They did a great job with Duffey in 2015, but I think it was less of a risk for the organization to gamble with Duffey's readiness than it was for Berrios. If Duffey flops and he takes a step backwards in his progression, it's not as big of a loss as if it were Berrios, and to your point, maybe Duffey was more ready, he certainly proved himself to be ready, where Berrios did not. 2 poor starts in transition does not prove to me that Berrios was not ready. every step along the way brings new challenges. for Berrios only needing two starts to adjust to a higher level of competition speaks to how ready he was of the bigs. I agree that Duffey/Berrios competition, Berrios wins. Its Milone, Hughes, Santana, Nolaco and Gibson that I'm not sure if it matters who is the better pitcher. from a contract standpoint, I get why he should start in AAA, but from a talent/readiness/improve the team standpoint, it would have been better for Berrios's clock to start last August/September as well as Duffey.