Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Benefits Of Badness


    Nick Nelson

    This Twins team is terrible. That's not breaking news. We're through more than a third of the season and they're on pace for the most losses in franchise history. They consistently fail at every aspect of the game. To further solidify their standing as the worst team in the American League, they went and lost six of seven games last week to the AL's other last-place clubs.

    But being terrible in major league baseball is not without its silver linings.

    Image courtesy of Jonathan Dyer, USA Today

    Twins Video

    In an effort to find the bright side of this miserable season, let's take a look at a few of the advantages that come along with Minnesota's status as an outright cellar-dweller.

    1) Top waiver priority

    Robbie Grossman is looking like he might be a player. Granted, he wasn't a waiver acquisition, as the Twins signed him to a minor-league deal after he opted out with the Indians, but he's the type of player that tends to pop up on waivers – a youngish guy who might have some untapped potential but was the victim of an in-season roster crunch. The Twins have the worst record in the league so they'll have first dibs on any such player to be dropped by an AL club. It's a sneaky way to add some decent talent.

    2) Top draft pick in 2017

    I know, it's tough to get excited about such a long-term proposition. But the 99-loss season in 2011 – worst for a Twins team since 1982 – resulted in the opportunity to draft Byron Buxton. A 93-loss clunker in 2000 got them Joe Mauer. In this respect, a truly rotten season can be a franchise-altering blessing. While it's impossible to get a clear picture of how the top amateur talent will stack up a year from now, there are some intriguing names already emerging. University of Florida catcher J.J. Schwarz is currently viewed as the likely No. 1 pick, and he obviously plays at a position of extreme need for Minnesota.

    3) Clear seller status

    During their stretch of losing campaigns from 2011 through 2014, the Twins were often in a state of ambiguity around this point in the early summer, in terms of their contending status. No general manager wants to sell off key parts in June when his club still has a reasonable chance at getting in the postseason mix. This year, there are no such illusions at play. Terry Ryan can and should make anyone who is not a clear long-term piece available, and by trading with more of the season remaining, he might be able to slightly enhance his return. As I wrote on Monday, the timing is particularly favorable with regards to Trevor Plouffe and the third base market.

    4) Low-pressure youth auditions

    At times, there are concerns about throwing a young and inexperienced player into the middle of an intense MLB race. The second half of this season will provide the Twins with an opportunity to ease any prospects in that they'd like to take a look at, with virtually nothing at stake in terms of wins and losses. This may be especially helpful with some of the system's minor-league bullpen arms, because the coaching staff really needs to get a handle on which ones are going to be able to help out in 2017.

    5) Deep introspection

    When things get this bad, an organization must look inward with a critical eye and scrutinize every individual that they have in place at a high level. No front office exec, coach, trainer or scout should feel safe from a harsh evaluation at the end of this disastrous season, whereas in better times, ineffectiveness might get overlooked.

    In the spirit of searching for glimmers of positivity within the wreckage, are there any other benefits to being brutally bad that you would add to this list? Sound off in the comments.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Polanco barely played when he was here, that's not an audition.

     

    Centeno has started only 11 of 29 games since being called up, and in at least 3 of those Suzuki was held out with injury.

     

    Also, not all auditions are equal (Pat Dean starting over Trevor May, for example, or Boshers over Chargois, etc.).

     

    This was brought up in a recent thread about Pat Dean.  They've pretty much done the bare minimum for auditions so far, given the circumstances (mostly injuries to Sano/Santana and the health of Hughes).

    Kepler is only playing everyday due to injury as well.  He rarely played when he was first up.  Buxton came back up earlier than probably anticipated because of injury.  It's good that they're actually playing, but the FO's hand was forced.

     

    Joe Mauer is a great player, but the experience of having him makes me leery of "investing" so much hitting talent in that position. It makes the management of the 25-man roster harder.

     

    Getting 130 games behind the plate out of any one player is a challenge, and then you want your stud batter in the lineup for the other games, which likely means DH. That in turn means you can't carry too many "corner" types like we have now, vying for extra at bats at DH (or those corner positions); at DH it also means there's a temptation to carry a third catcher if the manager is paranoid about being caught having to have pitchers bat in case of a mid-game injury. There's also the worry of the stress of playing catcher wearing your elite bat down.

