“The team has sufficient veteran depth in the back-of-the-rotation in veterans Paddack and DeSclafani. Varland is presumably better than the aforementioned duo.”
Why? Because he’s younger? More healthy? From Minnesota?
Nobody in baseball with as many innings pitched in 2023 as Varland (68), gave up home runs as frequently as did Varland. Most of the numbers don’t presume that Varland is better. And if the Twins REALLY thought he was their 4th best option, he’d be in the rotation out of spring.
Now, they could be wrong. We’ll see. For me, I’d rather have him as a reliever rather than a starter with the big club. But, I’m fine them continuing to try to develop him as a starter at St. Paul, and giving him another shot when injuries/rest/failure happen.