Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Monday Funday


    Nick Nelson

    Twins fans have endured a lot of tough days this year. There have been long stretches where the performances, the injuries, and the decision-making have led local ball enthusiasts to echo the words of Bryce Harper, in an urgent plea: Please, make baseball fun again.

    On Monday, baseball was fun again.

    Image courtesy of Ken Blaze, USA Today

    Twins Video

    From the perspective of disenchanted followers of the Twins searching for hope, it was easily the best day of the season thus far. It began with multiple trades that jolted excitement into a hazy Monday afternoon, and ended with one of the best games the team has played all year.

    For much of this campaign, it has been hard to feel confident that this ship is moving in the right direction. For a glorious 12-hour stretch, it was impossible to feel any other way.

    Let's run through Monday's developments in (somewhat) chronological order.

    Twins send RP Fernando Abad to Red Sox for RP Pat Light

    Things got started around lunchtime, when the Twins announced their first trade of the day.

    Terry Ryan is gone, but the Abad signing will go down as one of his best final moves. The veteran lefty gave the club four very good months and now yields a decent relief prospect.

    Light, who can touch 100 with his fastball but often struggles to find the zone, is far from a sure bet to become an effective MLB hurler. We have seen many such erratic fire-ballers come through this system and few have panned out. But he's a solid gamble and certainly a nice return for Abad, who was very much a non-essential piece. When it comes to lefty relievers, the Twins are just as well sticking with the likes of Taylor Rogers and Buddy Boshers.

    Twins send SP Ricky Nolasco and SP Alex Meyer to Angels for SP Hector Santiago and RP Alan Busenitz.

    Antony may sit in the GM chair long-term, but if not, he just cleared out one of the biggest headaches that his successor was going to inherit.

    Somehow, he managed to unload Nolasco.

    Since 2014, his first season in Minnesota, Nolasco ranks 113th out of 113 qualified MLB starters in ERA (5.44). Injuries marred his first two years with the Twins but this summer he has been healthy and utterly hittable. He hasn't made any case for belonging in a half-decent rotation, and is no more than an expensive innings-eater.

    Any incoming GM was going to face the unfortunate situation of having to either work around Nolasco on the staff or ask his new bosses to eat $13 million in salary. But Antony, perhaps in efforts to build his own case, has removed that dilemma.

    In Nolasco's place, the Twins get another established big-league starter who is – by all appearances – a massive upgrade. On the same list of 113 qualified pitchers since 2014, Santiago's ERA (3.68) ranks 60 spots higher, at 53. He's five years younger. He was an All Star last year. And he's coming off a month of July in which he went 6-0 with a 1.78 ERA.

    Granted, Santiago has his warts, but even when you overlook his blatantly superior play on the field, he gives the Twins newfound flexibility. He's arbitration-eligible for a final time in 2017, so if the team desires, they can simply non-tender and move on. Antony removed the anchor that was Nolasco's contract and flipped it into a team-friendly situation.

    He did so by capitalizing on the Angels' desperation to infuse any kind of upside into their drab farm system. The other part of the deal involved swapping projects, and I think most would agree that Meyer is a more interesting one than Busenitz. But Meyer is also 26, plagued by constant shoulder problems, utterly unaccomplished in the majors, and out of options next year.

    This deal looks like a home run.

    Speaking of home runs...

    All of this frenzied action unfolded before Monday night's series opener in Cleveland. Major League Baseball made the decision this year to nudge the trade deadline back – to a weekday afternoon, when no games would take place – and Twins fans benefited from the switch. After following the trade news during the day, we were able to devote our full attention to a revelatory ballgame for the local nine.

    Jose Berrios was making his anticipated return to the big-league mound, while Max Kepler was batting third against All-Star Danny Salazar. Both rookies rose to the challenge.

    Max Power

    Kepler has continually surprised with his long-ball proclivity since joining the team for good in June. In this game, he took things to another level entirely.

