Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,376

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    This is good new indeed. Glad the FO decided he was now ready.
  2. Mike Sixel
    I love snark. Seriously.
  3. Mike Sixel
    good point on the minors maybe being different. I had not thought of that. Would be interesting to know!
  4. Mike Sixel
    buying stocks is stupid. Buy funds. Nonetheless, I persist....
  5. Mike Sixel
    I don't know, but I love Shopify's moat. That's my favorite part of them, and their mgmt seems to be smart.
  6. Mike Sixel
    if you ignore inherited runners and other things, and look at ERA.....do people look at ERA for RPs?
  7. Mike Sixel
    ha! https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/05/09/better-buy-shopify-inc-us-vs-square-inc.aspx I have not read this....but here is one person's thoughts!
  8. Mike Sixel
    We use square in our business....
  9. Mike Sixel
    Brock on square. Dave on bitcoin. Mike on Shopify and Nvidia. Did I get them all? btw, I also like Activision and GM and Tesla. GM for the dividends, Activision because they just keep making money, and Tesla because they are more than a car company.
  10. Mike Sixel
    "we can't use the depth, then we won't have depth if we need it" You realize how that sentence reads, right?
  11. Mike Sixel
    thanks, and I know it's stupid. And yes, I have rolled back to slightly more conservative in a few spots.
  12. Mike Sixel
    Rucinski never should have been called up.
  13. Mike Sixel
    We were told a couple days ago, Berrios was not ready. If he's ready now, he was ready then....
  14. Mike Sixel
    A new market inefficiency has been found!
  15. Mike Sixel
    fair. but this does say they aren't trying to win this year, doesn't it? Can we ever be honest about rebuilding here? How would you feel if you were on the roster, and they made these decisions?
  16. Mike Sixel
    So it's cool Tepesch got two starts, or Wilk one? these actions make you feel more confident in the FO?
  17. Mike Sixel
    You see no difference between signing him, and not signing him, on the likelihood you can sign him in the future? We'll just disagree. I don't care one way or the other if they sign him at this point, since they won't trade him.
  18. Mike Sixel
    Technically June, but in rounding, July. We were both right.
  19. Mike Sixel
    All of them.
  20. Mike Sixel
    you asked why you'd sign him to an extension if you were the Twins.......I'm not opining on anything about Dozier.
  21. Mike Sixel
    Like Tepesch only getting 1 start, then being sent back down?
  22. Mike Sixel
    Well, he could sign with someone else.....there is that risk.
  23. Mike Sixel
    Be 28/29, never have been a good prospect, and come from outside the organization. This is the same FO that wanted a 35 yo DH, rather than Vargas or Park (that signing was before any injuries or WBC). Their actions are pretty clear.
  24. Mike Sixel
    given his service time last year? I would be surprised if it was June. but, hey, what's 6-8 more starts to the Twins, when you have Tepesch and Wilk, right?
  25. Mike Sixel
    Do people still think this team is interested in winning THIS YEAR, given these last few promotions?
×
×
  • Create New...