Cone was a one and done despite playing 13 years in NY. It wasn't regionalism. It was a crowded ballot and narrative. Johan deserved a longer look, no doubt. Poz wrote a nice article about him during the run up last year. Doc simply had more great seasons than Johan - Johan had arguably 5 HOF caliber seasons (a season above 5 WAR) - 2004-2008. If you want to argue his best season with the Mets was worthy, 199 ip, 4.7 WAR, that would be six. Doc, on the other hand, had 8 seasons where he topped 5 WAR (02-03, 05-06, 08-11) and another season where he threw 225 innings and finished 5th in Cy Young voting. WAR isn't the end-all, be-all stat but Johan is #100 all-time among pitchers while Doc is #42. Both won two Cy Youngs but Doc got jobbed twice (02, 11) while Johan got jobbed once (05). Doc, to me. was a clear HOFer. Johan was a bubble candidate who I think should have gotten in and deserved more consideration.