ashbury

I was affected by three mergers or acquisitions during my career. The Pohlads' handling of the Twins right now looks for all the world to me like a cash cow that they intended to milk until it runs dry and then they discard it. Baseball's not a similar business* to high-tech industry, so maybe the similarities to what I saw don't apply; warning lights sometimes give false positives. * indeed I've said elsewhere recently that I don't see it as a business whatsover, except in the sense that money comes in and goes out.

Yeah, right.

Waiver wire, baby! / oh wait, you said "upgrade".

Whether or not Max should have been traded, here's why I didn't expect it to happen: he faces left-handed pitchers, while Wallner and Larnach basically don't. When one of them starts being shown some trust, then that could be the end for Max here.

I find this gif helpful therapy in many situations. You are free to borrow.

As is fair. A trade should make the team better, not the same. We're 2 games behind the Dodgers in the loss column. They have no right to expect any favors. Meanwhile I see on MLBTR that Diego A. Castillo has been outrighted. That has been the case since Friday. There's your rumor mill to work from.

If you look at league splits the four different ways, you can understand why. It's not just Twins lefties who flail against lefties. (Also, in the favorable lefty-righty matchups for batters, the right-handers also fare ever so slightly better. Still, because of the far greater number of innings pitched by righties, there's nothing more valuable than a left-handed batter at your disposal.)

I don't know. How much more do you wish your perspective broadened? You tell me. Why is winning the World Series less desirable than the America's Cup or the Kentucky Derby? Few can even tell you who won those latter two most recently anymore. I'll give you my answer: billionaires are fickle, just like any human beings. And we're being asked to take their eccentric choices as inviolable law handed down from on his. Examine your assumptions.

Yes, because they routinely let the low-paid rookies throw 150 pitches every game, and they limit only the guys on guaranteed contracts. 😀

In that case: people never understand SATIRE!!!!11!eleventy!

If you have to ask, you already get it. SATIRE!!!!11!eleventy!

Correct.

I didn't think, until just this minute, that ChatGPT might have some views on Joe Mauer being a Hall of Famer now. Herewith, and without further delay, is this sadly belated essay. ChatGPT Oh, Joe Mauer’s in the Hall of Fame now? Well, color me shocked! It’s not like Minnesota Twins fans have been tirelessly waving Mauer flags like it’s a never-ending parade or anything. Seriously, Mauer’s induction is kind of like getting the gold star for showing up on time for a game you were clearly going to win anyway. Let’s not forget, this is the same Joe Mauer who, for a decade, made catching look so effortless that you half expected him to stroll out to the mound with a latte in one hand and a newspaper in the other. And let’s be honest, he was so smooth behind the plate that sometimes you wondered if he was actually playing a completely different game than the rest of us. A .306 career batting average and three batting titles? That’s cute. And winning the MVP award in a season where his team barely made a ripple in the playoffs? Adorable. He made it look so easy that the rest of us thought we might be able to give it a shot, only to realize that he was basically the baseball equivalent of a wizard performing a magic trick—except his wand was a bat, and the magic was turning fastballs into base hits. So congratulations to Joe Mauer for finally getting his well-deserved Hall of Fame nod. The voters have officially acknowledged what every baseball fan in Minnesota has known for years: Joe Mauer was too good for this planet and is now officially on a higher level of baseball greatness. May he continue to make the rest of us look bad in the most impressive way possible. (Full disclosure: I may have mentioned the word "snark" in my request to ChatGPT. And then I asked the service to take the contrary view. You might detect some themes in common.) ChatGPT Oh, Joe Mauer’s in the Hall of Fame? Well, isn’t that a fascinating plot twist. It’s almost like someone decided to mix a ‘Good for You’ award with a ‘We’re Feeling Generous’ badge. Mauer’s induction is a bit like being handed a trophy for showing up to a dance-off in tap shoes while everyone else is busting moves in sneakers. Let’s be real: Mauer’s career was like a perfectly pleasant cup of decaf coffee. Sure, he was a decent hitter and an exceptional catcher, but his .306 career average and three batting titles feel like the Hall of Fame equivalent of getting a participation trophy. And yes, he won an MVP, but he did it in a year when his team didn’t exactly light up the playoffs. It’s like getting a gold star for being the best at a game no one else bothered to play. His defensive skills behind the plate were top-notch, but it’s not like he reinvented the position or anything. And his career, while solid, lacked the explosive moments or transformative impact that often defines a true Hall of Famer. It’s not that Mauer wasn’t good—he was—but sometimes being ‘really good’ doesn’t quite cut it in a museum of legends. So congrats to Joe Mauer for joining the ranks of the Hall of Fame. It’s a nice acknowledgment of a good career, but let’s not kid ourselves into thinking he’s joining the ranks of baseball immortality with the same gravity as those who redefined the game.