    The 23-year-old homered in three of his first four at-bats. After tying for the MLB lead with eight bombs in July, he's now almost halfway to that mark in August after one day. He joins Harmon Killebrew, Justin Morneau, Tony Oliva and Bob Allison as the only hitters in Twins history to go deep three times in a game.

    Kepler is already achieving legendary status.

    Berrios bounces back

    Watching the young righty labor through a tumultuous, 30-pitch first inning in which he coughed up an early lead, it was hard not to think, 'Here we go again.' But Berrios wasn't ready to go down that path.

    Instead, he went out and retired 14 straight hitters, cruising through five more frames without allowing another run. Shaking off his previous control issues, Berrios threw 62 out of 99 pitches for strikes and didn't issue a walk.

    That's what I'm talking about.

    The fun didn't stop...

    These two performances by future cogs were two highlights of many in a 12-5 bashing of the division leaders. Jorge Polanco hit two triples, including one with the bases juiced. Joe Mauer reached base five times, and took Andrew Miller deep to foil his Cleveland debut. Eddie Rosario homered, and took a walk in an MLB game for the first time since April 15th. Brian Dozier made two insane defensive plays.

    This game felt like it included more encouraging moments than the first three months combined. Incidentally, it happened on a day where Byron Buxton and Miguel Sano were both out of the lineup. Those two obviously have been going through their struggles but no one can deny their enormous potential impact going forward.

    Which brings me to my final thought:

    If one is to disagree with the way Antony and the front office operated during this deadline period, it's because they didn't go all-in on a roster blowout. The Twins have the worst record in the league, the argument goes, and contention in 2017 is a pipe dream. Why not salvage whatever possible value for the likes of Ervin Santana and even someone like Brian Dozier?

    I personally don't agree with this defeatist attitude. Evidently, neither does the interim GM, because while he certainly acted as a seller, he managed to stay away from any moves with negative impact extending beyond this year.

    There's a rational case against that approach, but I'm glad it's not being embraced, and if the organization hires a new head of baseball ops, I hope it is not his or her mindset.

    At some point, this young core is going to turn a corner together. On Monday, that inevitability felt surer and closer than it ever has before.

    When that happens, it'll be a disservice to waste the opportunity by failing to surround the kids with a capable roster.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Again, I didn't say this, so if you want to continue the debate it would be best to stop putting words in my mouth.  I said buyout Nolasco, as in release.. DFA.  I never said they could get a prospect for him, so where did you get the quotes from

     

    My mistake. Misread your comment. 

     

    Still, I'd rather get something in return. Agree to disagree.

     

    Right, they could've DFA'd Nolasco.  Essentially instead of choosing that option, they traded Meyer for Santiago.  

     

    I'm far from sold on Meyer ever figuring it out, but its certainly possible, and this deal could be a big loss if he does.  

     

    How about this scenario.....the Twins decide not to go to arbitration with Santiago and he becomes a free agent.  The trade would essentially be 2 months of Santiago and MR Busenitz for Nolasco and Meyer.  This move would save them $8M in the trade next year.  Would the Twins have taken $8M cash for Meyer?

     

    Seems like the entire AL Central is being labeled as deadline losers which is also nice to see. Playing in a weak division: Hell it worked for the Twins of the early 2000s!

    Indians did pretty well in getting Miller (last night not withstanding), and  I see most sites recognizing that and declaring them as one of the deadline winners.

    Edited by jimmer

    Watching 4/6th of the future all shine yesterday was nice to see.  Kepler, Polanco, Rosario and Berrios all looked great.  That alone would have most teams excited about their future, but the Twins have two more who a year ago were more highly regarded than any of the above 4.  Think about that.  Most teams would kill for those 4 pieces as part of their future and the Twins have them plus 2 more that are possibly even better.  Add in additional guys waiting in the minors and the Twins could be good for while if the GM can make the right supplemental moves to add depth and fill in holes where they are needed.

