Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    25,021

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. nicksaviking
    I agree. But also last year's Atlanta team could have, and probably should have given SF and Boston pause about trading their rentals. I know they were supposed to be 'sellers', but both are only a couple games out of a wild card spot.
  2. nicksaviking
    Maybe we all wrote Strotman off too early. Looks like he's only given up 2 ER in his last 10 appearances, several of which have been multi inning outings.
  3. nicksaviking
    Mahle's numbers when he doesn't pitch in Cincinnati are really good. He's a better pitcher than you think.
  4. nicksaviking
    Brock was bursting at the seems trying not to squeal; thought I’d throw him a bone.
  5. nicksaviking
    I call BS. Brock first reported the trade, he just let Heyman get the credit.
  6. nicksaviking
    Sam Dyson. Wish they'd been a minute too late with that one actually.
  7. nicksaviking
    He's only in A ball. I think you'd be reading too much into that.
  8. nicksaviking
    I'd take another reliever, and I wouldn't say no to Robertson, but I'd rather find another arm who'll be here next year. Particulary after seeing the price for getting such a player.
  9. nicksaviking
    I don't see how Robertson would be considered a better relief option than Lopez. He's a free agent after this year, old, fragile and doesn't have close to the numbers Lopez has had. Are there some 'small sample size' concerns with Lopez? Maybe, but no more than Robertson who hasn't had a decent season since 2018.
  10. nicksaviking
    There's many things that go into doing what's best for the team and you can bet putting fans in the stands and keeping TVs tuned in is one of those things as far as ownership is concerned. But as far as what's best on field, I'd argue that showing the players you're not quitting on them while they're still in 1st place is probably doing what is best for the team. It would be demoralizing, and not just for this year, if they sold off players.
  11. nicksaviking
    One starter is only a token move, they need two starters and two relievers. If that’s not happening, and I’m guessing it’s not, stay away from rental players.
  12. nicksaviking
    I do think Baldelli is largely an on field avatar for the overall brain trust, of which he’s only moderately influential of. I absolutely think before every game they determine ‘starter a’ gets x innings or x pitches or gets pulled once ‘batter a’ comes to the plate for a third time. Id guess there is another discussion about which relievers are to be used with his real freedom only being able to decide the order they’re used based on matchups. I don’t like that Gray only went 5 innings or that Duran was used in a blowout, but I do believe Baldelli is just following the conglomerate’s game plan.
  13. nicksaviking
    So it sounds like Baldelli has two choices. Pull the starters early and have fans call for him to get fired. Or clearly defy his bosses by leaving them in and actually get fired.
  14. nicksaviking
    Can you clarify which lock down relievers and how many innings these relievers were supposed to go? Because I assume your answer is Duran and he should pitch all the innings.
  15. nicksaviking
    And replace him with the guy the Padres just fired? The guy who was probably leaned on most heavily in preparation for this series?
  16. nicksaviking
    What an incredible A’s team too. They definitely underperformed in the late 80’s-early 90’s. Should have had more than one WS ring.
  17. nicksaviking
    I’m still not in the “sellers” camp, but watching my new favorite pitcher get flayed alive was the most demoralizing thing I’ve watched this year. I agree, the loss of Wes Johnson has to be contributing to the pitching collapse. I’m not sure if that’s fixable in-season.
  18. nicksaviking
    I want Archer removed too, but I just can't watch Bundy any more. He's just lobbing meatballs at the plate and has no business facing major league hitters. Archer and his short starts are killing this team, but if they had four decent starters ahead of him, then I think the bullpen would be fine picking up his slack.
  19. nicksaviking
    Syndergaard isn't high on my list, but making sure Bundy and Smeltzer don't start another game is. To do that, the Twins will need two starters, presumably the second one won't be terribly exciting.
  20. nicksaviking
    I'll echo everyone else, great stuff. McMillan must have some pretty decent projectable attributes to go back to school as his numbers don't exactly scream 6th round money.
  21. nicksaviking
    No, it's exactly what I said. The Rays had to OVERPAY for Cruz. The Twins almost certainly would have to do the same if they wanted a guy early this year.
  22. nicksaviking
    I'd be thrilled if they did. Mahle has been my trade target most of the summer.
  23. nicksaviking
    Yes, and we celebrated wildly because Joe Ryan for a half season of Nelson Cruz was clearly a fleecing we were all happy with.
  24. nicksaviking
    I'd be more than happy to get a fair price for Mahle now, but wouldn't the Twins front office as well? I mean they're not waiting around just to mess with the fans; they know the situation the team is in just as we do. Neither of the Reds pitchers need to be traded. They're still under control next year and can be traded in the offseason.
  25. nicksaviking
    So why would they trade now if they are hoping someone will get desperate and up the ante? If the Twins wanted him now, wouldn't they have to pay that ante? Put whatever % on that markup we want, it's still a markup.
×
×
  • Create New...