Jump to content
The Twins took Lackey third overall, what do you think? Join the conversation with us! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,983

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    Brutal. Just can't lose the turnover battle like this
  2. Mike Sixel
    Easy. He was not good
  3. Mike Sixel
    Agree
  4. Mike Sixel
    Has a wr caught a ball for the Vikings?
  5. Mike Sixel
    This is close
  6. Mike Sixel
    Yup
  7. Mike Sixel
    Dobbs looks awful. Lucky not to have three picks....
  8. Mike Sixel
    If Kirk ever had this defense...
  9. Mike Sixel
    Why do I watch?
  10. Mike Sixel
    Utter domination for nothing. Seriously. Ugh.
  11. Mike Sixel
    I never want to see him touch the ball again, which, ya, he's actually been good tonight.
  12. Mike Sixel
    We can compliment Dobbs without ripping cousins.... Please
  13. Mike Sixel
    Is there a worse team at the snap on offense?
  14. Mike Sixel
    Lucky Dobbs doesn't have three picks..... The coach got way too cute on third down
  15. Mike Sixel
    My mom is here, and she likes the sound on. I never listen
  16. Mike Sixel
    Awful play
  17. Mike Sixel
    Lions will win
  18. Mike Sixel
    No surprise, neither team nor money
  19. Mike Sixel
    Denver
  20. Mike Sixel
    Not relevant now, thought, right? We are talking about now?
  21. Mike Sixel
    That's my belief also.
  22. Mike Sixel
    It's possible they sign crappy veterans also....or that they get hurt. This fear of even adding one rookie a year baffles me, especially for fans of a mid-market team with a budget.
  23. Mike Sixel
    I think they deal Gordon, but it is possible they deal Castro....but I think Castro has more defensive versatility.....speaking of that, I'd like to keep Farmer, since he can actually play SS.....but I don't know what they'll do. The did show, last year, how much they value depth......
  24. Mike Sixel
    I even said "imo"....to make it clear it wasn't absolute! Hope all is well. Enjoy the banter.
  25. Mike Sixel
    I'll address the middle part about context. This is 100% why you don't take context into account....Here is a real life example. Luis Castillo had negative value to Cincy when traded. They weren't making the playoffs, and he cost real money. Each start for him was one they couldn't use on someone else to gain information about them. He had extreme value to Sea, MN, and NYY....as they didn't have 3 very good / great starters for the playoffs. He had less value to LAD and HOU, since they had "enough" starters for the playoffs. that's why you take context out, why you use some generic replacement player. WAR isn't about VALUE at all. It is a tool to measure the outcomes produced by players so you can compare the outcome produced. Here is another way it isn't about value / context. Burnes likely produces more WAR next year than Peralta. But, Peralta has A LOT of control left at a low cost. He's going to cost more to acquire than Burnes for those reasons. WAR isn't a tool for measuring that. It ignores that context. If you want it to do more than it is made to do, well, it won't, because it isn't made to do that.
×
×
  • Create New...