Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Two Free-Agent Fits for Minnesota Twins at Shortstop

    With Brooks Lee still unproven and the depth chart looking thin, the Twins may be forced to search a barren shortstop market for answers.

    Greggory Masterson
    Image courtesy of © John E. Sokolowski-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Twins are (pardon the pun) short at the shortstop position. Brooks Lee is, frankly, the only player in the organization who has shown any indication that he may be a viable MLB shortstop in 2026, and even he has played at replacement level across 712 plate appearances in two seasons, slashing .232/.279/.357, with middling-at-best shortstop defense (-3 OAA across 803 innings, about 90 games’ worth).

    Behind him are a slew of semi-viable backup shortstops who have proved even less. Ryan Fitzgerald made his big-league debut late in 2025, posting an OPS 10% above league average (at .758) in 52 plate appearances. He plays shortstop, but he’s not great defensively. The Twins recently claimed Ryan Kreidler, a 28-year-old with a good glove but no bat, who has 211 plate appearances across four big-league seasons. Those 211 plate appearances are 211 more than Twins fans’ folk hero Payton Eeles has, and although many are clamoring for him to take a utility role in 2026, scouts are mixed on him at shortstop.

    There’s always Kaelen Culpepper, who rose quickly through the Twins’ farm system and is poised to open the 2026 season in Triple A, or at least reach that level early. Scouts see him as able to stick at shortstop, at least early in his career. His bat was impressive, with an .844 OPS across High A and Double A. He may be the Twins’ shortstop before long, but he doesn’t appear ready now. His late-season struggles could carry over into 2026, and he shouldn’t be counted on as depth yet.

    Thus, even in a year like this—when payroll room seems tight once again—the Twins would benefit from bringing in a veteran shortstop as a utility infielder, since there’s a reasonable chance that none of the four aforementioned names are even on the 40-man roster on Opening Day.

    Beyond that, though, are the questions about Lee. The Twins might not just need a utility infielder; they might need someone to play more like every day. If they have any genuine interest in competing in 2026, it would behoove the team to have someone else who wouldn’t be an outright disaster as a starting shortstop, even if they aren’t above average.

    Unfortunately, starting shortstops aren’t easily obtained in free agency. A player like Bo Bichette or even Ha-Seong Kim is priced out of the Twins’ market. And speaking of Bichette, many viable MLB players age out of shortstop viability by the time they hit free agency in their late 20s or early 30s. Free agents like Willi Castro, Luis Rengifo, Chris Taylor, Amed Rosario, or Kyle Farmer have their shortstop days in the rearview mirror. Those who can still play shortstop often don’t hit much.

    Did you know Farmer played more at first base than shortstop this season—and that he was the designated hitter twice as often as he was the shortstop? I learned that doing this research. Father Time comes for everyone.

    Here are the two names that fit in the happy medium space the Twins might be trawling. If it’s not one of these two guys, or someone acquired via trade, they’re going to have to roll with what they’ve got.

    Isiah Kiner-Falefa
    It’s the return of the king! The Twin-for-a-Day is probably the most reasonable candidate for this role. He’s getting older, but his performance really hasn’t changed much since the Twins originally acquired him ahead of 2022 to act as their placeholder shortstop. He was approximately the same caliber of fielder at shortstop as Lee in 2025, and both were roughly 25% worse than league-average hitters—though Lee’s profile was more dependent on slugging, while Kiner-Falefa’s was fueled by on-base ability.

    That Lee compares so closely to Kiner-Falefa is probably an indictment of Lee’s play early in his career, but it also puts into perspective the shallowness of the organization’s shortstop ranks. Kiner-Falefa is a known commodity whom the Twins have shown interest in before. He’s spent much of his career in a utility role and has played every position except first base in the majors.

    However, he’s going into his age-31 season, and his once dependable (if slightly below-average) defense at shortstop may be slipping. On the bright side, he’s looked fine at second and third. His ceiling has never been high, and once the floor is gone, it’s gone. Still, at the price the Twins would be willing to spend, he might be the best line of defense they can afford.

