably be a good bat 2B/1B/DH with someone else covering the defense at 2B more often than not.
  14. I don't think Julien has been undisciplined in the majors. He's had a pretty good eye with two strikes. It seems they've been trying to have him swing at strikes more aggressively early in the count, and he had some success with the approach at first, though lately it seems that either he's just a bit off or he's gotten more quality strikes that just haven't been as hittable. He hasn't really gotten himself into hitters counts too often, which speaks to how he's been pitched and the reason they've wanted him to be more aggressive. It'll have to be a balance of attacking early so pitchers aren't able to go right after him as much but making sure that the pitches he attacks are ones he can actually do something with.
  15. There has been some consternation over Brooks Lee recently Now he's on a 6 game hitting streak with 4 of those games being multi-hit efforts and with 4 doubles and a HR mixed in. Overall the power still seems to be a bit behind where it was supposed to be when he was drafted, but if he continues his current performance for another week his overall line should be right around where you want for a top prospect.
  16. I like contact in prospects, maybe even more than your average prospect ranker. But if contact is the only tool you end up with Nick Madrigal basically, which is a name I've heard mentioned in the same sentence as Wilson. Maybe the ceiling on Wilson is a little higher than that but I'm not sure what the safety is worth if the ceiling is too low, which is my worry on Wilson.
  17. I think they have shown a willingness to go multiple directions early in the draft. You can see some clear tendencies from later picks but that probably doesn't have as much bearing on their first round pick as the talent available in the draft. I'm not putting very much stock in rumors either. I think the reason their model would prefer hitters over pitchers probably isn't too nuanced in the end and it's the same reason that every team's model does: injuries. I think it's clear from they way they have gone about acquiring major league pitching that they have a pretty strong weight on injury risk, and every pitcher is going to have that, not in the least those throwing in the upper 90s or topping 100. I would think they would still be perfectly willing if not thrilled to go for Skenes at #5 though, whatever the rumors. Of course they are going to do their own due diligence and their board could end up different than the consensus. It's also a guarantee that someone outside of the consensus top 5 will go on to have a better career than most of them, if not all.
  18. I was curious if that 2 RBI pop fly hit would show up in Willi Castro's statcast page since it seemed like he got a bad jump and let up a little early. Sure enough it is there today. 5.4 seconds of hang time, 91 feet needed, 90% catch probability. So yes, most true centerfielders would make that play. It's just interesting how only watching the end of the play it looked like there was no way he could have gotten there. But going back to the beginning where he had a bad read off the bat and slow jump it was actually a play that should be made most of the time. Anyway, not to rip on Castro who probably shouldn't be relied on to be a center fielder very much. It was once again the offense as much as anything that sunk them, and Castro was just one part of that yesterday, though he certainly didn't have a good day in the field either.
  19. Good to see Cossetti carrying over success into high A so far. I'm preparing myself to start really getting excited about his stat line if he can repeat his low A numbers for a couple months with Cedar Rapids.
  20. They haven’t drafted many HS pitchers but I'd be curious if they have a long term health strategy where they limit his in game pitches a lot early on while development is still going on behind the scenes, at least until he gets to the upper minors where his workload can be built up. It seems like last year he actually pitched deeper early in the season before having a few brief absences and then somewhat short outings in the second half. I think there were a couple minor health issues in there but I don't remember any specifics. So that seems more like they are trying to manage his health more specifically to avoid any of those nagging issues from popping up. Makes me wonder a little more about his durability long term but if it does manage to get him to the majors without any major injuries that's a big plus.
  21. After Clark at #5 I'm doubling down on upside with surefire shortstop out of HS Adrian Santana at #34 and then their prototypical "positionless but he can really hit" college bat with LuJames "Gino" Groover III at #49. Then in rounds 3-10 probably about 6 college arms a couple of whom come out next year having added 2-4 MPH at velocity camp. Maybe not the most likely scenario but I think still fairly on brand for this front office. Probably of the guys left Yohandy Morales might be the most likely at #34 who fits into the college hitter type that they like.
  22. He seems probably like maybe a #4 right now, but I still think there could be more. Seems like his secondaries aren't always working great for him. In his latest outing against the Angels he had to rely heavily on his fastball. He's been able to get it done a few ways though. I remember in his start against the Yankees he went to the cutter a lot, especially early in counts, to keep their hitters off of the fastball. Having good command and a fastball that can be effective even when thrown over 60% of the time is a good foundation though. Not too dissimilar from where Joe Ryan was when the Twins acquired him. I'm optimistic he can work with the coaching staff to hone his secondary stuff and end up a solid #3 or maybe even #2 type.
  23. Nice to see Cossetti getting a pretty early promotion, I'm going to be very interested in how he does against tougher competition. There were no nits to pick with his batting line in low-A except for his age. I think Rafael Cruz could be on the verge of an offensive breakout in low-A. The strikeouts are an issue and his numbers haven't been good yet but he is hitting the ball very hard quite often.
  24. This thread is going to be a cesspool of negativity but I want to point out that while a bunch of different relievers have had their hand in blowing leads lately, Duran has pitched just 5 times in the month of May (without giving up any runs other than a Manfred Man). This is a case where Rocco's managing is actually way too traditional and he can't seem to imagine anything other than a traditional closer role. Duran obviously isn't going to save any game all by himself, but when the team is scuffling it seems like one solution would be to try to get one of the best relievers in baseball involved earlier in the game before you have a chance to blow it and maybe have a chance to tack on. Anyway, enough of the negativity for me, I'm going to try to do something more fun.
×
×
  • Create New...