     

    These are not insuperable obstacles, and of course you don't want an offensive black hole playing the position. But given a close decision, I would opt for another player, at a high first round pick, than catcher.

    Agree, Mauer averaged 90 games behind the plate for his 10 year catching career and it looks like it took a toll on him after he moved. 

     

    But Bryce Harper was a catcher before the draft and immediately switched positions.  So if he the best hitter in the draft, hopefully they look at the long term value not just a quick fix.

     

    I wish that I had your optimism that a move will actually be made.

     

    I'm optimistic that this team does not have something like a 55-50 run in them to finish the season with respectability and save his job. I think the owners will be facing a near fan revolt after they finish with ~58 wins and will have no choice

    One additional benny.  Pretty tough to raise ticket prices or any other prices after a year like this.  Now whether you want to pay the current price to go is another subject.  Once could even make the case that they should drop ticket prices if they want to get people in to the park.

    I hate to mention Reusse on here, it drives people nuts, but yesterday he said the rumor ar the park is 20% discount if you renew season tickets in August?

     

    Kepler is only playing everyday due to injury as well.  He rarely played when he was first up.  Buxton came back up earlier than probably anticipated because of injury.  It's good that they're actually playing, but the FO's hand was forced.

    Yup.  Where they've shown discretion in crafting the 25-man roster so far is basically as follows:

     

    Duffey over Milone

    Kintzler over Fien

    Grossman over Rosario

    Centeno over Murphy

     

    And within the 25-man roster:

    Nunez over Escobar as starting SS

    Dean over hobbled Hughes in the rotation

     

    Plus Rogers or Boshers (presumably whoever isn't optioned when Gibson returns) over an extra bench player.

     

    I guess it's better than completely standing pat, but in the number of moves and the priority given to guys like Dean and Boshers, it's not really what you want to see from a team that should be looking to the future.

     

    I'm optimistic that this team does not have something like a 55-50 run in them to finish the season with respectability and save his job. I think the owners will be facing a near fan revolt after they finish with ~58 wins and will have no choice

    I'm right there with you, even with the statement that they won't have a choice but to make a change.  I'm just not sure it'll happen.  

     

    Yup.  Where they've shown discretion in crafting the 25-man roster so far is basically as follows:

     

    Duffey over Milone

    Kintzler over Fien

    Grossman over Rosario

    Centeno over Murphy

     

    And within the 25-man roster:

    Nunez over Escobar as starting SS

    Dean over hobbled Hughes in the rotation

     

    Plus Rogers or Boshers (presumably whoever isn't optioned when Gibson returns) over an extra bench player.

     

    I guess it's better than completely standing pat, but in the number of moves and the priority given to guys like Dean and Boshers, it's not really what you want to see from a team that should be looking to the future.

    Agreed.  Many of the moves that they have made would be reasonable if the team were competitive and being in the thick of relevancy.  Obviously, that is not the scenario so they make little to no sense.

     

    Aside from being forced to due to injury, Buxton would be the most notable exception of a prospect being called up and actually playing.  This team is in a position where the notion of prospects coming up and playing every day should be the norm, not to exception.

     

    I think you need to accept the guy may only get 8-10 years behind the plate. But we have a huge hole at catcher that isn't getting fixed anytime soon.

    You fix it some other way. And the attempt to fix it via trade of a center fielder, which thus far has worked out so badly, leaves me underconfident that the talent assessment at the position will be better at the top of the draft.

    You fix it some other way. And the attempt to fix it via trade of a center fielder, which thus far has worked out so badly, leaves me underconfident that the talent assessment at the position will be better at the top of the draft.

    Good catchers rarely hit free agency. Guys like Perez, Posey, etc. get money thrown at them early. The one's that do are typically older and get huge deals.

     

    We have just not made the investment and it shows.

    But Bryce Harper was a catcher before the draft and immediately switched positions.  So if he the best hitter in the draft, hopefully they look at the long term value not just a quick fix.

    That would be a different talent assessment, and a choice I could get behind. It wouldn't do anything about the perceived hole we have at the catcher position, of course.

     

     


    4) Low-pressure youth auditions

    At times, there are concerns about throwing a young and inexperienced player into the middle of an intense MLB race. The second half of this season will provide the Twins with an opportunity to ease any prospects in that they'd like to take a look at, with virtually nothing at stake in terms of wins and losses. This may be especially helpful with some of the system's minor-league bullpen arms, because the coaching staff really needs to get a handle on which ones are going to be able to help out in 2017.