    Miguel Rojas
    No, seriously, that’s how thin this market is. After this point, the Twins will be sifting through a collection of sub-replacement-level players who appeared in fewer than 60 games this season, such as Jorge Mateo, Paul DeJong, Zack Short, or Orlando Arcia. MLB Trade Rumors lists 10 free-agent shortstops heading into 2026, and one of them is Tim Anderson. Tim Anderson had 17 hits this season and started 11 games at shortstop.

    Rojas was a Game 7 hero, and will be written into Dodgers lore forever. He was a part-time player this season. He managed to play a solid shortstop in limited action, but was an excellent second baseman. Depending on who you talk to, he’s either a great leader and beloved in the clubhouse or the worst teammate imaginable, but he could be a veteran presence. He intends to play in 2026 and then retire.

    Alas, he has made it clear he wants that 2026 season to be in Los Angeles. Jumping into a clubhouse of strangers on a team that might be rebuilding isn’t how most players envision their final year. So, yeah, even if the Twins wanted to, it seems like a long shot.

    So maybe it’s truly Kiner-Falefa or bust, if the Twins decide they need infield depth. But how many other teams are in the same position and don’t want to spend big on Bichette or Kim? Could Kiner-Falefa see a fairly robust market?

    I don’t know. This seemed like a more interesting topic when I signed up for it. I suppose it’s more “interesting” in the Minnesota vernacular. The trade market could be more interesting, but as Derek Falvey noted at last week's press event introducing Derek Shelton, trades for role players like these can be tricky, too.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    17 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    The Twins might have the least SS depth in the major leagues. Brooks Lee is one of the worst fielding SS in baseball. His backup is a 32-year-old who never made it. Culpepper played a half-season in Double-A last season and shouldn't be counted on in 2026 at all. They have almost nothing at SS.

    Culpepper turn 23 next month and was the 21st overall pick, if he can't be counted on to get experience next year, he was just another wasted pick by a terrible front office. He may fail or struggle next year but we have seen that having guys in the majors until 24 or 25 hasn't been a successful strategy. 

    5 hours ago, Mahoning said:

    Brooks Lee is 24 and everyone at Twins Daily has already concluded that he is a fraud, a bum, and a bust. Hmmm.

    Exactly and guys like Keirsay, Fedko and Eeles (and every other non prospect on the wrong side of 25, remember when people were clamoring for Chris Williams?)are the solution. All older and have no where near the talent Lee has. 

    2 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    Culpepper turn 23 next month and was the 21st overall pick, if he can't be counted on to get experience next year, he was just another wasted pick by a terrible front office. He may fail or struggle next year but we have seen that having guys in the majors until 24 or 25 hasn't been a successful strategy. 

    He can’t be counted on to contribute to a winning team. There’s a less than 10% chance he improves to a level that would make him an above average major leaguer. If you are counting on everyone making their 90th percentile projection you will be disappointed.

    We should be thrilled if he’s better than Brooks Lee by August.

    Players usually don’t get better on defense in their mid to late 20s. Lee doesn’t have the physical tools to become a plus defensive SS. He is a slow runner and his throwing arm is below average. If he is able to add an extra step on defense and an extra 10 mph on his throws in one offseason you should suspect PED use.

    2 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    He can’t be counted on to contribute to a winning team. There’s a less than 10% chance he improves to a level that would make him an above average major leaguer. If you are counting on everyone making their 90th percentile projection you will be disappointed.

    We should be thrilled if he’s better than Brooks Lee by August.

    Why? Aren't rookies on winning teams every year? Now I don't think the Twins will be winning team next year, but if you can't expect a 23 year old first round pick to be a league average player or slightly better that at age 22 in AA had a slash line of .285/.367/.460/.827, who can you ever expect? Rookie and young guys are brought up at this age all the time. If mean if we thought this than Keaschall shouldn't have been brought up and shouldn't have played as well as he did. 

