Concur. There's no law of physics (or baseball) I know of that decrees BABIP needs to be around .300 or will normalize to it. Where it comes to normalization, it's to whatever the player's norm is - and I don't know of a tool for guessing what that will be for a player just reaching the majors so when in doubt it's reasonable to guess .290-.300.
But some players, pitchers or batters alike, maintain departures from .300 that eventually need to be acknowledged. Joe Mauer was one - his lifetime .341 BABIP wasn't luck*, it was a mark of his superior skill. Clayton Kershaw? His .274 BABIP is well earned and is also a mark of his greatness. Max Kepler's a batter chronically on the low side; Ricky Nolasco was a hurler perpetually on the high side.
Aaron Judge's lifetime BABIP is .348. Does that mean he's lucky? Yes, of course - he's lucky to have been born with that much talent!!!
So Cody Klemens having a BABIP of .229 across 703 PA starts to look like who he really is. And the .440 BABIP he enjoyed during a 17-game run of 1.265 OPS in May of this year might, just might, be the outlier.
* I dislike using the word "luck" when discussing competition between opposing players who are each trying their best. I think of a low or high BABIP as potentially unsustainable, for reasons that may or may not be knowable.