     

    The manager needs to be motivated to do that.  I am not sure that Molitor is that motivated.  The Polanco case in point.   He was with the Twins from 4/20 to 5/20 (one full month) and got 32 PA (the equivalent of 7 games or so).

     

    Something's got to give.

     

    Quick question, take out injuries and how many of the Twins youth would be playing regularly on the ML team? Replacing injured players with another player is not constructing a roster, it's plugging holes temporarily.

    That's usually how young players first get playing time. Eddie Rosario was an injury replacement last year, and since he played well, he stayed. Hopefully we see Buxton and Kepler show that they deserve to stay up the rest of the year this year too.

    Good catchers rarely hit free agency. Guys like Perez, Posey, etc. get money thrown at them early. The one's that do are typically older and get huge deals.

     

    We have just not made the investment and it shows.

    I'm in favor of investment there. Perez, whom you mentioned, was not a draft pick, BTW. I hope they have success going that route. They apparently thought they had made some good bets with Garver and Turner, but neither one looks like will reach the level Perez is at. They should keep trying, by every avenue.

     

    Posey's a good example of the problem, though. He plays significant time at 1B, and still misses a consistent 12-15 games a year, it being a league with no DH. If your catcher's playing 40 games a year at 1B, then you have trouble keeping a Brandon Belt type in the lineup and you have to push him out to a corner outfield position several games a year, at some cost to the defense no doubt. It's not unsolvable but it does put pressure on the roster moves you can make. And in the Giants' case nothing has gone wrong in the plan, at least in the seasons since the broken leg incident.

     

    It's not that I want a bad hitting catcher. It's just that the investment choices needed to achieve a top hitting catcher are potentially as high as for any other position, and yet the payoff can be lower in terms of games actually played. If you are one of the teams with infinite resources, sure; for most teams, investment in one area comes at the expense of another.

     

    Said another way, if you make moderate investments in prospects like Perez, or Garver and Stuart, and then one of them happens to become the best hitter on your 25-man roster, then that's the proverbial "nice problem to have". Investing in a tippy-top draft pick, with an eye toward having the best hitter on your team if he pans out like the scouts say, should not be at catcher, in my view, because then you are purposely taking on a "problem".

     

    Finally, I freely admit that this means I probably would have picked Mark Prior instead of Joe Mauer (absent the local-boy angle, at least), and it would not have worked out as well. That's the nature of investing in pitching, too. I still think it would be the right call, if my scouts told me they were approximately on a par with one another.

     

    I hate to mention Reusse on here, it drives people nuts, but yesterday he said the rumor ar the park is 20% discount if you renew season tickets in August?

    While I can appreciate the marketing effort, the economics still don't add up.  You can get tix on stubhub for roughly at 50 percent discount.  Giving a season ticket holder a 20 percent discount may lessen the amount of money that he/she loses, but that's not exactly a selling point.  Want me to buy season tickets?  Offer to buy them back at the halfway point of the season if the team is under .400 winning percentage.

    That's usually how young players first get playing time. Eddie Rosario was an injury replacement last year, and since he played well, he stayed. Hopefully we see Buxton and Kepler show that they deserve to stay up the rest of the year this year too.

    So why is that usually the way? Because the FO won't stick it's neck out to make a change? Monetary? Incorrect talent assessment? In essence this formula leaves an underachieving healthy team intact indefinitely! :(

     

    So why is that usually the way? Because the FO won't stick it's neck out to make a change? Monetary? Incorrect talent assessment? In essence this formula leaves an underachieving healthy team intact indefinitely! :(

    It has to be loyalty and giving the veteran the benefit of the doubt. Look at the Nationals, they're in a tight competition for the division and they're playing Danny Espinosa and his .637 OPS instead of giving Trea Turner an extended shot.

    At this point, the Twins should trade away every veteran except Mauer. Ervin Santana, Nolasco, Hughes - gone. Suzuki, Dozier, Nunez, Plouffe - gone. Abad, Boshers, Jepsen, Kintzler - gone. I'd also trade Tonkin.

     

    None of these moves needs to return any significant prospects, tho they should be able to get something for a few of them. Doesn't really matter for the immediate future.