    18 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    Why? Aren't rookies on winning teams every year? Now I don't think the Twins will be winning team next year, but if you can't expect a 23 year old first round pick to be a league average player or slightly better that at age 22 in AA had a slash line of .285/.367/.460/.827, who can you ever expect? Rookie and young guys are brought up at this age all the time. If mean if we thought this than Keaschall shouldn't have been brought up and shouldn't have played as well as he did. 

    People had that expectation for Brooks Lee. He had posted a good batting line at AAA. How did that work out?

    26 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    People had that expectation for Brooks Lee. He had posted a good batting line at AAA. How did that work out?

    I would say Lee established that he has the skills to a be a major league player, at what position and at what level a player is still to be determined, but for a rookie I wouldn't say it was terrible but for sure not as good as we hoped for. 

    I would also say having him in the majors doing what he did, was better than wasting another year in the minors. 

    Now I am not for having rookies all over the diamond, but with Lewis at 3B, Lee at 2B, Keachall at first/second/left field, Buxton, Jeffers, Wallner, Martin, there is room for a rookie or two to get significant playing time this year. 

    34 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    People had that expectation for Brooks Lee. He had posted a good batting line at AAA. How did that work out?

    So, never try a rookie? That's no way to build a team, any team, but especially one that needs to spend less. Really, if you expect them to be bad next year, play the rookies so they aren't rookies in 27 and beyond....

    5 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    I would say Lee established that he has the skills to a be a major league player, at what position and at what level a player is still to be determined, but for a rookie I wouldn't say it was terrible but for sure not as good as we hoped for. 

    I would also say having him in the majors doing what he did, was better than wasting another year in the minors. 

    I would say that should be the expectation for Culpepper. Not terrible, but not as good as you'd hope for. Culpepper has spent half a season at Double-A so there's probably some more growth needed at AAA before you start challenging him with major league pitching. Look at how long it took Byron Buxton to adjust to MLB pitching.

    Quote

    So, never try a rookie? That's no way to build a team, any team, but especially one that needs to spend less. Really, if you expect them to be bad next year, play the rookies so they aren't rookies in 27 and beyond....

    I would say betting your season on a rookie with a half-season at Double A with a backup plan of a 32-year-old nobody or whatever you find on the waiver wire is no way to build a team. Powerball has better odds.

    Did people forget what happened when Terry Ryan traded away Span and Revere and handed the job to Aaron Hicks in 2015? Did you enjoy watching Clete Thomas play CF for a 66-win team? It's the same plan.

    54 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    I would say that should be the expectation for Culpepper. Not terrible, but not as good as you'd hope for. Culpepper has spent half a season at Double-A so there's probably some more growth needed at AAA before you start challenging him with major league pitching. Look at how long it took Byron Buxton to adjust to MLB pitching.

    I would say betting your season on a rookie with a half-season at Double A with a backup plan of a 32-year-old nobody or whatever you find on the waiver wire is no way to build a team. Powerball has better odds.

    Did people forget what happened when Terry Ryan traded away Span and Revere and handed the job to Aaron Hicks in 2015? Did you enjoy watching Clete Thomas play CF for a 66-win team? It's the same plan.

    I was responding to not playing him at all next year.... Great teams play this kind of guy less than a half year into next year all the time. Losing teams sign bad veterans and block this kind of player. 

    No one is betting their season on this team. It has one relief pitcher, no first baseman, one catcher, an unknown at second and third. There is no realistic path to winning next year given their budget and lack of players. 

    Your point about Buxton is mine.... It takes time to adjust, adjust while the team is bad. 

    21 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I was responding to not playing him at all next year.... Great teams play this kind of guy less than a half year into next year all the time. Losing teams sign bad veterans and block this kind of player. 

    No one is betting their season on this team. It has one relief pitcher, no first baseman, one catcher, an unknown at second and third. There is no realistic path to winning next year given their budget and lack of players. 

    Your point about Buxton is mine.... It takes time to adjust, adjust while the team is bad. 

    That's fine. With that perspective you also trade Ryan, Jeffers and Lopez this offseason.

