I'm going to use this thread as an opportunity to address postseason qualifications and seeding.
There have been critics saying the Twins didn't deserve a berth in the postseason because Seattle had a better record. (Even though it was only by 1 game.) Meanwhile, Miami and Arizona both entered the postseason with worse records than the Twins, and with negative run differentials to boot. I think it's certain that the Twins were a top 12 team in the regular season, even considering playing in the AL Central. Whether Seattle deserved to be in the postseason instead of Miami and Arizona is a legitimate related question.
Another criticism is whether the Twins should have been given the 3 seed. Personally, I think the winner of each division should advance. But I would have no problem seeding the teams in each league by overall record instead of automatically giving the top 3 seeds to the division winners. Beyond that, I would have no problem reseeding the teams by record within each league for each round of the postseason instead of keeping the brackets intact.
To put all this together, having the two leagues separated in the postseason until the World Series has become an anachronism. (IMHO, of course.) I would have no problem completely eliminating the separation between the two leagues. I think it would be fairer and in the long run good for baseball and for the fans. 52 games within the division and 22 games against each of the other 5 divisions. For the postseason seed the 6 division winners and the 6 wild card teams by regular season record, reseeding after each round. And if (when) it turns out 2 teams that historically were in the same league wind up in the World Series, so what?