     

    Mainly this is clearing the way for the next gen Twinkies. First, I'd promote as many decent pitchers as possible from Rochester. Wheeler, Darnell, Chargois, Wimmers, possibly Albers...but not Milone. Trade him, too. 

     

    Then I'd promote the new infield, again mostly from Rochester. Polanco, Beresford, and since there are NO SS's listed on the AAA roster (!), grab a shocked and happy Engelb Vielma from AA as your slick-fielding, light hitting SS. 

     

    Since I just remembered Escobar is fairly young and a good SS, that's a tougher call. They could trade Esco for some value to a contender, or keep him as captain of the infield. Either way Rochester gets at least one SS bumped up from AA. Ridiculous not to have a starting SS on a AAA roster. 

     

    Let's see now...what to do with Murphy? He's still not hitting, so I promote Garver from AA to split time 50-50 with Centeno. Turner to AAA, all below in the minors get bumped up. 

     

    Notice I'm leaving Berrios and Meyer in AAA. Throw strikes, kiddies.

     

    Hey, this is fun!

    Edited by jimbo92107

    Point is, the Twins haven't failed to make that investment. They invented that investment.

    Okay. Let me re-phrase. The Twins have not made an investment in the catcher position in 6 years. That guy was only going to catch another few years. They did not plan for the 2013+ period. I am guessing we have been bottom three in the league at the position and the outlook is about the same for the foreseeable future. So we have at least a 2013-2018 gap where we have punted the position, not had a plan, and not made an investment.

     

    Okay. Let me re-phrase. The Twins have not made an investment in the catcher position in 6 years. That guy was only going to catch another few years. They did not plan for the 2013+ period. I am guessing we have been bottom three in the league at the position and the outlook is about the same for the foreseeable future. So we have at least a 2013-2018 gap where we have punted the position, not had a plan, and not made an investment.

    Burd4

    Word up. 

    Why does everyone keep saying to dump Santana? He's one of the few SP above AA with a shot at being decent. You still need to fill out a rotation this year and next and there aren't 5 solid SP behind him. Without Nolasco/Santana/Hughes you'd have Gibson, Berrios, and Duffey as the only decent starting pitchers for next year. Possibly May on the unlikely chance he jumps back to starting. I don't consider Dean a real prospect and the rest of the names are pure lottery tickets. If the Twins went into the season with no reliable #4 and #5 starter, an no options for fallback or injury replacements, it would be absolute mayhem again. Stewart, Gonsalves, and Jay aren't going to be ready for the start of the season and may not even be ready by midseason. I'm not clearing out the major league roster for them this early.

     

    That's usually how young players first get playing time. Eddie Rosario was an injury replacement last year, and since he played well, he stayed. Hopefully we see Buxton and Kepler show that they deserve to stay up the rest of the year this year too.

    Rosario actually replaced another fairly young player in Arcia, who is also getting replaced by Kepler right now.  And Grossman replaced Rosario.  No veteran has been usurped in this series of moves.

     

    Polanco played pretty well in limited duty, better than multiple incumbents, but got shipped out again.

     

    Trevor May did just fine as a starter too, but apparently he's behind Pat Dean on the SP depth chart now.

     

    Why does everyone keep saying to dump Santana? He's one of the few SP above AA with a shot at being decent. You still need to fill out a rotation this year and next and there aren't 5 solid SP behind him. Without Nolasco/Santana/Hughes you'd have Gibson, Berrios, and Duffey as the only decent starting pitchers for next year. Possibly May on the unlikely chance he jumps back to starting. I don't consider Dean a real prospect and the rest of the names are pure lottery tickets. If the Twins went into the season with no reliable #4 and #5 starter, an no options for fallback or injury replacements, it would be absolute mayhem again. Stewart, Gonsalves, and Jay aren't going to be ready for the start of the season and may not even be ready by midseason. I'm not clearing out the major league roster for them this early.

    The FO would have to commit to grabbing a couple anchors for the rotation in the off-season, not exactly TR's strong suit. If the Twins had more going for them it might be worth hanging on to Santana but he's not vital to the Twins' future. I'd dump him and replace in the off-season but wouldn't mind holding on to him either for the reasons you've stated if they didn't plan to sign up some help over the winter.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...