    It's always hard to determine the context for people's comments. Are they based on trying to win in 2026 or in 2028? "Culpepper or bust" is a plan for competing in 2028. Even then, I'd keep Culpepper in AAA until he earns the promotion. It didn't do the Twins any good to waste a couple seasons of service time developing Aaron Hicks in the majors instead of in the minors. Give playing time to someone younger than Fitzgerald (Chad Stevens looks interesting, for example) and see if you can develop a second player who can help in 2028. If they don't work out, then you can still promote the rookie.

    The 2012/2013 Twins are relevant here. Terry Ryan wouldn't tear it all the way down after a bad 2012. He kept Morneau, Willingham, Perkins and Duensing and held onto Kevin Correia for the whole season instead of cashing him at the trade deadline. The team wasn't good again until 2015 and all of those guys (except Perkins) were gone. He filled in gaps with Clete Thomas and 39-year-old Jamey Carroll. Perkins got to play in 3 All-Star games but didn't pitch in the postseason in the prime of his career because Terry Ryan wouldn't cash in his all-star lefthanded reliever for more talent.

    8 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    That's fine. With that perspective you also trade Ryan, Jeffers and Lopez this offseason.

    It's always hard to determine the context for people's comments. Are they based on trying to win in 2026 or in 2028? "Culpepper or bust" is a plan for competing in 2028. Even then, I'd keep Culpepper in AAA until he earns the promotion. It didn't do the Twins any good to waste a couple seasons of service time developing Aaron Hicks in the majors instead of in the minors. Give playing time to someone younger than Fitzgerald (Chad Stevens looks interesting, for example) and see if you can develop a second player who can help in 2028. If they don't work out, then you can still promote the rookie.

    The 2012/2013 Twins are relevant here. Terry Ryan wouldn't tear it all the way down after a bad 2012. He kept Morneau, Willingham, Perkins and Duensing and held onto Kevin Correia for the whole season instead of cashing him at the trade deadline. The team wasn't good again until 2015 and all of those guys (except Perkins) were gone. He filled in gaps with Clete Thomas and 39-year-old Jamey Carroll. Perkins got to play in 3 All-Star games but didn't pitch in the postseason in the prime of his career because Terry Ryan wouldn't cash in his all-star lefthanded reliever for more talent.

    As this FO refused to trade Kepler. I really don't want bad veterans signed to multi year deals. I really don't know what earns a promotion means? How good, how long, does a player need to be? 

    My comments are firmly rooted in 2027 and beyond, yes, 100 percent. 

    I am not sure Culpepper matches the prospect status of players that jump quickly into the majors. Perhaps the rankings are wrong about him but he appears to be a third or fourth tier prospect. Those guys mostly become major leaguers. They hover between 50 and 150 in the rankings. He is not among the top 10 shortstop prospects in the MLB pipeline. Fangraphs has him at an FV 45+ and number 22 at SS. I think he is better than that. Those rankings should change this winter. If he moves to an FV55 in Fangraphs those are the kinds of players that might skip a level. I look forward to seeing how he is viewed after the midseason rankings.

    14 hours ago, Mahoning said:

    Brooks Lee is 24 and everyone at Twins Daily has already concluded that he is a fraud, a bum, and a bust. Hmmm.

    Brooks Lee is 24 and everyone at Twins Daily still thinks he's this young prospect who needs a few more years of seasoning before he emerges as a star.  😁

    (Nobody asked, but my actual opinion on Lee is probably between the two extremes.)

    30 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I really don't know what earns a promotion means? How good, how long, does a player need to be? 

    Is the player one of the best 5 at his position for his current level in the minors? If not, he probably should stay put.

    4 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Losing teams sign bad veterans and block this kind of player. 

    Every team hires veterans. Like the two teams in the World Series for which these two veterans played.

    People here looked incredibly foolish throwing a fit about Harrison Bader and they'd likely look just as foolish over a mediocre middle infielder veteran signing. They would almost certainly be a significant upgrade over Ryan Fitzgerald just like Bader was a significant upgrade over Keirsey. 

