spideyo Provisional Member Posted June 18, 2012 Posted June 18, 2012 Somebody brought up in the trade rumors thread the idea of the Twins having a "core" group of untouchables to build upon, and be willing to move everybody else for the right price. So what would your core be? For the sake of discussion, let's limit it to 5 players who are currently under contract with the Twins and could be ready to play in the Majors no later than next spring. Mine would be: Mauer Diamond Willingham Revere Dozier
IdahoPilgrim Provisional Member Posted June 18, 2012 Posted June 18, 2012 Span Plouffe Diamond Revere Burnett
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted June 18, 2012 Posted June 18, 2012 I don't think anyone on this roster should be untouchable. This team is going to be bad for at least two more years. If someone is willing to pay for a player, you take it. No one outside of Dozier, Revere, Diamond, and maybe Plouffe are under team control for 4+ years and have futures with the club and I'd trade any of them if the deal was right. They're not exactly blue-chippers. Obviously, Mauer isn't going anywhere but he hardly makes up a "core".
darin617 Verified Member Posted June 18, 2012 Posted June 18, 2012 Mauer would be a core player if his contract was $12-15 million not $23 million. There should be no such thing as an untouchable player on any team no matter the team. If someone wants to blow you away with a deal you should pull the trigger. I know you cannot trade everyone but I am puzzled with the article about the Twins searching for pitching.
Twins GFP Verified Member Posted June 18, 2012 Posted June 18, 2012 Carroll Casilla Parmalee Butera Capps
PMKI Verified Member Posted June 18, 2012 Posted June 18, 2012 My core would be: Hendriks Parmalee Revere Plouffe Mauer
shawntheroad Provisional Member Posted June 18, 2012 Posted June 18, 2012 Mauer is the only untouchable close to or in the MLB.... and that is because of his contract as well as status, MN born, etc.... There are no other premiere players on the roster in cheap long term deals and guys like Benson and Hicks could be trade chips if the team kept Span/Revere.
Bark's Lounge Verified Member Posted June 19, 2012 Posted June 19, 2012 Trevor Plouffe Sam Malone Ernie Pantusso Carla Tortelli Cliff Clavin Honorable Mention: Norm Peterson, Lilith Sternen and Woody Boyd
ashbury Verified Member Posted June 19, 2012 Posted June 19, 2012 I keep wrestling with the question as stated, and just can't come up with an answer. I have some assumptions about what you could get in trade for Plouffe or Diamond or Revere, namely that it would not justify giving up a young player who is starting to look like a bona fide major leaguer at a very favorable contract status. I also have assumptions about the big-salary guys Mauer and Morneau, that likewise would make trading them unlikely. I don't think I have a core of players I would not trade.
Riverbrian Old-Timey Member Posted June 19, 2012 Posted June 19, 2012 Below is my list of players that I would not trade in an effort to acquire Pitching. That concludes my list!!!
Riverbrian Old-Timey Member Posted June 19, 2012 Posted June 19, 2012 Trevor PlouffeSam MaloneErnie PantussoCarla TortelliCliff Clavin Honorable Mention: Norm Peterson, Lilith Sternen and Woody BoydYou can trade Ernie. He doesn't have much value at the moment. Or is that comment too soon? Anyway, Cheers to you.
Bark's Lounge Verified Member Posted June 19, 2012 Posted June 19, 2012 (Whispering) Keep Ernie's status on the down low - I'm trying to build up his value.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted June 19, 2012 Posted June 19, 2012 Mauer can't be traded. Everyone else can be. That said, my five core guys would be Mauer, Gibson, Hendriks, Revere (cheaper Span) and ... screw it, Morneau. Keep him. I don't want him traded.
Quentin Young Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A SS/3B The Young infielders knocked his 11th home run of the season on Wednesday morning. It accounted for three of his four RBI in the game. Explore Quentin Young News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.