     

    Once Sano gets back to being Sano and Buxton figures out how to be an MLB hitter this team will be exciting to watch (not that they aren't already).

     

    How about this scenario.....the Twins decide not to go to arbitration with Santiago and he becomes a free agent.  The trade would essentially be 2 months of Santiago and MR Busenitz for Nolasco and Meyer.  This move would save them $8M in the trade next year.  Would the Twins have taken $8M cash for Meyer?

     

    I think we both know that's unlikely... but interesting question.  I'm not sure that I would, but it's not my money.  

     

    Indians did pretty well in getting Miller (last night not withstanding), and  I see most sites recognizing that and declaring them as one of the deadline winners.

    As long as they don't sign LeBron I'm not worried....

     

    ...no, you're right. CLE shouldn't be lumped in w/ KC, DET, & CHI, my bad.

     

    Rob Antony has changed my mind. He won all three trades. And the Nolasco deal was the type of creative trade this organization has desperately needed for decades. 

     

    I would have definitely preferred to trade Brandon Kintzler and Kurt Suzuki. 

     

    But I'm still OK with the team holding onto Ervin Santana and Brian Dozier. Both can be traded in the offseason - and contenders this year don't need second basemen so Dozier really wasn't a trade deadline target, anyway. I'd still rather the new regime assess the team and its ability to contend and make deals. 

     

    Still, three trades were two more than I expected. And getting rid of Nolasco's contract was incredible. 

    If the four pitchers acquired are solid contributors making up 30% of the staff 2-3 years from now he won all three trades.  Foolhardy to make such a proclamation at this point.

     

    In the end, I almost saw Alex Meyer as being an odd-man out in the future plans of the Twins. As a starting candidate, he was being pushed by some names at AA right now (Gonsalves, Jay, Stewart). As a relief pitcher, this was his year to show (even though he was penned in as a starter). Right now, he fell behind Alex Wimmers in the call-up for September race.

     

    So it was an okay move. He may be great a couple of years down the path, but chances of him getting great with the Twins in a couple of years jsut didn't seem to be in the picture.

     

    It's the constant joy of looking at your system (and not failing). Where does Adam Walker fit in? Is he being pushed aside by Palka in an already crowded slugger zone that needs to find a place for Park, Kepler, Rosario, Sano, Vargas? Where will Harrison and Granite fit into the future picture. Was he a viable trade chip?

     

    Who else would the Twins have been dangling matched with a player they wanted to move...Baxendale, Bard, Meija, Polanco? Polanco is interesting. He played third base. Did a couple of triples.

     

    Am I sad to see Meyer leave? In context of the Span trade, where we were told we were fleecing the Nationals with a player from an area of strength on our team for a long-term asset, we suddenly hear rumbles that the Angels are drinking the same kool-aid, only that asset is three years older and doesn't seem ready to pitch in the majors...yet.

     

    But back to Monday. What a game. Kepler is the hardest working player I have seen in quite awhile. Now if he can give Buxton a little bit of whatever it is he's drinking.

     

     

    I think "fine with it" is a good way to put it. I'm shocked at the people bending over backwards to congratulate Antony.

     

    They are still paying the same amount of money next year and Santiago is no sure thing to be anything more than a #5 starter

    Yes. Antony did a decent job this deadline. I don't understand the accolades.

     

    What Antony did should be the norm, not the basis for jubilant cheer.

     

    I like all the moves. They were all fair trades of talent... But nothing stood out as amazing.

     

    Yes. Antony did a decent job this deadline. I don't understand the accolades.

    What Antony did should be the norm, not the basis for jubilant cheer.

    I like all the moves. They were all fair trades of talent... But nothing stood out as amazing.

    I agree. Sound perspective. It should be the norm but hasn't been in such a long time that it feels more than it was.

     

    Yes. Antony did a decent job this deadline. I don't understand the accolades.