    No one's being blocked. 

    47 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    No one's being blocked. 

    Like when Wallner wasn't brought up from the minors in 23 o4 24 so the likes of Kepler and Margot could keep getting ab's.  Even Miranda should have been given a shot at 1B over any of the veterans they brought in like Gallo and even Santana.  I know he fizzled last year, but in the years prior he was blocked.

    On 11/11/2025 at 10:57 AM, stringer bell said:

    Rojas said that he would play one more season and he would prefer to stay with the Dodgers. Given his post-season performance and what he offers outside the lines, I doubt he leaves Los Angeles. 

    If the Twins want to go with a good field-no hit option, Kreidler is probably as good as any free agent option. Bonus, he played center field a few games for the Tigers. Kreidler also appears to have pretty decent speed. Swiping a young guy with a good glove in the Rule V makes sense for a team that doesn't have a plus fielding SS all the way down to Cedar Rapids.

    I don't see having another no-hit guy on the 26 man roster as a good thing. Somebody on the bench needs to be a viable Pinch Hitter. And if he starts, well, it's nice to have more than 5 guys in your lineup that make the opposing pitcher nervous.

    On 11/11/2025 at 4:59 AM, Doctor Wu said:

    Free agents shortstops? Really, after all these shortstops we have drafted in recent years there is some sort of urgent need to sign a free agent? No, and no again. Let Lee and/or Culpepper sink or swim this coming season. We have more pressing needs than shortstop at this point. 

    Could not agree more.

    17 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    Look at how long it took Byron Buxton to adjust to MLB pitching.

    What? Buxton was up at 21 and struggled (46 games), age 22 put up 1.7 WAR in 92 games, .714 OPS, not great but decent, at age 23 was 18th in the MVP, age 24 was a wash out, and has been pretty darn good (when healthy since),

    I would rather see the Twins do what the Tigers did with Castro, give the guy an actual shot when he is young and if it isn't what you hoped let them go before paying them as opposed to the likes of Miranda and Julien (and a list of players people think are the solution to the twins issues) who spend extra time proving themselves and then wasting 3 to 4 years in their prime trying to figure out what they are. 

    I would rather see Culpepper (and for that matter EROD) start up, struggle get send down and comeback up, then wasting the year having them try to prove something that can't be defined or having a role player get hot and block them (you know somebody like Clemens or Martin) 

     

    14 hours ago, karcherd said:

    Like when Wallner wasn't brought up from the minors in 23 o4 24 so the likes of Kepler and Margot could keep getting ab's.  Even Miranda should have been given a shot at 1B over any of the veterans they brought in like Gallo and even Santana.  I know he fizzled last year, but in the years prior he was blocked.

    2023 he won the job and was the starting LF in the ALDS, so I don't know how you can say he was blocked. He had a difficult task of becoming an everyday starter with both CF and DH tied up, and Kepler having a long track record in RF, so they only had one actual position of flexibility to even work Wallner into the lineup.  

    And in 2024, he was given the job and played himself out of it. He was striking out in half of his plate appearances and continued to struggle when he was demoted to AAA. He then he eventually played his way back to the majors. 

    Matt Wallner was not blocked. 

    50 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    2023 he won the job and was the starting LF in the ALDS, so I don't know how you can say he was blocked. He had a difficult task of becoming an everyday starter with both CF and DH tied up, and Kepler having a long track record in RF, so they only had one actual position of flexibility to even work Wallner into the lineup.  

    And in 2024, he was given the job and played himself out of it. He was striking out in half of his plate appearances and continued to struggle when he was demoted to AAA. He then he eventually played his way back to the majors. 

    Matt Wallner was not blocked. 

    In 2024 he started 7 of the first 13 games and had 25 ab's, not sure how that considered he played himself out of a job when he was never given a real opportunity.  And then it took over a month when he started hitting in the minors before calling him up.  And he was not 22 years old at the time, they needed to find out what they had in him, not keep trotting out aging veterans which was what happened.  And Kepler was not hitting and had not done so in 3 years, so yes he was blocked.

