Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,968
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Front office showed last year how much they love depth, among hitters. This year they want it for pitchers, and likely have it for hitters, though they need another OF....
  2. Almost rounding errors there. I mean they aren't, but they aren't far off either.
  3. Also, this ignores the annual cash flow as part of the return. It's much higher than the simple math shows.
  4. I have a master's in finance and have worked with those people. Let's be real, they have so much money, risk is truly irrelevant to them. But they make neat market rate with no downside risk. That's the key. No downside risk at all. They would buy every bond ever if they got seven percent with no risk
  5. Sure, not the point at all. No owner sells at a loss ever. There's no real risk.
  6. I'm also surprised at all the DCs landing these jobs. And yes, Flores is being discriminated against, it appears
  7. The next time someone says the owners are taking financial risk, remember this and roll your eyes.
  8. Not one projection system likes him even close to that much.....Cruz was pretty amazing here.
  9. Well, even if they are iffy on the prospects, fangraphs sure likes this trade for MN https://blogs.fangraphs.com/twins-and-mariners-link-up-for-intriguing-swap/
  10. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/twins-and-mariners-link-up-for-intriguing-swap/
  11. I didn't say "untouchable"....I said it was unreal to fire a FO after their best year in decades....a FO which has had them in the playoffs more years than not....
  12. I never said to promote him....I said it was odd to say he hasn't shown anything in the minors after 1 year in professional ball when he reached AAA. Not once did I say promote him....I said people judging him as "not all that great" which many here are doing, seems premature. YMMV, of course.
  13. If you don't think buxton, lewis, and AK are playing much, there is no reason to build for the present.....unless you think they'll find a 3B, 1B, CF and very good SP somehow with this budget. I agree there were plenty of ABs for Polanco, though.
  14. "When he tells us he’s ready to go, we’re going to get him up to the big leagues.” Ya, not until someone gets hurt, they've shown that over and over. As for the idea, no. Lee is not signing this kind of deal. He's been hyped and prepped for a long time, and is 1 year from being drafted. He's betting on himself, easy.
  15. 1, A trade for a guy if they are in contention. Is this debatable? 2. Ya, no. They also got rid of Polanco's salary. They netted 5-8 million (I've seen different numbers). 3. Yup. And I doubt the Twins love him either. He was there to even out the money so the Twins got more prospect capital.
  16. They might, might, deal for a player that makes money (or at the deadline). Things I think are true: The Twins are less good now for 2024 than they were. The bullpen is better. The SP is deeper, but I'm not a fan of the new guy and have doubts. It sucks for Varland if he's in AAA, as he's losing a ton of money will in AAA. The farm is deeper. They aren't done trading. Things I like: I like the new RP I like the new prospects, and think the pitcher could move quickly if they make him a RP full time. I like the new OF..... Things I think will happen: Twins will sign an ok player. Twins will trade for a good player. It's possible for most of the thoughts on this thread to be true at the same time. Things I'm certain of: Seattle was not dealing any of their good ML SP. No way.
  17. Fair.....but if the front 7 isn't addressed, not even Mahomes could carry this team to the promised land.
  18. "still" I mean, sure, if 2-3 months in AAA shows us anything much......He was in AAA less than a year from being drafted, and people say he hasn't shown anything....
  19. They just won the division and advanced in the playoffs, and you want to fire the FO? Unreal.
  20. DL,DL, DL They have zero good starters in the front 4-5 right now.....
  21. Or, they got some money, a RP and will use that money to replace Polanco with someone similar, or in a position of more need? Plus two prospects....
  22. If they spend the money well, they get a good player, a good RP, a fifth starter, a good prospect, and a flyer prospect..... I'm failing to see this as anything but good, assuming they spend the money well.
  23. Because gray is gone? I mean, it seems likely they won't be as good or healthy, so more bullpen arms they trust is important.
  24. I'm struggling to figure out who they can sign or trade for, looking at the free agents and bad teams.... Twins need an OF, DH, maybe 1b..... That's bellinger, but they aren't paying that. But yes, if they reallocate that money, and get a legit player, it's hard not to like the deal.
×
×
  • Create New...