    What Antony did should be the norm, not the basis for jubilant cheer.

    I like all the moves. They were all fair trades of talent... But nothing stood out as amazing.

     

    If your manager doesn't give you positive feedback for doing your job.....you are working for the wrong manager. Doing his job should get him accolades and positive feedback. 

    Yes. Antony did a decent job this deadline. I don't understand the accolades.

    The moves are consistent with a larger strategy to both add young talent and improve roster flexibility. No single move will accomplish it all, so in that sense you're right, and the real proof will be what they do in the off-season with this (and any additional) new-found flexibility. But I am a lot more positive toward the possibility of RA having "Interim" removed from his title, and I never thought I'd say that after his first go-round. It seems decisions are finally being made about who fits into the team's long-term plans and who does not - e.g. Alex Meyer. I am somewhere between Decent and Accolades at the moment.

     

    The moves are consistent with a larger strategy to both add young talent and improve roster flexibility. No single move will accomplish it all, so in that sense you're right, and the real proof will be what they do in the off-season with this (and any additional) new-found flexibility. But I am a lot more positive toward the possibility of RA having "Interim" removed from his title, and I never thought I'd say that after his first go-round. It seems decisions are finally being made about who fits into the team's long-term plans and who does not - e.g. Alex Meyer. I am somewhere between Decent and Accolades at the moment.

     

    Thing is, the bar was set so low, that having as much action as we did was fun to watch.  Bars being set low happens a lot with this team.  Think about the offseason before 2010.  Got Hardy, Thome and Hudson and people were crazy happy. It wasn't REALLY all that big of a deal, but for us it was like Xmas time. More recently, people have gotten super-excited over Rosario's rookie year and Escobar.  I mean, seriously, doesn't take much to get our fan-base humming a sweet tune.

     

    Like you said, it moved us towards the right direction even if not everything was done that should have been done. And it's way more than I think our recently departed GM would have done.

    Edited by jimmer

    The moves are consistent with a larger strategy to both add young talent and improve roster flexibility. No single move will accomplish it all, so in that sense you're right, and the real proof will be what they do in the off-season with this (and any additional) new-found flexibility. But I am a lot more positive toward the possibility of RA having "Interim" removed from his title, and I never thought I'd say that after his first go-round. It seems decisions are finally being made about who fits into the team's long-term plans and who does not - e.g. Alex Meyer. I am somewhere between Decent and Accolades at the moment.

    Hey, I like what he did.

     

    But...

     

    - There are still several guys on this roster with little to no future with the team.

     

    - Getting rid of Nolasco was nice but Meyer went along with him. That's not a big win. It's a curious move, something interesting to follow.

     

    - Nunez was the best trade but even that trade wasn't out of the park. The Twins got a marginal upside guy for a guy posting pretty good numbers with 1.5 years of control.

     

    So, yeah, decent. I like what Antony did. That doesn't mean what he accomplished was amazing. I'm on board with the moves but more could have been done.

     

    In a grading scale, I'd give him a B grade, I think. Solid, not amazing.

     

    Brandon just gave him an A-.

     

    Ah, well, I am working today........and haven't read it all yet. I said between B and B+, before I knew about the money going over with Nolasco. I still think it is a B. A- seems a biiiiiiiiit generous to me, but I'll read the article later and see.

    Ah, well, I am working today........and haven't read it all yet. I said between B and B+, before I knew about the money going over with Nolasco. I still think it is a B. A- seems a biiiiiiiiit generous to me, but I'll read the article later and see.

    No offense to Brandon but I think he's way off the mark.

     

    As for my own grade, I initially had B- typed and then changed it to a B.

     

    Upon further thought, I'd probably go back to the B- but that's picking nits, really.

     

    It was a decent deadline.

    What qualifies as amazing?  Do people think rebuilding teams are regularly unloading all their pieces?  If you're holding them to the standard that "A = trading anyone and everyone I deem should be gone" you've basically created a grade no one has ever achieved.  Making it an utterly useless designation

     

    Your B is basically the best you can hand out.  Or am I missing some other justification people are using to knock this deadline?