Deyvison De Los Santos went 2-for-4 today, lowering his OPS for AAA Jacksonville to 1.357. 😀

Without a mention of words like "payroll" or "salary" the article seems incomplete in the broad analysis it offers. At minimum, assumptions on payroll based on off-season FO comments shift the likelihood toward "standing pat", versus trading away for anything likely to be available.

Just quickly scanning through the game thread. Looking forward to the full TD game recap of this disappointing 5-0 loss.

Been there a couple of times. Enjoyed it and the surrounding part of the city. I'm not the most critical judge of ballparks, though.

Leading the majors. Their pitchers are just about smack-dab in the middle of the ranking, for comparison's sake. And there were no HBP in yesterday's game, just in case I thought bad blood might have crossed over from yesterday.

I missed it too, but the video clip on mlb.com Gameday shows him heading to the dugout under his own power. That does not rule out several other bad outcomes.

The box score shows it that way, at least for the moment. Will be interesting to remember this question and check the official one tomorrow.

I don't buy into sports teams never losing money, no. It's a vanity project. As I said, it's fundamentally unlike running a chain of dry cleaners. Take the America's Cup, for example. Some of the richest men in history have spent hundreds of millions of dollars in an attempt to own it..They don't demand that a fast sailing boat turn a profit. Horseracing, similarly; some racing stables are self-sustaining, many are not. There's no reason except a scoundrel's handshake among 30 billionaires that each individual baseball team must make a profit every single year, either. Once you get over that artificial hurdle, my point of view is clear and consistent. Owning a sports team is a privilege, not necessarily a profit-center. My point of view is not very important, because of exactly that agreement among billionaires; the Pohlad family is hardly alone in this (though there are occasional exceptions like the Tigers for a while and the Padres recently). So I'm not holding my breath. But there is absolutely no reason a team like the Twins, who have a good if not stellar farm system, can't choose to pay 4 key players a total of $100M, as was suggested further up, to supplement their roster of rising players. Throwing out challenges to compare to low-revenue teams is what's incongruous, for the several reasons I stated.

Sorry. I don't accept the terms of discussion you stipulate. Revenue is not the independent variable. On the contrary, it's an embarrassment that the Twins' revenue is lower than the Cardinals', despite having a larger economic base; it speaks to decades of failure going back to Calvin Griffith and would take many years at minimum to turn around. The Twins should also be on a par in revenue with the Mariners but they are not. More importantly though, owning a sports franchise is nothing like running a chain of dry cleaning stores or even a health care behemoth. There is no rule except a corrupt handshake deal among 30 billionaires that profitability is inviolable. The competition is on the field, not among 30 CFOs. You've bought into bean-counting as a competitive sport. Most of us do not. For these reasons I'm not playing along with your rhetorical games. PS. The Forbes franchise value page seems to have Minnesota ranked #16, so while that's technically "bottom half" it's pretty disingenuous to limit the discussion to teams below them. So even if I did want to play along, the discussion's rigged before it starts.

There are no guarantees in life but $30M generally brings you a good player. And 4 good players on your roster before you start factoring in your low-cost players is a good position to be in. The $100M is a privilege to pay. Oscar Wilde said that a cynic is one who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.* The value of having good players is high. * In fairness, this is only half of a dialog attributed to Wilde that was also aiming to make an equal and opposite point about knowing the price of nothing and assigning absurdly high value to too many things. Real wisdom is finding the middle path between cynicism and sentimentalism.

The Twins will nonetheless find a way to make the windfall income tax-exempt.

GoFundYour$elve$, Twins.