Then why have young players at all? I don't think it's practical to field an entire team of established veterans; you have to let the young kids at it at some point, sink or swim. There's no way to guarantee anything, but the only way to know for certain is to bring them up and let them at it. I'd probably think differently if the Twins were winning and doing well, but they aren't. This is the opportunity to see what we have coming up in order to make decisions in the off season. Look at Dozier this year? I actually think his presence on the field is actually hurting the team, unless he can get it together ... and even though he's had these major highs and lows in the past is no guarantee he'll get past it this year. There just is no way to guarantee play. Even signing or re-signing a veteran is no guarantee, either. At this point I would consider both Sano and Polanco established players ... maybe not 'veterany' but I think they are established as players on the team. And I'd really like them to re-sign Escobar. At this point I think he brings more 'veteran-ness' than Dozier in a lot of ways ... not only his play on the field, but the kind of guy he is off the field, too. If they take on Morrison's option, then he's another established player. With Mauer and Dozier gone next year, I think they have the option of finding a good mix that brings us more in the long run, than keeping Dozier and/or Mauer. Don't get me wrong, I've always liked Dozier, but I'm not sure keeping him will be a good decision ... unless they know that Gordon can't do it. Then you always have Escobar, whom I like better over all anyway. <shrug> There are no guarantees and we can only guess what right or wrong was in hindsight, but that's my thought on it.