    What qualifies as amazing? Do people think rebuilding teams are regularly unloading all their pieces? If you're holding them to the standard that "A = trading anyone and everyone I deem should be gone" you've basically created a grade no one has ever achieved. Making it an utterly useless designation

     

    Your B is basically the best you can hand out. Or am I missing some other justification people are using to knock this deadline?

    There are a handful of players who could have been moved on top of the guys who were moved. Suzuki, Milone, Kintzler... And, course, Santana and Dozier.

     

    I just listed five guys. That's 20% of the 25 man roster.

     

    I like what Antony did this deadline. The return was close to on par with the value of each player.

     

    More could have been done, therefore he gets a B.

     

    Move Dozier for a top 100 prospect and that jumps to an A. The same goes for Santana. Maybe even Suzuki (though obliviously the return is much less than the other two guys).

     

    I don't see why it's so radical that I question some of the moves while liking the general direction of events. This isn't a binary situation.

     

    I don't see why it's so radical that I question some of the moves while liking the general direction of events. This isn't a binary situation.

     

    I'm calling into question your justifications.  Not forcing you into a binary choice.  I don't even care what you call your grade.  If you give them a Z with good reasons, I care less than you giving a D with bad reasons. I'm wondering if we're being realistic in how we assess these.  

     

    Look, could he have dealt those guys?  Maybe, but can you cite even one time in which a rebuilding team traded 80-90% of the guys that should be dealt?  Of late, a team even making three separate deals is relatively rare.  

     

    Hell, the Yankees are generally lauded for this deadline and they still have plenty of similar deadweight that should have been dealt on their roster, are we applying the same standards?

     

    I don't want to build Anthony a gold statue.  I don't even want to give him a grade, I jsut want to be fair in how we look at this.

    Edited by TheLeviathan

    I'm calling into question your justifications. Not forcing you into a binary choice. I don't even care what you call your grade. If you give them a Z with good reasons, I care less than you giving a D with bad reasons. I'm wondering if we're being realistic in how we assess these.

     

    Look, could he have dealt those guys? Maybe, but can you cite even one time in which a rebuilding team traded 80-90% of the guys that should be dealt? Of late, a team even making three separate deals is relatively rare.

     

    Hell, the Yankees are generally lauded for this deadline and they still have plenty of similar deadweight that should have been dealt on their roster, are we applying the same standards?

     

    I don't want to build Anthony a gold statue. I don't even want to give him a grade, I jsut want to be fair in how we look at this.

    The Yankees moved some high end players and brought back some fantastic prospects. It's not the same situation at all.

     

    I didn't expect to see every player get traded, which is why I specifically mentioned that had Antony moved one higher end guy with a fair return, he gets an A.

     

    And this is consistent with what I said two months ago when I put the over/under of guys traded at three. Move three guys, I'm happy. Move four, I'm ecstatic.

     

    The Yankees moved some high end players and brought back some fantastic prospects. It's not the same situation at all.

    I didn't expect to see every player get traded, which is why I specifically mentioned that had Antony moved one higher end guy with a fair return, he gets an A.

    And this is consistent with what I said two months ago when I put the over/under of guys traded at three. Move three guys, I'm happy. Move four, I'm ecstatic.

     

    Well, technically, we did move 4.   Again, my point is expecting four trades doesn't really have much of a precedent.  And I say that because I think it reflects the difficulty of making trades happen.  We know from the Astros hack that professional General Managers often call each other like that one guy we all know in fantasy leagues that offers you preposterously horrible trades on a semi-regular basis.  So to cut through the stupidity and make things happen is more difficult than we often think.

     

    Call the grade whatever you want, but honestly, making three trades happen (in and of itself) is pretty damn active and impressive.  Hopefully they pan out.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...