    1 hour ago, NYCTK said:

    2023 he won the job and was the starting LF in the ALDS, so I don't know how you can say he was blocked. He had a difficult task of becoming an everyday starter with both CF and DH tied up, and Kepler having a long track record in RF, so they only had one actual position of flexibility to even work Wallner into the lineup.  

    And in 2024, he was given the job and played himself out of it. He was striking out in half of his plate appearances and continued to struggle when he was demoted to AAA. He then he eventually played his way back to the majors. 

    Matt Wallner was not blocked. 

    In 22 Wallner played 18 games in the majors, after playing 128 in AA (OPS of 1.033) and AAA (839), there was no reason he couldn't or shouldn't have been brought up earlier.

    1 hour ago, karcherd said:

    In 2024 he started 7 of the first 13 games and had 25 ab's, not sure how that considered he played himself out of a job when he was never given a real opportunity.  And then it took over a month when he started hitting in the minors before calling him up.  And he was not 22 years old at the time, they needed to find out what they had in him, not keep trotting out aging veterans which was what happened.  And Kepler was not hitting and had not done so in 3 years, so yes he was blocked.

    He was terrible in spring training and struck out in half of his plate appearances at the start of the season and continued to play terrible in AAA, a 620 OPS in his first 150 PAs back in St. Paul. He did then seem to make some adjustments, really cut down his Ks and his next 150 PAs he had a 1100 OPS and he earned a promotion.

    Like I said, he won the starting job and was the primary LF in the playoffs the year prior. He was given the playing time his performance dictated both in 2023 and 2024. 

    Ergo, he wasn't blocked. 

     

    1 hour ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    In 22 Wallner played 18 games in the majors, after playing 128 in AA (OPS of 1.033) and AAA (839), there was no reason he couldn't or shouldn't have been brought up earlier.

    He wasn't really any good in '22, and those AAA numbers aren't all that impressive for a defensive liability. So it makes sense that he started '23 in AAA again. 

    He's a major league player now, and many fans here are asking to trade him because he's so bad. But we're simultaneously supposed to believe the Twins organization screwed him over because he was so clearly a good player in seasons prior. Maybe the Twins understood he was a bat only player that was going to strike out in 30% of his PAs and that really limits how valuable a player he could be. 

     

    6 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    He was terrible in spring training and struck out in half of his plate appearances at the start of the season and continued to play terrible in AAA, a 620 OPS in his first 150 PAs back in St. Paul. He did then seem to make some adjustments, really cut down his Ks and his next 150 PAs he had a 1100 OPS and he earned a promotion.

    Like I said, he won the starting job and was the primary LF in the playoffs the year prior. He was given the playing time his performance dictated both in 2023 and 2024. 

    Ergo, he wasn't blocked. 

     

    He wasn't really any good in '22, and those AAA numbers aren't all that impressive for a defensive liability. So it makes sense that he started '23 in AAA again. 

    He's a major league player now, and many fans here are asking to trade him because he's so bad. But we're simultaneously supposed to believe the Twins organization screwed him over because he was so clearly a good player in seasons prior. Maybe the Twins understood he was a bat only player that was going to strike out in 30% of his PAs and that really limits how valuable a player he could be. 

     

    Except Wallner isn't bad over his career. Those saying so just haven't adjusted to the modern game. 

    15 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Except Wallner isn't bad over his career. Those saying so just haven't adjusted to the modern game. 

    He's not great either. I think he's a perfectly fine major leaguer that is so bad on defense he should be viewed as a part time OF and DH. 

    This idea that he was blocked and/or cheated just isn't reality. This is the life of a fringe MLB player. They have to work harder to prove their value than the hot shot 5 tool prospect. He really, truly sucked at the start of the 2024 season and the Twins were absolutely right to demote him and force him to find his swing and fight for his job again.

    You can argue that he should have been promoted a few weeks earlier, but if we're really fighting over those 40 plate appearances as proof that the Twins screwed him over, I think we've really lost sight of what an MLB team is supposed to be. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...