Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Craig Arko

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    11,923
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Craig Arko

  1. So many gone. Now Walter and Sir Patrick. Make it not so.
  2. The lack of opinions on this topic probably constitutes the wisest discourse ever produced on this site. Kudos.
  3. I would think it will be whatever is agreed to by MLB and the Players Association. They’re neither the NFL nor the NHL, so I wouldn’t get too antsy about applying those cases to this one. By the way, if there is a floor in the agreement some teams (including, perhaps, the Twins) may try to meet it by signing current players to extensions, wouldn’t they?
  4. So, who do you suppose will be blamed when that doesn’t work out?
  5. Agreed. I wouldn’t mind the ability to put a few of the ‘content creators’ on ignore, but, you know, baby needs a new pair of shoes. :)
  6. This is the best explanation I’ve heard.
  7. I’d be okay with simply replacing them with an ‘lol’ style emoji.
  8. Per the beat writers, it sounds like a decision won’t be made until Friday.
  9. Okay. I suppose I’m not that interested in drawing any specific conclusions about it. Things will play out as they will. Anyway, please excuse the interruption.
  10. No, we always have to make assumptions. That’s the basis of any rational argument. The point is being able to recognize (and be able to examine) what are assumptions and what are conclusions. And then recognizing that the conclusions are only as good as the assumptions. Right? There’s this gizmo I learned studying formal logic with many names (I learned it as the ‘Munchhausen trilemma’) that posits all rational arguments must rely on feet of sand. I kinda like it. It’s an assumption, of course. Anyway, I have no clue as to what Pohlad, Falvey, and Zoll might have discussed in private, so I draw no conclusions. And continue to mourn Dolly.
  11. Reading this thread one thing jumps out at me: asserting something as true does not make it true. It doesn’t make it false, either. Just an unproved assumption. Don’t confuse the two. Lots of red herrings have begun this way. This site is full of them.
×
×
  • Create New...